题名

誘因排擠與原住民部落農業之發展—以臺灣新竹尖石鄉石磊部落為例

并列篇名

Incentives Crowding Out Effect and the Agricultural Development of Indigenous Community: A Case Study in Quri Community, Jianshih Township, Hsinchu County, Taiwan

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2012.65.03

作者

顏愛靜(Ai-Ching Yen);羅恩加(En-Chia Lo);陳胤安(Yin-An Chen)

关键词

自然農業 ; 誘因排擠 ; 社區自主治理 ; 原住民 ; 部落發展 ; natural farming ; incentive crowding out ; communal autonomous governance ; indigenous people ; community development

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

65期(2012 / 06 / 01)

页次

53 - 78

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

根據誘因理論(incentive theory)要旨,如欲組織成員成為合作的團體,則需建立分配誘因機制(Barnard 1938);因此,若將外部資源投入某個團體,在具備合宜的分配誘因機制下,方能激發合作的力量,產生集體行動極佳的效果。本文採用誘因排擠及社區集體行動理論,以文獻評析、個案研究、深度訪談、參與觀察等方法,透過對泰雅族石磊部落的案例研究,探討該部落居民有否發生理論所陳述之現象。經研究發現,石磊部落原住民本基於gaga 此種具「共享」內涵的傳統規範性誘因,及特殊親族關係間情感聯繫的社會性內在誘因,而志願參與有機農業共同經營的集體行動,並冀望藉由外部資源的投入,為部落帶來經濟發展的新契機,卻因主事者在受到該外部資源投入的經濟誘因及其他功利性外在誘因影響下,排擠了原有的內在誘因,導致資源分配不均,族人紛爭衝突不斷,有機農業共同經營的集體行動最終以失敗收場。惟嗣後部分族人在傳統規範的反省下,感悟出這些紛爭對部落發展產生的不良衝擊,也因受社會性誘因影響,冀望促成族人共同成長及建立部落永續發展的根基,故自發性的進行自然農法技術及知識的學習與推廣,並經由此種農作方式的推廣,重新建立部落人際關係的網絡,帶動部落將其農作方式改採自然農法施作的集體行動,及逐漸修復族人之間已呈破裂的緊張關係,甚而建構出一個以部落自主治理為基礎的農業推展模式。有鑑於農業仍是原住民部落營生的根基,而現階段的農村與農業發展亦需政府部門的資源投入,是以經由本研究案例的探討,強調任何對部落資源的資助,皆應檢討外部資源投入的時間與運作機制,並建立一個符合部落自主性的共同收益分配與成本分擔的機制,方能使資源更能有效運用,並促進部落穩定的發展。

英文摘要

According to incentive theory, Barnard (1938) considers that if the leader would like to organise members as a cooperative group, it is necessary to establish distributing incentives mechanism. Therefore, if external resources put into certain group, it must be under appropriate distributing incentives mechanism and then stimulate cooperation and produces the best collective action effect. This study adopted incentive crowding out and community collective action theory, and proceeded to literature review, case studies, in-depth interviews, and participatory observation. Through investigating the case of Tayal Quri Community, this study attempted to explore whether theoretical phenomenon has occurred.Via gradually uncovering, Quri Communal indigenous people were based on 'gaga', the traditional normative incentive which had meaning of 'to share something with all'. Also, they had social internal incentive which was based on specific kinship relationship so that communal members were willing to participate in organic farming by collective action. They wished to develop communal economy by external resource input. However, farm leader was influenced by external resource input, which was economic and utilitarian external incentive, that crowded out primary internal incentive and then led to uneven distribution and conflicts among communal members. It resulted in eventual failure of collective action in organic farm. Fortunately, part of the communal members reflected under traditional norms, realising conflict impacts were against communal development. By the influence of social incentive, they wished to advocate communal members to establish the foundation of communal sustainable development. Afterward communal members spontaneously proceeded to natural farming technique and knowledge learning and promotion. Those communal members re-established community interpersonal relationship network, led to collective action which community adopting natural farming, and recovered fragile relationship among communal members. Eventually, they wished to construct a communal autonomy based agriculture promoting pattern.In consideration of agriculture as the foundation of indigenous community, current rural area and agricultural development also need governmental resource input. Thus, according to the exploration in this study, any resource subsidised to community, is highly considered to review the time and mechanism of external resource putting in. Also, establishing a mechanism which meets communal autonomous common income distribution and cost responsibility is more effectively to utilise resource and promote community development stably.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 莊武龍、戴興盛(2009)。誘因排擠與社區保育集體行動:臺灣東部兩個案例之比較研究。地理學報,56,17-38。
    連結:
  2. 湯京平、黃詩涵、黃坤山(2009)。災後重建政策與誘因排擠:以九二一地震後某社區營造集體行動為例。政治學報,48,1-31。
    連結:
  3. 戴興盛、謝妙勤(2007)。保育為先:苗栗縣後龍溪區域性河川─保育之集體行動與制度分析。地理學報,48,67-86。
    連結:
  4. 顏愛靜、孫稚堤(2008)。原住民地區共用資源自主治理之研究─以馬里克彎河域的護魚行動為例。地理學報,52,53-91。
    連結:
  5. Teles, N. 2007. Motivations and incentives: From the “crowding-out effect” to “peer-production”. http://www.dime-eu.org/working-papers/wp11/motivations-and-incentives (last accessed 15 September 2011).
  6. Vidal, J. 1998. Switch over to organic farming. http://www.tribuneindia.com/1998/98dec26/agro.htm#4 (last accessed 29 September 2010).
  7. 黎旭瀛、陳惠雯 [Li, X. Y., and H. W. Chen] 2007。人人可實踐的自然農法 [Ren ren ke shi jian de zi ran nong fa]。http://e-info.org.tw/node/27979 (擷取日期:2011.03.16)。
  8. 陳胤安、張文樺 [Chen, Y. A., and W. H. Chang] 2007。有機才有機會:體驗最深層的土地關懷─秀明自然農法 [You ji cai you ji hui: Ti yan zui shen ceng de tu di guan huai-Xiu ming zi ran nong fa]。http://e-info.org.tw/node/21949 (擷取日期:2011.02.05)。
  9. Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Singh. A. 2002. For a better harvest. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/opinion/For-a-Better-Harvest/articleshow/1901291183.cms (last accessed 23 June 2010).
  11. INFRC (International Nature Farming Research Center), date unknown. Nature farming (Kyusei nature farming): Mokichi Okada-Founder of nature farming. http://www.infrc.or.jp/english/INFRC_Web_2_draft/Nature_Farming.html (last accessed 3 April 2011).
  12. Baland, J. M.,Platteau, J. P.(1996).Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities?.Oxford:Clarendon.
  13. Bromley, D. W.(1993).Making the commons work: Theory, practice, and policy.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,75(3),862-3.
  14. Clark, P. B.,Wilson, J. Q.(1961).Incentive system: A theory of organization.Administrative Science Quarterly,6,129-66.
  15. Dahama, A. K.(1997).Organic farming for sustainable agriculture.New Delhi, India:Ashila Offset Printers.
  16. Darnhofer, I.(2005).Organic farming and rural development: Some evidence from Austria.Sociologic Ruralis,45(4),308-23.
  17. Dasgupta, P.,Beard, V. A.(2007).Community driven development, collective action and elite capture in Indonesia.Development and Change,38(2),229-49.
  18. Dawes, R. M.(1973).The commons dilemma game: An N-Person mixed-motive motive game with a dominating strategy for defection.ORI Research Bulletin,13,1-12.
  19. Deci, E. L.(1971).Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,18,105-15.
  20. Deci, E. L.,Koestner, R.,Ryan, R. M.(1999).A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.Psychological Bulletin,125,627-68.
  21. Frey, B. S.(1997).Not just for the money-An economic theory of personal motivation.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  22. Frey, B. S.,Götte, L.(1999).Does pay motivate volunteers?.Zurich, Switzerland:Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
  23. Frey, B. S.,Oberholzer-Gee, F.(1997).The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out.American Economic Review,87(4),746-55.
  24. Frey, B. S.,Oberholzer-Gee, F.,Eichenberger, R.(1996).The old lady visits your backyard: A tale of morals and markets.Journal of Political Economy,104,1297-313.
  25. Frey, B.,Jegen, R.(2001).Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence.Journal of Economic Surveys,15(5),589-612.
  26. Fukuoka, M.(1985).The natural way of farming: Theory and practice of green philosophy.Tokyo, Japan:Japan publications, Inc.
  27. Geertz, C.(1994).Agricultural involution: The process of ecological change in Indonesia.California:Berkeley, Univ. of Calif. Press.
  28. German, L. A.,Keeler, A.(2010)."Hybrid institutions": Applications of common property theory beyond discrete property regimes.International Journal of the Commons,4(1),571-96.
  29. Hardin, G.(1968).The tragedy of the commons.Science,162,1243-8.
  30. Hodgson, G.(2002).The Evolution of institutions: An agenda for future theoretical research.Constitutional Political Economy,13,111-27.
  31. Kaplan, M. F.(ed.),Schwartz, S.(ed.)(1975).Human judgment and decision processes: Formal and mathematical approaches.New York:Academic Press.
  32. Knoke, D.(1988).Incentives in collective action organizations.American Sociological Review,53(3),311-29.
  33. Kreps, D.(1997).Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives.American Economic Review,87(2),359.
  34. Lebel, L.,Manuta, J. B.,Garden, P.(2010).Institutional traps and vulnerability to changes in climate and flood regimes in Thailand.Regional Environmental Change,11,45-58.
  35. Lepper, M. R.,Greene, D.,Nisbett, R. E.(1973).Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,28,129-37.
  36. Mansbridge, J. J.(ed.)(1990).Beyond self-interest.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  37. Olson, M.(1965).The logic of collective action, public goods and the theory of groups.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  38. Ostrom, E.(1990).Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Ostrom, E.(ed.),Dietz, T.(ed.),Dolsak, N.(ed.),Stern, P. C.(ed.),Stonich, S.(ed.),Weber, E. U.(ed.)(2002).The drama of the commons.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
  40. Parr, J. F.,Miler, R. H.,Colacicco, D.(1985).Utilization of organic material for crop production in developed and developing countries.International Workshop,,Richmond. NSW, Australia:
  41. Simon, H. A.(1991).Organizations and markets.Journal of Economic Perspectives,5(2),25-44.
  42. Thakur, D. S.,Sharma, K. D.(2005).Organic farming for sustainable agriculture and meeting the challenges of food security in 21st Century: An economic analysis.Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics,60(2),205-19.
  43. Titmuss, R.(1970).The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy.London:Allen and Unwin.
  44. Vollan, B.(2008).Socio-ecological explanations for crowding-out effects from economic field experiments in southern Africa.Ecological Economics,67(4),560-73.
  45. Wade, R.(1987).The management of common property resources collective action as an alternative to privatization or state regulation.Cambridge Journal of Economics,11,95-106.
  46. Walck, C.,Strong, K. C.(2001).Using Aldo Leopold's land ethic to read environmental history: The case of the Keweenaw forest.Organization and Environment,14(3),261-89.
  47. Weerakkody, P. R.(1999).Farming systems for sustainable development: A case study in organic farming in Sri Lanka.APO Seminar on Farming Systems for Sustainable Development,Sri Lanka:
  48. Wilson, J. Q.(1989).Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it.New York:Basic Books.
  49. Yen, A. C.,Sun, C. T.(2009).Self-governing indigenous common pool resources-A case of forest protection and eco-tourism development at Cinsibu Atayal Tribes in Taiwan.2009 Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities,Honolulu, Hawaii:
  50. Youngberg. G.,Buttel, F. H.(1985).Public policy and socio-politico factors affecting the future of sustainable farming systems.Paper presented at an International Workshop, Hawkesbury Agricultural College, Richmond,Richmond, NSW, Australia:
  51. 中央研究院民族學研究所譯、臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會(1996)。番族慣習調查報告書。臺北=Taipei:中央研究院民族學研究所=Zhong yang yan jiu yuan min zu xue yan jiu suo。
  52. 王梅霞(2006)。泰雅族。臺北=Taipei:三民書局=San min shu jyu。
  53. 王嵩山(2006)。臺灣原住民與人類學。臺北=Taipei:國立臺灣大學=Guo li tai wan da xue。
  54. 古惠茹(2007)。Yunlin,國立雲林科技大學文化資產維護系=Department of Culture Heritage Conservation, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology。
  55. 史育禎、張長義、蔡博文(2006)。社區林業作為部落自然資源管理之想像─新竹縣尖石鄉司馬庫斯部落個案研究。臺大實驗林研究報告,20(1),51-64。
  56. 江榮吉(1997)。農業經營與行銷管理。自然農法,15,15-8。
  57. 行政院原住民族委員會(2006)。臺灣原住民經濟調查報告。臺北=Taipei:行政院原住民族委員會=Council of Indigenous Peoples, Executive Yuan。
  58. 吳東傑(2006)。臺灣的有機農業。臺北=Taipei:遠足文化=Yuan zu wen hua。
  59. 陳秀淳(1998)。日據時期臺灣山地水田作的展開。臺北=Taipei:稻鄉出版社=Dao xiang chu ban she。
  60. 劉佩琪(2009)。Taipei,國立政治大學地政學系=Department of Land Economics, National Chengchi University。
  61. 顏愛靜、官大偉(2004)。傳統制度與制度選擇─新竹縣尖石鄉兩個泰雅族部落CPR自主治理案例分析。地理學報,37,27-49。
  62. 羅恩加(2008)。原住民發展有機農業遭遇的若干問題─以新竹縣尖石鄉石磊部落為例。2008生物產業推廣暨經營學系學術研討會,臺中=Taichung:
被引用次数
  1. 官大偉(2014)。空間秩序、地理再現與生態政治:台灣山地資源利用/保育的歷史地理回顧。台灣原住民族研究季刊,7(1),159-197。
  2. 李宜澤(2020)。原力回鄉之後:原住民農人的返鄉策略與在地農產業的組織認同。東台灣研究,27,169-200。
  3. 羅恩加、日宏煜(2018)。從「酵素」到「醬」:當代泰雅族飲食流變的文化地景。中國飲食文化,14(2),175-214。
  4. 闕河嘉、林鈺珊(2015)。初探當代台灣原住民社群支持型農業發展之社會鑲嵌意義。台灣原住民族研究季刊,8(2),33-65。
  5. (2015)。在地道德世界觀與堅定型有機農民的農業實踐:以新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族石磊部落為例。臺灣人類學刊,13(1),79-130。
  6. (2016)。評析台灣原住民族農業發展之趨勢:以戰後泰雅族農業相關研究為例。民族學界,37,139-170。
  7. (2022)。原住民族推展自然農業的困境與契機:以新竹縣尖石鄉泰雅族為例。臺灣人類學刊,20(2),23-78。
  8. (2024)。健康傳統食材在部落長者照顧服務上的意涵:以南投縣信義鄉明德文健站為例。社會發展研究學刊,33,28-62。