题名

地理學中的量體轉向：領土立體化、地球物理政治與環境中的情感氛圍

并列篇名

Volumetric Turn in Human Geography: Three-Dimensional Territory, Geophysical Politics and Affective Atmosphere

DOI

10.6161/jgs.201904_(92).0001

作者

廖昱凱(Yu-Kai Liao)；簡旭伸(Shiuh-Shen Chien)

关键词

量體 ； 領土 ； 地球物理政治 ； 天∕空∕氣安全 ； 情感 ； Volume ； territory ； geophysical politics ； atmospheric security ； affect

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

92期（2019 / 04 / 01）

页次

1 - 29

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文旨在引介近幾年英文文獻關於量體地理學的觀點與概念，並且指出當代地緣政治與環境議題，必須要從平面思考轉向量體思考，才能夠掌握量體特徵與其政治權力。首先，本研究將說明量體轉向的由來：量體的定義、地緣政治立體化所引發的安全治理、地緣政治與地球物理政治關聯，以及量體中的情感與身體經驗，說明量體研究的重點在於揭示量體的政治與權力運作。其次，透過天／空／氣作為安全治理，說明地緣政治與安全治理已經延伸到大氣當中，大氣自身已經成為反恐監控的對象，並具有階級差異。第三，本文分析指出地緣政治與地球物理政治兩者是會相互影響，指出量體中的物質性如何鬆動僵固的靜態領土想像，其中包含地質資源探勘、潮濕本體論與大氣具象化三個部分。第四，聚焦在量體中的情感與身體經驗，探討身體在藝術－技術物－環境三者關係，指出當人們身處與浸淫於量體空間中，將會感受到量體的質地與氛圍，進而形成情感。最後，本文將提出未來在量體研究上值得深入探討的議題。
英文摘要

This review article on Volume Geography argues that contemporary geopolitical and environmental issues should be retheorized by volumetric thinking. This review is divided into four main sections. The first section introduces the key concepts in volume studies literature, namely the definition of volume, three-dimensional geopolitics and security governance, relationship between geophysical politics and geopolitics, and affect and body within a volume. The second section elaborates the roles of air, aerospace, atmosphere and weather in security governance. The third section discusses the challenges posed by geophysical processes to related practices of resource ownership, territorial boundary, and soverignty power. The fourth section explains how affect and body experience within the volume are formed, re-presented and transformed via arts and technologies and through environments. The conclusion notes certain theoretical and empirical implications.
主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. Adey, P.(2010).Aerial life: Spaces, mobilities, affects.Chichester, United Kingdom:John Wiley and Sons Ltd..
  2. Adey, P.(2013).Securing the volume/volumen: Comments on Stuart Elden's Plenary paper ‘Secure the volume'.Political Geography,34,52-54.
  3. Adey, P.(2014).Security atmospheres or the crystallisation of worlds.Environment and Planning D,32,834-851.
  4. Adey, P.,Anderson, B.(2011).Anticipation, materiality, event: The Icelandic ash cloud disruption and the security of mobility.Mobilities,6(1),11-20.
  5. Adey, P.,Whitehead, M.,Williams, A. J.(2013).From above: War, violence and verticality.London, United Kingdom:C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd..
  6. Anderson, B.(2009).Affective atmospheres.Emotion, Space and Society,2,77-81.
  7. Anderson, B.(2006).Becoming and being hopeful: Towards a theory of affect.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,24,733-752.
  8. Anderson, B.(2018).Cultural geography II: The force of representations.Progress in Human Geograph
  9. Arènes, A.,Latour, B.,Gaillardet, J.(2018).Giving depth to the surface: An exercise in the Gaia-graphy of critical zones.The Anthropocene Review,5(2),120-135.
  10. Barry, A.(2015).Thermodynamics, matter, politics.Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory,16(1),110-125.
  11. Barry, A.(2013).Material politics: Disputes along the pipeline.New York, United States:John Wiley & Sons Inc..
  12. Bear, C.(2014).Governance of the seas: A more-than-human perspective on the Cardigan Bay scallop fishery.Water worlds: Human geographies of the ocean
  13. Billé, F. 2017. Introduction: Speaking volumes. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1241-introduction- speakingvolumes (last accessed 24 October 2017).
  14. Boumans, M.(ed.)(2015).Science outside the laboratory: Measurement in field science and economics.Oxford, United Kingdom:Oxford University Press.
  15. Braun, B.(2000).Producing vertical territory: Geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada.Ecumene,7(1),7-46.
  16. Bridge, G.(2013).Territory, now in 3D!.Political Geography,34,55-57.
  17. Chien, S. S.,Hong, D. L.,Lin, P. H.(2017).Ideological and volume politics behind cloud water resource governance –Weather modification in China.Geoforum,85,225-233.
  18. Clark, N.(2016).Politics of strata.Theory, Culture & Society,34(2-3),211-231.
  19. Clark, N.(2013).Geopolitics as threshold.Political Geography,37,48-50.
  20. Clark, N.(2010).Inhuman nature: Sociable life on a dynamic planet.Thousand Oaks, United States:SAGE Publications Inc..
  21. Dalby, S.(2013).The geopolitics of climate change.Political Geography,37,38-47.
  22. Dalby, S.(2017).Anthropocene formations: Environmental security, geopolitics and disaster.Theory, Culture & Society,34(2-3),233-252.
  23. Dalby, S.(2015).Geoengineering: The next era of geopolitics?.Geography Compass,9(4),190-201.
  24. de Larrinaga, M.(2016).(Non)-lethality and war: Tear gas as a weapon of governmental intervention.Critical Studies on Terrorism,9(3),522-540.
  25. Deleuze, G.(1988).Spinoza: Practical philosophy.Monroe, OR, United States:City Lights Books.
  26. Ekins, P.(ed.)Bradshaw, M.(ed.),Watson, J.(ed.)(2015).Global energy: Issues, potentials, and policy implications.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  27. Elden, S.(2017).Legal terrain-The political materiality of territory.London Review of International Law,5(2),199-224.
  28. Elden, S.(2013).Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power.Political Geography,34,35-51.
  29. Enghelmann, S.(2015).Toward a poetics of air: Sequencing and surfacing breath.Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers,40(3),430-444.
  30. Fairbanks, L.(2016).Moving mussels offshore? Perceptions of offshore aquaculture policy and expansion in New England.Ocean & Coastal Management,130,1-12.
  31. Gabrys, J.(ed.),Hawkins, G.(ed.),Michael, M.(ed.)(2013).Accumulation: The material politics of plastic.London, United Kingdom:Routledge.
  32. Gandy, M.(2014).The fabric of space: Water, modernity, and the urban imagination.Cambridge, Mass., United States:MIT Press Ltd..
  33. Garrett, B.(2016).Picturing urban subterranea: Embodied aesthetics of London's sewers.Environment and Planning A,48(10),1948-1966.
  34. Garrett, B.,Anderson, K.(2018).Drone methodologies: Taking flight in human and physical Geography.Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers,43(3),341-359.
  35. Graham, S.(2015).Life support: The political ecology of urban air.City,19(2-3),192-215.
  36. Graham, S.(2004).Vertical geopolitics: Baghdad and after.Antipode,36(1),12-23.
  37. Graham, S.(2016).Vertical: The city from satellites to bunkers.London:Verso Books United Kingdom.
  38. Graham, S.(2011).Cities under siege: The new military urbanism.London, United Kingdom:Verso Books.
  39. Graham, S.,Hewitt, L.(2012).Getting off the ground: On the politics of urban verticality.Progress in Human Geography,37(1),72-92.
  40. Gregory, D.(2016).The natures of war.Antipode,48(1),3-56.
  41. Grundy-War, C.,Sithirith, M.,Li, Y. M.(2015).Volumes, fluidity and flows: Rethinking the ‘nature’ of political geography.Political Geography,45,93-95.
  42. Harris, A.(2015).Vertical urbanisms: Opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city.Progress in Human Geography,39(5),601-620.
  43. Harvey, C. B. Jensen(2017).Manifesto for a chemical geography.UCL 24th
  44. Harvey, P.(ed.),Jensen, C. B.(ed.),Morita, A.(ed.)(2016).Infrastructures and social complexity: A companion.London, United Kingdom:Routledge.
  45. Hewitt, L.,Graham, S.(2014).Vertical cities: Representations of urban verticality in 20th-century science fiction literature.Urban Studies,52(5),923-937.
  46. Ingold, T.(2007).Earth, sky, wind, and weather.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,13(1),19-38.
  47. Kama, K.(2016).Contending geo-logics: Energy security, resource ontologies, and the politics of expert knowledge in Estonia.Geopolitics,21(4),831-856.
  48. Kaplan, C.(ed.)(2018).Aerial aftermaths wartime from above.North Carolina, United States:Duke University Press.
  49. Klinke, I.(2018).Cryptic concrete: A subterranean journey into Cold War Germany.New York, United States:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  50. Latour, B.(2014).Some advantages of the notion of "Critical Zone" for geopolitics.Procedia Earth and Planetary Science,10,3-6.
  51. Latour, B.(2017).Why Gaia is not a God of Totality.Theory, Culture & Society,34(2-3),61-81.
  52. Lehman, J. S.(2013).Volume beyond volumetrics: A response to Simon Dalby's ‘The Geopolitics of Climate Change’.Political Geography,37,51-52.
  53. Martin, C.(2011).Fog-bound: Aerial space and the elemental entanglements of body-with-world.Environment and Planning D,29(3),454-468.
  54. Massumi, B.(2002).Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect and sensation.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
  55. McCormack, D.(2014).Refrains for moving bodies: Experience and experiment in affective spaces.North Carolina, United States:Duke University Press.
  56. McCormack, D.(2018).Atmospheric things: On the allure of elemental envelopment.North Carolina, United States:Duke University Press.
  57. McCormack, D.(2008).Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition.Cultural Geographies,15,413-430.
  58. McNeil, D.(2017).Towards a volumetric urbanism: Governing underground & vertical space.Paper presented at Council on Tall Building and Urban Habitat International Conference,Sydney, Australia:
  59. Nethercote, M.(2018).Theorising vertical urbanization.City,22(5-6),657-684.
  60. Nieuwenhuis, M.(2016).Breathing materiality: Aerial violence at a time of atmospheric politics.Critical Studies on Terrorism,9(3),499-521.
  61. Ong, A. 2017. "Buoy." Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, October 24, 2017. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/1233-buoy (last accessed 10 September 2018).
  62. Pérez, M. A.(2014).Exploring the vertical: Science and sociality in the field among cavers in Venezuela.Social & Cultural Geography,16(2),226-247.
  63. Pérez, M. A.(2016).Yearnings for Guácharo Cave: Affect, absence, and science in Venezuelan speleology.Cultural Geographies,23(4),693-714.
  64. Peters, K.(2018).Broadcasting borders: Controlling the air.London:Palgrave Macmillan.
  65. Peters, K.,Turner, J.(2018).Unlock the volume: Towards a politics of capacity.Antipode,50(4),1037-1056.
  66. Rajan, K. S.(ed.)(2012).Lively capital: Biotechnologies, ethics, and governance in global markets.North Carolina, United States:Duke University Press.
  67. Satizábal, P.,Batterbury, S. P. J.(2017).Fluid geographies: Marine territorialisation and the scaling up of local aquatic epistemologies on the Pacific coast of Colombia.Transactions of The Institute of British Geograp
  68. Shaw, I. G. R.(2017).The Great War of Enclosure: Securing the skies.Antipode,49(4),883-906.
  69. Shaw, I. G. R.(2016).Predator empire: Drone warfare and full spectrum dominance.Minnesota, United States:University of Minnesota Press.
  70. Sherman, D. J.(ed.),Castree, N.(ed.),Rogers, A.(ed.)(2005).Questioning geography: Fundamental debates.Oxford, United Kingdom:John Wiley and Sons Ltd..
  71. Sloterdijk, P.(2009).Terror from the air.New York, United States:AUTONOMEDIA.
  72. Squire, R.(2015)."Do you dive?": Methodological considerations for engaging with "volume".Geography Compass,11(7),e12319.
  73. Squire, R.(2015).Rock, water, air and fire: Foregrounding the elements in the Gibraltar-Spain dispute.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,34(3),545-563.
  74. Squire, R.(2016).Immersive terrain: the US Navy, Sealab and cold war undersea geopolitics.Area,48(3),332-338.
  75. Steinberg, P.(2008).It's so easy being green: Overuse, underexposure, and the marine environmentalist consensus.Geography Compass,2(6),2080-2096.
  76. Steinberg, P. E.(ed.),Peters, K.(ed.),Stratford, E.(ed.)(2018).Territory beyond Terra.London, United Kingdom:Rowman & Littlefieldg International.
  77. Steinberg, P.,Kristoffersen, B.(2017).‘The ice edge is lost…nature moved it’: Mapping ice as state practice in the Canadian and Norwegian North.Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers,42(4),625-641.
  78. Steinberg, P.,Peters, K.(2015).Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,33,247-264.
  79. Tawil-Souri, H. 2017. "Spectrum." Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology website, October 24, 2017. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/spectrum (last accessed 10 September 2018).
  80. Thornes, J.(2008).Cultural climatology and the representation of sky, atmosphere, weather and climate in selected art works of Constable, Monet and Eliasson.Geoforum,39(2),570-580.
  81. Turan, N.(ed.)(2009).New geographies.Cambridge, United States:Harvard Graduate School of Design.
  82. Usher, M.(2018).Desali-nation: Techno-diplomacy and hydraulic state restructuring through reverse osmosis membranes in Singapore.Transactions of the Institute of British Geograph
  83. Virilio, P.,Degner, M.(trans.)(2002).Desert screen: War at the speed of light.London:Continuum.
  84. Weizman, E.(2007).Hollow land: Israel's architecture of occupation London.London. United Kingdom:Verso Books.
  85. Weizman, E. 2002. The politics of verticality. https://www.opendemocracy.net/ecology-politicsverticality/article_801.jsp (last accessed 07 December 2017).
  86. Whitehead, M.(ed.)(2009).State, science and the skies: Governmentalities of the British atmosphere.Chicester, United Kingdom:John Wiley.
  87. Zurita, M. L. M.,Munro, P. G.,Houston, D.(2018).Un-earthing the subterranean anthropocene.Area,50(3),298-305.
  88. 王文誠, W. C.(2016)。Zai nan jheng jhih: 2014 nian gao syong shih hua chi bao hou de chih du jheng jhih yu bu jyun di li fa jhan=Disaster politics: Politics of scale and uneven geographical development after the 2014 Kaohsiung Petrochemical Explosion。政治學報，61，87-113。
  89. 周桂田, K. T.,杜文苓, W. L.(2016).臺灣空氣污染之風險治理與制度研究.臺北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學公共政策與法律研究中心=Center for Public Policy and Law, NTU.
  90. 周桂田, K. T.,杜文苓, W. L.(2017)。,臺北市=Taipei:國立臺灣大學公共政策與法律研究中心=Center for Public Policy and Law, NTU。
  91. 劉承宗, C. C.(2015)。中共南海建島的戰略意圖與挑戰。藝見學刊，10，74-84。
被引用次数
  1. 莊曉萍,王志弘(2022)。草莽進城，藝術下鄉：舞台車的跨域變身與場面塑造。地理研究，76，65-96。
  2. (2021)。量體流動與風的時空政治－以大林蒲的空氣污染為例。臺灣人類學刊，19(2)，147-188。
print cancel