题名

不同競爭行為下的產業內授權決策

并列篇名

The Analysis of Inside Licensing under Differentiated Competitive Behavior

DOI

10.3966/054696002014060095002

作者

王光正(A. Kang-Cheng Wang);周冰瑤(Ping-Yao Chou);吳宜謙(Yi-Cian Wu);林俊宏(A. Chun-Huang Lin)

关键词

猜測變量 ; 固定權利金授權 ; 單位權利金授權 ; Conjectural Variations ; Fixed-fee Licensing ; Royalty Licensing

期刊名称

應用經濟論叢

卷期/出版年月

95期(2014 / 06 / 01)

页次

35 - 59

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文設立一雙占模型,討論不同猜測變量下,專利擁有者的授權行為。考慮專利擁有者授權後仍與被授權廠商在產品市場進行數量競爭的假設下,本文得到:第一、在非劇烈創新且市場越不競爭時,授權廠商越可能以固定權利金授權。第二、考慮廠商間的競爭程度後,若授權廠商以單位權利金授權,其最適單位權利金可能小於授權前後的成本差距。

英文摘要

This paper develops a duopoly model to investigate the licensing behavior of inside licensors under different competitive relationships with its competitor and a conjectural variations approach is employed. Assuming that both the licensor and licensee engage in a quantitative competition in the same industry after licensing, we obtain the following results. First, the less competitive a market with a non-drastic innovation, the more likely the licensor would prefer a fixed-fee licensing to a royalty licensing. Second, considering the magnitude of competition between firms, the optimal royalty rate could be smaller than the cost reduction after licensing when the licensor is responsible for selecting a royalty licensing regime.

主题分类 基礎與應用科學 > 永續發展研究
生物農學 > 農業
生物農學 > 森林
生物農學 > 畜牧
生物農學 > 漁業
社會科學 > 經濟學
社會科學 > 財金及會計學
参考文献
  1. 蔡明芳、邱俊榮、吳世傑、李依珊(2009)。存在中間財市場下的廠商授權。經濟論文,37,557-585。
    連結:
  2. Arrow, K.(1962).Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity,Princeton, New Jersey:
  3. Carlton, D. W.,Perloff, J. M.(2005).Modern Industrial Organization.Chicago:Addison Wesley.
  4. Dixit, A.(1986).Comparative Statics for Oligopoly.International Economic Review,27,107-122.
  5. Forfuri, A.,Roca, E.(2004).Optimal Licensing Strategy: Royalty or Fixed Fee?.International Journal of Business and Economics,3,13-19.
  6. Friedman, J. W.,Mezzetti, C.(2002).Bounded Rationality, Dynamic Oligopoly, and Conjectural Variations.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,49,287-306.
  7. Kamien, M. I.,Oren, S. S.,Tauman, Y.(1992).Optimal Licensing of Cost-reducing Innovation.Journal of Mathematical Economics,21,483-508.
  8. Kamien, M. I.,Tauman, Y.(2002).Patent Licensing: The Inside Story.The Manchester School,70,7-15.
  9. Kamien, M. I.,Tauman, Y.(1986).Fee versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,101,471-492.
  10. Liao, C. H.,Sen, D.(2005).Subsidy in Licensing: Optimality and Welfare Implications.The Manchester School,73,281-299.
  11. Macho-Stadler, I.,Martinez-Giralt, X.,Perez-Castrillo, J. D.(1996).The Role of Information in Licensing Contract Design.Research Policy,25,43-57.
  12. Poddar, S.,Sinha, U. B.(2010).Patent Licensing from a High-cost Firm to a Low-cost Firm.Economic Record,86,384-395.
  13. Rostoker, M. D.(1984).A Survey of Corporate Licensing.Journal of Law and Technology,24,59-92.
  14. Saracho, A.(2005).The Relationship between Patent Licensing and Competitive Behavior.The Manchester School,73,563-581.
  15. Sen, D.,Tauman, Y.(2007).General Licensing Schemes for a Cost-reducing Innovation.Games and Economic Behavior,59,163-186.
  16. Wang, X. H.(1998).Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model.Economics Letters,60,55-62.
  17. Wang, X. H.(2002).Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly.Journal of Economics and Business,54,253-266.
  18. Wang, X. H.,Yang, B. Z.(2004).On Technology Transfer to an Asymmetric Cournot Duopoly.Economic Bulletin,4,1-6.
  19. Wang, X. H.,Yang, B. Z.(1999).On Licensing under Bertrand Competition.Australian Economic Papers,38,106-119.
  20. 馮國璋、陳達仁(2006)。技術標準與專利佈局策略研究─以國內無線通信技術研發為例。政大智慧財產評論,4,21-54。