永續發展 一個都市政治生態學的批判性視角

Sustainable Development A Critical Perspective from Urban Political Ecology

10.6161/jgs.2016.82.01

曾裕淇(Yu-Qi Zeng)；徐進鈺(Jinn-Yuh Hsu)

批判永續發展 ； 後政治 ； 都市政治生態學 ； 混雜 ； 政策轉移 ； critical sustainable development ； post-politics ； urban political ecology ； hybridity ； policy transfer

地理學報

82期（2016 / 09 / 01）

1 - 25

繁體中文

本文章的目標在於闡明永續發展的建構與國際資本主義發展危機深刻的內在關聯，並說明其中自然、社會的關係如何被呈現，以及歐美國家如何在社會、文化上與永續性連結，以產生廣泛的共識，並且這樣的共識形構了環境議題的道德高度，且在某種程度上擴散到全球。本文指出臺灣從1990 年代中期開始一連串有關永續發展的政策、策略與資源挹注，伴隨著環境教育的興起，2000 年後永續發展逐漸成為顯學。然而，臺灣官方、社會大眾，乃至環保團體與學院對於永續發展的理解與想像大部分移植、轉譯國際永續發展的框架與其模糊不清的宣言，忽視採用長遠的政治經濟與歷史脈絡去看待其中全球資本主義發展中複雜的權力關係；並且，新興的環境教育傳遞國際對災難的天啟示想像，宣揚回到或維護「單一自然」的意識形態，這加深我們對於「社會─自然」二元的錯誤認識，缺乏理解真實社會自然實為混雜一體的能力。因此，本文指認與回顧自1990 年代晚期在激進地理學中衍生出的都市政治生態學 (urban political ecology) 理論發展，提出其中批判永續發展的視角、引介此領域的源起與核心概念，並認為此取徑有機會更核心的理解環境、社會與經濟發展的議題：也就是，都市自然本身是歷史地理的、深刻政治的、高度競奪的，同時也是文化交織的。最後，本文對臺灣的永續發展與都市環境議題提出研究方向的建議。

This article aims to clarify the connection between the establishment of sustainable development and the crisis of capitalism. It demonstrates how nature and society are represented and how western countries relate sustainability to society and culture in order to generate a consensus, whose noticeable high morality standard in environment to some extent proliferate globally. First, the article introduces Taiwan's context in developing sustainable development. To follow global trend in environmental concerns, Taiwan government set up policies and then promoted relevant strategies since mid-1990s. Because of the considerable resources, sustainable development has grown in popularity gradually. Then, the paper points out that Taiwan, paradoxically, transplanted and translated mostly from international dialogue on environmental sustainability without being well aware that sustainable development is to tackle the crisis of international capitalism. Moreover, the ongoing penchant for environmental thinking hails the ideology of ＂only one Nature＂ and warns human beings of apocalyptic imagination of disasters. Next, the article reviews the theories of urban political ecology (UPE) that have derived from radical geography since late 1990s. UPE is suggested to be an efficient approach to pinpoint the nexus of environment, society, and economy; that is, urban nature is historically geographical, profoundly political, highly competitive, and culturally intertwined. Finally, we make future research suggestions on Taiwan's sustainable development and urban environment.

1. 王志弘、林純秀(2013)。都市自然的治理與轉化：新北市二重疏洪道。臺灣社會研究季刊，92，35-71。
   連結：
2. 杜文苓、李翰林(2008)。國際永續發展趨勢初探─以聯合國千禧年發展目標為例。臺灣國際研究季刊，4(2)，211-37。
   連結：
3. 紀駿傑(1998)。我們沒有共同的未來：西方主流環保關懷的政治經濟學。臺灣社會研究季刊，31，141-68。
   連結：
4. 湯京平、邱崇原(2010)。專業與民主：臺灣環境影響評估制度的運作與調適。公共行政學報，35，1-28。
   連結：
5. United Nations 1987. Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm (last accessed 11 August 2015).
6. Ozone Secretariat 1985. Vienna convention for the protection of the ozone layer. http://ozone.unep.org/en/ treaties-and-decisions/vienna-convention-protection-ozone-layer (last accessed 10 April 2015).
7. World Conservation Union 1973. Convention on international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora (CITES). https://www.cites.org/eng/disc/text.php (last accessed 5 April 2015).
8. United Nations. 2000. Millennium development goals. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (last accessed 15 April 2015).
9. 鄭光利、馬鴻文 [Cheng, G. L., and H. W. Ma] 2014。永續轉型[Yong xu zhuan xing]。臺大風險政策中心[Risk Society and Research Center, National Taiwan University]。http://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-TW/%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E8%BD%89%E5%9E%8B/148-sustainable-transformation ( 擷取日期：2015.02.16)。
10. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) 1992. Convention on biological diversity (CBD). https://www.cbd.int/convention/text/ (last accessed 12 April 2015).
11. United Nations. 1992. Rio declaration on environment and development.http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm (last accessed 2 May 2015).
12. UNSD (United Nations Sustainable Development) 1992. Agenda 21. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (last accessed 15 April 2015).
13. Amin, A.,Thrift, N.(2002).Cities: Reimagining the urban.Cambridge:Polity Press..
14. Angelo, H.,Wachsmuth, D.(2014).Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,39(1),16-27.
15. Bakker, K.(2004).An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
16. Bauman, Z.(1991).Modernity and ambivalence.Cambridge:Polity Press.
17. Braun, B.(2006).Environmental issues: Global natures in the space of assemblage.Progress in Human Geography,30(5),644-54.
18. Braun, B.(ed.),Castree, N.(ed.)(1998).Remaking reality: Nature at the millenium.London:Routledge.
19. Bury, J.(2005).Mining mountains: Neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods, and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca.Environment and Planning A,37,221-39.
20. Carreta, M.(ed.),Concillo, G.(ed.),Monno, V.(ed.)(2010).Strategic Spatial Planning. Urban and Landscape Perspectives.Berlin:Springer Verlag.
21. Carson, R.(1962).Silent spring.Boston:Houghton Mifflin.
22. Castree, N.(2008).Neo-liberalising nature: The logics of deregulation and reregulation.Environment and Planning A,40(1),131-52.
23. Castree, N.(2005).Nature: The adventures of a concept.London:Routledge.
24. Castree, N.(2014).Making sense of nature.London:Routledge.
25. Castree, N.(2008).Neo-liberalising nature: Processes, outcomes and effects.Environment and Planning A,40(1),153-73.
26. Castree, N.(1995).The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism..Antipode,27,12-48.
27. Castree, N.,Braun, B.(2001).Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics.Malden, Mass:Blackwell Publishers.
28. Desfor, G.,Keil, R.(2004).Nature and the city: Making environmental policy in Toronto and Los Angeles.Tucson:University of Arizona Press.
29. Ekers, M.,Loftus, A.(2012).Revitalizing the production of nature thesis: A Gramscian turn?.Progress in Human Geography,1-19.
30. Foster, J. B.(2000).Marx's ecology: Materialism and nature.New York:Monthly Riview Press.
31. Gandy, M.(2002).Concrete and clay: Reworking nature in New York City.Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press.
32. Haraway, D. J.(1991).Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature.London:Free Association Books.
33. Harvey, D.(1996).Justice, nature and the geography of difference.Oxford:Blackwell.
34. Harvey, D.(2003).Paris, capital of modernity.London:Routledge.
35. Harvey, D.(1985).The urbanisation of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanisation.Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press.
36. Heynen, H.(1999).Architecture and modernity: A critique.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
37. Heynen, N.(2014).Urban political ecology I: The urban century.Progress in Human Geography,38(4),598-604.
38. Heynen, N.(ed.),Kaika, M.(ed.),Swyngedouw, E.(ed.)(2006).In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism.London:Routledge.
39. Kaika, M.(2005).City of flows: Modernity, nature and the city.London:Routledge.
40. Kaika, M.,Swyngedouw, E.(1999).Fetishising the modern city: The phantasmagoria of urban technological networks..International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,24(1),120-38.
41. Keil, R.(2003).Urban political ecology.Urban Geography,24,723-38.
42. Krueger, R.(ed.),Gibbs, D.(ed.)(2007).The sustainable development paradox: Urban political economy in the United States and Europe.New York:Guilford.
43. Lawhon, M.,Ernstson, H.,Silver, J.(2013).Provincializing urban political ecology: Towards a situated UPE through African Urbanism.Antipode,46(2),497-516.
44. Lele, S.(1991).Sustainable development: A critical review.World Development,19(6),607-21.
45. Leyshon, A.(ed.),Lee, R.(ed.),McDowell, L.(ed.),Sunley, P.(ed.)(2011).The SAGE handbook of economic geography.London:SAGE.
46. Loftus, A.(2012).Everyday environmentalism: Creating an urban political ecology.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
47. Low, N.(ed.),Gleeson, B.(ed.),Elander, I.(ed.),Lidskog, R.(ed.)(2000).Consuming cities: The urban environment in the global economy after the Rio Declaration.London:Routledge.
48. Mansfield, B.(2004).Neoliberalism in the oceans: 'Rationalization', property rights and the commons question.Geoforum,35,313-26.
49. Marx, K.(1973).Grundrisse: Foundations of the critique of political economy.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
50. Marx, K.(1971).Capital.New York:Penguin.
51. Meadows, D. H.,Meadows, D. L.,Randers, J.,Behrens, W. W., III(1972).The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind.New York:Universe Books.
52. Meadows, D. H.,Randers, J.,Meadows, D. L.(2004).Limits to growth: The 30-year update.White River Junction, Vermont:Chelsea Green Publishing Co..
53. Mouffe, C.(2005).On the Political.London:Routledge.
54. O'Riordan, T.(1985).Future directions in environmental policy.Journal of Environment and Planning,17,1431-46.
55. Peet, R.(1977).Radical geography: Alternative viewpoints on contemporary social issues.Chicago:Maaroufa Press.
56. Rademacher, A.(2011).Reigning the river: Urban ecologies and political transformation in Kathmandu.Durham:Duke University Press.
57. Rancière, J.(2006).Hatred of democracy.London:Verso.
58. Redclift, M.(1987).Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions.New York:Methuen.
59. Robbins, P.,Sharp, J. T.(2003).Producing and consuming chemicals: The moral economy of the American lawn.Journal of Economic Geography,79(4),425-51.
60. Robertson, M.(2006).The nature that capital can see: Science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,24,367-87.
61. Robertson, M.(2004).The neoliberalization of ecosystem services.Geoforum,35,361-74.
62. Simon, J. L.(1981).The ultimate resource.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
63. Smith, N.(1984).Uneven development: Nature, capital and the production of space.Oxford:Blackwell.
64. Swyngedouw, E.(2010).Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change.Theory Culture and Society,27(2-3),213-32.
65. Swyngedouw, E.(1997).Power, nature and the city: The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880-1980.Environment and Planning A,29(2),311-32.
66. Swyngedouw, E.(2004).Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
67. Swyngedouw, E.(1996).The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanisation.Capitalism Nature Socialism,7(2),65-80.
68. UNFPA=United Nations Population Fund(2007).State of world population 2007: Unleashing the potential of urban growth.New York:UNFPA.
69. UN-Habitat(2006).State of the world's cities 2006/2007: 30 years of shaping the habitat agenda.London:Earthscan.
70. UN-Habitat(2011).State of the world's cities 2010/2011: Bridging the urban divide.London:Earthscan.
71. Žižek, S.(1999).The ticklish subject - The absent centre of political ontology.London:Verso.
72. 中央研究院經濟研究所(1993)。永續發展的意義討論會論文集，臺北=Taipei:
73. 王鑫(1999)。地球環境教育與永續發展教育。環境教育季刊，37，87-103。
74. 行政院國家永續發展委員會秘書處(1999)。89 年國家永續發展年報。
75. 行政院國家永續發展委員會秘書處(2002)。91 年國家永續發展年報。
76. 行政院國家永續發展委員會秘書處(2001)。90 年國家永續發展年報。
77. 行政院國家永續發展委員會秘書處(2004)。93 年國家永續發展年報。
78. 行政院國家永續發展委員會秘書處(1999)。88 年國家永續發展年報。
79. 李永展(2003)。永續發展：大地反撲的省思。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Chu liu。
80. 周桂田(2010)。邁向永續產業政策的里程碑。科技、醫療與社會期刊，11，9-12。
81. 周桂田、謝子蓉(2012)。從高耗能高污染產業的轉型看臺灣的永續發展與風險。生態臺灣，35，22-6。
82. 施信民(2006)。臺灣環保運動史料彙編1。臺北=Taipei:國史館=Guo shi guan=Academia Historica。
83. 紀駿傑(1999)。永續發展：一個皆大歡喜的發展？。應用倫理研究通訊，10，16-20。
84. 紀駿傑、蕭新煌(2003)。當前臺灣環境正義的社會基礎。國家政策季刊，2(3)，169-80。
85. 孫志鴻(1999)。永續發展研究。環境教育季刊，37，75-81。
86. 張隆盛、葉俊宏(1999)。永續發展的精髓－簡樸生活。環境教育季刊，37，2-11。
87. 盧誌銘(1999)。國際永續發展的評估與展望。環境教育季刊，37，12-7。
88. 蕭新煌編、紀駿傑編、黃世明編(2008)。深耕地方永續發展：臺灣九縣市總體檢。臺北=Taipei:巨流=Chu liu。
89. 蕭新煌、朱雲鵬、蔣本基、劉小如、紀駿傑、林俊全(2003)。永續臺灣2011。臺北=Taipei:天下文化=Tian xia wen hua。
90. 蕭新煌、蔣本基、紀駿傑、朱雲鵬、林俊全(2005)。綠色藍圖：邁向臺灣的地方永續發展。臺北=Taipei:天下文化=Tian xia wen hua。
91. 蕭新煌、蔣本基、劉小如、朱雲鵬(1993)。臺灣2000年。臺北=Taipei:天下文化=Tian xia wen hua。

1. 黃若慈、江欣樺、王志弘(2018)。水的延展都市化：坪林水源保護區的領域治理。都市與計劃，45(2)，131-160。
2. 邱啟新(2018)。陽光下之非正式性：綠能導向違建治理之發展願景與城市管理意義。地理學報，90，27-54。
3. 邱啟新(2020)。非正式城市之永續性修補：高雄市違章住宅轉型之空間與環境策略。都市與計劃，47(2)，111-147。
4. 周如怡(2022)。書評－How Green Became Good: Urbanized Nature and the Making of Cities and Citizens。地理學報，101，125-132。
5. (2024)。邁向多尺度跨域治理架構的長期社會生態研究：國際回顧與臺灣前瞻。臺灣土地研究，26(2)，103-146。