题名

多財貨雙界二元選擇條件評估起始點偏誤檢定與校正模型之建構-改善三高危險因子對心血管疾病願付價值之評估

并列篇名

Model for Correcting Starting-Point Bias of Multiple Goods under Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice CV Data: Evaluation of WTP for Controlling Three Major Risk Factors of Cardiovascular Disease

DOI

10.7086/TJAE.201006.0045

作者

吳珮瑛(Pei-Ing Wu);林雅芳(Ya-Fang Lin);劉哲良(Je-Liang Liou)

关键词

心血管疾病 ; 罹病風險 ; 願付價格 ; 替代 ; 互補 ; Cardiovascular Diseases ; Risk of Disease ; Willingness to Pay ; Substitution ; Complementary

期刊名称

應用經濟論叢

卷期/出版年月

87期(2010 / 06 / 01)

页次

45 - 86

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究建構一個雙界二元選擇評估多個有相關性財貨起始點偏誤的檢定與校正模型,此一模型改良過去只針對單一財貨未考量財貨間的替代/互補性的單界或雙界二元選擇起始點偏誤模型。並使用一套長期追蹤竹東及朴子地區心臟血管疾病之資料,比較有無考量危險因子之相關性與有無校正起始點偏誤,改善高血壓、高血脂及糖尿病三危險因子願付價值的差異。結果顯示,考量因子間之相關性,則改善心血管疾病三高因子平均的每年每人估計願付價值均比未考量時來得低。同樣的,校正雙界二元起始點偏誤,每年每人改善三危險因子之估計效益,也比未校正時來得低。依此,本文所建構之檢定與校正起始點偏誤且考量三危險因子相關係之模型,所得到的每人每年改善三危險因子之估計效益爲174,667元,反之,如果未進行起始點偏誤也未考量因子間的相關係,則估計效益爲335,657 元,二者相差二倍有餘。

英文摘要

This study constructs a model to account for the starting-point bias of multiple goods and services under the double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation experiment. A set of data of cardiovascular disease risk factor two-township study (CVDFACTS) is adopted for the willingness to pay comparison between models for controlling hypertension, hyperlipemia, and diabetes three major causes of cardiovascular disease risk factors. The results show that the relationship exists among these three factors. As such, the benefit for controlling these factors with the adjustment of starting-point bias and accounting for the relationship among factors is NT $174,667 per capita annually. On the contrary, the benefit without the adjustment of starting-point bias and not accounting for the relationship among factors is NT $335,657 per person per year. This demonstrates that the total benefit will be biased upward while no concern is accounted for the evaluation of multiple goods.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 永續發展研究
生物農學 > 農業
生物農學 > 森林
生物農學 > 畜牧
生物農學 > 漁業
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. 吳珮瑛、劉哲良、蘇明達(2005)。受訪金額在開放選擇條件評估支付模式的作用—引導或是誤導。農業經濟半年刊,77,1-43。
    連結:
  2. 傅祖壇、李杰憲(2006)。改善心臟血管疾病之效益衡量—群體歸因風險模式之應用。經濟研究,42,151-182。
    連結:
  3. 傳祖壇、劉錦添、簡錦漢、賴文龍(2001)。健康風險認知與香菸消費行爲—台灣的實證研究。經濟論文,29,91-118。
    連結:
  4. Arias, O.,K. F. Hallock,W. Sosa-Escudero(2001).Individual Heterogeneity in the Return to Schooling: Instrumental Variable Quantile Regression Using Twin Data.Empirical Economics,26,7-40.
  5. Arrow, K.,R. Solow,E. Leamer,P. Portney,R. Randner,H. Schuman(1993).Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Federal Register,58,4600-4614.
  6. Bateman, I. J.,I. H. Langford,A. P. Jones,G. N. Kerr(2001).Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.Resource and Energy Economics,23,191-213.
  7. Bishop, R. C.,T. A. Heberlein(1979).Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measure Biased?.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,61,926-930.
  8. Bohara, A.,J. Kerkvliet,R. Berrens(2001).Addressing Negative Willingness to Pay in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.Environmental and Resource Economics,20,173-195.
  9. Boyle, K. J.,R. C. Bishop,M. P. Welsh(1985).Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games.Land Economics,61,188-194.
  10. Brookshire, D. S.,R. C. d''Arge,W. D. Schulze,M. A. Thayer,Smith, V.K.(ed.)(1981).Experiments in Valuing Public Goods.Advances in Applied Microeconomics,1,123-172.
  11. Cameron, T. A.(1988).A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,15,355-379.
  12. Carson, R.,W. M. Hanemann,R. C. Mitchell(1986)."Determining the Demand for Public Goods by Simulating Referendums at Different Tax Prices," Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, Cited by Trudy, A. C. and J. Quiggin, 1994, "Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire".Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,27,218-234.
  13. Chien, Y. L.,C. J. Huang,D. Shaw(2005).A General Model of Starting Point Bias in Double-bounded Dichotomous Contingent Valuation Surveys.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,50,362-377.
  14. Dardanoni, V.,A. Wagstaff(1990).Uncertainty and the Demand for Medical Care.Journal of Health Economics,9,23-38.
  15. Driver, B. L.,W. J. McLaughlin(1989).Improving the Contingent Valuation Method: A Psychological Perspective.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,17,213-229.
  16. Dupont, D. P.(2003).CVM Embedding Effects When There Are Active, Potentially Active and Passive Users of Environmental Goods.Environmental and Resource Economics,25,319-341.
  17. Flachaire, E.,G. Hollard(2006).Controlling Starting-point Bias in Double-bounded Contingent Valuation Surveys.Land Economics,82,103-111.
  18. Grossman, M.(1972).On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health.Journal of Political Economy,80,223-255.
  19. Haab, T.,K. E. McConnell(1997).Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,32,251-270.
  20. Hammack, J.,G. M. Brown Jr.(1974).Waterfowl and Wetlands: Towards Bioeconomic Analysis.Baltimore, MD:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  21. Hanemann, W. M.(1984).Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66,332-341.
  22. Hanemann, W. M.,J. Loomis,B. Kanninen(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
  23. Hanley, N.,S. Colombo,B. Kristrom,F. Watson(2009).Accounting for Negative, Zero and Positive Willingness to Pay for Landscape Change in a National Park.Journal of Agricultural Economics,60,1-16.
  24. Herriges, J. A.,J. F. Shogren(1996).Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-up Questioning.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30,112-131.
  25. Hoehn, J. A.,A. Randall(1987).A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,14,226-247.
  26. Janis, I. L.,L. Mann(1977).Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment.New York:Free Press.
  27. Kan, K.,W. D. Tsai(2004).Obesity and Risk Knowledge.Journal of Health Economics,23,907-934.
  28. Kanninen, B. J.(1995).Bias in Discrete Response Contingent Valuation.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28,114-125.
  29. Kenkel, D. S.(1991).Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, and Schooling.Journal of Political Economy,99,287-305.
  30. Langford, I. H.,I. J. Bateman,H. D. Langford(1996).A Multilevel Modeling Approach to Triple-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.Environmental and Resource Economics,7,197-211.
  31. Lee, S.(2007).Endogeneity in Quantile Regression Models: A Control Function Approach.Journal of Econometrics,141,1131-1158.
  32. Levin, J.(2001).For Whom the Reductions Count: a Quantile Regression Analysis of Class Size and Peer Effects on Scholastic Achievement.Empirical Economics,26,221-246.
  33. Maddala, G. S.(1983).Econometric Society Monograph No. 3.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  34. Randall, A.,D. S. Brookshire(1978)."Public Policy, Public Goods and Contingent Valuation Mechanisms," paper presented at the Western Economics Association Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii. June 22, Cited by Boyle, K. J., R. C. Bishop, and M. P. Welsh, 1985, "Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games".Land Economics,61,188-194.
  35. Spash, C. L.(2002).Informing and Forming Preferences in Environmental Valuation: Coral Reef Biodiversity.Journal of Economic Psychology,23,665-687.
  36. Sprietsma, M.,F. Waltenberg(2005).The Impact of Teachers' Wages on Students' Performance in the Presence of Heterogeneity and Endogeneity: Evidence from Brazil.Université Catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques, Working Paper 2005008.
  37. Whitehead, J. C.(2002).Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions.Land Economics,78,285-297.
  38. Wu, P. I.,S. K. Wu,S. L.Yang(2007).The Consistency of the Theoretical Duality of Utility and Expenditure Interpretation and their Empirical Implication for the DB CV Responses.The Empirical Economics Letters,6,545-558.
  39. Wu, P. I.,W. H. Hsieh,Mendelsohn, R.(eds.),D. Shaw(eds.)(1996).The Economics of Pollution Control in the Asia Pacific.Edward Elgar, UK:Cheltenham.
  40. 吳珮瑛、謝雯華(1995)。環境財需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊,1,1-46。
  41. 吳珮瑛、蘇明達(2001)。墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益評估—兼論資源保育之哲學觀與資源價值之內涵。國家公園學報,11,1-29。
  42. 林仁德(2006)。高血脂合併糖尿病,控制壞膽固醇。http://www.diacare.com.tw/html/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1792
  43. 林興中(2007)。脂肪代謝異常:高血脂症。http://www.vghks.gov.tw/meta/lipidedu.htm
  44. 翁國昌(2007)。高血壓加高血脂,心血管拉警報。http:mag.udn.com/mag/life/storypage.page.jsp?f_ART-ID=62529
  45. 國民健康局(2005)。高血脂紅色通緝令。台中:國民健康局。
  46. 許惠恆(2001)。糖尿病與心臟血管疾病。http://www.dmcare.org.tw/up3/2001-3-%E8%A8%B1%E6%83%A0%E6%81%92.htm
被引用次数
  1. 郭彥廉(Yen-Lien Kuo);謝庭華(Ting-Hua Hsieh)(2024)。客製化防災資訊的使用意願及願付價格-以2016年高雄美濃地震與2018年花蓮地震強震區調查為例。應用經濟論叢。(115)。103-147。