都市化的批判－Neil Brenner全域都市化與資本主義的存續

Critique of urbanization: Neil Brenner's Planetary Urbanization and the Survival of Capitalism

10.6161/jgs.202208_(102).0003

黃子倫(Zih-Lun Huang)；朱凌毅(Ling-I Chu)；徐進鈺(Jinn-Yuh Hsu)

Neil Brenner ； 國家空間 ； 新自由主義都市 ； 全域都市化 ； Lefebvre式的馬克思主義 ； Neil Brenner ； the state-space ； neo-liberal urbanism ； planetary urbanization ； Lefebvrian Marxist

地理學報

102期（2022 / 08 / 01）

37 - 53

繁體中文

批判都市研究近年成為重要的都市理論之一。本文將藉由Neil Brenner的學術發展到全域都市化對於資本主義存續的觀點，試圖釐清其學術貢獻、爭辯以及未來在臺灣研究展望的可能。作為當代都市研究最重要的理論者之一，Brenner以Lefebvre式的馬克思主義者視角出發，認為都市化與資本主義的緊密發展是伴隨著資本主義國家空間的轉化、新自由主義城市發展。同時，藉由全域都市化理論的提出，他也近指出全球化以及氣候變遷下，此概念能夠全面的、批判性的理解資本主義的空間組織與變遷動力的知識架構。在闡述Brenner的學術核心理論觀點之後，本文也探討Brenner參與的四場學術辯論，藉以錨定並彰顯Brenner觀點的特殊與重要性，之後藉由相關的經驗研究，來進一步指出全域都市化所指涉的核心。最後，本文嘗試提出全域都市化作為當前資本主義發展的主要動力與目前的應用，並以此對應臺灣脈絡提出未來展望的研究方向。

This study reviews Neil Brenner's scholarly development and summarizes his academic contributions, debates and possibilities for future application in Taiwan. As one of the most important theorists in contemporary urban studies, Brenner argues, from a Lefebvrian Marxist perspective, that urbanization has a material, imaginative and practical relationship with the development of capitalism, and then presents planetary urbanization in the context of the spatial transformation of the capitalist state, neoliberal urban development, and recent globalization and climate change. This concept is a comprehensive and critical intellectual framework for understanding the spatial organization of capitalism and the dynamics of change. After presenting Brenner's core theoretical perspectives, this work also examines three academic debates in which Brenner participated in order to anchor and highlight the specificity and importance of his perspectives, and concludes from relevant empirical studies that the objects of research on planetary urbanization extend to primary industries, infrastructure and urban hinterlands, which are neglected by conventional urban studies. Finally, this study suggests possible directions and issues for research into planetary urbanization, which is a major driving force of current capitalist development, in the context of Taiwan, and highlights the analytical merits of such a perspective.

1. 王志弘(2015)。裝都市論與都市政治經濟學之辯。地理研究，62，109-122。
   連結：
2. 周志龍,陳台智(2014)。新自由主義都市開發策略的多尺度治理挑戰─大臺北新都會的案例分析。地理學報，72，31-55。
   連結：
3. 張容瑛(2014)。臺北都會區港口城市的困。再生中的基隆？地理學報，72，5-29。
   連結：
4. 陳怡伶,黎德星(2010)。新自由主義化、國家與住宅市場臺灣國宅政策的演變。地理學報，59，105-131。
   連結：
5. 蕭力偉,蘇淑娟(2017)。高速鐵路車站特定區空間開發之結構歷程分析新自由主義都市治理案例研究。地理學報，84，55-88。
   連結：
6. Agnew, J.(2003).Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics.London:Routledge.
7. Arboleda, M.(2016).In the nature of the non-city: Expanded infrastructural networks and the political ecology of planetary urbanisation.Antipode,48(2),233-251.
8. Arboleda, M.(2015).Financialization, totality and planetary urbanization in the Chilean Andes.Geoforum,67,4-13.
9. Arboleda, M.(2020).Planetary mine: Territories of extraction under late capitalism.London:Verso.
10. Balakrishnan, S.(2019).Shareholder cities: Land transformations along urban corridors in India.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
11. Brenner, N.(2016).Critique of urbanization: Selected essays.Berlin:Birkhäuser.
12. Brenner, N.(2000).Chicago University.
13. Brenner, N.(2004).New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood.New York:Oxford University Press.
14. Brenner, N.(2016).The hinterland urbanised?.Architectural Design,86(4),118-127.
15. Brenner, N.(2018).Debating planetary urbanization: For an engaged pluralism.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),570-590.
16. Brenner, N.(2019).New urban spaces: Urban theory and the scale question.Oxford University Press.
17. Brenner, N.(2014).Implosions/Explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization.Berlin:Jovis.
18. Brenner, N.,Elden, S.(2009).Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory.International Political Sociology,3(4),353-377.
19. Brenner, N.,Jessop, B.,Jones, M.,MacLeod, G.(2003).Introduction: State space in question.State/Space: A reader,Malden, MA:
20. Brenner, N.,Katsikis, N.(2020).Operational landscapes: Hinterlands of the capitalocene.Architectural Design,90(1),22-31.
21. Brenner, N.,Madden, D. J.,Wachsmuth, D.(2011).Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory.City,15(2),225-240.
22. Brenner, N.,Schmid, C.(2015).Towards a new epistemology of the urban?.City,19(2-3),151-182.
23. Brenner, N.,Schmid, C.(2012).Brenner, N., and C. Schmid. 2012. Towards a theory of extended urbanization. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge, Mass.: Urban Theory Lab, Harvard Graduate School of Design..
24. Brenner, N.,Schmid, C.(2014).The ‘Urban Age’ in question.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,38(3),731-755.
25. Callon, M.(1999).Actor-network theory: The market test.Actor network theory and after,Oxford, UK:
26. Deleuze, G.,Guattari, F.,Massumi, B.(Trans.)(1988).A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
27. Deutsche, R.(1991).Boys town.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,9(1),5-30.
28. Furlong, K.(2020).Geographies of infrastructure 1: Economies.Progress in Human Geography,44(3),572-582.
29. Furlong, K.(2022).Geographies of infrastructure III: Infrastructure with Chinese characteristics.Progress in Human Geography,46(3),915-925.
30. Furlong, K.(2021).Geographies of infrastructure II: Concrete, cloud and layered (in) visibilities.Progress in Human Geography,45(1),190-198.
31. Goonewardena, K.(2018).Planetary urbanization and totality.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),456-473.
32. Harvey, D.(1985).The urban experience.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Ibañez, D.,Hutton, J.,Moe, K.(2019).Wood urbanism: From the molecular to the territorial.New York:Actar Publishers.
34. Kaika, M.,Swyngedouw, E.(2011).The urbanization of nature: Great promises, impasse, and new beginnings.The new blackwell companion to the city,Malden, MA:
35. Kipfer, S.(2018).Pushing the limits of urban research: Urbanization, pipelines and counter-colonial politics.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),474-493.
36. Larkin, B.(2013).The politics and poetics of infrastructure.Annual Review of Anthropology,42,327-343.
37. Latour, B.(1993).We have never been modern.Cambridge. MA:Harvard University Press.
38. Law, J.(1999).After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology.The Sociological Review,47(S1),1-14.
39. Lefebvre, H.,Bononno, R.(Trans.)(2003).The urban revolution.Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.
40. McCann, E.,Ward, K.(2012).Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making.Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space,44(1),42-51.
41. McFarlane, C.(2011).Encountering, describing and transforming urbanism: Concluding reflections on assemblage and urban criticality.City,15(6),731-739.
42. McLean, H.(2018).In praise of chaotic research pathways: A feminist response to planetary urbanization.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),547-555.
43. O'Shea, C. E.,Hegeman, L.,Bennett, C.(2015).Logistical ecologies of the North American operational landscape.MAS Context,28,8-35.
44. Oswin, N.(2018).Planetary urbanization: A view from outside.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),540-546.
45. Peake, L.,Patrick, D.,Reddy, R. N.,Tanyildiz, G. Sarp,Ruddick, S.,Tchoukaleyska, R.(2018).Placing planetary urbanization in other fields of vision.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),374-386.
46. Robinson, J.(2016).Comparative urbanism: New geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,40(1),187-199.
47. Robinson, J.(2006).Ordinary cities : Between modernity and development.London:Routledge.
48. Robinson, J.,Roy, A.(2016).Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of Urban Theory.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,40(1),181-186.
49. Roy, A.(2016).Who's afraid of postcolonial theory?.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,40(1),200-209.
50. Sassen, S.(1991).The global city : New York, London, Tokyo.Princeton, N.J:Princeton University Press.
51. Schmid, C.(2018).Journeys through planetary urbanization: Decentering perspectives on the urban.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space,36(3),591-610.
52. Scott, A. J.,Storper, M.(2015).The nature of cities: The scope and limits of Urban Theory.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,39(1),1-15.
53. Smith, N.(2007).Nature as accumulation strategy.Socialist register,43,16-36.
54. Walker, R.(2015).Building a better theory of the urban: A response to 'Towards a new epistemology of the urban?.City,19(2-3),183-191.
55. 吳柏澍(2019)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
56. 呂欣怡(2020)。會議作為未來時間性的匯集與競逐－臺灣離岸風電環評的民族誌分析。臺灣人類學刊，18(2)，79-128。
57. 區偉庭(2020)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所。
58. 劉光瑩 2020。鳳梨田改租給種電，收入翻十倍！關廟地主：我是為了留錢給孩子 。https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5104680 (擷取日期：2021.06.10)。
59. 賴美君(2018)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所。
60. 鍾政霖(2020)。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。