流動的人民故事　桃園縣水庫移民遷徙過程的研究

The People's Story of Mobility: A Study of the Migration due to the Construction of Reservoir in Taoyuan County

10.6161/jgs.2012.64.04

陳其澎(Chie-Peng Chen)

流動 ； 石門水庫 ； 移民 ； mobility ； Shihmen Reservoir ； migration

地理學報

64期（2012 / 04 / 01）

67 - 96

繁體中文

回顧歷史，桃園縣的空間發展史彷彿就是一部「流動」的歷史，水圳、輕便車、鐵路、高鐵等線路的開通，石門水庫的興建，改變了不同地區的區域景觀。特別是石門水庫興建造成了人口的大流動，移民的遷出與遷入也相當程度見證著這一歷史。討論「流動的人民」就是想從時間的軸向來探討桃園縣因水庫興建而起的空間變遷與發展影響。相關流動的研究包括：身體移動、交通與通訊基盤設施、資本化的空間再造、遷徙與移民、公民與跨國際主義、觀光與旅行的課題等。游牧（nomadic）與靜止（sedentary）的兩種辯證關係，似乎是流動討論的知識生產的主軸，在本研究中研究課題著重在遷徙（displacement）與移民（migration）的知識生產過程。當人們陷入於徙置（displacement）的困境，敘說旅程中故事具有擴展人們想像力與改變現況的潛力。本文收集因興建石門水庫所產生不同移民的親身故事，透過強迫遷出者與自願移入者之間的比較，冀望深切地省思他們在臺灣社會、歷史、文化上的意涵，而不只是單獨書寫的移民故事。

Tracing back in time, the spatial development of Taoyuan County is like a history of ”mobility”. The opening of irrigation channels, push cars, railways, and the high speed railway and the construction of the Shihmen Reservoir changed the regional landscape. The reservoir induced great mobility of the population, immigrants moving out and immigrating in the area fairly witnessed this particular period in history. Here I investigate the development influence and spatial transition caused by the construction of the reservoir to the flow of people through the temporal axis. Related mobility study include body mobility, basic transportation and communication device installations, spatial re-building of capitalization, displacement and migration, citizenship and cross-internationalism, and recreation and tourism. The dialectical relation between nomadic and sedentary appears to be the main knowledge output source during mobility discussion, thus the main focus of this study was emphasized on the knowledge output process of displacement and migration. When people encounter the dilemma of displacement, by narrating stories in a journey, people's imagination are extended and present situations are changed. This paper collected the personal stories and experiences of different immigrants, caused by the construction of the Shihmen Reservoir. In addition, by comparing the people that moved out against their own will and the people that immigrated voluntarily, I profoundly explored their place and meaning in the society, history and culture in Taiwan, not just solely wrote migration stories.

1. 經濟日報 [Jing ji ri bao; Economic Daily News] 1988。高銀昨與大潭村民達成補償損失協議 [Gao yin zuo yu da tan cun min da cheng bu chang sun shi xie yi]。經濟日報 [Jing ji ri bao; Economic Daily News] 11 月26 日15 版。
2. 楊索 [Yang, S.] 1994。失去部落三十四年的卡拉社人 [Shi qu bu luo san shi si nian de ka la she ren]。中國時報 [China Times]，12 月5 日23 版。
3. 王斐 [Wang, F.] 1960。石門水庫移民新村 [Shi men shui ku yi min xin cun]。青年戰士報 [Qing nian zhan shi bao; Youth Daily News]，12 月1 日4 版。
4. 多奧 (黃修榮) [Duo ao/ Huang, X. R.] 1988。1988 還我土地運動座談會專輯演講詞 [1988 Huan wo tu di yun dong zuo tan hui zhuan ji yan jiang ci]。http://www.abohome.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=554:viewpoints-554&catid=65:2008-10-22-22-01-21&Itemid=60 ( 擷取日期：2008.07.15)。
5. 呂理德、羅如蘭、江睿智 [Lyu, L. D., J. L. Luo, and R. J. Jiang] 2006。蓋再多防砂壩 水庫難活化 [Gai zai duo fang sha ba shuei ku nan huo hua]。中國時報 [China Times]，6 月26 日A7 版。
6. 陳鈞凱 [Chen, J. K.] 2005。石門水庫淤積嚴重 環團籲停止石秀灣開發案 [Shih men shuei ku yu ji yan jhong huan tuan yu ting jhih shih siou wan kai fa an]。大紀元報 [The Epoch Times]，8 月17 日，臺灣地方新聞版。
7. Appadurai, A.(1996).Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization.Minneapolis:University of Minneapolis Press.
8. Bauman, Z.(2000).Liquid modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
9. Benko, G.(ed.),Strohmayer, U.(ed.)(1997).Space & social theory: Interpreting modenity and postmodernity.Oxford:Blackwell.
10. Blunt, A.(2007).Cultural geographies of migration: Mobility, transnationality and diaspora.Progress in Human Geography,31(5),684-694.
11. Cernea, M.(ed.)(1991).Putting people first: Socilogical variables in rural development.New York:Oxford University Press.
12. Chambers, I.(1990).Border dialogues: Journeys in postmodernity.London:Routledge.
13. Chambers, I.(1994).Migrancy, culture, identity.London:Routledge.
14. Clifford, J.(1997).Routes: Travel and translation in the late Twentieth Century.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
15. Colajacomo, J.(2000).The Chixoy Dam: The Maya Achi' Genocide: The story of forced resettlement.Thematic Review 1.3: Displacement, Resettlement, Rehabilitation, Reparation and Development,Vlaeberg, Cape Town, South Africa:
16. Corbin, A.(1998).Village bell: Sound and meaning in the 19th-century French Countryside.New York:Columbia University Press.
17. Cresswell, T.(2006).On the move: Mobility in the modern Western World.London:Routledge.
18. de Certeau, M.(1984).The practice of everyday life.Berkeley:University of California Press.
19. Deleuze, G.,Guattari, F.(1987).A thousand plateaus: Capitalism & schizophrenia.Inneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
20. Ellender, A.(1957).Report on overseas operations of the United States Government.Washington:United States Government Printing Office.
21. Grossberg, L.(ed.),Nelson, C.(ed.),Treichler, P. A.(ed.)(1992).Cultural studies.London:Routledge.
22. Johnston, B. B.(2000).Reparations and the right to remedy.Thematic Review 1.3: Displacement, Resettlement, Rehabilitation, Reparation and Development,Vlaeberg, Cape Town, South Africa:
23. Jordan, B.,Düvell, F.(2002).Irregular migration: The dilemmas of transnational mobility.Northampton:Edward Elgar.
24. Kaplan, C.(1996).Questions of travel: Postmodern discourses of displacement.London:Duke University Press.
25. McCully, P.(1996).Silenced rivers: The ecology & politics of large dams.London:Zed Books.
26. McDowell, C.(ed.)(1996).Understanding impoverishment: The consequences of development-induced displacement.Oxford:Berghahn Books.
27. Plummer, K.(1995).Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds.London:Routledge.
28. Robertson, G.(ed.),Mash, M.(ed.),Tickner, L.(ed.),Bird, J.(ed.),Curtis, B.(ed.),Putnam, T.(ed.)(1994).Travellers' tales: Narratives of home and displacement.London:Routledge.
29. Rutter, O.(1990).Through Formosa: An account of Japan' s island colony.Taipei:SMC Publishing.
30. Solnit, R.(2000).Wanderlust: A history of walking.New York:Penguin.
31. Thrift, N.(1996).Spatial formations.London:Sage.
32. Urry, J.(2000).Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century.London:Routledge.
33. Urry, J.(2007).Mobilities.London:Polity.
34. Verstraete, A. G.(ed.),Cresswell, T.(ed.)(2002).Mobilizing place, placing mobility: The politics of representation in a globalized world.New York:Rodopi.
35. Wolschke-Bulmahn, J.(1992).The fear of the new landscape: Aspects of the perception of landscape in the German youth movement between 1900 and 1933 and its influence on landscape planning.Journal of Architectural and planning Research,9(1),33-47.
36. 矢內原忠雄、周憲文譯(2002)。日本帝國主義下之臺灣。臺北=Taipei:海峽=Hai xia。
37. 石門水庫建設委員會(1955)。石門水庫工程定案計劃報告石門水庫工程定案計劃報告,桃園=Taoyuan:石門水庫建設委員會=Shihmen Reservoir Construction Committee。
38. 石門水庫建設委員會(1966)。石門水庫建設誌。桃園=Taoyuan:石門水庫建設委員會=Shihmen Reservoir Construction Committee。
39. 李慧慧(2007)。Taipei，國立政治大學民族研究所=Department of Ethnology, National Cheng-Chi University。
40. 沈文麒(1996)。Taipei，國立中興大學公共行政及政策研究所=Department of Public Administration and Policy, National Chung Hsing University。
41. 岳喜淼(1996)。石門觀光三十年。桃園=Taoyuan:桃園縣觀光協會=Taoyuan County Tourism Association。
42. 林文祺(2008)。Taoyuan County，私立中原大學室內設計研究所=Department of Interior Design, Chung Yuan Christian University。
43. 林志明(1998)。Taoyuan County，私立中原大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Chung Yuan Christian University。
44. 林志峰(1995)。Taoyuan County，私立中原大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Chung Yuan Christian University。
45. 長江水資源委員會(1997)。三峽工程移民問題研究。武漢=Wuhan:湖北科學與工程出版社=Hu bei ke xue yu gong cheng chu ban she。
46. 范玉梅(1999)。Taoyuan County，私立中原大學建築研究所=Department of Architecture, Chung Yuan Christian University。
47. 徐鼐(1963)。石門水庫。桃園=Taoyuan:石門水庫建設委員會=Shihmen Reservoir Construction Committee。
48. 張瓊方(2001)。出污泥而不染—工業重鎮觀音鄉蓮香處處。光華雜誌，九月號，91-95。
49. 陳川成編(2003)。石門水庫營運四十年特刊。桃園=Taoyuan:北水局=Northern Region Water Resources Office, Water Resource Agency, Ministry of Economic Affairs。
50. 陳其澎、范玉梅(2002)。日久他鄉是故鄉：石門水庫移民遷徙歷程之研究。文化研究學會2002 年會「重訪東亞：全球、區域、國家、公民」論文，臺中=Taichung:
51. 陳宗逸(2005)。桃園缺水夢魘．戳破石門水庫神話。新臺灣新聞雜誌，490，36-38。
52. 曾一豪(2005)。少年馬英九。臺北=Taipei:高寶=Gao Bao。
53. 程佳惠(1999)。石門水庫移民新村之土地公信仰，庄頭庄尾土地公：土地伯公信仰到社區文化。桃園=Taoyuan:桃園縣文化中心=Cultural Affairs Center of Taoyuan County。
54. 馮天蔚(2004)。臺灣龍潭的客家庄佳安村。臺北=Taipei:客家委員會=Council for Hakka Affairs。
55. 蕭瑩琪(2005)。Taoyuan County，私立中原大學土木研究所=Department of Civil Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University。
56. 賴志彰(1996)。桃園民居調查報告書—上。桃園=Taoyuan:桃園縣文化局=Cultural Affairs Bureau of Taoyuan County Government。
57. 賴淑雅(2008)。社區劇場的藝術實踐：我的社區劇場歷程。在地美學實踐：社區Vs. 美學論文集，臺北=Taipei:

1. 陳其澎(2013)。水利建設對文化地景的改變之研究：以百年來桃園縣為例。建築學報，85，77-98。
2. 張道本,李小蕙(2023)。記憶為表述之策展實踐與反思－以雄江庫區移民文化博物館為例。博物館學季刊，37(4)，105-119+121。