憎肇的假名論與指涉的不可測度說

Sengzhao's Theory of Provisional Designation (jiaming) and the Theory of the Inscrutability of Reference

嚴瑋泓(Wei-Hung Yen)

僧肇 ； 假名 ； 《肇論》 ； 語言 ； 指涉的不可測度說 ； Sengzhao ； provisional designation ； Zhaolun ； language ； theory of the inscrutability of reference

東吳哲學學報

32期（2015 / 08 / 01）

105 - 127

繁體中文

本文旨於探究僧肇的語言哲學觀點。作者將說明僧肇語言觀的基礎乃是他的假名理論，此理論的內涵在於揭露語言與其指涉的不對當以及語言的功能與限制。作者分別從「名實無當」、「此彼莫定乎一名」與「語應無方」來論述僧肇的假名理論，發現其與蒯因之指涉的不可測度說具有理論的相似性。依據本文的結論，僧肇的假名理論乃基於《般若經》的空、無所得以及中觀哲學的二諦論而成立。在世俗諦上，僧肇仍然承認語言在約定脈絡的暫時語意。據此，僧肇的假名理論與指涉的不可測度說的理論相似性與差異性可從經驗論、自然主義以及行為主義的視角論之。此外，僧肇的假名理論亦適用在理解第一義諦的動態歷程，但此時的語言僅作為過渡的工具，當終極真理朗現，語言則須退居世俗諦，此乃僧肇所謂「真境無言」之意義。這也是僧肇假名理論與指涉的不可測度說的不同之處。

This paper is mainly an inquiry into Sengzhao's (Eastern Jin dynasty; 384-414 C.E.) point of view on language. I aim to illustrate that the basis of Sengzhao's philosophy of language is his theory of provisional designation (jiaming). According to this theory, language is not precisely correspondent with its referent- a fact which reveals both the function and limitations of language. I then elaborate on Sengzhao's theory of provisional designation from the discussions of ＂language is not correspondent with its referent (ming-shi-wu-dang),＂ ＂indeterminacy of a word (ci-bi-mo-ding-hu-yi-ming),＂ and ＂language should be indefinite (yu-ying-wu-fang)＂ and show that there is a theoretical similarity between Sengzhao's views and Quine's theory of the inscrutability of reference. I conclude by showing that the philosophical foundation of Sengzhao's theory of provisional designation is based on the two theories of emptiness and non-apprehension from the Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra, and the Mādhyamika theory of the two truths. Sengzhao recognizes the temporary meaning of language in a conventional context, accordingly, theoretical similarities and differences between Sengzhao's and Quine's views are that they both adopt empirical, naturalistic, and behaviorist perspectives on language. Furthermore, Sengzhao's theory of provisional designation has particular relevance to the dynamic process of gaining insight into ultimate truth. Since language functions only as a temporary transitional instrument, language is remaining on the level of conventional truth. The ultimate truth however, shows that ＂the true nature of all things is silent (zhen-jing-wu-yen).＂ This is the difference between Sengzhao's theory of provisional designation and Quine's theory of the inscrutability of reference.

1. 方萬全(2008)。以維根斯坦之矛攻蒯因之盾：論威廉斯對蒯因的「不確定說」的批評。哲學與文化，35(8)，5-24。
   連結：
2. 鄭凱元(2008)。不確定說意涵之探討：語意取消論或化約傾向論？。哲學與文化，35(8)，47-65。
   連結：
3. 嚴瑋泓(2006)。論《般若經》的「假名」概念─以《大般若波羅蜜多經．第四會》〈妙行品〉與《第二會》〈善現品〉的對比作為考察的基礎─。中華佛學研究，10，43-70。
   連結：
4. 卍續藏。臺北:新文豐。
5. CBETA 電子佛典集成。中華電子佛典協會 (Chinese Buddhist Electronic Text Association)，2011。
6. Ho, Chien-hsing(2013).Ontic Indeterminacy and Paradoxical Language: A Philosophical Analysis of Sengzhao's Linguistic Thought.Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy,12(4),505-522.
7. Liebenthal, W.(1968).Chao Lun: The Treatise of Seng-chao.Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press.
8. Quine, W. V.(1960).Word and Object.Cambridge:Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
9. Quine, W. V.(1990).Pursuit of Truth.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
10. Quine, W. V.(1969).Ontological Relativity, and Other Essays.New York:Columbia University Press.
11. 方萬全(1993)。第一人稱與翻譯的不確定說。分析哲學與語言哲學論文集，香港:
12. 林建德(2013)。道與空性：老子與龍樹的哲學對話。臺北:法鼓文化。
13. 林從一(2002)。蒯因的語意窘境。歐美研究，32(1)，107-153。
14. 張岱年(2005)。中國哲學大綱。南京:江蘇教育出版社。
15. 陳平坤(2013)。僧肇與吉藏的實相哲學。臺北:法鼓文化。
16. 陳鼓應(1999)。莊子今註今譯。臺北:臺灣商務。
17. 陳鼓應輯(1985)。莊子集釋。北京:中華書局。
18. 塚本善隆編(1955)。肇論研究。京都:法藏館。