题名

科技研究中的地理轉向及其在地理學中的迴響

并列篇名

Geographical Turn in Science and Technology Studies and Its Resonances in Geography

DOI

10.6161/jgs.2016.83.02

作者

洪廣冀(Kuang-Chi HUNG)

关键词

地理轉向 ; 科技研究 ; 科學知識 ; 科學知識社會學 ; 行動者網絡理論 ; geographical turn ; science and technology studies ; scientific knowledge ; sociology of scientific knowledge ; actor-network theory

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

83期(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

23 - 69

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

科學哲學、科學社會學與科學史研究者一度堅稱科學知識必定是普世性的、是貫穿古今且放諸四海皆準的。然而,自1970 年代以來於科學史與科學知識社會學中蓬勃發展的「在地取向」挑戰這樣的說法,進而以一系列精巧的經驗研究證明科學知識不僅可為社會學與人類學分析的對象,更有其地理學。本文旨在介紹這波持續近半世紀、影響橫跨地理學、人類學、社會學與科學技術研究的「地理轉向」。首先,我將回顧1970 年代以降科學史與科學知識社會學的發展,說明科學知識之地方性如何成為研究者關心的重點。進而,我將討論同時期之地理學者如何回應這波來自學科外對科學之普世性與進步性的挑戰。第三部分將回顧主導此地理轉向的兩類理論取向:1. 由社會學者Steven Shapin 與地理學者David N.Livingstone 倡導之將「科學置於其地」;2. 挑戰社會與自然之二元論的行動者網絡理論。結論將總結此地理轉向係如何再形塑研究者對科學知識的定義,並簡述全球論者、後殖民主義者與後結構主義者對此轉向的批評。以此為基礎,我將提出數點值得臺灣地理學者深入探討的主題。

英文摘要

Researchers in philosophy of science, sociology of science, and history of science formerly believed that scientific knowledge must be universal, ahistorical and independent from any geographical context. The "localist" approach that has thrived in the history of science and science and technology studies (STS) challenges this view of science, thus producing a series of sophisticated studies to show that scientific knowledge not only belongs to a legitimate subject worthy of sociological and anthropological scrutiny, but also has its own geography. This article aims at introducing this "geographical turn" that has lasted for the past 40 years, and has become influential across geography, anthropology, sociology and STS. First, this study traces the development of the history of science and sociology of scientific knowledge from the 1970s onward, revealing how locality of scientific knowledge became an important research issue. The responses of geographers to the challenges posed by historians and sociologists regarding the universality and progressiveness of scientific knowledge are then discussed. The third part is devoted to reviewing two theoretical approaches that have led the geographical turn: 1. the approach advocated by the sociologist Steven Shapin and geographer David N. Livingstone, with an emphasis on "putting science in its place", and 2. the act-network theory (ANT) that challenges the nature/culture dualism. The conclusion summarizes the contributions of the geographical turn to reshape our understanding of scientific knowledge. The criticisms made by postcolonialists, poststructuralists, and globalists on this turn in the history of science and STS are then outlined, and applied to derive themes that merit further geographical inquiries.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. Lei, S. H-l.(2014).Neither donkey nor horse: Medicine in the struggle over China's modernity.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
    連結:
  2. 王文隆(2008)。臺灣中學地理教科書的祖國想像(1949-1999)。國史館學術集刊,17,201-51。
    連結:
  3. 王志弘(2015)。拼裝都市論與都市政治經濟學之辯。地理研究,62,109-22。
    連結:
  4. 林文源(2007)。論行動者網路理論的行動本體論。科技、醫療與社會,4,65-108。
    連結:
  5. 陳瑞麟(2014)。孔恩vs. STS 的興起:《科學革命的結構》五十年的驀然回首。科技、醫療與社會,18,29-98。
    連結:
  6. 楊弘任(2012)。行動中的川流發電:小水力綠能技術創新的行動者網絡分析。臺灣社會學,23,51-99。
    連結:
  7. 雷祥麟(2010)。「我們不曾現代過」的三個意義。科技、醫療與社會,10,221-36。
    連結:
  8. 戴麗娟(2008)。周口店發掘時代的一名法國顧問:以新近出版的德日進書信集為基礎材料的研究。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,79(1),95-161。
    連結:
  9. 鍾明光、蔡博文、盧道杰(2012)。利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統對社區發展轉向之影響:以美濃黃蝶翠谷為案例。地理學報,64,21-44。
    連結:
  10. Sarton, G. 1936. The study of the history of science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
  11. Agnew, J. A.(ed.),Livingstone, D. N.(ed.)(2011).The Sage handbook of geographical knowledge.London:Sage.
  12. Agnew, J. A.(ed.),Livingstone, D. N.(ed.)(2011).The Sage handbook of geographical knowledge.London:Sage.
  13. Amsterdamska, O.(1990).Surely you are joking, Monsieur Latour!.Science, Technology, and Human Values,15(4),495-504.
  14. Anderson, W.(2012).Asia as method in science and technology studies.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,6(4),445-51.
  15. Anderson, W.(2002).Introduction: Postcolonial technoscience.Social Studies of Science,35(5-6),643-58.
  16. Barnes, B.(1974).Scientific knowledge and sociological theory.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  17. Barnes, B.(1977).Interests and the growth of knowledge.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  18. Barnes, T. J.(2006).Geographical intelligence: American geographers and research and analysis in the Office of Strategic Service, 1941-1945.Journal of Historical Geography,32(1),149-68.
  19. Barnes, T. J.(2001)."In the beginning was economic geography": A science studies approach to disciplinary history.Progress in Human Geography,25(4),521-44.
  20. Barnes, T. J.(2004).The rise (and decline) of American regional science: Lessons for the new economic geography?.Journal of Economic Geography,4(2),107-29.
  21. Barnett, C.(1995).Awakening the dead: Who needs the history of geography?.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, NS,20(4),417-19.
  22. Basalla, G.(1967).The spread of Western science: A three-stage model describes the introduction of modern science into any non-European nation.Science,156(3775),611-22.
  23. Bassett, K.(1999).Is there progress in human geography? The problem of progress in the light of recent work in the philosophy and sociology of science.Progress in Human Geography,23(1),27-47.
  24. Blaut, J. M.(1993).The colonizer's model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history.New York:Guilford Press.
  25. Bloor, D.(1976).Knowledge and social imagery.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  26. Callon, M.,Law, J.(1982).On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment.Social Studies of Science,12(4),615-25.
  27. Carse, A.(2014).Beyond the big ditch: Politics, ecology, and infrastructure at the Panama Canal.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  28. Castree, N.(2002).False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks.Antipode,34(1),111-46.
  29. Chambers, D. W.,Gillespie, R.(2000).Locality in the history of science: Colonial science, technoscience, and indigenous knowledge.Osiris,2nd Series 15,221-40.
  30. Chen, R. L.(2012).A voyage to East Asian STS theories; or, what might make an STS theory East Asian.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,6(4),465-85.
  31. Collins, H. M.(1985).Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice.London Beverly Hills:Sage Publications.
  32. Collins, H. M.,Evans, R.(2007).Rethinking expertise.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  33. Collins, H. M.,Evans, R.(2002).The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience.Social Studies of Science,32(2),235-96.
  34. de Laet, M.,Mol, A.(2000).The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology.Social Studies of Science,30(2),225-63.
  35. Demeritt, D.(2002).What is the "social construction of nature"? A typology and sympathetic critique.Progress in Human Geography,26(6),767-90.
  36. Demeritt, D.(2001).The construction of global warming and the politics of science.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,91(2),307-37.
  37. Driver, F.(1994).New perspectives on the history and philosophy of geography.Progress in Human Geography,18(1),92-100.
  38. Durkheim, E.(1972).Selected writings, edited, translated, and with an introduction by Anthony Giddens.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Elshakry, M.(2010).When science became Western: Historiographical reflections.Isis,101(1),98-109.
  40. Epstein, S.(1996).Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  41. Fan, F-t.(2004).British naturalists in Qing China: Science, empire, and cultural encounter.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  42. Farías, I.(ed.),Bender, T.(ed.)(2010).Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies.Abingdon:Routledge.
  43. Finnegan, D. A.(2008).The spatial turn: Geographical approaches in the history of science.Journal of the History of Biology,41(1),369-88.
  44. Forsyth, I.(2013).The more-than-human geographies of field science.Geography Compass,7(8),527-39.
  45. Foucault, M.(1986).Of other spaces.Diacritics,16(1),22-7.
  46. Galison, P.(1997).Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  47. Galison, P.(2008).Ten problems in history and philosophy of science.Isis,99(1),111-24.
  48. Garrety, K.(1997).Social worlds, actor-networks and controversy: The case of cholesterol, dietary fat and heart disease.Social Studies of Science,27(5),727-73.
  49. Gertler, M. S.(2010).Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change.Regional Studies,44(1),1-15.
  50. Gieryn, T. F.(1983).Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.American Sociological Review,48(6),781-95.
  51. Gieryn, T. F.(2006).City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies.Social Studies of Science,36(1),5-38.
  52. Gieryn, T. F.(1999).Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  53. Gieryn, T. F.(2002).Three truth-spots.Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences,38(2),113-32.
  54. Goldman, M. J.(ed.),Nadasdy, P.(ed.),Turner, M. D.(ed.)(2011).Knowing nature: Conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  55. Gregory, D.(1995).A geographical unconscious: Spaces for dialogue and difference.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,85(1),175-86.
  56. Habib, I.,Raina, D.(1999).Situating the history of science: Dialogues with Joseph Needham.New Delhi:Oxford University Press.
  57. Hackett, E. J.(ed.),Amsterdamska, O.(ed.),Lynch, M. E.(ed.),Wajcman, J.(ed.)(2008).The handbook of science and technology studies.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  58. Hackett, E. J.(ed.),Amsterdamska, O.(ed.),Lynch, M.(ed.),Wajcman, J.(ed.)(2008).The Handbook of science and technology studies.Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press.
  59. Harding, S.(ed.)(2011).The postcolonial science and technology studies reader.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  60. Harris, S. J.(1998).Long-distance corporations, big sciences, and the geography of knowledge.Configurations,6(2),269-304.
  61. Hart, R.(1999).Beyond science and civilization: A post-Needham critique.East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine,16,88-114.
  62. Harvey, D.(1973).Social justice and the city.Baltimore:John Hopkins University Press.
  63. Heggie, V.(2014).Why isn't exploration a science?.Isis,105(2),318-34.
  64. Hu, D.(2005).China and Albert Einstein: The reception of the physicist and his theory in China, 1917-1979.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  65. Jasanoff, S.(ed.),Markle, G. E.(ed.),Petersen, J. C.(ed.),Pinch, T.(ed.)(1995).Handbook of science and technology studies.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications.
  66. Jasanoff, S.(ed.),Merkle, G.(ed.),Petersen, J.(ed.),Pinch, T.(ed.)(1995).Handbook of science and technology studies.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
  67. Knorr-Cetina, K.(1981).The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science.Oxford:Pergamon Press.
  68. Knorr-Cetina, K. D.(ed.),Mulkay, M.(ed.)(1983).Science Observed.London:Sage.
  69. Kohler, R. E.(2002).Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  70. Kohler, R. E.(1994).Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  71. Kohler, R. E.(2008).Lab history: Reflections.Isis,99(4),761-8.
  72. Kuhn, T. S.(1962).The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  73. Kuukkanen, J-M.(2012).Senses of localism.History of Science,50(4),477-500.
  74. Lash, S.(ed.),Szerszynski, B.(ed.),Wynne, B.(ed.)(1996).Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology.London:Sage.
  75. Latour, B.(1996).On actor-network theory: A few clarifications plus more than a few complications.Soziale Welt,47,369-81.
  76. Latour, B.(1993).We have never been modern.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  77. Latour, B.(2005).Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  78. Latour, B.(1987).Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  79. Latour, B.,Sheridan, A.(trans.),Law, J.(trans.)(1988).The pasteurization of France.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  80. Latour, B.,Woolgar, S.(1979).Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts.Beverly Hills:Sage.
  81. Law, J.(2004).And if the global were small and noncoherent? Method, complexity, and the baroque.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,22(1),13-26.
  82. Law, J.(2002).Objects and spaces.Theory, Culture and Society,19(5-6),91-105.
  83. Law, J.(ed.)(1986).Power, action, belief.London:Routledge and Kegan.
  84. Law, J.,Mol, A.(2001).Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,19(5),609 -621.
  85. Lee, R.(ed.),Castree, N.(ed.),Kitchin, R.(ed.),Lawson, V.(ed.),Paasi, A.(ed.),Philo, C.(ed.),Radcliffe, S.(ed.),Roberts, S. M.(ed.),Withers, C. W. J.(ed.)(2014).The Sage handbook of human geography: volume 1.Los Angeles:Sage.
  86. Lin, W-Y, Law, J.(2014).A correlative STS: Lessons from a Chinese medical practice.Social Studies of Science,44(6),801-24.
  87. Lin, W-Y, Law, J.(2015).We have never been latecomers!? Making knowledge spaces for East Asian technosocial practices.East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal,9(2),117-26.
  88. Livingstone, D. N.(1995).The Spaces of knowledge: Contributions towards a historical geography of science.Environment and Planning D,13(1),5-34.
  89. Livingstone, D. N.(2003).Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  90. Livingstone, D. N.(1992).The geographical tradition: Episodes in the history of a contested enterprise.Oxford:Blackwell Publishers.
  91. Livingstone, D. N.(2014).Dealing with Darwin: Place, politics, and rhetoric in religious engagements with evolution.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  92. Livingstone, D. N.(ed.),Withers, C. W. J.(ed.)(2005).Geography and revolution.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  93. Livingstone, D. N.,Withers, C. W. J.(2011).Geographies of nineteenth-century science.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  94. Lynch, M.(1985).Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  95. Lynch, M.(1993).Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  96. Lynch, M.(1991).Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of topical contextures.Science in Context,4(1),51-78.
  97. MacKenzie, D.(1978).Statistical theory and social interests: A case-study.Studies of Science,8(1),35-83.
  98. Mair, A.(1986).Thomas Kuhn and understanding geography.Progress in Human Geography,10(3),345-69.
  99. Martin, E.(1998).Anthropology and the cultural study of science.Science Technology Human Values,23(1),24-44.
  100. Massey, D.(1999).Space-time, "science" and the relationship between physical geography and human geography.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series,24(3),261-76.
  101. Mayhew, R. J.(2001).The effacement of early modern geography (c. 1600-1850): A historiographic essay.Progress in Human Geography,25(3),308-401.
  102. McEwan, C.(1998).Cutting power lines within the palace? Countering paternity and Eurocentrism in the "Geographical Tradition".Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,23(3),371-84.
  103. Merton, R. K.,Storer, N. W.(ed.)(1973).The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  104. Mol, A.,Law, J.(1994).Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology.Social Studies of Science,24(4),641-71.
  105. Müller, M.(2015).A half-hearted romance? A diagnosis and agenda for the relationship between economic geography and actor-network theory (ANT).Progress in Human Geography,39(1),65-86.
  106. Müller, M.,Schurr, C.(2016).Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,41(3),217-29.
  107. Murdoch, J.(1997).Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations.Progress in Human Geography,21(3),321-37.
  108. Murdoch, J.(1998).The spaces of actor-network theory.Geoforum,29(4),357-74.
  109. Murdoch, J.,Marsden, T.,Banks, J.(2000).Quality, nature, and embeddedness: Some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector.Economic Geography,76(2),107-25.
  110. Naylor, S.(2005).Introduction: Historical geographies of science: places, contexts, cartographies.British Journal for the History of Science,38(1),1-12.
  111. Naylor, S.(2005).Historical geography: Knowledge, in place and on the move.Progress in Human Geography,29(5),626-34.
  112. Needham, J.(1967).The roles of Europe and China in the revolution of oecumenical science.Journal of Asian History,1(1),3-32.
  113. Needham, J.(1969).The grand titration: Science and society in East and West.London:George Allen and Unwin.
  114. Numbers, R. L.,Stenhouse, J.(1999).Disseminating Darwinism: The role of place, race, religion, and gender.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  115. Ophir, A.,Shapin, S.(1991).The place of knowledge: A methodological survey.Science in Context,4(1),3-22.
  116. Peet, R.(1985).The social origins of environmental determinism.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,75(3),309-33.
  117. Pickering, A.(ed.)(1992).Science as practice and culture.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  118. Pickstone, J. V.(2001).Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology, and medicine.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  119. Powell, R. C.(2007).Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures.Progress in Human Geography,31(3),309-29.
  120. Raj, K.(2013).Beyond postcolonialism and postpositivism: Circulation and the global history of science.Isis,104(2),337-47.
  121. Roberts, L.(2009).Situating science in global history: Local exchanges and networks of circulation.Itinerario,33(1),9-30.
  122. Rupke, N. A.(ed.)(2002).Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences.Göttingen:Wallstein Verlag.
  123. Said, E. W.(1978).Orientalism.New York:Pantheon Books.
  124. Schaffer, S.(1991).The eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour.Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A,22(1),174-92.
  125. Secord, A.(1994).Science in the pub: Artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire.History of Science,32(3),269-315.
  126. Secord, J. A.(2014).Visions of science: Books and readers at the dawn of the Victorian Age.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  127. Secord, J. A.(2000).Victorian sensation: The extraordinary publication, reception and secret authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  128. Secord, J. A.(2004).Knowledge in transit.Isis,95(4),654-72.
  129. Shapin, S.(1982).History of science and its sociological reconstructions.History of Science,20(3),157-211.
  130. Shapin, S.(2010).Never pure: Historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  131. Shapin, S.(1995).Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge.Annual Review of Sociology,21,289-321.
  132. Shapin, S.(1998).Placing the view from nowhere: Historical and sociological problems in the location of science.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,23(1),5-12.
  133. Shapin, S.(1988).The house of experiment in seventeenth-century England.Isis,79(3),373-404.
  134. Shapin, S.(1975).Phrenological knowledge and the social structure of early nineteenth-century Edinburgh.Annals of Science,32(3),219-43.
  135. Shapin, S.(1994).Civility and science in seventeenth-century England.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  136. Shapin, S.,Schaffer, S.(2011).Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  137. Shapin, S.,Schaffer, S.(1985).Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  138. Shapin, S.、Schaffer, S.、蔡佩君譯(2006)。利維坦與空氣泵浦:霍布斯、波以耳與實驗生活。臺北=Taipei:行人=Xing ren。
  139. Shen, G. Y.(2013).Unearthing the nation: Modern geology and nationalism in Republican China.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  140. Sivin, N.(1982).Why the Scientific Revolution did not take place in China-or didn't it?.Chinese Science,5,45-66.
  141. Smith, C.(ed.),Agar, J.(ed.)(1998).Making space for science: territorial themes in the shaping of knowledge.Basingstoke:Macmillan.
  142. Smith, N. R.(1990).Geography redux? The history and theory of geography.Progress in Human Geography,14(4),547-59.
  143. Smith, N. R.(1987).Academic war over the field of geography: The elimination of geography at Harvard, 1947-1951.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,77(2),155-72.
  144. Smith, N. R.(1984).Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space.New York:B. Blackwell.
  145. Snow, C. P.(1959).Two cultures and the scientific revolution.New York:Cambridge University Press.
  146. Star, S. L.,Griesemer, J. R.(1989).Institutional ecology, "translation", and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.Social Studies of Science,19(3),387-420.
  147. Stoddart, D, R.(1986).On geography and its history.Oxford:B. Blackwell.
  148. Stoddart, D, R.(ed.)(1981).Geography, ideology and social concern.Oxford:B. Blackwell.
  149. Strasser, B. J.(2011).The experimenter's museum: GenBank, natural history, and the moral economies of biomedicine.Isis,102(1),60-96.
  150. Traweek, S.(1988).Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists.Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press.
  151. Whatmore, S.(2002).Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces.London:Sage.
  152. Withers, C. W. J.(2009).Place and the "spatial turn" in geography and in history.Journal of the History of Ideas,70(4),637-58.
  153. Wynne, B.(1989).Sheep farming after Chernobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information.Environmental Magazine,31(2),3-9.
  154. 李尚仁(2012)。帝國的醫師:萬巴德與英國熱帶醫學的創建。臺北=Taipei:允晨=Yun chen。
  155. 李承嘉(2005)。行動者網絡理論應用於鄉村發展之研究:以九份聚落1895-1945 年發展為例。地理學報,39,1-30。
  156. 沙培德編、張哲嘉編(2013)。中央研究院第四屆國際漢學會議論文集:近代中國新知識的建構,臺北=Taipei:
  157. 林文源(2014)。看不見的行動能力:從行動者網絡到位移理論。臺北=Taipei:中央研究院社會學研究所=Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica。
  158. 施添福(1984)。地理學研究在臺灣地區的發展與變遷。地理研究,10(2),17-48。
  159. 郭雙林(2000)。西潮激盪下的晚清地理學。北京=Beijing:北京大學出版社=Bei jing da xue chu ban she。
  160. 陳瑞麟(2010)。科學哲學:理論與歷史。臺北=Taipei:群學=Qun xue。
  161. 傅大為(2009)。回答科學是什麼的三個答案:STS、性別與科學哲學。臺北=Taipei:群學=Qun xue。
  162. 黃之棟編、黃瑞祺編、李正風編(2012)。科技與社會:社會建構論、科學社會學和知識社會學的視角。臺北=Taipei:群學=Qun xue。
  163. 楊弘任(2014)。社區如何動起來?黑珍珠之鄉的派系、在地師傅與社區總體營造。臺北=Taipei:群學=Qun xue。
  164. 韓子奇(2008)。進入世界的挫折與自由:二十世紀初的《地學雜誌》。新史學,19(2),151-79。
被引用次数
  1. 何俊頤(2019)。田野科學與其基礎建設以臺灣地下水觀測網為例。地理學報,93,1-34。
  2. 洪廣冀(2018)。拼裝的科學革命─以美國第一回達爾文爭議為中心。臺大歷史學報,61,159-235。
  3. 洪廣冀(2021)。畢士博、李濟與「中國人自己領導的第一次田野考古工作」。中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊,92(4),779-846。
  4. 洪廣冀、何俊頤(2018)。自然資源治理與原住民部落發展:後發展與後人類的視角。考古人類學刊,89,93-141。
  5. (2018)。從「臺灣之恥」到「發展最速的產業」:再思日治時期臺灣的科學林業與工業化。臺灣史研究,25(3),83-140。