Very Early Utterances in Child Language: Implications for the Minimalist Theory

幼兒早期話語研究及其對微言主義的意涵

10.6503/THJCS.2017.47(2).06

村杉惠子(Murasugi Keiko)

Root Infinitives ； Root Infinitive analogues ； two-word utterances ； Minimalist program ； scrambling ； Universal Grammar ； 非限定主句 ； 類非限定主句 ； 語言習得之二詞階段 ； 微言主義 ； 變序 ； 普遍語法

清華學報

47卷2期（2017 / 06 / 01）

361 - 381

英文

In this paper, we will revisit the grammar of very early utterances that young children produce at around age 2 under the linguistic theory of the past 50 years. We will argue that very young children in the stage of two words and the telegraphic speech, who already know the head-complement relationship, the basic word order, the morphological properties regarding whether or not the language is agglutinative, have a specific system of φ-feature agreement then, and the detailed mechanism of the operation of Merge and Labeling proposed in the recent Minimalist thesis can be considered to be still under construction. Children are free to project unattested hypotheses based on their innately endowed knowledge, and in the course of language acquisition, there are intriguing cases where English-acquiring children fail to match their hypothesis to the input of the target language, thereby producing 'erroneous' scrambled sentences. We argue in this paper that the scrambled sentences that very young English-acquiring children produce (e.g., Powers 2000) can naturally be explained by assuming the child-specific system of φ-feature agreement, or the system whose spirit is consistent with AGR/TNS Omission Model (ATOM) (Schütze and Wexler 1996) for the child grammar, and Saito (2016) for the adult grammar.

本文探討以日語為母語之幼兒在語言習得過程中所犯的語誤，研究焦點放在兩歲幼兒在詞序上所產生的語誤。研究的結果指出，幼兒在二詞階段 (two-word stage) 與電報式言語階段 (telegraphic speech) 時，即已具備母語中詞組及構詞的相關知識；然而其對詞組性質及詞組互動的認識，則尚在成長建構之中。透過對幼兒的詞序語誤進行分析，本文也修正了近五十年來學界對兩歲幼兒語言習得的認知與研究。

1. Murasugi Keiko. “The Linguistic Constellations: Relating Phenomena with Parameter Setting,” Invited talk presented at GLOW in Asia VIII, 14 August 2010, Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.
2. Ai, Okubo(1975).Yooji no Kotoba to Chie.Tokyo:Ayumi Shuppan.
3. Ai, Okubo(1967).Yooji Gengo no Hattatsu.Tokyo:Tokyodo.
4. Aljenaie, Khawla(2000).The Emergence of Tense and Agreement in Kuwaiti Children Speaking Arabic.Reading Working Paper in Linguistics,4,1-24.
5. Blom, Elma,Wijnen, Frank(2000).How Dutch Children's Root Infinitives Become Modal.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD),Somerville, MA:
6. Bloom, Lois(1970).Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammars.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
7. Bohnacker, Ute(1997).Determiner Phrases and the Debate on Functional Categories in Early Child Language.Language Acquisition,6,49-90.
8. Braine, Martin D. S.(1963).On Learning the Grammatical Order of Words.Psychological Review,70(4),323-348.
9. Braine, Martin D. S.(1976).Children's First Word Combinations.Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development,41(1),1-104.
10. Brown, Roger(1973).A First Language: The Early Stages.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
11. Brown, Roger,Cazden, Courtney,Bellugi-Klima. Ursula(1968).The Child's Grammar from I to III.Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology,Minneapolis:
12. Chomsky, Noam(1981).Lectures on Government and Binding.Dordrecht:Foris.
13. Chomsky, Noam(2013).Problems of Projection.Lingua,130,33-49.
14. Coene, Martine,Taelman, Helena,Avram, Larisa,Gillis, Steven(2005).Early Bare Infinitives are Universally Non-finite...But Not Always Infinitives!.5th International Council for Central and East European Studies,Berlin:
15. d'Arcais, G. B. Flores(ed.),Levelt, W. J.(ed.)(1970).Advances in Psycholinguistics.Amsterdam:North-Holland.
16. Deen, Kamil Ud(2002).Los Angeles, CA,UCLA.
17. Guasti, Maria Teresa(1993).Verb Syntax in Italian Child Grammar: Finite and Non-finite Forms.Language Acquisition,3,1-40.
18. Haegeman, Lilliane(1995).Root Infinitives, Tense, and Truncated Structures in Dutch.Language Acquisition,4,205-255.
19. Hoekstra, Teun,Hyams, Nina(1998).Aspects of Root Inf.Lingua,106,81-112.
20. Hyams, Nina(2008).The Acquisition of Inflection: A Parameter-setting Approach.Language Acquisition,15,192-209.
21. Hyams, Nina(2002).Clausal Structure in Child Greek: A Reply to Varlokosta, Vainikka and Rohrbacher and a Reanalysis.The Linguistic Review,19(3),225-269.
22. Kato, Sachiko,Sato, Yumi,Chikuda, Yukiko,Miyoshi, Rituko,Sakai, Yumi,Koizumi, Masatoshi(2003).'Root Infinitives': Nihongo karano Kensho.Tohoku University Linguistics Journal,12,113-127.
23. Kim, Meesook,Phillip, Collin Phillips(1998).Complex Verb Constructions in Child Korean: Overt Markers of Covert Functional Structure.Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD),Somerville, MA:
24. Krämer, Irene(1993).The Licensing of Subjects in Early Child Language.MITWPL,19,197-212.
25. Miller, Wick,Ervin, Susan(1964).The Development of Grammar in Child Language.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,29(1),9-3.
26. Murasugi, Keiko,Fuji, Chisato(2011).Root Infinitives: The Parallel Routes the Japanese- and Korean-speaking Children Step in.Japanese/Korean Linguistics,19,527-541.
27. Murasugi, Keiko,Fuji, Chisato(2008).Root Infinitives: The Parallel Routes the Japanese- and Korean-speaking Children Step in.Japanese/Korean Linguistic Conference 18,New York:
28. Murasugi, Keiko,Fuji, Chisato,Hashimoto, Tomoko(2007).What's Acquired Later in an Agglutinative Language.GLOW in Asia VI,Hong Kong:
29. Murasugi, Keiko,Nakatani, Tomomi(2013).Three Types of 'Root Infinitives': Theoretical Implications from Child Japanese.Japanese/Korean Linguistics,20,263-280.
30. Murasugi, Keiko,Nakatani, Tomomi,Fuji, Chisato(2009).The Roots of Root Infinitive Analogues: The Surrogate Verb Forms Common in Adult and Child Grammars.34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD),Boston:
31. Murasugi, Keiko,Nakatani, Tomomi,Fuji, Chisato(2010).The Roots of Root Infinitive Analogues: The Surrogate Verb Forms Common in Adult and Child Grammars.BUCLD 34 Proceedings Online Supplement
32. Noji, Junya(1973).Yooji no Gengoseikatu no Zittai.Tokyo:Bunka Hyoron Syuppan.
33. Pierce, Amy(1992).Language Acquisition and Syntactic Theory: A Comparative Analysis of French and English Child Grammars.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
34. Powers, Susan M.(ed.),Hamman, Cornelia(ed.)(2000).The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization.Dordrecht:Kluwer.
35. Radford, Andrew(1990).Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax.Oxford:Blackwell.
36. Rasetti, Lucienne(2003).Genéve, Switzerland,Universite de Geneve.
37. Rice, Mabel L.(ed.)(1996).Toward a Genetics of Language.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
38. Rice, Mabel L.(ed.)(1996).Toward a Genetics of Language.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
39. Rizzi, Luigi(1993).Some Notes on Linguistic Theory and Language Development: The Case of Root Infinitives.Language Acquisition,3,371-393.
40. Saito, Mamoru(2016).(A) Case for Labeling: Labeling in Languages withoutφ-feature Agreement.The Linguistic Review,33,129-175.
41. Sano, Tetsuya(1995).Los Angeles, CA,UCLA.
42. Sano, Tetsuya,Hyams, Nina(1994).Agreement, Finiteness, and the Development of Null Arguments.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS),Amherst, MA:
43. Schütze, Carson T.,Wexler, Kenneth(1996).Subject Case Licensing and English Root Infinitives.Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD),Somerville, MA:
44. Varlokosta, Spyridoula,Vainikka, Anne,Rohrbacher, Bernhard(1996).Root Infinitives without Infinitives.Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD),Somerville, MA:
45. Wexler, Kenneth(1994).Optional Infinitives, Head Movement, and Economy of Derivations.Verb Movement,Cambridge, MA:
46. Wexler, Kenneth(2000).Three Problems in the Theory of the Optional Infinitive Stage: Stage/Individual Predicates, Eventive Verbs and Finite Null-Subjects.Proceedings of the 19th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL),Somerville, MA:
47. Wexler, Kenneth(1998).Very Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A New Explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage.Lingua,106,23-79.