题名

區域災害系統評估坡地災害風險程度 以臺東縣海端鄉為例

并列篇名

The Study of Regional Disaster System for Hai-Duan Township in Taitung of Taiwan

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2014.75.02

作者

洪政耀(Cheng-Yao Hung);林雪美(Hsueh-Mei Lin)

关键词

區域災害系統 ; 孕災環境敏感度 ; 致災因子危害度 ; 承災體曝露與脆弱度 ; 風險 ; Regional Disaster System ; susceptibility of potential hazard environment ; hazard of extreme natural phenomena ; exposure and vulnerability of residents ; risk

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

75期(2014 / 12 / 01)

页次

29 - 56

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在臺灣,過去十年來自然現象所導致的災害損失逐年上升,因此深入了解災害發生的原因有其必要性,且藉由了解災害發生之因,落實有效的預備、減災措施,可將災害損失降低。首先,需收集並確認災害的點位、分析災害的孕災環境因素以推估相鄰的環境特性,找出環境敏感地帶。再者,災害對於居民會產生多大的風險程度,並不只能考慮孕災環境與致災因子可能造成的威脅,還必須考慮承災體的曝露與脆弱程度,這扮演著相當關鍵的角色。本篇目的就是以區域災害系統論,提供一個了解人與環境之間互動的有利分析方式,並結合GIS平臺以空間化的方式展現其成果。結果顯示災害風險最高的地方並非單純的高敏感危害地區就愈易受災,仍須考量承災體曝露於塊體崩壞的量與自身的脆弱程度。顯示災害的複雜、綜合與多元的組合,必須考量不同時間、空間尺度下,區域災害系統的運作情形方能理解災害發生之因。

英文摘要

In Taiwan, losses from extreme natural phenomena have escalated in the past decade. There is a noticeable change in policy, with more emphasis on loss reduction through mitigation, preparedness, and recovery programs. Effective mitigation of losses from hazards requires hazard identification, analysis of the time and spatial characteristics of mass wasting, and assessment of the sensitivity of potential hazard environment along the side of study area. The vulnerability of the local population to hazards, however, is not solely dependent upon proximity to the source of the threat or the physical nature of the hazard-exposure and vulnerability of residents also play a significant role in determining vulnerability. The regional disaster system supported method of analysis relationship between residents and environment, and spatially present results through Geographic Information System (GIS). Our results suggest that the most risk places do not always spatially intersect with the most susceptibility area. For example, the exposure and vulnerability of residents must also be considered. Disaster is a state of complex and comprehensive, we used regional disaster system to interpret causes of disaster in consider the different time and space scales.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 李錫堤、費立沅(2011)。蘭陽溪流域之山崩土石流潛在危害預測。前瞻科技與管理,1(2),67-83。
    連結:
  2. 洪政耀(2012)。區域災害系統研究─以臺東縣海端鄉為例。災害防救科技與管理學刊,1(2),17-41。
    連結:
  3. 蕭煥章(2008)。Taipei,中國文化大學地理研究所=Graduate Institute of Earth Science, Chinese Culture University。
    連結:
  4. White, G. F. 1945. Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago
  5. Alexander, D.(1993).Natural disasters.London:UCL Press.
  6. Ali, A. M. S.(2007).September 2004 flood event in Southwestern Bangladesh: A study of its nature, causes, and human perception and adjustments to a new hazard.Natural Hazards,40,89-111.
  7. Bettalanffy, L. V.(1950).The theory of open systems in physics and biology.Science,111,23-29.
  8. Birkmann, J.,Fernando, N.(2008).Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities on coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka.Disasters,32(1),82-105.
  9. Brilly, M.,Polic, M.(2005).Public perception of flood risks, flood forecasting and mitigation.Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,5,345-55.
  10. Bui, D. T.,Lofman, O.,Revhaug, I.,Dick, O.(2011).Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression.Natural Hazard,59,1413-44.
  11. Burton, I.,Kates, R. W.,White, G. F.(1993).The environment as hazard.New York:Oxford University Press.
  12. Carrara, A.,Cardinali, M.,Guzzetti, F.,Reichenbach, P.(1995).GIS technology in mapping landslide hazard.Geographical information systems in assessing natural hazards,Dordrecht Netherlands:
  13. Chapman, D.(1994).Natural hzards.New York:Oxford University Press.
  14. Chau, K. T.,Chan, J. E.(2005).Regional bias of landslide data in generating susceptibility maps using logistic regression: Case of Hong Kong Island.Landslides,2,280-90.
  15. Chauhan, S.,Sharma, M.,Arora, M. K.(2010).Landslide susceptibility zonation of the Chamoli region, Garhwal Himalayas, using logistic regression model.Landslides,7,411-23.
  16. Chen, Z. H.,Wang, J. F.(2007).Landslide hazard mapping using logistic regression model in Mackenzie Valley, Canada.Natural Hazards,42,75-89.
  17. Chorley, R. C.,Kennedy, B. A.(1971).Physical geography: A systems approach.London:Prentice-Hall International.
  18. Corominas, J.,Moya, J.(1999).Reconstructing recent landslide activity in relation to rainfall in the Llobreg at River basin, Eastern Pyrenees, Spain.Geomorphology,30,79-93.
  19. Cutter, S. L.,Barnes, L.(2008).A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters.Global Environmental Change,18,598-606.
  20. Cutter, S. L.,Mitchell, J. T.,Scott, M. S.(2000).Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of georgetown county, South Carolina.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,90(4),713-37.
  21. Darbra, R. M.,Crawford, J. F. E.,Haley, C. W.,Morrison, R. J.(2007).Safety culture and hazard risk perception of Australian and New Zealand maritime pilots.Marine Policy,31(6),736-45.
  22. Das, I.,Sahoo, S.,Van Westen, C.,Stein, A.,Hack, R.(2010).Landslide susceptibility assessment using logistic regression and its comparison with a rock mass classification system, along a road section in the northern Himalayas (India).Geomorphology,114,627-37.
  23. Erener, A.,Sebnem, H.,Düzgün, B.(2010).Improvement of statistical landslide susceptibility mapping by using spatial and global regression methods in the case of More and Romsdal (Norway).Landslide,7,55-68.
  24. Galli, M.,Guzzetti, F.(2007).Landslide vulnerability criteria: A case study from Umbria, Central Italy.Environment Management,40,649-64.
  25. Glade, T.,Anderson, M.,Crozier, M.(2006).Landslide hazard and risk.Hoboken:John Wiley.
  26. Gorsevski, P. V.,Gessler, P. E.,Foltz, R. B.,Elliot, W. J.(2006).Spatial prediction of landslide hazard using logistic regression and ROC analysis.Transactions in GIS,10(3),395-415.
  27. Huggett, R.(1980).Systems analysis in geography.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  28. IPCC(2007).Climate change 2007: The physical science basis: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  29. Jaiswal, P.,Van Westen, C. J.,Jetten, V.(2010).Quantitative landslide hazard assessment along a transportation corridor in southern India.Engineering Geology,116,236-50.
  30. Kates, R. W.(1971).Natural hazard in human ecological perspective: Hypotheses and models.Economic Geography,47(3),438-51.
  31. Krasovskaia, I.,Gottschalk, L.,Ibrekk, A. S.,Berg, H.(2007).Perception of flood hazard in countries of the north sea region of Europe.Nordic Hydrology,38(4-5),387-99.
  32. Lee, S.,Ryu, J. H.,Kim, L. S.(2007).Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: A case study of Youngin, Korea.Landslides,4,327-38.
  33. Mustafa, D.(2002).Linking access and vulnerability: Perceptions of irrigation and flood management in Pakistan.Professional Geographer,54(1),94-105.
  34. Nefeslioglu, H. A.,Duman, T. Y.,Durmaz, S.(2008).Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (eastern Black Sea region of Turkey).Geomorphology,94,401-18.
  35. Remondo, J.,González-Díez, A.,de Terán, J. R. Díaz,Cendrero, A.(2003).Landslide susceptibility models utilising spatial data analysis techniques: A case study from the Lower Deba Valley, Guipúzcoa (Spain).Natural Hazards,30,267-79.
  36. Remondo, J.,Soto, J.,González, D. A.,de Terán, J. R. Díaz,Cendrero, A.(2005).Human impact on geomorphic processes and hazards in mountain areas in northern Spain.Geomorphology,66,69-84.
  37. Schumm, S. A.(1977).The fluvial system.New York:Wiley.
  38. Smith, K.(2001).Environmental hazards: Assessing risk and reducing disaster.London:Routledge.
  39. Strahler, A. N.(1950).Equilibrium theory of erosional slopes approached by frequency distribution analysis.American Journal of Science,248,673-96.
  40. Süzen, M. L.,Doyuran, V.(2004).A comparison of the GIS based landslide susceptibility assessment methods: Multivariate versus bivariate.Environmental Geology,45,665-79.
  41. Terlien, M. T. J.(1998).The determination of statistical and deterministic hydrological landslide-triggering thresholds.Environmental Geology,5,124-30.
  42. Thomas, D. S. G.,Goudie, A.(2000).The dictionary of physical geography.Malden Ma:Blackwell Press.
  43. Tunusluoglu, M. C.,Gokceoglu, C.,Nefeslioglu, H. A.,Sonmez, H.(2008).Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: A case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey).Environmental Geology,54,9-22.
  44. UNDP(2007).,New York:Palgrave Macmillan Press.
  45. UNDRO(1982).,Geneva:Office of the United Nations Disater Relief Co-ordinator.
  46. Vafeidis, A.T.,Nicholls, R. J.,McFadden, L.,Tol, R. S. J.,Hinkel, J.,Spencer, T.,Grashoff, P. S.,Boot, G.,Klein, R. J. T.(2008).A new global coastal database for impact and vulnerability analysis to sea-level rise.Journal of Coastal Research,24(4),917-24.
  47. Van Den Eeckhaut, M.,Poesen, J.,Vandekerckhove, L.,Van Gils, M.,Van Rompaey, A.(2010).Human-environment interactions in residential areas susceptible to landsliding: The Flemish Ardennes case study.Area,42(3),339-58.
  48. Van Den Eeckhaut, M.,Vanwalleghem, T.,Poesen, J.,Govers, G.,Verstraeten, G.,Vandekerckhove, L.(2006).Prediction of landslide susceptibility using rare events logistic regression: A case-study in the Flemish Ardennes (Belgium).Geomorphology,76,392-410.
  49. Wang, H.B.,Sassa, K.(2005).Comparative evaluation of landslide susceptibility in Minamata area, Japan.Environment Geology,47,956-66.
  50. White, G. F.(ed.)(1974).Natural hazard: Local, national global.New York:Oxford University Press.
  51. Wisner, B.,Blaikie, P.,Cannon, T.,Davis, I.(2004).At risk-natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters.London:Routledge.
  52. Yilmaz, I.(2010).Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: Conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine.Environmental Earth Sciences,61,821-36.
  53. 周憲德、廖偉民、姚善文(2002)。發生土石流之臨界降雨特性分析。中國土木水利工程學刊,14(1),1-8。
  54. 林冠慧(2011)。Taipei,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所=Department of Geography, National Taiwan University。
  55. 林雪美(2004)。臺灣地區近三十年自然災害的時空特性。國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告,41,99-128。
  56. 洪政耀(2012)。區域災害系統論坡地災害風險評估。工程環境會刊,29,21-41。
  57. 洪政耀(2012)。羅吉斯回歸與不安定指數應用於塊體崩壞敏感度評估比較─以臺東縣海端鄉為例。中國地理學會會刊,49,77-103。
  58. 洪政耀、林雪美(2010)。新竹縣五峰、尖石鄉坡地災害對居民的災害識覺與調適行為之研究。工程環境會刊,25,23-32。
  59. 徐美玲、王秋原(1991)。安坑地區居民對山坡地社區開發所造成環境衝擊之識覺。中國地理學會會刊,19,1-19。
  60. 張長義(1977)。環境識覺與自然災害之研究。中國地理學會會刊,5,56-60。
  61. 陳樹群、馮智偉(2005)。應用 Logistic 迴歸繪製崩塌潛感圖─以濁水溪流域為例。中華水土保持學報,36(2),191-201。