题名

再探台灣景氣循環轉折點之認定:兼論台灣第十次的循環日期

并列篇名

A Revisit on Identifying Taiwan's Business Cycle Turning Points with the Probit-Markov Switching Model

DOI

10.29973/JCSA.200512.0002

作者

陳仕偉(Shyh-Wei Chen)

关键词

景氣循環 ; Probit模型 ; 馬可夫轉換模型 ; Business cycle ; Probit model ; Markov Switching model

期刊名称

中國統計學報

卷期/出版年月

43卷4期(2005 / 12 / 01)

页次

387 - 406

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

裁至目前為止經建會都尚未公佈台灣第十次完整的景氣循環高峰及谷底日期,而且在2003年年初,台灣景氣似乎又有下跌的趨勢而形成所謂的「雙重衰退」。根據經建會所編製之「綜合領先指標」資料,我們發現台灣綜合領先指標領先台灣景氣狀況的「最適」期間應該為3個月,符合綜合領光指標應該領先景氣狀態3至6個月的預期。Probit模型認定出的高峰及谷底轉折點日期與經建會所定義的「台灣景氣循環基準日期」誤差較大,而且會產生誤認的情況;相反的,根據Probit馬可夫轉換模型的當期機率所認定出的高峰及谷底轉折點日期與經建會所定義的「台灣景氣循環基準日期」幾乎完全相同。根據本文的實證結果,我們認為台灣第十次的景氣循環的確已經結束,而且台灣並沒有出現所謂的「雙重衰退」,印證了Chen (2003)所得到的預測結果。

英文摘要

Using Taiwan data, we employ the Probit-Markov Switching (Probit-MS) model to identify business cycle turning points. The merit of the Probit-MS model is that it incorporates the dependent structures of the leading indicator, which is not taken consideration in the traditional Probit model. It is unambiguous that the best forecast horizon for Taiwan's leading indicator in predicting the business condition is three months. The turning points identified by the Probit-Markov switching model are greatly enhanced when compared with those from the Probit model, and beyond this, the model-identified business cycle dates are highly consistent with the officially identified turning points. Our empirical results provide further evidence in favor of Chen's (2003) predictions.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 統計
参考文献
  1. Chen, S.-W.(2003).Is Taiwan`s 10th business cycle over yet? A simple note.Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy,33,39-60.
    連結:
  2. Chen, S.-W.,J.-L. Lin(2000).Modelling business cycles in Taiwan with time-varying Markov-Switching Models.Academia Economic Papers,28,17-42.
    連結:
  3. 陳仕偉(2005)。景氣波動變異對景氣轉折點認定之影響:跨國的實證研究。人文及社會科學集刊
    連結:
  4. Birchenhall, C. R.,H. Jessen,D. R. Osborn,P. Simpson(1999).Predicting U.S. Business Cycle Regime.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,17,313-323.
  5. Bry, G.,C. Boschan(1971).Cyclical analysis of time series: selected procedures and computer programs.New York:NBER.
  6. Chauvet, M.(1998).An econometric characterization of business cycle dynamics with factor structure and regime switching.International Economic Review,39,969-996.
  7. Dueker, M. J.(2002).Regime-dependent recession forecasts and the 2001 recession.Ferderal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,84,29-36.
  8. Dueker, M. J.(1997).Strengthening the case for the yield curve as a oredictor of U.S. recession.Ferderal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,79,41-51.
  9. Estrella, A.(1998).A new measure of fit for equations with dichotomous dependent variables.Journal of Business and Economics Statistics,16,198-205.
  10. Estrella, A.,F. S. Mishkin(1998).Predicting U.S. recessions: financial variables as leading indicators.Review of Economics and Statistics,80,45-61.
  11. Hamilton, J. D.(1996).Specification testing in Markov-switching time-series models.Journal of Econometrics,70,127-157.
  12. Hansen, B. E.(1992).The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: Testing the Markov switching model of GNP.Journal of Applied Econometrics,7,61-82.
  13. Hansen, B. E.(1996).Erratum: The likelihood ratio test under nonstandard conditions: Testing the Markov switching model of GNP.Journal of Applied Econometrics,11,195-198.
  14. Huang, C.-H.(1999).Phases and characteristics of Taiwan business cycles: A Markov switching analysis.Taiwan Economic Review,27,185-213.
  15. Kim, C.-J.,C. J. Murray(2002).Permanent and transitory components of recessions.Empirical Economics,27,163-183.
  16. Kim, C.-J.,C. R. Nelson(1998).Business cycle turning points, a new coincident index, and tests of duration dependence based on a dynamic factor model with regime switching.The Review of Economics and Statistics,80,188-201.
  17. Kim, C.-J.,J. Piger(2002).Common stochastic trends, common cycles, and asymmetry in economic fluctuations.Journal of Monetary Economics,49,1189-1121.
  18. Kim, M.-J.,J.-S. Yoo(1995).New index of coincident indicators: A multivariate Markov-Switching factor model approach.Journal of Monetary Economics,36,607-630.
  19. Lam, P.-S.(2004).A Markov-switching model of GNP growth with duration dependence.International Economic Review,45,175-204.
  20. McConnel, M. M.,G. Perez-Quiros(2000).Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980`s?.American Economic Review,90,1464-1476.
  21. 利秀蘭(2003)。我國第十次景氣循環高峰谷底之初步認定。經濟研究,3,1-16。
  22. 林向愷、黃裕烈、管中閔(1998)。景氣循環轉折點認定與經濟成長率預測。經濟論文叢刊,26,431-457。
  23. 徐士勛、管中閔(2001)。九零年代台灣的景氣循環:馬可夫轉換模型與紀卜斯抽樣法的應用。人文及社會科學集刊,13,515-540。