题名

原住民傳統領域共同管理之研究以新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族部落為例

并列篇名

The Study on Co-management of Indigenous Traditional Territory Cases Study of Atayal Communities in Jianshin Township, Hsinchu County, Taiwan

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2011.61.01

作者

顏愛靜(Ai-Ching Yen);陳亭伊(Ting-Yi Chen)

关键词

原住民 ; 傳統領域 ; 共同管理 ; 泰雅族 ; indigenous people ; traditional territory ; co-management ; Atayal

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

61期(2011 / 04 / 01)

页次

1 - 30

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

2007年肇因於司馬庫斯的櫸木事件,當地原住民團體「泰雅族馬里光、基那吉傳統領域聯盟」要求就其傳統領域範圍內進行共同管理,政府旋即公佈實施「原住民族地區資源共同管理辦法」,提供與原住民建立共同管理機制之法源。由於係屬初次制度創新之舉,有關如何操作細節並不詳悉,引發不少爭辯。根據Carlsson and Berkes(2005)提出的五種共同管理方式,直指公部門政府機構、私部門地方社區和資源使用者等利害關係人之間的協力合作關係應予強化,且須基於各地之發展脈絡,協商特定區域或資源系統的管理權力和責任;本文乃參酌該論點建構分析框架,並以司馬庫斯櫸木事件為背景說明,選取新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族馬里光、基那吉部落群為研究個案,透過文獻回顧、模型分析及個案研究的方法,探討原住民傳統領域共同管理機制之問題所在,並於最後提出政策建議,以供政府未來建構這類機制之參酌。

英文摘要

After the Smangus Beech Event in 2007, the local indigenous groups, Atayal Mrqwang and Knazi Traditional Territory Association, requested the government to grant them co-management rights in their traditional territory. The government soon passed the Regulation for Co-management of Resource in Indigenous Areas, serving as a legal foundation for a co-management mechanism with indigenous people. As this was without legal precedent, details were not specified thoroughly, and many arguments ensued. According to Carlsson and Berkes' (2005) five co-management models, joint collaboration between public governmental agencies, private local communities, the developmental context of each region should serve as a basis for negotiating the powers and responsibilities in managing each specific area or resources system. This study references these perceptions to construct a frameswork for analysis, in which the Smangus Beech Event serves as the event in question, with the Mrqwang and Knazi sub-groups selected as study cases. Through a literature review, models analysis, and cases studies, we discuss problems in the co-management mechanism in traditional indigenous territories, and propose suggestions for the future implementation of such mechanisms by the government.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 司馬庫斯部落 [Smangus community] 2009。當上帝的部落遇到國家 [Dang shang di de bu luo yu dao guo jia] http://blog.yam.com/smangus/ (擷取日期:2009.04.04)。
  2. IUCN. 1996. Resolutions and recommendations. Paper presented at World Conservation Congress, Montreal, Canada. http://iucn.org/wcc/resolutions/resrecen.pdf. (last accessed 14 February 2003).
  3. 行政院農業委員會 [Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan] 2007。新竹縣尖石鄉玉峰村及秀巒村原住民族採取森林產物作業要點 [Xin zhu xian jian shi xiang yu feng cun ji xiu luan cun yuan zhu min zu cai qu sen lin chan wu zuo ye yao dian; Regulations for indigenous traditional harvesting of forest products in Yufeng and Siouluan villages, Jianshin Township, Hsinchu County, Taiwan] 。 http://law.coa.gov.tw/GLRSnewsout/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=FL044328&KeyWordHL=%e6%8e% a1%e5%8f%96%e6%a3%ae%e6%9e%97%e7%94%a2%e7%89%a9%e4%bd%9c%e6%a5%ad%e8%a 6%81%e9%bb%9e&StyleType=1 (擷取日期:2011.04.20)。
  4. 行政院原住民族委員會 [Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan] 2007。新竹縣尖石鄉原住民保留地各類保育用地及公共設施用地統計表、新竹縣尖石鄉原住民保留地非都市土地編定使用類別統計表、新竹縣尖石鄉原住民保留地各類管理機關概況統計表[Ge lei bao yu yong di ji gong gong she shi yong di tong ji biao, fei du shi tu di bian ding shi yong lei bie tong ji biao, ge lei guan li ji guan gai kuang tong ji biao of Indigenous Reserved Land in Jianshin Township, Hsinchu County, Taiwan] (未出版資料,資料日期:2007.03.06)。
  5. 泰雅族馬里光、基那吉傳統領域聯盟 [Alliance of Tayal Mrqwang and Mrqwang Communities] 2008。泰雅族馬里光與基那吉傳統領域守護管理規範 (中文版) [Tai ya zu ma li guang yu ji na ji chuan tong ling yu shou hu guan li gui fan (zhong wen ban); Gaga na mlahang rhyal qyunam Tayal Mrqwang ru Mrqwang (Chinese Version) ]。
  6. Arnstein, S.(1969).A ladder of participation.Journal of the American Planning Association,35(4),216-24.
  7. Berkes, F.,George, P.,Preston, R.(1991).Co-management: The evolution of the theory and practice of joint administration of living resources.Alternatives,18(2),12-8.
  8. Borrini-Feyerabend, G.(ed.)(2004).Governance of protected areas, participation and equity.Secretariat of the convention on biological diversity, biodiversity issues for consideration in the planning, establishment and management of protected areas sites and networks,Canada:
  9. Borrini-Feyerabend, G.(ed.)(1996).Collaborative management of protected areas: Tailoring the approach to the context.Gland, Switzerland:IUCN.
  10. Carlsson, L.(2003).Managing commons across levels of organizations.Proceedings from a workshop on Commons: Old and new,Trondheim:
  11. Carlsson, L.(2000).Policy networks as collective action.Policy Studies Journal,28(3),502-20.
  12. Carlsson, L.,Berkes, F.(2005).Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications.Journal of Environmental Management,75(2005),65-76.
  13. Carlsson, L.,Sandstrom, A.(2008).Network governance of the Commons.International Journal of the Commons,2,33-54.
  14. Geisler, C.(ed.),Daneker, G.(ed.)(2000).Property and values: Alternatives to public and private ownership.Washington, DC:Island Press.
  15. Ostrom, V.(1985).Multiorganizational arrangements in the governance of unitary and federal political systems.Policy implementation in federal and unitary systems: Questions of analysis and design,The Netherlands:
  16. Pinkerton, E.(1994).Summary and conclusions.Folk management in the world's fisheries: Lessons for modern fisheries management,Niwot:
  17. Pomeroy, R. S.,Berkes, F.(1997).Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management.Marine Policy,21(5),465-80.
  18. The World Bank(1999).Report from the international workshop on community-based natural resource management (CBNRM)Report from the international workshop on community-based natural resource management (CBNRM),Washington, DC:The World Bank.
  19. 行政院原住民族委員會(2006)。行政院原住民族委員會十週年施政成果專輯。臺北=Taipei:行政院原住民族委員會=Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan。
  20. 汪明輝(2005)。臺灣原住民族傳統領域之調查及其策略。2005 年原住民族傳統領域土地調查學術研討會,臺北=Taipei:
  21. 紀駿傑(2003)。原住民與國家公園共同管理經驗:加拿大與澳洲個案之探討。國家公園學報,13(2),103-23。
  22. 陳亭伊(2009)。臺北=Taipei,國立政治大學地政學系=Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University。
  23. 盧道杰(2001)。參與、共管與自然資源的經營管理。國家公園生物多樣性保育策略研討會
被引用次数
  1. 戴秀雄(2022)。傳統領域劃設之法解釋與實務問題:原基法第21條第1項規範旨意及法體系架構角度的探討。台灣原住民族研究,15(1),137-176。
  2. 官大偉(2014)。原住民族土地權的挑戰:從一個當代保留地交易的區域研究談起。考古人類學刊,80,7-52。
  3. 洪廣冀、何俊頤(2018)。自然資源治理與原住民部落發展:後發展與後人類的視角。考古人類學刊,89,93-141。
  4. 黃居正、邱盈翠(2015)。台灣原住民族集體同意權之規範與實踐。臺灣民主季刊,12(3),43-82。
  5. 林益仁(2015)。泰雅族傳統領域與流域治理的啟示。臺灣社會研究季刊,100,291-310。
  6. (2021)。我在泰雅生態農耕敘事中的走動:對Tim Ingold的呼應。臺灣人類學刊,19(2),9-55。