题名

德性知識論與懷疑論:Linda Zagzebski《論知識論》

并列篇名

Virtue Epistemology and Skepticism: "On Epistemology" by Linda Zagzebski

作者

米建國(Chien-Kuo Mi)

关键词

德性知識論 ; 懷疑論 ; 超驗論證 ; virtue epistemology ; skepticism ; transcendental argument ; Linda Zagzebski ; Ernest Sosa

期刊名称

東吳哲學學報

卷期/出版年月

29期(2014 / 02 / 01)

页次

95 - 123

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

除了當代德性知識論創始人Ernest Sosa之外,Linda Zagzebski是二十世紀80年代以來,德性知識論發展過程中最具代表性的哲學家之一。本文將從論述Zagzebski的新著《論知識論》開始,特別針對「知識的價值(與本質)」和「懷疑論」這兩個議題,提出本文作者的理解與討論,一方面努力展現Zagzebski在這本書所標示出的重要宣稱與獨特見解,另一方面也藉由對比Sosa德性知識論的主張與想法,企圖為當代知識論的重要議題(特別是懷疑論)提供一個比較合理可能的解決途徑。

英文摘要

Linda Zagzebski is one of the two main figures in the contemporary development of Virtue Epistemology, the other is Ernest Sosa. This critical review begins by offering some brief descriptions of Zagzebski's recent book ”On Epistemology”, and moves forward to discussions on two important issues regarding ”the value (and nature) problem” and ”the skeptical problem” in epistemology. By comparing and contrasting with Sosa's ideas of ”what knowledge is” and ”the transcendental argument (against skepticism)”, I will point out what Zagzebski's contributions really are and also provide a rational consideration in which the skeptical problem can be better dealt with.

主题分类 人文學 > 人文學綜合
参考文献
  1. 米建國(2012)。什麼是德性知識論?知識的本質與價值問題。哲學與文化,39(2),23-46。
    連結:
  2. Strawson, P. F. (1595). Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.
  3. Greco, J.(Ed.)(2004).Ernest Sosa and His Critics.Blackwell Press.
  4. Hendricks, V.(Ed.),Pritchard, D. H.(Ed.)(2007).New Waves in Epistemology.Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Landesman, C.(Ed.),Meeks, R.(Ed.)(2003).Philosophical Skepticism.Blackwell Press.
  6. McComiskey, B.(2002).Gorgias and the New Sophistic Rhetoric.Carbondale:Southern Illinois.
  7. Popkin, R. H.(Ed.),Maia Neto, J. R.(Ed.)(2007).Skepticism: An Anthology.Prometheus Books Press.
  8. Sosa, E.(2010).Knowing Full Well.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
  9. Stroud, B.(1984).The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  10. Unger, P.(1978).Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  11. Williams, B.(1978).Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry.NJ:Humanities Press.
  12. Zagzebski, L.(2009).On Epistemology.CA:Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  13. Zagzebski, L.(1996).Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge.Cambridge University Press.
被引用次数
  1. 羅雅純(2020)。德性資於學問-戴震知識論新釋。東吳中文學報,39,113-142。
  2. 羅雅純(2021)。情感主義?智識主義?-論戴震「問學所得,德性日充」知識進路的道德觀。東華漢學,34,189-220。
  3. 米建國(2014)。書評:Ernest Sosa, Knowing Full Well(《知之完好》)。哲學與文化,41(3),143-152。