賽夏語疑問詞及其疑問範疇研究

Saisiyat Interrogative Words and Domains in Question

10.6503/THJCS.201809_48(3).0005

葉美利(Marie Meili Yeh)

賽夏語 ； 疑問詞 ； 構詞 ； 概念 ； 疑問動詞 ； Saisiyat ； interrogative words ； morphology ； concept ； interrogative verbs

清華學報

48卷3期（2018 / 09 / 01）

595 - 629

繁體中文

本文透過構詞分析探討賽夏語疑問詞所表達的語意範疇，含基本語意範疇涵蓋哪些以及範疇間的關聯性為何。研究發現賽夏語的基本疑問範疇包含人、物、空間、動作與數量。表空間概念的處所疑問詞除了能與不同表路徑與靜態空間概念的詞彙前綴結合表達更細緻的處所疑問之外，並能透過加綴衍生時間疑問詞與方式疑問詞，選擇疑問詞亦是以空間為本透過語用推論(pragmatic inference)延伸而來。疑問動詞在世界語言少見(Hagège 2008)，凸顯動作疑問這個概念鮮以單純詞表示，但賽夏語存有詢問動作的疑問詞powa'，且表示原因與目的的疑問詞皆是由此動作疑問詞經由隱喻或轉喻發展而來。動作這個概念在賽夏語的獨立性亦展現在數量的疑問：賽夏語以黏著疑問詞-pilaz詢問與動作相關的數概念。

This paper deals with the concepts questioned by interrogative words in Saisiyat, a Formosan language spoken in the northwestern mountainous area of Taiwan. Through morphological decomposition, it is found that the conceptual domains under question include person, object, space, action, and quantity. Spatial interrogative words are combined with morphemes denoting such concepts as source, goal, or path to express specific questions concerning location. In addition, selection, time, and manner interrogative words are derived from spatial interrogative words via metonymic pragmatic inference and metaphoric extension. Although interrogative verbs are reported to be rare in world languages (Hagège 2008), action and quantity interrogative words in Saisiyat manifest themselves as verbs. From the action domain, question words for purpose and cause are derived. The status of action as an independent category is also evident in question words for quantity, where Saisiyat sets aside a bound morpheme, -pilaz, to form questions concerning actions or events.

1. Huang, Lillian M.(2001).Focus System of Mayrinax Atayal: A Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspective.Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Science,46(1-2),51-69.
   連結：
2. 葉美利(2014)。賽夏語指示詞的句法、構詞與語意初探。臺灣語文研究，9(1)，55-78。
   連結：
3. 葉美利、高清菊(2011)。賽夏族語詞典編輯的語義分析問題。臺灣語文研究，6(1)，189-210。
   連結：
4. 《賽夏語詞典》Saixiayu cidian，http://e-dictionary.apc.gov.tw/xsy/Search.htm
5. Austronesian Comparative Dictionary, http://www.trussel2.com/acd/
6. Bhat, D.N.S.(2000).Word Classes and Sentential Functions.Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes,Berlin:
7. Bhat, D.N.S.(1994).The Adjectival Category: Criteria for Differentiation and Identification.Amsterdam:John Benjamins.
8. Chou, Yi-ming M.(2008).Hsinchu,National Tsing Hua University.
9. Cuyckens, Hubert(2002).Metonymy in Prepositions.Perspectives on Prepositions,Tübingen:
10. Cysouw, Michael(2005).The Typology of Content Interrogatives.The 6th Meeting of the Association for Linguistic Typology,Indonesia: Padang:
11. Cysouw, Michael(2007).Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison.International Journal of American Linguistics,73(2),133-163.
12. Cysouw, Michael(2004).Interrogative Words: An Exercise in Lexical Typology.The Workshop 'Bantu Grammar: Description and Theory 3: Session on Question Formation in Bantu',Berlin:
13. Diessel, Holger(2003).The Relationship Between Demonstratives and Interrogatives.Studies in Language,27(3),635-655.
14. Greenberg, Joseph H.(ed.),Ferguson, Charles A.(ed.),Moravcsik, A.(ed.)(1978).Universals of Human Languages Vol. 1: Method and Theory.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
15. Hagège, Claude(2008).Towards a Typology of Interrogative Verbs.Linguistic Typology,12(1),1-44.
16. Heine, Bernard,Claudi, Ulrike,Hünnemeyer, Friederike(1991).Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
17. Hopper, Paul L.,Thompson, Sandra A.(1984).The Discourse Basis for Lexical Categories in Universal Grammar.Language,60(4),703-752.
18. Huang, Lillian M.,Yeh, Marie M.,Zeitoun, Elizabeth,Chang, Anna H.,Wu, Joy J.(1999).Interrogative Constructions in Some Formosan Languages.Chinese Languages and Linguistics V: Interactions in Language,Taipei:
19. Jackendoff, Ray(1983).Semantics and Cognition.Cambridge, Mass.:The MIT Press.
20. Lin, Dong-yi(2013).Florida,University of Florida.
21. Lu, Louis W.,Su, Lily I.(2003).From Main Verb, Verb Aspect to Current Relevant State: A Case Study on the Grammaticalization of Saisiyat Polysemous ila.The Second Workshop on Formosan Languages: On the Notion of "Verb" in Formosan Languages,Taipei:
22. Lyons, John(1977).Semantics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Ross, Malcolm D.(1995).Reconstructing Proto-Austronesian Verbal Morphology: Evidence from Taiwan.Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan, Symposium Series of Institute of History and Philology,Taipei:
24. San Roque, L.(2016).'Where' Questions and Their Responses in Duna (Papua New Guinea).Open Linguistics,2(1),85-104.
25. Tai, James H-Y(1985).Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order.Iconicity in Syntax,Amsterdam:
26. Traugott, Elizabeth C.,Dasher, Richard B.(2001).Regularity in Semantic Change.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
27. Tsai, Cheng-yu Edwin(2008).Wh-interrogatives in Saisiyat and Lexical Merger Parameter.USTWPL,4,117-131.
28. Ultan, Russell(1978).Some General Characteristics of Interrogative Systems.Universals of Human Language,4,211-248.
29. Wierzbicka, Anna(2000).Lexical Prototypes as a Universal Basis for Cross-linguistic Identification of Parts of Speech.Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes,Berlin:
30. Yeh, Marie Meili(2003).Taipei,National Taiwan Normal University.
31. Yeh, Marie Meili(2011).Nominalization in Saisiyat.Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives,Amsterdam:
32. Yeh, Marie Meili(1991).Hsinchu,National Tsing Hua University.
33. Zeitoun, Elizabeth,Chu, Tai-hwa,Lalo a tahesh kaybaybaw(2015).A Study of Saisiyat Morphology.Honolulu:University of Hawai'i Press.
34. Zeitoun, Elizabeth,Teng, Stacy F. C.,Ferrell, Raleigh(2010).Reconstruction of '2' in PAN and Related Issues.Language and Linguistics,11(4),853-884.
35. 日智衡編(2009)。賽夏族故事劇本。苗栗=Miaoli:苗栗縣政府=Miaolixian zhengfu。
36. 何德華、董瑪女(2016)。達悟語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
37. 宋麗梅(2016)。賽德克語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
38. 李佩容、許韋晟(2016)。太魯閣語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
39. 沈文琦(2016)。撒奇萊雅語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
40. 高清菊(2008)。新竹=Hsinchu，國立新竹教育大學臺灣語言與語文教育研究所=Guoli Hsinchu jiaoyu daxue Taiwan yuyan yu yuwen jiaoyu yanjiusuo。
41. 國立東華大學原住民族發展中心編(2011)。原住民族語言發展─理論與實務論叢。臺北=Taipei:行政院原住民族委員會=Xingzhengyuan yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
42. 張永利(2000)。噶瑪蘭語參考語法。臺北=Taipei:遠流出版=Yuanliu chuban。
43. 張永利、潘家榮(2016)。鄒語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
44. 葉美利(2000)。賽夏語參考語法。臺北=Taipei:遠流出版=Yuanliu chuban。
45. 葉美利(1995)。賽夏語的「時制」與「動貌」初探。臺灣南島民族母語研究論文集，臺北=Taipei:
46. 葉美利(2016)。賽夏語語法概論。新北=New Taipei:原住民族委員會=Yuanzhuminzu weiyuanhui。
47. 葉美利、何清輝(2015)。卓社布農語的數詞初探。第九屆臺灣文化國際學術研討會『跨越與創新：新視域下的臺灣語言、文學與文化研究』，臺北=Taipei:
48. 蔡維天(2007)。重溫「為什麼問怎麼樣，怎麼樣問為什麼」─談漢語疑問句和反身句中的內、外狀語。中國語文，31，195-207。
49. 蔡維天(2011)。從「這話從何說起？」說起。語言學論叢，43，194-208。

1. 陳嬿庄(2018)。巴宰語和噶哈巫語的疑問詞。台灣原住民族研究，11(2)，1-62。
2. 謝富惠(2019)。排灣語疑問詞語意範疇及其延伸途徑。臺灣語文研究，14(1)，1-44。
3. 鄭明中,張月珍(2020)。賽夏語清擦音[s,ʃ]之聲學分析：一個初探性的個案研究。聯大學報，17(1)，23-46。