题名

作為制度舒緩的三生農業臺灣農地新自由化、調節過程與農業體制再結構

并列篇名

Three Vital Functions of Agriculture as Institutional Alleviation Taiwan's Farmland Neoliberalization, Regulation Process, and the Restructuring of Agricultural Regime

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2015.76.02

作者

藍逸之(I-Chih Lan)；李承嘉(Chen-Jai Lee)

关键词

後生產論 ； 多功能性 ； 新自由主義 ； 制度舒緩 ； 新農業體制 ； Postproductivism ； multifunctionality ； neoliberalism ； institutional alleviation ； new agricultural regime

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

76期（2015 / 03 / 01）

页次

25 - 68

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文從1990年代起深受空間政治經濟取向影響的新自由主義地理為基礎，並且以當前引起普遍國際爭論的兩種回應新自由農業的地理思潮─「後生產論」與「農業多功能性」作為對話的參考架構，用以探索臺灣當前農業體制變遷與農地利用轉型之社經趨力。本文主張，若要抵抗新自由化的潛在風險，相較於後生產論，農業多功能性或可提供體質較健全的替選途徑。然而，臺灣經驗深受1990年代國家發展邁向新自由化階段的調節路徑演化影響，不均等的城鄉發展關係使新農業體制看似較為傾向於後生產論，企圖設定與新自由主義相容的農業改革，藉此創造新的空間生產以利彈性資本積累。此一結構性障礙，實乃造成臺灣農地資源持續流失及相對弱勢的瓶頸。
英文摘要

In this study of the emergent neoliberal geography based on critical spatial political economy, two reference frameworks that have caused widespread international arguments, 'postproductivism' and 'agricultural multifunctionality', were used to explore the socio-economic driving force behind Taiwan's new agricultural regime and farmland transformation. The research results suggest that, compared to postproductivism, multifuntionality may provide a healthier alternative against the disastrous neolibralism. In Taiwan, which has been influenced by state regulation, the new transiting regime apparently favors the route towards postproductivism and is attempting to implement agricultural reforms that conform to neoliberal ideology to create new production of space for flexible capital accumulation. The structural malfunction has caused a bottleneck due to loss of farmland resources and relative deprivation in agricultural sector.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 陳怡伶、黎德星(2010)。新自由主義化、國家與住宅市場－臺灣國宅政策的演變。地理學報，59，105-31。
    連結：
  2. 廖石(2001)。從都市企業化主義的觀點探討在全球化過程中的城鄉均衡發展課題。都市與計劃，28(2)，155-70。
    連結：
  3. 行政院研究發展考核委員會 [Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan] 1998。農地釋出方案實地查證報告 [Nong di shi chu fang an shi di zha zheng bao kao]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院研究發展考核委員會[Research, Development and Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan]。
  4. 行政院經濟建設委員會 [Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan] 1996。國土綜合開發計畫 [Guo tu zhong he kai fa ji hua]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院經建會[Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan]。
  5. 行政院農業委員會 [Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]1991。農業綜合調整方案 [Nong ye zong he tiao zheng fang an]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院農委會[Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]。
  6. 蔡培慧 2008。在自己土地上流離失所─解讀行政院版《農村再生條例》[Zai zi ji tu di shang liu li shi suo: Jie du xing zheng yuan ban nong cun zai sheng tiao li]。http://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/32395 (擷取日期：2013.12.13)。
  7. 行政院農業委員會 [Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]. 2012。2011 年農業統計年報 [2011 nian nong ye tong ji nian bao]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院農委會[Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]。
  8. 行政院農業委員會 [Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]. 2010。因應氣候變遷農業調適政策總報告 [Yin ying qi hou bian qian nong ye tiao shi zheng ce zhong bao kao]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院農委會[Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]。
  9. 洪天財 [Hong T. C.] 2012。臺糖公司配合政策釋出土地[Tai tang gong si pei he zheng ce shi chu tu di]。http://moodle.ncku.edu.tw/mod/resource/view.php?id=183069 (擷取日期：2013.4.30)。
  10. Garzon, I. 2005. Multifunctinality of agriculture in the European Union: Is there substance behind the discourse's smoke? http://igov.berkley.edu/workingpapers/index.html (last accessed 28 September 2007).
  11. 行政院農業委員會[Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]. 2004。2003 年農業統計年報 [2003 nian nong ye tong ji nian bao]。臺北[Taipei]：行政院農委會[Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan]。
  12. munch 2008。三分鐘搞懂《農村再生條例》[San fen zhong gao dong nong cun zai sheng tiao li]。http://e-info.org.tw/node/39817 (擷取日期：2013.12.13)。
  13. Alonso, W.(1964).Location and land use.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  14. Barlowe, R.(1986).Land resource economics: The economics of real estate.New York:Prentice Hall.
  15. Bowler, I. R.,Ilbery, B. W.(1987).Redefining agricultural geography.Area,19(4),327-32.
  16. Brenner, N.(1998).Global cities, glocal states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe.Review of International Political Economy,5(1),1-37.
  17. Brenner, N.,Peck, J.,Theodore, N.(2010).Variegated capitalism: Geographies, modalities, pathways.Global Networks,10(2),182-222.
  18. Brenner, N.,Theodore, N.(2002).Cities and geographies of 'actually existing neoliberalism'.Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe,London:
  19. Campbell, S.(1996).Greening cities, growing cities, just cities? Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development.Journal of the American Planning Association,62(3),296-312.
  20. Carnoy, M.(1984).The state and political theory.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  21. Castells, M.(1991).The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring and the urban-regional process.Oxford:Blackwell.
  22. Castree, N.(ed.),Gregory, D.(ed.)(2006).David Harvey: A critical reader.Malden:Blackwell.
  23. Cloke, P.,Goodwin, M.(1992).Conceptualizing countryside change: From post-Fordism to rural structured coherence.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,17(3),321-36.
  24. Conway, D.(ed.),Heynen, N.(ed.)(2006).Globalization's contradictions: Geographies of discipline, destruction and transformation.London:Routledge.
  25. Dean, J.(2008).Enjoying neoliberalism.Cultural Politics,4(1),47-72.
  26. Dibden, J.,Potter, C.,Cocklin, C.(2009).Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia.Journal of Rural Studies,25,299-308.
  27. Evans, N.,Morris, C.,Winter, M.(2002).Conceptualizing agriculture: A critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy.Progress in Human Geography,26(3),313-32.
  28. Friedman, M.(2002).Capitalism and freedom.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  29. George, S.(1999).A short history of neoliberalism.The Conference on Economic Sovereignty in a Globalising World,Bangkok, Thailand:
  30. Gkartzios, M.,Norris, M.(2011).'If you build it, they will come': Governing property-led rural regeneration.Land Use Policy,28,486-94.
  31. Glenna, L. L.,Mitev, G. V.(2009).Global neo-liberalism, global ecological modernization, and a swine CAFO in rural Bulgaria.Journal of Rural Studies,25(3),289-98.
  32. Goodwin, M.,Painter, J.(1996).Local governance, the crises of fordism and the changing geographies of regulation.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,21(4),635-48.
  33. Hansen, N.,Higgins, B.,Savoie, D. J.(1990).Regional policy in a changing world.New York:Plenum Press.
  34. Harvey, D.(2003).The new imperialism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  35. Harvey, D.(1985).The limits to capital.London:Verso.
  36. Harvey, D.(1978).The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2,101-31.
  37. Harvey, D.(2001).Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography.Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
  38. Harvey, D.(2006).Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development.London:Verso.
  39. Harvey, D.(1975).The geography of capitalist accumulation: A reconstruction of the Marxian theory.Antipode,7(2),9-21.
  40. Harvey, D.(1989).The condition of postmodernity.Oxford:Blackwell.
  41. Harvey, D.(1981).The spatial fix-Hegel, von Thunen, and Marx.Antipode,13(3),1-12.
  42. Harvey, D.(2000).Spaces of hope.Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press.
  43. Harvey, D.(2010).The enigma of capital and the crises of capitalism.London:Profile.
  44. Harvey, D.(1996).Nature, justice and the geography of difference.Malden:Blackwell.
  45. Harvey, D.(2005).A brief history of neoliberalism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  46. Hou, J.(2000).From dual disparities to dual squeeze: The emerging patterns of regional development in Taiwan.Berkeley Planning Journal,14,4-22.
  47. Hubacek, K.,Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M.(2006).Changing concepts of 'land' in economic theory: From single to multi-disciplinary approaches.Ecological Economics,56,5-27.
  48. Ilbery, B.(ed.)(1998).The geography of rural change.London:Longman.
  49. Jessop, B.(2000).The crisis of the national spatio-temporal fix and the tendential ecological dominance of globalizing capitalism.Internal Journal of Urban and Region al Research,24(2),323-60.
  50. Jessop, B.(1990).State theory: Putting the capitalist state in their place.Pennsylvania:Pennsylvania State University Press.
  51. Jessop, B.(2002).The future of capitalist state.London:Polity.
  52. Jones, M.(1997).Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance.Environment and Planning A,29,831-64.
  53. Lietner, H.(ed.),Peck, J.(ed.),Sheppard, E. S.(ed.)(2007).Contesting neoliberalism: Urban frontiers.NY:Guilford.
  54. Lowe, P.,Murdoch, J.,Marsden, T.,Munton, R.,Flynn, A.(1993).Regulating the new rural spaces: The uneven development of land.Journal of Rural Studies,9(3),205-22.
  55. Marsden, T.,Munton, R.,Ward, N.,Whatmore, S.(1996).Agricultural geography and the political economic approach: A review.Economic Geography,72(4),361-75.
  56. Marsedn, T.(1988).Exploring political economy approaches in agriculture.Area,20(4),315-22.
  57. Mather, A. S.,Hill, G.,Nijnik, M.(2006).Post-productivism and rural land use: Cul de sac or challenge for theorization?.Journal of Rural Studies,22,441-55.
  58. McCarthy, J.,Prudham, S.(2004).Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism.Geoforum,35,275-83.
  59. Mitchell, C. J. A.(1998).Entrepreneurialism, commodification and creative destruction: A model of post-modern community development.Journal of Rural Studies,14(3),273-86.
  60. Neumayer, E.(2003).Weak versus strong sustainability: Exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar.
  61. Ng, M. K.(1999).Political economy and urban planning: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taiwan.Progress in Planning,9,1-90.
  62. OECD(2001).Multifunctionality: Towards an analytical framework-Summary and conclusions.
  63. Ohmae, K.(1995).The end of nation state.London:HarperCollins.
  64. Peck, J.,Tickell, A.(1994).Jungle law breaks out: Neoliberalism and global-local disorder.Area,26(4),317-26.
  65. Peck, J.,Tickell, A.(2002).Neoliberalizing space.Antipode,34,380-404.
  66. Peet, R.,Hartwick, E.(1999).Theories of development.NY:Guilford Press.
  67. Potter, C.,Tilzey, M.(2005).Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: Neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality.Progress in Human Geography,29(5),581-600.
  68. Sassen, S.(1991).The global city: New York, London, Tokyo.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
  69. Scott, A.(2001).Globalization and the rise of city-regions.European Planning Studies,9(7),813-26.
  70. Selman, P.(1996).Local sustainability: Managing and planning ecologically sound places.London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.
  71. Smith, N.(2008).Uneven development: Nature, capitalism and the production of space.Athens:The University of Georgia Press.
  72. Smith, N.(2008).Nature as accumulation strategy.Socialist Register,43,16-36.
  73. Storper, M.(1997).The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy.New York:The Guilford Press.
  74. Sugden, F.(2009).Neoliberalism, markets and class structures on the Nepali lowlands: The political economy of agrarian change.Geoforum,40,634-44.
  75. Tilzey, M.(2000).Natural areas, the whole countryside approach and sustainable agriculture.Land Use Policy,17,279-94.
  76. United Nations(1992).Agenda 21: United Nations conference on environment and development,Rio de Janerio:
  77. Van der Ploeg, J. D.(ed.),Dijk, G.(ed.)(1995).Beyond modernization: The impact of endogenous rural development.Assen:Van Gorcum.
  78. Van Huylenbroeck, G.(ed.),Durand, G.(ed.)(2003).Multifunctional agriculture: A new paradigm for European agriculture and rural development.Hampshire:Ashgate.
  79. Van Huylenbroeck, G.,Vandermeulen, V.,Mettepenningen, E.,Verspecht, A.(2007).Multifunctionality of agriculture: A review of definitions, evidence and instruments.Living Reviews in Landscape Research,1(3)
  80. Wheeler, J. O.,Muller, P. O.,Thrall, G. I.,Fik, T. J.(1999).Economic geography.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
  81. Wheeler, S. M.(2004).Planning for sustainability: Creating livable, equitable, and ecological communities.Abingdon:Routledge.
  82. Wilson, G. A.(2007).Multifunctional agriculture: A transition theory perspective.Wallingford:CAB International.
  83. Wilson, G. A.(2001).From productivism to post-productivism...and back again? Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,26(1),77-102.
  84. Wilson, G. A.(2009).The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: A human geography perspective.Geoforum,40,269-80.
  85. Wilson, G. A.(2004).The Australian landcare movement: Towards 'post-productivist' rural governance?.Journal of Rural Studies,20,461-84.
  86. Wilson, G. A.(2008).From 'weak' to 'strong' multifunctionality: Conceptualizing the farm level multifunctional transitional pathway.Journal of Rural Studies,24,367-83.
  87. Wilson, G. A.(2010).Multifunctional 'quality' and rural community resilience.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,35,364-81.
  88. Wilson, G. A.,Rigg, J.(2003).'Post-productivist' agricultural regimes and the South: Discordant concepts?.Progress in Human Geography,27(6),681-707.
  89. Zander, P.,Knierim, A.,Groot, J. C. J.,Rossing, W. A. H.(2007).Multifunctionality of agriculture: Tools and methods for impact assessment and valuation.Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment,120,1-4.
  90. 中央研究院經濟研究所(2002)。,臺北=Taipei:行政院經建會=Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan。
  91. 中國土地經濟學會(2008)。,臺北=Taipei:行政院農委會=Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan。
  92. 台灣農村陣線編(2012)。土地正義的覺醒與實踐─抵抗圈地文集。臺北=Taipei:台灣農村陣線=Taiwan Rural Front。
  93. 行政院農業委員會(1995)。農業政策白皮書。臺北=Taipei:行政院農委會=Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan。
  94. 行政院農業委員會(2011)。全國農業與農地研討會總報告，臺北=Taipei:
  95. 余玉賢編(1975)。臺灣農業發展論文集，臺北=Taipei:
  96. 吳田泉(1993)。臺灣農業史。臺北=Taipei:自立晚報社文化出版部=Independence Evening News Culture Publishing Department。
  97. 吳清輝(1998)。加強農地管理、落實農地農用。人與地，177，26-34。
  98. 李永展(2003)。永續發展：大地反撲的省思。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Jui lui。
  99. 李永展、藍逸之、莊翰華(2005)。全球經濟變遷、發展型國家與臺灣城鄉規劃之重探─都市企業主義適用性的地理探查及其治理危機。地理學報，40，69-97。
  100. 李承嘉(1998)。臺灣戰後土地政策分析─平均地權下的土地改革與土地稅制變遷。臺北=Taipei:正揚=Zheng yang。
  101. 李承嘉(2007)。戰後臺灣鄉村體制轉變之研究：從農業生產論走向農業後生產論？。2007 年土地研究學術研討會，臺北=Taipei:
  102. 李承嘉(2012)。農地與農村發展政策─新農業體制下的轉向。臺北=Taipei:五南=Wu nan。
  103. 李朝賢(1993)。區域發展規劃。臺北=Taipei:華泰=Hua tai。
  104. 李鴻毅編(1996)。土地政策論。臺北=Taipei:中國地政研究所=The China Research Institute of Land Economics。
  105. 周志龍(1997)。全球經濟發展與國土規劃開發體制變遷─臺灣與英國為例。思與言，35(3)，139-89。
  106. 周志龍(2001)。臺灣國土經營管理制度結構變遷。人文及社會科學集刊，13(1)，89-132。
  107. 周志龍(1997)。資本主義全球化過程中的臺灣都市及區域發展之結構變遷。法商學報，33，1-45。
  108. 岳裕智、白仁德、黃書偉(2010)。,臺北=Taipei:行政院經建會=Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive Yuan。
  109. 林建元編、邊泰明編、李承嘉編(2001)。知識經濟與土地利用。臺北=Taipei:中國土地經濟學會=Chinese Institute of Land Economics。
  110. 林家榮(2000)。WTO 新回合談判有關農業多功能性之爭議。農政與農情，92，50-55。
  111. 孫義崇(1988)。臺灣的區域空間政策。台灣社會研究季刊，1(2/3)，33-96。
  112. 殷章甫(1984)。中國之土地改革。臺北=Taipei:中央文物供應社=Zhong yang wen wu gong ying she。
  113. 國家發展挑戰組編(1993)。國土規劃的挑戰。臺北=Taipei:業強=Ye qiang。
  114. 張志銘(2003)。現行農會及農企業法人許可承受耕地作法之探討。農政與農情，136，30-33。
  115. 陳明燦(1995)。農地釋放與國土規劃政策之探討。理論與政策，2(3)，83-94。
  116. 陳東升(1995)。金權城市─地方派系、財團與臺北都會發展的社會學分析。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Jui lui。
  117. 陳東升、周素卿(1993)。國家結構、政商關係與空間形構。國立臺灣大學社會學刊，22，149-83。
  118. 陳劍揚(2005)。Tainan，國立成功大學政治經濟研究所=Graduate Institute of Political Economy, National Cheng Kung University。
  119. 黃樹仁(2001)。心牢：農地農用意識形態與臺灣城鄉發展。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Jui lui。
  120. 廖正宏、黃俊傑(1992)。戰後臺灣農民價值取向的轉變。臺北=Taipei:聯經=Lian jing=Linking Publishing。
  121. 廖正宏、黃俊傑、蕭新煌(1986)。光復後臺灣農業政策的演變─歷史與社會的分析。臺北=Taipei:中央研究院民族研究所=Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica。
  122. 廖安定(2001)。農業政策與農業法規。農政與農情，103，50-60。
  123. 蔡秀婉(2004)。我國農地釋出原則與做法。農政與農情，145，29-34。
  124. 蔡宜紋(2008)。Hsinchu，國立清華大學社會學研究所=Graduate Institute of Sociology, National Tsing Hua University。
  125. 蕭新煌(1997)。臺灣地方環保抗爭運動：1991-1996。臺北=Taipei:行政院環境保護署=Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan。
  126. 鍾秀梅(2011)。發展主義批判。高雄=Kaohsiung:春暉出版社=Chun hui chu ban she。
被引用次数
  1. 陳品嘉(2023)。以環境正義觀點淺談地面型光電與農業農地的衝突。土地問題研究季刊，22(3)，36-48。
  2. 蘇淑娟,林育加(2023)。農工並存的鄉村：鹿港頂番婆水五金產業的政治生態學。地理學報，104，91-124。
print cancel