論客家話「好X」格式的語法化和主觀化

On the Grammaticalization and Subjectification of the 'HO+X' (好X) Construction in Hakka

10.6503/THJCS.2012.42(3).05

葉瑞娟(Jui-Chuan Yeh)

客家話 ； 好X ； 主觀化 ； 語法化 ； Hakka ； HO+X ； subjectification ； grammaticalization

清華學報

42卷3期（2012 / 09 / 01）

527 - 565

繁體中文

本文從共時的語料出發，檢視客家話「好X」格式，討論「好NP」、「好VP」、「好AP」等次類格式的特點。首先，根據衍生詞彙理論，分析「好NP」格式中「好」的意義，發現它不單由「好」本身的詞彙語意所承載，還須視「好」和NP兩者共同組合結果而定。其次，「好VP」格式中「好」的語意和形態句法功能的界定，也須依其所出現的情境而定。當「好」以言者為態度或觀點的來源時，其為義務情態詞，表示「要求」或「允許」的指令意義；若「好」出現在兩個子句之間，是目的子句標記，表示兩個子句間「條件—目的」的關係；當「好」以受事（或工具）為主語，且在概念結構中隱含施事時，「好」則為中間結構標記。接著，論述「好AP」格式中的「好」是一個表主觀增量的情態副詞。本文論證「好」的詞類轉變與語意延伸的動因主要始自主觀性的表達。隨著主觀性的強弱變化，所採取的相對應的主觀化形式也不同。

This study provides a synchronic analysis of the Hakka 'HO+X' (好X) construction, which can be subdivided into 'HO+NP', 'HO+VP', and 'HO+AP' subconstructions. Following generative lexicon theory, it is argued that the interpretation of HO in the 'HO+NP' construction is not determined by the inherent lexical semantics of HO, but by the co-composition of HO and the NP. Likewise, the grammatical environment of HO in the 'HO+VP' construction is crucial in interpreting its semantics and in defining its morphosyntactic categories. When it appears in a sentence in which the speaker is the source of modal attitudes, HO, as a deontic modal, involves requirement or permission. When it occurs between two clauses, HO serves as a purpose clause marker, indicating the condition-purpose relation between the two clauses. As a middle construction marker, HO occurs in a sentence whose subject is a patient (or an instrument) and whose agent is implicit in the conceptual structure. In the 'HO+AP' construction, HO is a modal adverb expressing strengthened subjective quantity. Finally, we suggest that the primary motivation for the categorical shift and semantic extension of HO is the need for expressing speakers' subjectivity, and that the corresponding subjectified forms are determined by the degree of subjectification. The mechanisms involved here include reanalysis and analogy.

1. 陳俊光、劉欣怡(2009)。漢語「好」的多視角分析與教學應用。華語文教學研究，6(2)，45-98。
   連結：
2. (1995).The Generative Lexicon.Cambridge:MIT Press.
3. Aronoff, Mark(1980).Contextuals.Language,56(4),744-758.
4. Beesley, Kenneth R.(1982).Evaluative Adjectives as One-place Predicates in Montague Grammar.Journal of Semantics,1(3),195-249.
5. Blank, Andreas(ed.),Koch, Peter(ed.)(1999).Historical Semantics and Cognition.Berlin:Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Bybee, Joan,Perkins, Revere,Pagliuca, William(1994).The Evolution of Grammar.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
7. Chappell, Hilary,Lamarre, Christine(2005).A Grammar and Lexicon of Hakka: Historical Materials from the Basel Mission Library.Paris:Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l'Asie Orientale.
8. Coats, Jennifer(1983).The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries.London:Croom Helm.
9. Cole, P.(ed.),Morgan, J.(ed.)(1975).Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts.New York:Academic Press.
10. Diessel, Holger(2001).The Ordering Distribution of Main and Adverbial Clauses: A Typological Study.Language,77(3),433-455.
11. Fagan, Sarah(1988).The English Middle.Linguistic Inquiry,19(2),181-203.
12. Fellbaum, Christiane(1986).On the Middle Construction in English.Bloomington:Indiana University Linguistics Club.
13. Goldberg, Adele(1995).A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
14. Hale, Kenneth,Keyser, Samuel J.(1987).A View from the Middle.Lexicon Project Working Papers,10,1-36.
15. Halliday, M. A. K.(1994).An Introduction to Functional Grammar.London:Edward Arnold.
16. Higginbotham, James(1985).On Semantics.Linguistic Inquiry,16(4),547-593.
17. Hopper, Paul J.,Traugott, Elizabeth C.(2003).Grammaticalization.New York:Cambridge University Press.
18. Jackendoff, Ray(1997).The Architecture of the Language Faculty.Cambridge:MIT Press.
19. Jacobson, P.(ed.),Pullum, G. K.(ed.)(1982).Nature of Syntactic Representation.Dordrecht:Reidel.
20. Jones, Charles(1991).Purpose Clauses: Syntax, Thematics, and Semantics of English Purpose Constructions.Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Katz, Jerrold J.(1964).Semantic Theory and the Meaning of 'Good'.The Journal of Philosophy,61,739-766.
22. Kennedy, Christopher,McNally, Louise(2005).Scale Structure, Degree Modification, and the Semantics of Gradable Predicates.Language,81(2),345-381.
23. Keyser, Samuel J.,Roeper, Thomas(1984).On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English.Linguistic Inquiry,15(3),381-416.
24. Lakoff, George(1987).Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about Mind.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
25. Langacker, Ronald W.(1990).Subjectification.Cognitive Linguistics,1990(1),5-38.
26. Langacker, Ronald W.(1991).Foundations of Cognitive Grammar.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
27. Larson, Richard K.(1998).Events and Modification in Nominals.Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII,New York:
28. Lehmann, Winfred P.(ed.),Malkiel, Yakov(ed.)(1982).Perspectives on Historical Linguistics.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
29. Li, Charles N.(ed.)(1977).Mechanisms of Syntactic Change.Austin:University of Texas Press.
30. Lien, Chinfa(2010).Middles in Taiwanese Southern Min: The Interface of Lexical Meaning and Event Structure.Lingua,120,1273-1287.
31. Lyons, John(1977).Semantics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
32. Miracle, W. Charles(1991).Ohio,Ohio State University.
33. Palmer, F. R.(1986).Mood and Modality.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
34. Palmer, F. R.(2001).Mood and Modality.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
35. Palmer, F. R.(1990).Modality and the English Modals.London:Longman.
36. Perkins, Michael R.(1983).Modal Expressions in English.Norwood, NJ.:Ablex Publishing Co..
37. Pustejovsky, James(1991).The Generative Lexicon.Computational Linguistics,17(4),409-441.
38. Rotstein, Carmen,Winter, Yoad(2004).Total Adjectives vs. Partial Adjectives: Scale Structure and Higher-order Modifiers.Natural Language Semantics,12,259-288.
39. Siegel, Muffy E. A.(1980).Capturing the Adjective.New York:Garland Publishing, Inc..
40. Stein, Dieter(ed.),Wright, Susan(ed.)(1995).Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
41. Stein, Dieter,Wright, Susan(1995).Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
42. The Linguistic Society of Korea(ed.)(1982).Linguistics in the Morning Calm.Seoul:Hanshin.
43. Traugott, E. C.(ed.),Heine, B.(ed.)(1991).Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
44. Traugott, Elizabeth C.(1988).Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization.BLS,14,406-416.
45. Traugott, Elizabeth C.(1989).On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.Language,65(1),31-55.
46. Traugott, Elizabeth C.(ed.),Heine, Bernd(ed.)(1991).Appoaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.1: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issus.Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.
47. Traugott, Elizabeth C.(ed.),Heine, Bernd(ed.)(1991).Approaches to Grammaticalization 2: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers.Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
48. Traugott, Elizabeth C.,Dasher, Richard B.(2002).Regularity in Semantic Change.New York:Cambridge University Press.
49. von Dieter Kastovsky, herausgegeben(ed.)(1980).Perspektiven der Lexikalischen Semantik: Beitrage zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2-3, Dezember 1977.Bonn:Bouvier.
50. Wang, Cheuh-chen,Huang, Lillian M.(2006).Grammaticalization of Connectives in Mandarin Chinese: A Corpus-based Study.Language and Linguistics,7(4),991-1016.
51. Wang, Hisaomei(2008).Hsinchu,National Tsing Hua University.
52. Wang, Hsiao-Ling(2005).Hsinchu,National Tsing Hua University.
53. Wang, Li-Ya(2001).From Predicate to Discourse Marker: The Grammaticalization of Hao in Mandarin Chinese.Proceedings of the 2001 National Conference on Linguistics,Hsinchu:
54. Wang, Li-Ya(2005).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
55. Wang, Yu-Fang,Tsai, Pi-Hua(2005).Hao in Spoken Chinese Discourse: Relevance and Coherence.Language Sciences,27,215-243.
56. Wang, Yu-Fang,Tsai, Pi-Hua,Goodman, David,Lin, Meng-Ying(2010).Agreement, Acknowledgment, and Alignment: The Discourse-Pragmatic Functions of hao and dui in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation.Discourse Studies,12(2),241-267.
57. Yoon, Youngeun(1996).Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations.Natural Language Semantics,1996(4),217-236.
58. Yoshimura, Kimihiro,Taylor, John R.(2004).What Makes a Good Middle? The Role of Qualia in the Interpretation and Acceptability of Middle Expressions in English.English Language and Linguistics,8(2),293-321.
59. 太田辰夫、蔣紹愚譯、徐昌華譯(2003)。中國語歷史文法。北京:北京大學出版社。
60. 余光武、姚瑤(2009)。“好不好” 的表達功能及其形成的語用解釋。語言科學，8(6)，625-632。
61. 呂叔湘(2004)。現代漢語八百詞。北京:商務印書館。
62. 李晉霞(2005)。“好”的語法化與主觀性。世界漢語教學，2005(1)，44-49+96。
63. 杜道流(2004)。與 “多（麼）、太、好” 有關的感嘆句。語言研究，24(3)，52-56。
64. 沈家煊(2002)。如何處置 “處置式”？─論把字句的主觀性。中國語文，2002(5)，387-399。
65. 沈家煊(2001)。語言的 “主觀性” 和 “主觀化”。外語教學與研究，33(4)，268-275。
66. 武振玉(2004)。程度副詞 “好” 的產生與發展。吉林大學社會科學學報，2004(2)，59-63。
67. 邵敬敏、朱曉亞(2005)。“好” 的話語功能及其虛化軌跡。中國語文，2005(5)，399-407。
68. 徐兆泉(2009)。臺灣四縣腔海陸腔客家話辭典。臺北:南天書局。
69. 張玉春(2001)。釋“好”。東北師大學報（哲學社會科學版），2001(4)，85-88。
70. 張誼生(2006)。試論主觀量標記 “沒”、“不”、“好”。中國語文，2006(2)，127-134。
71. 強舒媺(2009)。無指疑問句之「形式─功能」誤配：客語「有麼介好V」構式研究。詞彙語意與構式的互動小型工作坊，臺北:
72. 許丕華(1996)。“好V” 式討論。瀋陽師範學院學報（社科版），1996(1)，80-82。
73. 許言(1998)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所。
74. 連金發(2000)。華語名前形容詞的語意探索。第六屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集，臺北:
75. 陳俊光(2008)。對比分析與教學應用。臺北:文鶴。
76. 曾小武(2003)。近代漢語裡特殊的 “好N” “好V”。漢語學報，2003(6)，194-197。
77. 湯廷池、湯志真(1997)。華語情態詞序論。第五屆世界華語文教學研討會論文集：語文分析組，臺北:
78. 葉瑞娟(2009)。客家話「正」的語用研究。日本中國語學會第59回全國大會，札幌:
79. 劉欣怡(2008)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學華語文教學研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
80. 蔣紹愚(2005)。古漢語詞匯綱要。臺北:商務印書館。
81. 霍伯爾‧鮑爾、伊莉莎白‧特拉格特、梁銀峰譯(2008)。語法化學說。上海:復旦大學。
82. 謝佳玲(2003)。華語的情態動詞與情態副詞：語意的分類與歸類。第七屆世界華語文教學研討會，臺北:
83. 謝佳玲(2002)。博士論文(博士論文)。新竹，國立清華大學語言學研究所。
84. 韓靜(2008)。語氣詞 “好了” 的語義與語用分析。南開語言學刊，2008(2)，105-111。
85. 鮮麗霞(2007)。“好” 的標記性與語用解釋。西昌學院學報（社會科學版），19(3)，1-5。

1. 蘇建唐(2017)。閩南語正反問句和程度結構中否定詞的角色：共時和歷時透視。清華大學語言學研究所學位論文。2017。1-228。