藝術的意義理論－一個詮釋學的變體

The Meaning Theory of Art-A Hermeneutical Variety

10.29732/SJPS.201108.0004

史偉民(Wei-Min Shi)

藝術理論 ； 藝術的意義理論 ； 審美意識 ； 高達美 ； theory of art ； the Meaning Theory of Art ； aesthetic consciousness ； Gadamer

東吳哲學學報

24期（2011 / 08 / 01）

99 - 130

繁體中文

本文試圖由分析的藝術哲學的角度檢視高速美在其詮釋學中是否提供了對於藝術的適切理解。本文論證：高達美對於審美意識的批判，預設了一個藝術作品的存有的理論，後者則包含了一個有關於做為藝術經驗的對象的藝術作品的理論。本文首先把高達美的此一觀點立場歸類為藝術的意義理論，繼之則分析高達美對於藝術所傳遞的意義的特殊界定，並且提出批判。

This paper aims to examine whether Gadamer offered a proper understanding of art in his hermeneutics from the point of view of the analytic philosophy of art. It is argued that Gadamer's critique of the aesthetic consciousness presupposes a theory of the being of artworks, which implies a theory of the artwork as an object of artistic experience. This theory is then identified as a hermeneutical variety of the Meaning and Gadamer's further specification of the meanings conveyed in artworks is analyzed and criticized.

1. 張鼎國(2008)。文本與詮釋：論高達美如何理解康德《判斷力批判》。中央大學人文學報，34，63-95。
   連結：
2. Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. A Novel. London: Secker & Warburg.
3. Arstotle,Barnes, J.(Ed.)(1984).The Complete Works of Aristotle.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
4. Barasch, M.(1998).Modern Theories of Art, 2: From Impressionism to Kandinsky.New York:New York University Press.
5. Beardsley, M. C.(1982).The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected Essays.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
6. Carroll, N.(1997).Danto's New Definition of Art and the Problem of Art Theories.British Journal of Aesthetics,37(4),386-392.
7. Carroll, N.(Ed.)(2000).Theories of Art Today.Madison, Wisconsin:The University of Wisconsin Press.
8. Chipp, H. B.(1968).Theories of Modern Art: A Source Book by Artists and Critics.Berkeley:University of California Press.
9. Collingwood, R. G.(1955).The Principles of Art.Oxford:The Clarendon Press.
10. Crowther, P.(1983).The Experience of Art: Some Problems and Possibilities of Hermeneutical Analysis.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,43(3),347-362.
11. Danto, A.(1997).After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History.Princeton, New Jersey:Princeton University Press.
12. Danto, A.(1981).The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
13. Danto, A.(1964).The Artworld.The Journal of Philosophy,61(19),571-584.
14. Danto, A.(1974).The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,33,139-148.
15. Dickie, J.(1974).Art and the Aesthetic. An Institutional Analysis.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
16. Dickie, J.(1964).The Myth of the Aesthetic Attitude.American Philosophical Quarterly,1,56-65.
17. French P. A.(Ed.),Uehling, T. E. Jr.(Ed.),Wettstein, H. K.(Ed.)(1991).Philosophy and the Arts: Midwest Studies in Philosophy.Notre Dame, Ind.:University of Notre Dame Press.
18. French P. A.(Ed.),Wettstein H. K.(Ed.)(2003).Meaning in the Art: Midwest Studies in Philosophy.Boston:Blackwell Publishing.
19. Gadamer, H.-G.(1993).Gesammelte Werke. 8. Äesthetik und Poetik. I. Kunst als Aussage.Tübingen:J. C. B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck).
20. Gadamer, H.-G.(1995).Gesammelte Werke. 10. Hermeneutik im Rückblick.Tübingen:J. C. B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck).
21. Gadamer, H.-G.(1990).Gesammelte Werke. 1. Hermeneutik. I. Wahrheit und Methode.Tübingen:J. C. B. Mohr(Paul Siebeck).
22. Gadamer, H.-G.(1986).The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
23. Gadamer, H.-G.,Barden, G.(Trans.),Cumming, J.(Trans.)(1975).Truth and Method.London:Sheed and Ward Ltd..
24. Gadamer, H.-G.,Weinsheimer, J.(Trans. revised),Marshall, D. G.(Trans. revised)(2004).Truth and Method.London:Continuum.
25. Grondin, J.,Montreal, K. Plant(Trans.),Kingston(Trans.)(2003).The Philosophy of Gadamer.Ithaca:McGill-Queen's University Press.
26. Heidegger, M.,Stambaugh, J.(Trans.)(1996).Being and Time.Albany:State University of New York Press.
27. Kieran, M.(Ed.)(2006).Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art.Malden, MA:Blackwell Publishing Ltd..
28. Kivy, P.(1997).Philosophies of Arts: An Essay in Differences.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
29. Krajewski, B.(Ed.)(2004).Gadamer's Repercussions: Reconsidering Philosophical Hermeneutics.Berkeley, California:University of California Press.
30. Levinson, J.(1990).Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics.Ithaca, N.Y.:Cornell University Press.
31. McFee, G.(1980).The Historicity of Art.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,38,307-324.
32. Schroeder, H. J.(Trans.)(1978).Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent.Rockford, Illinois:Tan Books & Publishers.
33. Shusterman, R.(1997).The End of Aesthetic Experience.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,55(1),29-41.
34. Weinsheimer, J. C.(1985).Gadamer's Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method.New Haven:Yale University Press.
35. Yanal, R. J.(1996).The Danto-Wollheim Meaning Theory of Art.Ratio,9(1),56-67.