式微文化地景的再活化泰安村舊鐵道的空間意涵

The Revitalization of Degrading Cultural Landscape the Spatial Signification of Historical Railway of Tai-An Village

10.6161/jgs.2011.61.07

劉子綺(Tzu-Chi Liu)；李素馨(Su-Hsin Lee)；侯錦雄(Jing-Shoung Hou)

文化資產 ； 空間生產 ； 社會群體 ； cultural heritage ； production of space ； social group

地理學報

61期（2011 / 04 / 01）

147 - 166

繁體中文

臺中縣泰安村具有豐富的文化地景，因舊山線鐵道廢除而逐漸式微，地方期望朝向文化觀光發展。本研究基於Lefebvre之社會空間生產理論，探討不同群體對於泰安村文化地景指定意向與對空間社會意涵認知之差異。研究透過訪談及文獻資料，遴選出代表地方的二十處文化地景，再對居民、在地菁英及公部門與專業菁英進行深度訪談。研究結果發現：(1)對泰安村文化地景的保存意向各群體均認為舊山線泰安車站與花樑鋼橋兩處為最重要的文化地景，具有共通性。但公部門與專業者幾乎聚焦在舊山線鐵道周邊景觀，而在地住民較重視日常生活和宗教信仰的景點。(2)對應至Lefebvre的概念，「空間的實踐」顯現泰安村舊鐵道的產業文化與地景變遷有密切的關係，「空間的再現」呈現不同群體對文化地景發展的想像差異，「再現的空間」呈現群體間行動的衝突。(3)泰安村居民透過再現的空間，重新建構出泰安村獨特的地方特性，以維護村落本身的生活文化。研究結果可提供公部門或專業者在文化地景指定、政策發展、規劃設計與進行民眾參與相關機制的參考。

Rich in cultural landscape but abolition of the old mountain railway the village gradually declined, Tai-An Village in Taichung County is looking at the possibility of developing cultural tourism. The purposes of this study are to apply Henri Lefebvre's social space theory in discussing the social signification of cultural landscapes, and further explore the differences in identification of Tai-An cultural landscapes between different social groups. Through interview and local documentations 20 representative cultural landscapes were selected. Then in-depth interview of the residents, local elites and the administrative sectors were conducted. The results found include: (1) Regarding each group's intention of preserving Tai-An Village's cultural landscape, administrative and professional opinions for preservation focused almost entirely on two famous landscapes, the Tai-An Train Station on the old mountain line and the Truss Bridge; yet local residents have different views on what should be preserved. They pay much attention on the ordinary and religious landscape around them. (2) Corresponds to Lefebvre's concept of space, the ”spatial practices” showed that the village's old railway industry and the cultural landscape changes are closely related, the ”representations of space” showed different imagination of development of the cultural industry development between the three groups, while ”representational spaces” showed conflicts arising from actions between these groups. (3) The identification of local residents toward Tai-An Village's unique cultural landscape is established through the representational spaces, so that residents can reconstruct unique local characteristics of Tai-An Village and preserve the distinct qualities in their current landscape. The results can serve as a reference for officials and professionals in identification of cultural landscape, developing and planning future policies, and help to establish a feasible mechanism for public participation.

1. 王志弘(2009)。多重的辯證：列斐伏爾空間生產概念三元組演繹與引申。地理學報，55，1-24。
   連結：
2. Ingerson, A. E. 2000. Changing approaches to landscape. Institute for Cultural Landscape Studies, Harvard University, Harvard. http://www.icls.harvard.edu/ language/ hist!.html (last accessed 10 February 2007).
3. Wright, J. K. 1947. Terrace incognitae: The place of imagination in geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 37: 1-15.
4. Sauer, C. 1925. The morphology of landscape. Berkeley: California Press.
5. Cosgrove, D.(1994).Cultural landscape.The dictionary of human geography,Oxford:
6. Cosgrove, D.(1988).The iconography of landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, design, and use of past environments.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
7. Cresswell, T.(2004).Place: A short introduction.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers Ltd..
8. Foote, K. E.(1997).Shadowed ground: America's landscape of violence and tragedy.Austin:University of Texas Press.
9. Gregory, D.(1994).Geographical imaginations.Cambridge, MA.:Blackwell.
10. Groth, P.,Todd, W. B.(1997).Understanding ordinary landscapes.New Haven:Yale University Press.
11. Harvey, D.(1989).The condition of postmodernity.Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
12. Harvey, D.(2006).Spaces of global capitalism.London:Verso.
13. Henderson, G. L.(2003).What (else) we talk about when we talk about landscape: For a return to the social imagination.Everyday America: Cultural landscape studies after J. B. Jackson,Berkeley:
14. Johnston, R. J.(1992).Philosophy and human geography: An introduction to contemporary approaches.New York:Edward Arnold.
15. Lefebvre, H.(1991).The production of spaces.Oxford:Blackwell.
16. Massey, D.(1993).Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place.Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change,London:
17. Mitchell, D.(2000).Cultural geography: A critical introduction.Malden:Blackwell Press.
18. Relph, E.(1976).Place and placelessness.London:Pion.
19. Rose, G.(1993).Feminism and geography.London:Routledge.
20. 王志弘譯、余佳玲譯、方淑惠譯、Crang, M.(2003)。文化地理學。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Chu Liu。
21. 王志弘譯、張華蓀譯、王玥民譯、Soja, E. W.(2004)。第三空間。臺北=Taipei:桂冠=Kuei Kuan。
22. 王志弘譯、張華蓀譯、宋郁玲譯、陳毅峰譯、Peet, R.(2005)。現代地理思想。臺北=Taipei:群學=Socio。
23. 王志弘(1998)。流動、空間與社會。臺北=Taipei:田園城市=Tian yuan cheng shi。
24. 李素馨(2007)。法國文化景觀的典範：法國花園盧瓦河流域Loire Valley。「法國文化遺產之登錄‧保存與經營：文化資產詮釋第三階段人才培育計畫」論文集，臺北=Taipei:
25. 洪士閔(2004)。雲林=Yunlin，國立雲林科技大學空間設計系=Department of Architecture and Interior Design, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology。
26. 夏鑄九(1994)。（重）建構公共空間―理論的反省。臺灣社會研究季刊，16，21-54。
27. 康旻杰(2002)。生活世界的混沌之詩與地方之舞。臺北=Taipei:行政院文化建設委員會=Xing zheng yuan wen hua jian she wei yuan hui。
28. 梁炳琨、張長義(2004)。地理學的文化經濟與地方再現。地理學報，35，81-99。
29. 畢恆達(2001)。空間就是權力。臺北=Taipei:心靈工坊文化=Xin ling gong fang wen hua。
30. 陳其南(2006)。新文資法的時代意義。2006 文化資產行政國際研討會，臺北=Taipei:
31. 黃嘉琪(2004)。臺北=Taipei，私立世新大學社會發展研究所=Graduate Institute for Social Transformation Studies, Shih Hsin University。
32. 廖本全(2004)。臺北=Taipei，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所=Graduate Institute of Urban Planning, National Taipei University。
33. 臺中縣文化局(2003)。,臺中=Taichung:劉可強=Liu, ke qiang。
34. 蔡淑真(2006)。臺中=Taichung，私立東海大學景觀學系=Department of Landscape Architecture, Tunghai University。

1. 蘇恒安(2013)。跨界「混融」─岡山羊肉飲食文化的建構與再現。中國飲食文化，9(1)，195-238。