《正統道藏》本《玉皇本行集經》成書時間考定

The Date of Publication of the Zhengtong Daozang Version of the Yuhuang Benxing Jijing

10.6503/THJCS.2010.40(2).02

謝聰輝(Tsung-Hui Hsieh)

道教 ； 梓潼 ； 張良 ； 飛鸞 ； 玉皇經 ； Daoism ； Zitong ； Zhang Liang ； spirit-writing ； Yuhuang Jijing

清華學報

40卷2期（2010 / 06 / 01）

193 - 220

繁體中文

《正統道藏》中有兩個三卷五品本《玉皇本行集經》，學界對其成書時間討論非常分歧。本文運用了比較與溯源的方法，首先證實張良本（CTll）早於白文本（CT10），且其卷末所附七則〈誦經感應〉，乃改編自《太平廣記》中原先奉誦《金剛經》的感驗故事。接著一一駁斥兩個版本成書於南宋前的所有可能。最後運用明永樂本《玉里本行集經》的相關記載，論證《正統道藏》所收錄的張良本，可能接近四川蓬邑縣真一壇1221年張良校正後，而尚未科儀化的較純樸版本，後附的〈誦經感應〉亦有可能這個時候添加，即介於1221年至1225年的版本。至於白文本經文因晚於張良本，又完全依照1225年梓潼帝君校正本修改，所以其有可能是從1225年梓潼帝君儀式本抄錄下的經文部分，亦即其成書時間不會早於1225年。

There are two different versions of the Yuhuang Benxing Jijing with three volumes and five chapters. Daoist scholars have different opinions concerning their dates of publication. In this paper, I first apply the methods of comparison and textual criticism to corroborate the ideas that Zhang Liang's text (CT11) is earlier than the basic text (CT10) and that the seven stories of miracles in response to reciting scriptures are adapted from those in response to reciting the Diamond Sutra collected in the Taiping Guangji. Next, I refute the possibility that the two versions were published before the Southern Song Dynasty. Finally, by making use of the relevant records of the Yung-Lo version of the Yuhuang Benxing Jijing, I assert that CT11 collected in the Zhengtong Daozang may be close to a simpler version, without the reciting rituals, which was corrected by Zhang Liang through spirit-writing in 1221 at the Zhen-Yi altar in Peng-Yi County, Sichuan. The seven stories of miracles in response to scripture recitation might have been added at this time, i.e., 1221-1225. CT10 came out later than CT11 and was corrected according to the version modified by Zitong through spirit-writing in 1225, so it could not have appeared before 1225.

1. 王子欣(2011)。2010年台灣地區宗教類期刊篇目索引。輔仁宗教研究，23，185-213。
2. 楊明璋(2022)。敦煌講史變文的佛教敘事及其講唱者的身分。清華中文學報，28，145-196。