题名

臺北都會區港口城市的困局再生中的基隆？

并列篇名

Shrinking Seaport in Metropolitan Taipei Regenerating Keelung City?

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2014.72.02

作者

張容瑛(Jung-Ying Chang)

关键词

城市區域 ； 臺北都會區 ； 基隆港口城市 ； 萎縮城市 ； 新自由主義 ； City-region ； metropolitan Taipei ； seaport Keelung City ； shrinkage ； neoliberalism

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

72期（2014 / 03 / 01）

页次

5 - 29

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

以全球城市為核心所構成之城市區域，已成為全球化過程中，新興的學術及政策論辯焦點，不僅被認為是新自由主義政策論述及實踐的重要實驗場所，並且存在一個假說：這些區域內部的城市，經常以合作聯盟的方式，共同強化在全球當中的領域競爭力。本文透過基隆再生論述、實踐及其現實的觀察，討論分析新自由主義化具體實踐的真實樣貌。本文指出，基隆市，作為臺北都會區中一個曾經輝煌的港口城市，近年來陸續浮現功能萎縮、城市衰退及轉型的壓力，主要交織著三個結構性困境：（1）後工業化時期，傳統單核心港埠經濟發展危機；（2）臺北市及新北市的磁吸效果，以及基隆市依賴經濟體的制度慣性，造成不對等的城際網絡競爭；（3）在雙北市的城際競爭中，基隆市採取同質的競爭策略，反而使其進一步陷入危機當中，進一步加速基隆市在城市區域中功能角色的邊緣化。顯然，新自由主義在城市區域的具體實踐，與理論上的說法有相當的落差。
英文摘要

Globalization not only focuses on a few important global cities that adapt to the global economic order, but also integrates cities located in close proximity to one another into global city-regions. City-regions are important sites of policy experimentation involving new regulatory structures and governance spaces that are strongly influenced by neoliberal policy discourses and practices. However, current work on city-regions is in danger of making a priori assumptions-coherent inter-urban networks and empowered regional governance entities must be created to strengthen territorial competitiveness in the process of globalization. This paper thus aims to examine a realistic neo-liberal city-region by exploring the discourse and reality of regeneration in Keelung City. Once a thriving seaport in metropolitan Taipei, Keelung City today is shrinking, and its transformation is interweaved with three predicaments. First, the traditional port-based economy suffered a crisis in the post-industrial era. Second, the city faces problems of population and capital flight as a result of the magnetic attraction from central Metropolitan Taipei. Third, Keelung City's institutional inertia of following so-called neoliberal best practice strategies potentially is accelerating its marginalization. Obviously, a considerable gap exists between the neoliberal theoretical script and the reality in city-regions.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 朱鎮明(2010)。競爭型計畫與臺灣府際夥伴關係的實踐。公共行政學報，37，71-110。
    連結：
  2. 周志龍(2002)。全球化、國土策略與臺灣都市系統變遷。都市與計劃，29(4)，491-512。
    連結：
  3. (2003)。2003 健康城市大調查：哪個城市運動環境最友善。康健雜誌，61
  4. 基隆市政府 [Ji long shi zheng fu; Keelung City Government] 2007。基隆火車站暨西二西三碼頭都市更新案 (工作會議簡報) [Ji long huo che zhan ji xi er xi san ma tou du shi geng xin an (gong zuo hui yi jian bao)]。基隆 [Keelung]：基隆市政府 [Keelung City Government]。
  5. 交通部中央氣象局 [Jiao tong bu zhong yang qi xiang ju; Central Weather Bureau] 2012。氣候統計 [Qi hou tong ji]。http://www.cwb.gov.tw/V7/climate (擷取日期：2012.02.06) 。
  6. 經濟日報 [Jing ji ri bao; Economic Daily News]. 2000。基港五年建設經費逾百億元 [Ji gang wu nian jian she jing fei yu bai yi yuan]。1 月 27 日32 版。
  7. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)] 1994-2010。家庭收支調查報告 [Jia ting shou zhi diao cha bao gao; Report on the Survey of Family Income and Expenditure]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  8. Hoyt, H. 1939. The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Washington D.C.: Federal Housing Administration.
  9. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2001。民國 90 年工商及服務業普查 [Min guo 90 nian gong shang ji fu wu ye pu cha; 2001 Industry, Commerce and Service Census]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  10. 經濟日報 [Jing ji ri bao; Economic Daily News] 1992。基隆西岸高架橋「傷痕」累累，81 年度維修費每公里高達 1400 萬元 [Ji long xi an gao jia qiao shang hen lei lei, 81 nian du wei xiu fei mei gong li gao da 1400 wan yuan]。3 月 16 日 19 版。
  11. 基 隆 港 務 局 [Ji long gang wu ju; Port of Keelung]. 2012。基隆港營運實績 (統計表) [Ji long gang ying yun shi ji (tong ji biao)]。http://www.klhb.gov.tw/ Html/H06/H0603.aspx (擷取日期：2012.02.04)。
  12. 交通部 [Jiao tong bu; Ministry of Transportation and Communication, R.O.C. (Taiwan)] 2007。基隆港、臺北港、蘇澳港整體規劃及未來發展計畫 (96 年至 100 年) [Ji long gang tai bei gang su ao gang zheng ti gui hua ji wei lai fa zhan (2007-2011)]。臺北 [Taipei]：交通部 [Ministry of Transportation and Communication, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  13. 行政院經濟建設委員會 [Xing zheng yuan jing ji jian she wei yuan hui; Council for Economic Planning and Development] 2010。國土空間發展策略計畫 [Guo tu kong jian fa zhan ce lyue ji hua; Strategic Plan for National Spatial Development]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院經濟建設委員會 [Council for Economic Planning and Development]。
  14. 基隆市政府 [Ji long shi zheng fu; Keelung City Government]. 2010。擴大暨變更基隆市主要計畫 (通盤檢討) (第一階段) 書 [Kuo da ji bian geng ji long shi zhu yao ji hua (tong pan jian tao) (di yi jie duan) shu]。基隆 [Keelung]：基隆市政府 [Keelung City Government]。
  15. 聯合報 [Lian he bao; United Daily] 2004。西岸高架道重建案還有變數 [Xi an gao jia dao chong jian an hai you bian shu]。4 月 8 日 B2 版。
  16. 新北市城鄉發展局 [Xin bei shi cheng xiang fa zhan ju; Urban & Rural Development Department, New Taipei City] 2011。新北市港埠門戶—臺北港都心計畫 [Xin bei shi gang bu men hu: Tai bei gang du xin ji hua]。http://epaper.ntpc.gov.tw/_admin/_upload/epaper/epaper/14/file/epaper.html (擷取日期：2012.02.04)。
  17. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2013。主計處統計專區 [Zhu ji chu tong ji zhuan qu]。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=1 (擷取日期：2013.05.06)。
  18. 立法院公報 [Li fa yuan gong bao] 2009。院會記錄 [Yuan hui ji lu]。立法院公報 [Li fa yuan gong bao] 99(5): 22-3。
  19. 營建署 [Ying jian shu; Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan)] 2010。推動直轄市、縣 (市) 政府擬定區域計畫方案 [Tui dong zhi xia shi xian shi zheng fu ni ding qu yu ji hua fang an]。臺北 [Taipei]：內政部營建署 [Construction and Planning Agency, Ministry of the Interior, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  20. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2000。民國 89 年人口及住宅普查 [Min guo 89 nian ren kou ji zhu zhai pu cha; 2000 Population and Housing Survey]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  21. 聯合報 [Lian he bao; United Daily]. 2010。2 大都更流標，基市查詢原因 [2 da dou geng liu biao ji shi cha xun yuan yin]。11 月 9 日 B2 版。
  22. 基隆港務局[Ji long gang wu ju; Port of Keelung] 2011。基港成長[Ji gang cheng zhang]。http://www.klhb.gov.tw/Html/H01/H010102.aspx (擷取日期：2011.12.14)。
  23. 臺灣港務股份有限公司基隆港務分公司 [Tai wan gang wu gu fen you xian gong si ji long gang wu fen gong si; Taiwan International Ports Corporation, Ltd., Keelung Branch] 2013。101 年臺灣港務股份有限公司基隆港務分公司統計要覽 [2012 tai wan gang wu gu fen you xian gong si ji long gang wu fen gong si tong ji yao lan]。http://www.klhb.gov.tw/Statistic/Filelist_.aspx (擷取日期：2013.05.06)。
  24. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2006。民國 95 年工商及服務業普查 [Min guo 95 nian gong shang ji fu wu ye pu cha; 2006 Industry, Commerce and Service Census]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget,Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  25. (2000)。2000 健康城市大調查：你住的地方「健康」嗎。康健雜誌，23
  26. 行政院衛生署 [Xing zheng yuan wei sheng shu; Ministry of Health and Welfare, R.O.C. (Taiwan)] 2011。衛生統計系列：死因統計 [Wei sheng tong ji xi lie: si yin tong ji]。http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=1717 (擷取日期：2011.12.14)。
  27. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2013。民國 100 年普查初步結果統計表 [Min guo 100 nian pu cha chu bu jie guo tong ji biao]。http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33986&ctNode=3267&mp=1 (擷取日期：2013.05.06)。
  28. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 1996。民國 85 年工商及服務業普查 [Min guo 85 nian gong shang ji fu wu ye pu cha; 1996 Industry, Commerce and Service Census]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  29. 中央社新聞網 [Zhong yang she xin wen wang; CNA NEWS] 2012。紓解交通、藍綠拼捷運到基隆 [Shu jie jiao tong, lan lyu pin jie yun dao ji long]。http://www2.cna.com.tw/News/aALL/201201030267.aspx (擷取日期：2012.02.06) 。
  30. 聯合報 [Lian he bao; United Daily]. 2012。自批最混蛋市長，退回「好人卡」還有兩年一搏 [Zi pi zui hun dan shi zhang, tui hui hao ren ka hai you liang nian yi bo]。9 月 5 日 A3 版。
  31. 聯合報 [Lian he bao; United Daily]. 2004。大陸直追、臺灣港口排名退後 [Da lu zhi zhui tai wan gang kou pai ming tui hou]。5 月 6日。
  32. 行政院主計總處 [Xing zheng yuan zhu ji chu; Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]. 2010。民國 99 年人口及住宅普查 [Min guo 99 nian ren kou ji zhu zhai pu cha; 2010 Population and Housing Survey]。臺北 [Taipei]：行政院主計總處 [Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. (Taiwan)]。
  33. 交通部統計查詢網 [Jiao tong bu tong ji cha xun wang; Statistics Inquiry, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, R.O.C. (Taiwan)] 2013 。 貨 櫃 港 排 名 [Huo gui gang pai ming] 。http://stat.motc.gov.tw/ mocdb/stmain.jsp?sys=100 (擷取日期：2013.05.06)。
  34. 聯合報 [Lian he bao; United Daily]. 2012。施政滿意度最後一名，基市長張通榮自批最混蛋、最差勁市長 [Shi zheng man yi du zui hou yi ming, ji shi zhang zhang tong rong zi pi zui hun dan zui cha jin shi zhang]。9 月 5 日 A1 版。
  35. Amin, A.(ed.)(1994).Post fordism: A reader.Oxford:Blackwell.
  36. Amin, A.,Thrift, N.(1994).Globalization, institutions and regional development in Europe.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  37. Audirac, I.(2005).Information technology and urban form: Challenges to smart growth.International Regional Science Review,28(2),119-45.
  38. Audirac, I.,Cunningham-Sabot, E.,Fol, S.,Moraes, S. T.(2012).Declining suburbs in Europe and Latin America.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,36(2),226-44.
  39. Batten, D. F.(1995).Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century.Urban Studies,32(2),313-27.
  40. Bell, D.,Jayne, M.(2009).Small cities? Towards a research agenda.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,33(3),683-99.
  41. Berry, B. J. L.(1964).Cities as systems within systems of cities.Papers of the Regional Science Association,13,147-63.
  42. Bontje, M.(2004).Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig.GeoJournal,61(1),13-21.
  43. Brenner, N.(2002).Decoding the newest "metropolitan regionalism" in the USA: A critical overview.Cities,19(1),3-21.
  44. Brenner, N.(1999).Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalisation studies.Theory and Society,28,39-78.
  45. Brenner, N.,Theodore, N.(2002).Space of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe.Oxford:Blackwell Publishing.
  46. Brenner, N.,Theodore, N.(2005).Neoliberalism and the urban condition.City,9(1),101-7.
  47. Brenner, N,Peck, J.,Theodore, N.(2010).Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways.Global Networks,10(2),1-41.
  48. Camagni, R.(2002).On the concept of territorial competitiveness: Sound or misleading?.Urban Studies,39,2395-411.
  49. Castells, M.(1996).The rise of the network society.Oxford:Blackwell.
  50. Castells, M.(2000).The rise of the network society.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishers.
  51. Clarke, S.,Gaile, G.(1998).The work of cities.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
  52. Dicken, P.(2003).Global shift: Reshaping the global and economic map in the 21st Century.New York:Guilford Press.
  53. Evans, R.(2002).E-commerce, competitiveness and local and regional governance in greater Manchester and Merseyside: A preliminary assessment.Urban Studies,39(5-6),947-75.
  54. Friedmann, J.,Wolff, G.(1982).World city formation: An agenda for research and action.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,6,339-44.
  55. Friedrichs, J.(1993).A theory of urban decline: Economy, demography and political elites.Urban Studies,30(6),907-17.
  56. Glock, B.,Häußermann, H.(2004).New trends in urban development and public policy in eastern Germany: Dealing with the vacant housing problem at the local level.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,28(4),919-29.
  57. Gold, T. B.(1986).State and society in the Taiwan miracle.New York:M. E. Sharpe.
  58. Hall, P.(1998).Cities in civilization.New York:Pantheon.
  59. Hall, P.(1966).The world cities.London:Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  60. Harding, A.(2007).Taking city regions seriously? Response to debate on 'city-regions: new geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction'.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31(2),443-58.
  61. Harvey, D.(1989).The condition of post-modernity.Oxford:Blackwell.
  62. Hauswirth, I.,Herrschel, T.,Newman, P.(2003).Incentives and disincentives to city-regional cooperation in the Berlin - Brandenburg conurbation.European Urban and Regional Studies,10(2),119-34.
  63. Jonas, A. E. G.,Ward, K.(2007).Introduction to a debate on city-regions: New geographies of governance, democracy and social reproduction.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31(1),169-78.
  64. Knapp, W.,Kunzmann, K.,Schmitt, P.(2004).A cooperative spatial future for RheinRuhr.European Planning Studies,12(3),323-50.
  65. Leibovitz, J.(2003).Institutional barriers to associative city-region governance: The politics of institution-building and economic governance in 'Canada's technology triangle'.Urban Studies,40(13),2613-42.
  66. Leitner, H.(ed.),Peck, J.(ed.),Sheppard, E.(ed.)(2007).Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers.New York:Guilford.
  67. Leitner, H.,Sheppard, E.(2002)."The city is dead, long live the net": Harnessing European interurban networks for a neoliberal agenda.Space of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe,Oxford:
  68. Leo, C.,Anderson, K.(2006).Beingrealistic about urban growth.Journal of Urban Affairs,28(2),169-89.
  69. Martinez-Fernandez, C.,Audirac, I.,Fol, S.,Cunningham-Sabot, E.(2012).Shrinking cities: Urban challenges of globalization.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,36(2),213-25.
  70. Mollenkopf, J. H.(ed.),Castells, M.(ed.)(1992).Dual city: Restructuring New York.New York:Russell Sage.
  71. Pflieger, G.,Rozenblat, C.(2010).Introduction. Urban networks and network theory: The city as the connector of multiple networks.Urban Studies,47(13),2723-35.
  72. Purcell, M.(2007).City-regions, neoliberal globalization and democracy: A research agenda.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,31(1),197-206.
  73. Reckien, D.,Martinez-Fernandez, C.(2011).Why do cities shrink?.European Planning Studies,19(8),1375-97.
  74. Rogerson, R. J.(1999).Quality of life and city competitiveness.Urban Studies,36(5-6),969-85.
  75. Rusk, D.(1995).Cities without Suburbs.Washington, DC:Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  76. Rybczynski, W.,Linneman, P.(1999).How to save our shrinking cities.Public Interest,135,30-44.
  77. Sassen, S.(1991).The global city: New York, London Tokyo.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  78. Sassen, S.(2001).The global city: New York, London, Tokyo.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  79. Savitch, H. V.,Collins, D.,Sanders, D.,Markham, J.(1993).Ties that bind: Central cities, suburbs and the new metropolitan region.Economic Development Quarterly,7(4),341-57.
  80. Scott, A. J.(2006).Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions.Journal of Urban Affairs,28(1),1-17.
  81. Scott, A. J.(1996).Regional motors of the global economy.Futures,28(5),391-411.
  82. Scott, A. J.(2001).Globalization and the rise of city-regions.European Planning Studies,9(7),813-24.
  83. Scott, A. J.(ed.)(2001).Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  84. Scott, A. J.,Storper, M.(2003).Regions, globalization, development.Regional Studies,37(6-7),549-578.
  85. Smith, N.,Caris, P.,Wyly, E.(2001).The Camden syndrome and the menace of suburban decline: Residential disinvestment and the discontents in Camden County, New Jersey.Urban Affairs Review,36(4),497-531.
  86. Storper, M.(1997).The regional world.New York:Guilford Press.
  87. Storper, M.,Scott, A. J.(1995).The wealth of regions: Markets forces and policy imperatives in local and global context.Futures,27,505-26.
  88. Taşan-Kok, T.(ed.),Baeten, G.(ed.)(2012).Contradictions of neoliberal planning: Cities, policies, and politics.New York:Springer.
  89. Taylor, P. J.,Hoyler, M.,Verbruggen, R.(2010).External urban relational process: Introducing central flow theory to complement central place theory.Urban Studies,47(13),2803-18.
  90. Theodore, N.,Peck, J.(2012).Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating 'commonsense' urban policy across the OECD zone.European Urban and Regional Studies,19(1),20-41.
  91. Timberlake, M.(ed.)(1985).Urbanization in the World-Economy.London:Academic Press.
  92. 天下雜誌(2011)。2011 幸福城市大調查。天下雜誌，480，54-60。
  93. 天下雜誌(2003)。25 縣市的競爭力排行榜。天下雜誌，280，138-47。
  94. 王文誠(2006)。全球化趨勢下的都會治理：高雄的挑戰。環境與世界，13，36-56。
  95. 基隆市政府(2011)。農林漁牧業普查之回顧與展望。基隆市刊，4 月號，24-5。
  96. 彭杏珠(2011)。城市競爭力：施政理念，縣市長的政績與挑戰。遠見雜誌，301，152-9。
被引用次数
  1. 傅偉哲(2022)。新自由主義、兩岸貿易與企業地產金融化：臺灣縣市與企業層級追蹤數據的實證檢驗，2000～2019。問題與研究，61(3)，95-143。
  2. 傅偉哲,林宗弘(2022)。今天拆大埔，明天換政府？臺灣民主化後的土地開發與選舉，1993－2015。人文及社會科學集刊，34(2)，315-364。
  3. 黃幼宜,張淑滿(2021)。港埠風華再現？港口城市的經濟角色。海洋文化學刊，31，1-44。
  4. 黃子倫,徐進鈺,朱凌毅(2022)。都市化的批判－Neil Brenner全域都市化與資本主義的存續。地理學報，102，37-53。
  5. 蕭力偉(2018)。都市空間發展結構歷程與治理的困局－以高速鐵路苗栗車站特定區為例。中國地理學會會刊，60，25-50。
  6. 蕭力偉(2018)。游移在發展型國家與新自由主義之間的開發與治理：以高速鐵路桃園車站特定區為例。地理研究，69，155-195。
print cancel