台灣社區林業生態產業間接效益之價值評估

The Benefit Assessment of Ecoindustry in Taiwan's Community Forestry

李俊鴻(Chun-Hung Lee)；王瓊霞(Chiung-Hsia Wang)；陳郁蕙(Yu-Hui Chen)；陳雅惠(Ya-Hui Chen)；陳凱俐(Kai-Lih Chen)

社區林業 ； 生態產業 ； 社區參與階段 ； 社區補助類別 ； 願付價值 ； Community Forestry ； Ecoindustry ； Benefit Assessment ； Local Community Participation ； Support Category ； Willingness to Pay

應用經濟論叢

93期（2013 / 06 / 01）

43 - 82

繁體中文

本研究依據條件評估法（Contingent Valuation Method, CVM）建構評估「社區林業生態產業之間接效益」的理論與實證模型，以分析影響各項間接效益之願付價值的相關因素，據此探討不同「社區參與階段」及「社區補助類別」在各項間接效益的差異。結果顯示：（1） 所得較高的受訪居民對社區生態產業的生態維護、環境保育及文化資產保存有較高願付價值，在該社區居住時間較長及有參與社區林業計畫的受訪民眾，對生態維護與環境保育的願付價值亦較高；（2） 瞭解社區「生態特性及動植物資源」與「環境資源及特色」的受訪民眾，在生態維護與環境保育的願付價值較高；（3） 參與第一階段社區林業計畫的社區民眾，對生態維護、環境保育及文化資產保存等三項間接效益的願付價值均高於第二階段社區參與者；（4）「不同補助類別」的社區受訪民眾，在三項間接效益的願付價值亦呈現顯著差異，申請「森林保護」補助項目者願付價值明顯高於申請「自然資源調查」與「森林育樂」的受訪社區民眾。

Based on the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), this study builds the theoretical and empirical models to evaluate the indirect benefits of Ecoindustry in Taiwan’s community forestry. These models are used to analyze the effects of related factors, such as Ecosystem Conservation (EC), Environmental Protection (EP), and Cultural Heritage Preservation (CHP), on the Willingness-To-Pay (WTP). Then, they are applied to different stages of community participations and different programs of community forestry.The results show that: (1) the higher income of the residents, the higher WTP for EC, EP and CHP. Furthermore, the longer the residents live in the community, the higher WTP for EC and EP; (2) residents who know better about ”ecological features and animal and plant resources” and ”environmental resources and characteristics” have higher WTP for EC and EP; (3) residents who had participated in the 1st stage community forestry project had higher WTP for EC, EP and CHP compared to those who only have participated in the 2nd stage community forestry project; (4) residents who had applied for different programs have different levels of WTP. For example, those who applied for Forestry Protection Program have higher WTP compared to those who applied for Natural Resource and Forestry Recreation Program.

1. 黃錦煌、蕭柏勳、李俊鴻(2009)。旅客參與節慶活動推擠成本與滿意度之市場區隔分析。觀光休閒學報，15，141-161。
   連結：
2. Hotelling, H., 1949, Letter to the National Service, An Economic Study of the Monetary Valuation of Recreation in the National Park, Washington DC: US Department of the Interior.
3. 行政院農業委員會林務局，2008，社區林業計畫作業規範，台北：農業委員會林務局。
4. Adhikari, B.(2004).,South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics=SANDEE.
5. Alberini, A.(1995).Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-bound, Double-bound, and Bivariate Models.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,28,287-306.
6. Alberini, A.(1995).Estimating Willingness-to-pay Model of Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Survey Data.Land Economics,71,83-95.
7. Arnold, J. E. M.(1995).Managing Forests as Common Property.Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
8. Barbier, E. B.,Heal, G. H.(2006).Valuing Ecosystem Services.The Economists' Voice,3,1-52.
9. Bhattarai, B.,Ojha, H. P.(2000).,Kathmandu:.
10. Bishop, R. C.,Boyle, K. J.,Welsh, M. P.(1987).Toward Total Economic Value of Great Lakes Fishery Resource.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society,116,339-345.
11. Cameron, T. A.,Quiggin, J.(1994).Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,27,218-234.
12. Carson, R. T.,Flores, N. E.,Mitchell, R. C.(1999).The Theory and Measurement of Passive Use Value.Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuing Method in the USA, EC, and Developing Countries,New York:
13. Ciracy-Wantrup, S. V.(1962).Resource Conservation Economics and Policies.Berkeley:University of California.
14. Clawson, A.,Knetsch, M.(1966).The Economics of Outdoor Recreation.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. Cooper, J. C.,Hanemann, M.,Signorello, G.(2002).One-and-one-half-bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.The Review of Economics and Statistics,84,742-750.
16. Costanza, R.,d''Arge, R.,de Groot, R.,Rarber, S.,Hannon, M. B.,Naeem, S.,Limburg, K.,Paruelo, J.,O''Neil, R. V.,Raskin, R.,Sutton, P.,Van den Belt, M.(1997).The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital.Nature,387,253-260.
17. de Groot, R. S.,Wilson, M. A.,Boumans, R. M. J.(2002).A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services.Ecological Economics,41,393-408.
18. Despres, A.,Normandin, D.(1996).Les Services d'environment Fournis Parla Forêt: Problèm d'é Valuation et de Régulation.Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales,41,61-91.
19. Dev, O. P.,Yadav, N. P.,Springate-Baginski, O.,Soussan, J.(2003).Impacts of Community Forestry on Livelihoods in the Middle Hills of Nepal.Journal of Forest and Livelihood,3,64-77.
20. Freeman, A. M. III.(1993).The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods.Washington DC:Resources for the Future.
21. Haab, T. C.,McConnell, K. E.(2002).Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation.Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.
22. Hanemann, W. M.,Loomis, J.,Kanninen, B.(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
23. Kerr, G. N.(2000).Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Probability Distributions.Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,44,233-252.
24. Krieger, D. J.(2001).Economic Value of Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review.Washington DC:The Wilderness Society.
25. Kruger, L. E.,Jakes, P. J.(2003).The Importance of Place: Advances in Science and Application.Forest Science,49,819-821.
26. Lawless, J. F.(2003).Statistical Models and Methods, for Lifetime Data.New York:Wiley.
27. Lawless, J. F.(1982).Statistical Models and Methods, for Lifetime Data.New York:Wiley.
28. León, C. J.(1996).Double Bounded Survival Values for Preserving the Landscape of Natural Parks.Journal of Environmental Management,46,103-118.
29. Markandya, A.,Harou, P. A.,Bellu, L.,Cistulli, V.(2002).Environmental Economics for Sustainable Growth: A Handbook for Practitioners.Cheltenham:Elgar Publisher.
30. Maskey, V.,Gebremedhin, T. G.,Dalton, T. J.(2006).Social and Cultural Determinants of Collective Management of Community Forest in Nepal.Journal of Forest Economics,11,261-274.
31. McAllister, K.(1999).Rural Poverty and Environment Working Paper Series, No. 2Rural Poverty and Environment Working Paper Series, No. 2,Ottawa:International Development Research Centre=IDRC.
32. Meizen-Dick, R.,Brown, L. R.,Feldstein, H. S.,Quisumbling, A. R.(1997).,Washington DC:International Food Policy Research Institution=IFPRI.
33. Mitchell, R. C.,Carson, R. T.(1989).Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method.Washington DC:Resources for the Future Press.
34. Navrud, S.,Ready, R.(2007).Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods.Dordrecht:Springer.
35. Nijkamp, P.,Vindigni, G.,Nunes, P. A. L. D.(2008).Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: A Comparative Study.Ecological Economics,67,217-231.
36. Pearce, D. W.(2001).The Economic Value of Forest Ecosystems.Ecosystem Health,7,284-296.
37. Pearce, D. W.,Pearce, C. G. T.(2001).The Value of Forest Ecosystems.Quebec:Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
38. Randall, A.(1991).The Value of Biodiversity.Ambio,20,64-68.
39. Ready, R.,Navrud, S.(2006).International Benefits Transfer: Methods and Validity Tests.Ecological Economics,60,429-434.
40. Sills, E. O.(ed.),Lee, A. K.(ed.)(2003).Forests in a Market Economy.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
41. Sinden, J. A.,Griffith, G.(2007).Combing Economic and Ecological Arguments to Value the Environmental Gains from Control of 35 Weeks in Australia.Ecological Economics,61,396-409.
42. Siry, J. P.,Cubbage, E. W.,Ahmed, M .R.(2005).Sustainable Forest Management: Global Trends and Opportunities.Forest Policy and Economics,7,551-561.
43. Stacy, E. W.(1962).A Generalization of the Gamma Distribution.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,33,1187-1192.
44. Stenger, A.,Harou, P.,Navrud, S.(2009).Valuing Environmental Goods and Services Derived from the Forests.Journal of Forests Economics,15,1-14.
45. Venn, T. J.(2007).Economic Implications of Inalienable and Communal Native Title: The Case of Wik Forestry in Australia.Ecological Economics,64,131-142.
46. Wang, S.,Wilson, B.(2007).Pluralism in the Economics of Sustainable Forest Management.Forest Policy and Economics,9,743-750.
47. 王鴻濬(2008)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
48. 行政院農業委員會林務局(2008)。2007 年林務局年報。台北:行政院農業委員會林務局。
49. 行政院農業委員會林務局(2006)。2005 年林務局年報。台北:行政院農業委員會林務局。
50. 林鴻忠、吳坤銘、林浩立、廖天賜(2007)。參與社區林業在生態旅遊之效益—以宜蘭縣朝陽社區為例。林業研究季刊，29，31-42。
51. 洪鴻智(1997)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所。
52. 陳郁蕙、李俊鴻、陳雅惠(2008)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
53. 陳郁蕙、陳凱俐、李俊鴻、陳雅惠(2009)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
54. 陳郁蕙、陳凱俐、李俊鴻、陳雅惠(2010)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
55. 黃宗煌(1989)。台灣地區國家公園之遊憩效益的評估。台灣銀行季刊，41，282-304。
56. 葉美智、羅紹麟(2006)。社區林業之建構─以新化實驗林場為例。2006 年社區林業學術研討會，台北:
57. 葉寶文(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。東吳大學經濟學系研究所。
58. 廖學誠、陳宛君(2006)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
59. 劉宗超、黃順基、于法穩(2001)。中國西部發展生態產業的理論探索。科技導報，4，56-59。
60. 盧道杰(2007)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。
61. 羅凱安、林喻東(2008)。行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告行政院農業委員會林務局研究報告,行政院農業委員會林務局。

1. 曾偉君、陳宗薊、王世銘(2017)。國人對於保育台灣黑熊之願付價值估計。農業與經濟，58，103-130。
2. 林鴻忠、林浩立(2014)。社區林業政策推動成效之研究：以宜蘭縣林美社區為例。地理研究，60，1-15。
3. 謝奇明、張凱智、林佩蓉、李俊鴻(2015)。島嶼居民對觀光發展態度與遊憩資源維護願付價值之研究—以台灣澎湖群島為例。戶外遊憩研究，28(4)，63-102。
4. 趙榮台、黃意鈞、郭奇芊、邵廣昭、林幸助、李玲玲、李芃、方國運(2018)。「生態系服務與永續發展」科學計畫。臺灣土地研究，21(2)，137-152。