Meaning and Morality: An Examination of the Meaning of Life

意義與道德：關於生命意義的探索

游承霖(Cheng-Ling Yu)

生命的意義 ； 無道德的問題 ； 意義價值與道德價值分離的主張 ； 意義價值與道德價值最終等同的主張 ； 意義價值與道德價值互相關聯的主張 ； The Meaning of Life ； The Problem of Immorality ； The Thesis of the Distinction between Meaning Values and Moral Values ； The Thesis of the Ultimate Identification of Meaning Values with Moral Values ； The Thesis of the Interrelatedness of Meaning Values and Moral Values

東吳哲學學報

31期（2015 / 02 / 01）

93 - 111

英文

在本篇文章筆者將探討意義與道德之間的關聯。在討論生命意義議題的哲學家之間，針對意義與道德之間的關聯，基本上有三種不同的看法：一、意義價值與道德價值完全區分的主張；二、意義價值最終等同道德價值的主張；三、意義價值與道德價值互相關聯的主張。在此筆者將試圖替第三個主張辯護。首先，經由探討「無道德的問題」以及分析意義與道德概念上的不同，筆者將指出前兩個主張的不足之處。接著，筆者將以Dworkin的「康德的自我尊重原則」以及意義作為有層次的結構的想法為依據，試圖論證第三個主張是比較完善的。

In this essay I shall examine the relationship between meaning and morality, which is a major theme in the discussion about the meaning of life in the contemporary philosophy. There are basically three different views one can take concerning the relationship between meaning and morality: First, one may separate meaning values from moral values, so that the inquiry about meaning is distinct from and independent of the inquiry about morality. Second, one may maintain that ultimately, meaning values are not different from moral values. Third, one may argue that although meaning values and moral values are not identical, they are nonetheless interrelated, so that the inquiry about meaning cannot be separated from the inquiry about morality. In this essay, I shall defend the last of these views. I shall note the unsatisfactoriness of the first two views by examining what I shall call the Problem of Immorality and the conceptual difference between meaning and morality. I shall defend the last of these views by utilizing Dworkin's conception of the Kantian principle of self-respect and by proposing the idea of meaning as having a hierarchical structure.

1. Singer, P. (2011). Part 6-The Meaning of Life. wmv. Retrieved November 10, 2014, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_LN8dl9RAE&index=6&list=UUKxP08Rf2J64mWm74LHUb1A
2. Underhill, E. (1930). Mysticism: A Study in Nature and Development of Spiritual Consciousness (12th ed.). Grand Rapids: Christian Classics Ethereal Library
3. Dworkin, R.(2011).Justice for Hedgehogs.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
4. Frankfurt, H. G.(2004).The Reasons of Love.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
5. Kekes, J.(2000).Pluralism in Philosophy: Changing the Subject.Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
6. Kennett, J.(2002).Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency.The Philosophical Quarterly,208(52),340-357.
7. Klemke, E. D.(Ed.),Cahn, S. M.(Ed.)(2008).The Meaning of Life: A Reader.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Pereboom, D.(Ed.)(1997).Free Will.Indianapolis:Hackett.
9. Peterson, M.(Ed.),Hasker, W.(Ed.),Reichenbach, B.(Ed.),Basinger, D.(Ed.)(2014).Philosophy of Religion.New York:Oxford University Press.
10. Singer, P.(1995).How Are We to Live?.New York:Prometheus Book.
11. Singer, P.(1993).Practical Ethics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. Wolf, S.(2010).Meaning in Life and Why It Matters.Princeton:Princeton University Press.