農民團體對行銷諮詢願付價值之研究－以品牌水果為例

A Study on the Willingness to Pay of Farmers' Organizations for Marketing Consultation-A Case of Brand Fruits

10.7086/JAE.200706.0121

顏如汾(Run-Fen Yan)；黃炳文(Biing-Wen Hunag)

行銷諮詢 ； 品牌水果 ； 條件評估法 ； Marketing consultation ； Brand fruit ； Contingent valuation method

農業經濟半年刊

81期（2007 / 06 / 01）

121 - 164

繁體中文

為因應加入WTO對水果產業所造成的衝擊，農政單位積極輔導農民團體辦理水果品牌認證。然目前國產品牌水果的銷售比率依然不高，農民團體相對較缺乏行銷人才，對於品牌水果的行銷可透過相關諮詢以拓展市場。農民團體經由行銷諮詢所產生的潛在效益因無法量化，故可利用條件評估法求算。本研究以具有品牌水果之農民團體為研究對象，估算農民團體對於現有行銷諮詢單位與未來品牌水果行銷諮詢專責單位之願付價值。結果發現農民團體對品牌水果行銷諮詢專責單位之願付價值相當高，例如品牌水果行銷諮詢專責單位幫助品牌水果銷售額增加一倍時，農民團體每年願付價值，將為現有行銷諮詢單位願付價值的四倍，達29991元。

To overcome the impacts of joining WTO on the fruit industries, the agricultural authority actively assists farmers' organizations to certify brands for fruits. However, the sale ratio of brand fruits to whole market is still not high up to now. Because farmers' organizations are lack of specialist for marketing, they could rely on the marketing consultation to expand the market of brand fruits. Since the potential benefit of marketing consultations provided for farmers' organizations can not be quantification, it could be evaluated by the contingent valuation method. The investigation target of this study is the farmers' organizations, those have owned fruit' brands. The result finds that the willingness to pay of farmers' organizations for marketing consultation is very high. For example, suppose the sales would increase 100% by the assistance of specialized marketing consultation institution, the willingness to pay for which would be more four times than that for present related institution. It is equivalent to NT $ 29991.

1. 蕭代基、錢玉蘭、蔡麗雪(1998)。淡水河水質與景觀改善效益之評估。經濟研究，35(1)，29-59。
   連結：
2. Alberini, A.(1995).Testing willingness-to-pay of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data.Journal of Environment Economics and Management,28,287-306.
3. Barner, B.(2005).Patients` willingness to pay for pharmacist-provided menopause and hormone replacement therapy.Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy,1(1),77-100.
4. Gonzalez, J. E.,J. R. Nelson,T. B. G.,C. S. Shwery(2004).Teacher Resistance to School-Based Consultation with School Psychologists: A Survey of Teacher Perceptions.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders,12(1),30-38.
5. Hanemann, W. M.,J. Loomis,B. Kanninen(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
6. Rosângela, C. L.,M. Y. Makuch,C. A. Petta,S. S. Morais(2005).Women`s satisfaction with physicians` communication skills during an infertility consultation.Patient Education and Counseling,59(1),38-45.
7. Thayer, M. A.(1981).Contingent Valuation Techniques for Assessing Enviromental Impacts: Futher Evidence.Journal of Enviroment Economics and Management,8,27-44.
8. Till, K. H.,P. M. Jakus,W. M. Park(1997).Household Willingness to Pay for Dropoff Recycling.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,22(2),310-320.
9. Virtala, A.,I. Virjo(2005).Consultations concerning contraception and induced abortions among university students-trends in Finland 1986-2003.Contraception,72(5),372-376.
10. Wimberley, T.,A. Rubens(2002).Management support organizations and university partnership in nonprofit education, training and consultation.The Social Science Journal,39,129-136.
11. 李俊鴻(2005)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立中興大學應用經濟學系。
12. 李皇照(2001)。臺灣地區蔬果品牌建立與行銷策略。農產運銷半年刊，123，13-200。
13. 林師模、陳苑欽(2003)。2003多變量分析－管理上的應用。雙葉書廊。
14. 陳凱俐(1997)。自然資源之經濟效益評估－以宜蘭縣蘭陽溪口爲例。台灣銀行季刊，48(4)，153-190。
15. 陸雲(1990)。環境資源估價之研究－非市場估價方法。經濟論文，18(1)，305-325。
16. 黃宗煌(1990)。台灣地區國家公園之遊憩效益評估。台灣銀行季刊，41(3)，282-304。
17. 黃宗煌(1990)。台灣地區國家公園之保育效益評估。台灣銀行季刊，41(3)，305-325。
18. 賈紅鶯(1997)。諮詢的基本概念及其在學校輔導上的運用。諮商與輔導，141，2-9。
19. 魯真、陳宏易(2000)。國產品牌水果之消費者認知研究。農業金融論叢，46，357-382。
20. 鐘乃光(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立中興大學行銷研究所。

1. 張瑋珊(2017)。臺灣一般釋迦與鳳梨釋迦之消費行為研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學系學位論文。2017。1-149。