利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統對社區發展轉向之影響　以美濃黃蝶翠谷為案例

Assessment of PPGIS and Community Development by Actor-Network Theory: A Case in Meinung Yellow Butterfly Valley

10.6161/jgs.2012.64.02

鍾明光(Ming-Kuang Chung)；蔡博文(Bor-Wen Tsai)；盧道杰(Dau-Jye Lu)

公眾參與地理資訊系統 ； 行動者網絡理論 ； 美濃黃蝶翠谷 ； 社區發展 ； Public Participation GIS ； Actor-Network Theory ； Meinung Yellow Butterfly Valley ； community development

地理學報

64期（2012 / 04 / 01）

21 - 44

繁體中文

本研究運用行動者網絡理論（Actor-Network Theory，ANT）的觀點，探討社區引介公眾參與地理資訊系統（Public Participation GIS，PPGIS）後，所促成的行動者網絡組構與發展議題轉向，並嘗試建構以ANT為基礎的PPGIS檢視方法。本研究運用1992至2007年美濃社區發展的相關文獻及2007至2008年間黃蝶翠谷PPGIS工作坊中的群眾討論為文本，嘗試結合權益關係人（stake holder）與行動者（actor）的概念，試圖自控制、技能、資金與資訊等四個向度，作為轉譯分析的基礎，同時以資源－權責行動者與接受方等概念，區分不同行動者的屬性與互動關係，配合治理尺度的概念來建構PPGIS應用於社區發展議題中的行動者網絡圖像，及其所促成的發展議題轉向。本研究發現：運用ANT的分析架構可有效分析PPGIS於社區運作中的網絡化特徵，尤能掌握在社區發展議題上，各項異質要素藉由PPGIS共同建構的協商過程。此架構更可有效跨越自然、技術與社會的界線，並具體描述PPGIS運用過程中利益轉譯及嵌入的特徵，故而能成為分析PPGIS程序效益的有效取徑。

This study employed the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to assess a Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) case in Meinung community Kaohsiung (Yellow Butterfly Valley) in Taiwan. An analytical framework of PPGIS by ANT was built. In order to assess the PPGIS project, the actors and networks of the Meinung community before the introduction of the PPGIS project were also analyzed by referring to previous literature. This study combined concepts from stakeholders and actors, and considered governance scale to delineate the role of actors' agency in community development. Martin's (2000) ”Network Diagram” which included control, technology, money and information was adopted to trace the actor-network interactions. Further, this study used ”input resources”, ”accountable actors”, and ”recipients” to distinguish the relationships among different actors in different time periods. Using this framework and hypothesis, this study was able to analyze the change and the effects after using PPGIS in the community development issues.

1. 林文源(2007)。論行動者網絡理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會，4，65-108。
   連結：
2. Schlossberg, M., and M. Mathew. 2003. When GIS was rejected: Implications for collaborative planning and public participation GIS (PPGIS). https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/1287 (last accessed 15 August 2010).
3. Barndt, M.(1998).Public participation GIS: Barriers to implementation.Cartography and Geographic Information Systems,25(2),105-112.
4. Callon, M.(ed.),Law, J.(ed.),Rip, A.(ed.)(1986).Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world.London:Macumillan.
5. Comber, A.,Fisher, P.,Wadsworth, R.(2003).Actor-network theory: A suitable framework to understand how land cover mapping projects develop?.Land Use Policy,20(4),299-309.
6. Corbett, J.,Keller, C. P.(2005).Empowerment and participatory geographic information and multimedia systems: Observations from two communities in Indonesia.Information Technologies and International Development,2(2),25-44.
7. Craig, W. J.(ed.),Harris, T. M.(ed.),Weiner, D.(ed.)(2002).Community participation and geographic information systems.London:Taylor and Francis.
8. Craig, W. J.,Elwood, S. A.(1998).How and why community groups use maps and geographic information.Cartography and Geographic Information Systems,25,95-104.
9. Dunn, C. E.(2007).Participatory GIS: A people' s GIS?.Progress in Human Geography,31,616-637.
10. Elwood, S. A.,Ghose, R.(2004).PPGIS in community development planning: Farming the organizational context.Cartographica,38,19-33.
11. Haklay, M.,Tobon, C.(2003).Usability evaluation and PPGIS: Towards a user-centred design approach.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,17(5),77-92.
12. Harris, T.,Weiner, D.(1998).Empowerment, marginalization, and community integrated GIS.Cartography and Geographic Information Systems,25,67-76.
13. Harvey, F.(2001).Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration.Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association,13,29-37.
14. Jordan, G. H.(1998).A systems based framework for the evaluation of a geographic information system for community forest resource assessment.GIS and Society Conference,Minneapolis, MN:
15. Knorr-Cetina, K. D.(ed.),Mulkay, M.(ed.)(1983).Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science.London:Sage Publications.
16. Latour. B.(2005).Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory.New York:Oxford University Press.
17. Law, J.(ed.)(1991).A sociology of monsters, essays on power, technology and domination.London:Routledge.
18. Lee, A. S.(ed.),Liebenau, J.(ed.),DeGross, J. I.(ed.)(1997).Information systems and qualitative research.London:Chapman and Hall.
19. Martin, E. W.(2000).Actor-networks and implementation: Examples from conservation GIS in Ecuadorint.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,14(8),715-738.
20. Murduch, J.(2000).Networks: A new paradigm of rural development.Journal of Rural Studies,16,407-419.
21. Pickering, A.(ed.)(1992).Science as practice and culture.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
22. Poore, B. S.(2003).The open black box: The role of the end-user in GIS integration.The Canadian Geographer,13,62-74.
23. Schlossberg, M.,Shuford, E.(2005).Delineating "public" and "participation" in PPGIS.Journal of Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA),16(2),15-26.
24. Sheppare, E.,Couclelis, H.,Graham, S.,Harrington, J. W.,Onsrud, H.(1999).Geographies of the information society.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,13(8),797-823.
25. Sieber, R. E.(2004).Rewiring for a GIS/2.Cartographica,39,25-39.
26. Sieber, R. E.(2006).Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework.Annals of the Association of the American Geographers,96(3),491-507.
27. Sieber, R. E.(2000).Conforming (to) the opposition: The social construction of geographical information systems in social movements.International Journal of Geographic Information Science,14(8),775-793.
28. Tulloch, D. L.,Shapiro, T.(2003).The intersection of data access and public participation: Impacting GIS users' success?.Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA),15(2),55-60.
29. 余欣芳(2006)。Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學地理學研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。
30. 李承嘉(2005)。行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究－以九份聚落1895~1945 年發展為例。地理學報，39，1-30。
31. 鄭玉惠(2000)。Taipei，國立臺灣師範大學地理研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。
32. 譚鴻仁(2009)。澎風茶的地理學。臺北=Taipei:國立臺灣師範大學地理學系=Department of Geography, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. 洪廣冀(2016)。科技研究中的地理轉向及其在地理學中的迴響。地理學報，83，23-69。
2. 彭立沛、王瑞庚(2015)。都會社區高地供水系統之行動者網絡研究。都市與計劃，42(2)，171-207。
3. 闕河嘉、鍾明光、盧道杰、蔡博文(2013)。保護區與鄉村發展的整合嘗試：以美濃社區運動1990年代迄今的保育軌跡為例。都市與計劃，40(3)，217-241。
4. 邵軒磊(2015)。社群意識與原鄉敘事－以交工樂隊在美濃社區運動之作用為例。人文社會科學研究，9(2)，1-19。
5. 吳連賞,朱芳慧(2021)。東港石斑魚產業之產銷網絡發展分析。華岡地理學報，33，12-33。
6. (2022)。從行動者網絡理論探析偏鄉學校108課綱校本實踐與轉譯。教育研究月刊，334，86-103。