题名

石化產業污染風險知覺與風險溝通:不同開發階段石化園區之比較

并列篇名

Pollution Risk Perception and Risk Communication in Petrochemical Industry: A Comparison of the Petrochemical Parks at Different Development Stages

DOI

10.6161/jgs.202004_(95).0002

作者

洪鴻智(Hung-Chih Hung);李佳芳(Chia-Fang Li)

关键词

風險知覺 ; 風險溝通 ; 石化產業 ; 地域性 ; 社會資本 ; risk perception ; risk communication ; petrochemical industry ; locality ; social capital

期刊名称

地理學報

卷期/出版年月

95期(2020 / 04 / 01)

页次

37 - 59

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

石化產業在臺灣經濟一直扮演重要角色,然近年常成為環保抗爭重要標的。許多研究關注此議題,特別是從地域、地方連結特性與風險溝通角度,瞭解其對居民石化產業污染風險態度的影響。本文主要目的,乃透過雲林六輕與彰化國光石化兩個不同開發階段石化園區之比較,探討不同地域特性、資訊提供與風險溝通策略,對於居民風險知覺之影響。本文整合焦點團體法、地理資訊系統、多變量與空間統計分析,分析居民風險知覺特性。研究結果發現居民風險知覺分布並非隨機,而具有空間聚集特性與地域性。不同開發階段石化園區的居民風險知覺分布與影響因素具有明顯差異,特別是資訊接收與瞭解、社會信任與參與風險溝通程度,乃影響規劃設廠中石化園區周邊居民風險知覺之關鍵因素。

英文摘要

The petrochemical industry plays a role in the national economy of Taiwan. However, the siting and operation of petrochemical plants often face widespread public opposition, owing to their potential environmental health risks. Numerous studies focus on this issue by improving the understanding of the effects of local characteristics and risk communication on residents' petrochemical industrial risk perception. This article compares the influence of local characteristics, information accessibility and risk communication strategies on risk perception of two petrochemical industrial parks in different development stages. Residents' risk perceptions were characterized by incorporating focus group meetings with geographical information systems, multivariate and spatial statistic analysis. Analytical results show that the spatial patterns of residents' perceived risk across the study areas are not dispersed randomly, but instead are spatially correlated in specific regions. Residents' risk perceptions have a significantly different distribution from their influencing factors in the two petrochemical industrial parks. In particular, information accessibility and understanding, social trust and participation of risk communication are the key factors affecting the risk perception of residents surrounding the petrochemical industrial parks during the planning stage.

主题分类 人文學 > 地理及區域研究
参考文献
  1. 李明穎, M. Y.(2014)。科學民主化下科技議題的風險治理:探討國光石化廠開發案的科技官僚風險溝通、公眾風險感知與公眾動員。思與言,52(4),111-159。
    連結:
  2. 杜文苓, W. L.,施佳良, C. L.(2014)。環評知識的政治角色—檢視六輕健康風險評估爭議。臺灣民主季刊,11(2),89-136。
    連結:
  3. 周桂田, K. T.(2004)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之“對話”-在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。台灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。
    連結:
  4. 洪鴻智, H. C.(2002)。科技風險知覺與風險消費態度的決定:灰色訊息關聯分析之應用。都市與計劃,29(4),579-597。
    連結:
  5. 洪鴻智, H. C.(2000)。公共選擇與環境風險設施管制政策工具之選擇。都市與計劃,27(1),47-63。
    連結:
  6. 洪鴻智, H. C.(2005)。科技鄰避設施風險知覺之形成與投影:核二廠。人文及社會科學集刊,17(1),33-70。
    連結:
  7. 洪鴻智, H. C.,黃于芳, Y. F.(2010)。農村工業污染風險知覺的空間特性與決定因素。台灣土地研究,13(2),31-57。
    連結:
  8. Anselin, L.(2002).Under the hood issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression model.Agricultural Economics,27(3),247-267.
  9. Anselin, L.(ed.),Florax, R.(ed.)(2000).Advances in spatial econometrics.Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag.
  10. Aven, T.,Renn, O.(2010).Risk management and governance.New York:Springer Verlag.
  11. Babcicky, P.,Seebauer, S.(2017).The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: Opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy and coping capacity.Journal of Risk Research,20(8),1017-1037.
  12. Bell, M. L.,O’Neill, M. S.,Cifuentes, L. A.,Braga, A. L.,Green, C.,Nweke, A.,Rogat, J.,Sibold, K.(2005).Challenges and recommendations for the study of socioeconomic factors and air pollution health effects.Environvental Science & Policy,8,525-533.
  13. Bickerstaff, K.(2004).Risk perception research: Socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution.Environment International,30,827-840.
  14. Binder, A. R.,Scheufele, D. A.,Brossard, D.,Gunther, A. C.(2011).Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility.Risk Analysis,31(2),324-334.
  15. Boholm, Å.(2008).New perspectives on risk communication: Uncertainty in a complex society.Journal of Risk Research,11(1-2),1-3.
  16. Brown, G.,Raymond, C. M.,Corcorana, J.(2015).Mapping and measuring place attachment.Applied Geography,57,42-53.
  17. Bubeck, P.,Botzen, W. J.,Aerts, J. C.(2012).A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior.Risk Analysis,32(9),1481-1495.
  18. Covello, V. T.,Johnson, B. B.(1987).The social and cultural construction of risk: Issues, methods and case study.The social and cultural construction of risk,Dordrecht, Holland:
  19. Cutchin, M. P.,Martin, K. R.,Owen, S. V.,Goodwin, J. S.(2008).Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion.Risk Analysis,28(3),589-601.
  20. Dosman, D. M.,Adamowicz, W. L.,Hrudey, S. E.(2002).Socioeconomic determinants of health‐ and food safety‐related risk perceptions.Risk Analysis,21(2),307-318.
  21. Freudenburg, W. R.,Pastor, S. K.(1992).Public responses to technological risks: A sociological perspective.Sociological Quarterly,33(3),389-413.
  22. Gochman, D. S.(ed.)(1997).Handbook of health behavior research I: Personal and social determinants.New York:Plenum Press.
  23. Heath, R. L.(ed.),O’Hair, H. D.(ed.)(2009).Hhandbook of risk and crisis communication heath.New York:Routledge.
  24. Hillson, D. A.(2005).Understanding and managing risk attitude.Gower UK:Aldershot.
  25. Hung, H. C.(2009).The attitude towards flood insurance purchase when respondents’ preferences are uncertain: A fuzzy approach.Journal of Risk Research,12(2),239-258.
  26. Hung, H. C.,Lu, Y. T.,Hung, C. H.(2019).The determinants of integrating policy-based and community-based adaptation into coastal hazard risk management: A resilience approach.Journal of Risk Research,22(10),1205-1223.
  27. Hung, H. C.,Wang, T. W.(2011).Determinants and mapping of collective perceptions of technological risk: The case of the Second Nuclear Power Plant in Taiwan.Risk Analysis,31(4),668-683.
  28. Janmaimool, P.,Watanabe, T.(2014).Evaluating determinants of environmental risk perception for risk management in contaminated sites.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,11,6291-6313.
  29. Kellens,W.,Terpstra, T.,De Maeyer, P.(2013).Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research.Risk Analysis,33(1),24-49.
  30. Kunreuther, H.,Easterling, D.(1996).The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,15(4),602-622.
  31. Lazarus, R. S.(1991).Emotion and adaptation.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  32. Lazarus, R. S.,Folkman, S.(1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping.New York:Springer.
  33. Lee, C. S.,Watson-Manheim, M. B.,Ramaprasad, A.(2007).Exploring the relationship between communication risk perception and communication portfolio.IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,50(2),130-146.
  34. Löfstedt, R. E.,Perri, S.(2008).What environmental and technological risk communication research and health risk research can learn from each other.Journal of Risk Research,11(1-2),141-167.
  35. López-Navarro, M. Á.,Tortosa-Edo, V.,Llorens-Monzonís, J.(2015).Environmental management systems and local community perceptions: The case of petrochemical complexes located in Ports.Business Strategy and the Environment,24,236-251.
  36. Luce, R. D.,Weber, E. U.(1986).An axiomatic theory of conjoint expected risk.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,30(2),188-205.
  37. Marx, S. M.,Webera, E. U.,Orlovea, B. S.,Leiserowitza, A.,Krantza, D. H.,Roncolia, C.,Phillips, J.(2007).Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information.Global Environmental Change,17,47-58.
  38. Poussin, J. K.,Botzen, W. J. W.,Aerts, J.(2014).Factors of influence on flood damage mitigation behaviour by Households.Environmental Science & Policy,40,69-77.
  39. Renn, O.,Burns, W. J.,Kasperson, J. X.,Kasperson, R. E.,Slovic, P.(1992).The social amplification of risk: Theoretical foundations and empirical applications.Journal of Social Issues,48(4),137-160.
  40. Rodrigo, M. F.,Ato, M.(2002).Testing the group polarization hypothesis by using logit models.European Journal of Social Psychology,32(1),3-18.
  41. Schwarz, N.(2000).Emotion, cognition, and decision making.Cognition and Emotion,14(4),433-440.
  42. Siegrist, M.,Cvetkovich, G.(2002).Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge.Risk Analysis,20(5),713-720.
  43. Siegrist, M.,Cvetkovich, G.,Roth, C.(2000).Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception.Risk Analysis,20(3),353-361.
  44. Signorino, G.(2012).Proximity and risk perception. Comparing risk perception ‘profiles’ in two petrochemical areas of Sicily (Augusta and Milazzo).Journal of Risk Research,15(10),1223-1243.
  45. Sjöberg, L.(2000).Factors in risk perception.Risk Analysis,20(1),1-11.
  46. Slovic, P.(ed.)(2000).The perception of risk.London:Earthscan.
  47. Steg, L.(ed.),van den Berg, A. E.(ed.),de Groot, J. I. M.(ed.)(2018).Environmental psychology: An introduction.New York:Wiley-Blackwell.
  48. Stone, J. V.(2001).Risk perception mapping and the Fermi II nuclear power plant: Toward an ethnography of social access to public participation in Great Lakes environmental management.Environmental Science & Policy,4(4-5),205-217.
  49. Terpstra,T.,Lindell, M. K.,Gutteling, J. M.(2009).Does communicating (flood) risk affect (flood) risk perceptions? Results of a quasi-experimental study.Risk Analysis,29(8),1141-1155.
  50. Travis, C. C.(ed.)(1988).Carcinogen risk assessment.Boston, MA:Springer.
  51. Wakefield, S. E.,Elliott, S. J.,Eyles, J. D.,Cole, D. C.(2006).Taking environmental action: The role of local composition, context, and collective.Environmental Management,37(1),40-53.
  52. Weber, O.,Scholz, R. W.,Bühlmann, R.,Grasmück, D.(2001).Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes toward decontamination strategies.Risk Analysis,21(5),967-977.
  53. Wester-Herber, M.(2004).Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts-the role of place-identity in risk perception.Environmental Science & Policy,7(2),109-116.
  54. Whitmarsh, L.(2008).Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioral response.Journal of Risk Research,11,351-374.
  55. Wiener, L.,Viola, A.,Wilfond, B. S.,Wendler, D.,Grady, C.(2015).Contrasting views of risk perception and influence of financial compensation between adolescent research participants and their parents.Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,10(1),49-58.
  56. 施信民, S. M.(2006).臺灣環保運動史料彙編 (第1 卷).臺北市=Taipei City:國史館=Academia Historica.
  57. 洪鴻智, H. C.(2001)。鄰避設施的厭惡排比分析:多準則模糊評估模型與灰相關分析之結合。公共事務評論,2(2),21-48。
  58. 陳兆裕, Z. Y.(2016)。台灣石化產業對經濟的貢獻。科學發展,525,48-54。
  59. 蔡偉銑, W. H.(1997)。台灣石化工業發展過程的政治經濟分析。東吳政治學報,8,157-224。
被引用次数
  1. 徐牧謙,洪鴻智,洪至萱(2021)。都會颱洪災害韌性變遷及其與脆弱度、調適力之連結。地理學報,99,59-81。