地景敘事的詮釋與建構：臺北社子島文化地景的實驗性敘事操作

Interpretations and Constructions of Landscape Narratives: The Experimental Narrative Operation for the Cultural Landscapes of Taipei's Shezi Island

10.6161/jgs.2017.86.04

康旻杰(Min Jay Kang)

地景敘事 ； 文化地景 ； 社子島 ； 根與路徑 ； landscape narrative ； cultural landscape ； Shezi Island ； root and route

地理學報

86期（2017 / 09 / 01）

49 - 69

繁體中文

本研究以地景敘事的理論及方法，運用民族誌的田野研調和故事採集，實驗性建構一則臺北社子島的地景文本。不同於一般地方文史的線性書寫，地景敘事體的敘事策略和開放結局刻意融入常被歷史忽略的微敘事及生活情節，甚至從文化政治的觀點關照被地方權力關係及總體規劃排除的他者。社子島的地景敘事以卷軸的方式開展，探索開發當道的主流論述下居民的社會處境及現存聚落的空間現實，並由根與路徑的辯證，引發地景敘事建構作為行動研究、甚或地景規劃設計模式的可能。

This research is grounded on the theory and methodology of landscape narrative, and employs ethnographical fieldworks and story collection to experimentally construct a landscape text of Taipei's Shezi Island. Dissimilar to the linear writing of general chorographic history, the narrative strategy and open-end nature of landscape narratives intentionally incorporate pico-narratives and plots of everyday life that are often overlooked by the grand narrative of history, and pay special attentions to the excluded others of local power relations and master planning from the perspectives of cultural politics. The landscape narrative of Shezi Island unfolds through a long scroll to explore the social conditions of the local residents and the spatial realities of extant settlements, and, via the dialectics of roots vs. routes, bolsters the possibilities of constructing landscape narratives as a mode of action research or of landscape planning and design.

1. 許家維 [Hsu C.W.] 2008。和平島故事 [He ping dao gu shi]。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu6DiqgKpFk (擷取日期：2017.01.31)。
2. 廖桂賢[Liao, G. X.] 2016。為什麼社子島開發計劃引發質疑？[Wei she me she zi dao kai fa ji hua yin fa zhi yi?]。聯合報鳴人堂[Lian he bao ming ren tang]。https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/8048/1920658 (擷取日期：2017.04.24)。
3. Nolan, C. dir. 2014. Interstellar. Film. Warner Bros. Pictures.
4. 吳思萍、莊琇閔 [Wu, S.P., and X.M. Zhuang] 2016。生態社子島勝出後續問題待溝通 [Sheng tai Shezi dao sheng chu hou xu wen ti dai gou tong]。聯合報[Lian he bao; United Daily News] 2016.03.01。https://udn.com/news/story/7323/1532524 (擷取日期：2017.01.31)。
5. 許家維 [Hsu, C. W.] 2009。花東新村 [hua dong xin cun]。https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6bqeHqEAr8 (擷取日期：2017.01.31)。
6. Benveniste, E.,Meek, M. E.(trans.)(1971).Problems in general linguistics.Coral Gables, FL:University of Miami Press.
7. Bird, J.(ed.),Curtis, B.(ed.),Putnam, T.(ed.),Robertson, G.(ed.),Tickner, L.(ed.)(1993).Mapping the futures: local cultures, global change.London:Routledge.
8. Boal, A.(1993).Theater of the oppressed.New York:Theatre Communications Group.
9. Chatman, S. B.(1978).Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
10. Clifford, J.(1997).Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
11. Cosgrove, D.,Daniels, S.(1988).The iconography of landscape: Essays on the symbolic representation, design and use of past environments.Cambridge:University Press.
12. Dibell, A.(1999).Plot, Elements of Fiction Writing Series.Cincinnati OH:Writer's Digest Books.
13. Foster, D. R.(1999).Thoreau's country: Journey through a transformed landscape.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
14. Freire, P.(2014).Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed.London:Bloomsbury.
15. Freire, P.(2007).Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York:Continuum.
16. Gaffikin, F.,Morrissey, M.(2011).Planning in divided cities.Chichester, UK:Blackwell Publishing.
17. Groden, M.(ed.),Kreiswirth, M.(ed.),Szeman, I.(ed.)(2005).The Johns Hopkins guide to literary theory and criticism.Baltimore MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Gruenewald, D. A.(2003).The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place.Educational Researcher,32(4),3-12.
19. Hayden, D.(1996).The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
20. Hou, J.(ed.)(2010).Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities.London:Routledge.
21. Jackson, P.(1989).Maps of meaning: An introduction to cultural geography.London:Unwin Hyman.
22. Least Heat-Moon, W.(1982).Blue highways: A journey into America.New York:Fawcett Crest.
23. Lyotard, J.(1984).The postmodern condition.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
24. McQuillan, M.(2000).The narrative reader.New York:Routledge.
25. Meinig, D.W.(ed.)(1979).The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: Geographical essays.New York:Oxford University Press.
26. Mitchell, D.(1996).The lie of the land: Migrant workers and the California landscape.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
27. Odum, E. P.(1997).Ecology: A bridge between science and sociology.Sunderland, MA:Sinauer Associates Inc..
28. Peet, R.(ed.),Thrift, N.(ed.)(1989).New models in geography: The political-economy perspective.London:Unwin Hyman.
29. Potteiger, M.,Puriton, J.(1998).Landscape narratives: Design practices for telling stories.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
30. Stein, M. S.,Harper, T. L.(2012).Creativity and innovation: Divergence and convergence in pragmatic dialogical planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research,32(1),5-17.
31. Turner, V. W.(1969).The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure.Chicago:Aldine Pub.
32. Virilio, P.(2000).A landscape of events.Boston, Mass:The MIT Press.
33. Virilio, P.(ed.)(2000).A landscape of events.Boston, Mass:The MIT Press.
34. Wilson, C.(ed.),Groth, P.(ed.)(2003).Everyday America: Cultural landscape studies after J. B. Jackson.Berkeley:University of California Press.
35. Wylie, J.(2007).Landscape.New York:Routledge.
36. Yamin, R.(ed.),Metheny, K. B.(ed.)(1996).Landscape archaeology: Reading and interpreting the American historical landscape.Knoxville:The University of Tennessee Press.
37. 朱天心(1999)。古都。台北=Taipei:麥田=Mai tien。
38. 連建興(2001)。連建興2001。台北=Taipei:誠品畫廊=Cheng pin hua lang。
39. 連建興(1998)。連建興1998。台北=Taipei:誠品畫廊=Cheng pin hua lang。
40. 楊牧(1996)。亭午之鷹。台北=Taipei:洪範=Hong fan。
41. 葉俊谷(2005)。台北=Taipei，國立政治大學中國文學研究所=Guo li zheng zhih da xue zhong guo wen xue yan jiu suo。
42. 舞鶴(1997)。思索阿邦、卡露思。台北=Taipei:元尊文化=Yuan zun wen hua。

1. 陳夢琨(2020)。臺北市社子島開發案探討：複雜性理論作用者的觀點。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，58(2)，105-166。
2. 陳夢琨(2021)。複雜適應系統之作用者互動分析：以臺北市社子島開發案為探討。中國行政評論，27(4)，56-85。
3. 官大偉(2020)。在地視角下的文化地景保存：以菲律賓伊富高梯田為例。地理學報，95，61-93。
4. 洪鵬程(2020)。走讀「臺中文學館」－文學博物館的後殖民敘事。臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類，34(2)，1-12。
5. 鍾依倫,周融駿(2020)。走過時間的洪流－建構埔頂支渠流域日常生活地景敘事。戶外遊憩研究，33(3)，85-125。