從技藝與機運的對立關係來看公共領域中的政治自由－鄂蘭與海德格的比較

On Political Freedom in Public Sphere in View of the Contrast between Téchne and Túche - A Comparison between Arendt and Heidegger

汪文聖(Wen-Sheng Wang)

技藝 ； 機運 ； 公共領域 ； 漢娜鄂蘭 ； 馬丁海德格 ； Téchne ； Túche ； Public Sphere ； Hannah Arendt ； Martin Heidegger

東吳哲學學報

35期（2017 / 02 / 01）

1 - 29

繁體中文

此文始於討論亞里斯多德理解政治為一種技藝，及其界定的技藝對反於機運。故政治學既非精確的科學，也非偶發的意見，它可稱為一種技藝之學，政治是以人為活動來面對機運的公共事務。其次本文探討漢娜．鄂蘭如何理解公共領域中的政治自由為多數公民的意志，以面對一個機運的、但可被化解的不確定未來。本文接著對馬丁．海德格基於「此－在」的意志與從「存有」的本有而來的思想，以理解公共領域中的政治自由，並詮釋政治對於海德格而言是如何面對機運的。最後我們可做介於鄂蘭與海德格之間的一個比較。

This paper begins with a discussion of the thesis that politics is a kind of téchne (art), as Aristotle states. He defines téchne to be the opposite of túche (chance). Hence, politics is neither an exact science nor an accidental opinion. It is, rather, a teachable art or skill (Kunstlehre). Politics is a public affair in the sense of human activity facing túche. Based on this theme, the paper investigates how Hannah Arendt interprets political freedom in public sphere as the will of the plural citizens, facing an uncertain future, which can be interpreted as túche, in an attempt to still the disquiet of the collective ego. We further investigate Heidegger's understanding of political freedom in public sphere based on his comprehension of the will of Da-sein and the enowning (Ereignis) of Being. Hence we can also interpret how politics is for Heidegger to face túche. With this regard, a comparison between Arendt and Heidegger could be made.

1. Aristotle (1933). Metaphysics (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
2. Held, K. (2004, October 20-21). Phenomenology of the Political World.「政治世界中的現象學」系列講座.臺北: 政治大學哲學系.
3. Angier, T.(2010).Techne in Aristotle's Ethics. Crafting the Moral Life.New York:Continuum.
4. Arendt, H.(1978).The Life of the Mind. Two/Willing.San Diego:A Harvest Book Harcourt, Inc.
5. Arendt, H.(1978).The Life of the Mind. One/Thinking.San Diego:A Harvest Book Harcourt, Inc.
6. Arendt. H.(1958).The Human Condition.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
7. Aristotle,Thomson, J. A. K.(Trans.),Tredennick, H.(revised notes appendices)(2004).The Nicomachean Ethics.London:Penguin.
8. Bowler, M.(2008).Heidegger and Aristotle. Philosophy as Praxis.New York:Continuum International Publishing Group.
9. de Beistegui, Miguel(Ed.),Sparks, Simon(Ed.)(2000).Philosophy and Tragedy.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
10. Dunne, J.(2001).Back to the Rough Ground. Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique.Indiana:University of Notre Dame Press.
11. Figal, G.(Ed.),Veith, J.(Trans.)(2007).The Heidegger's Reader.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
12. Habermas, J.,Burger, T.(Trans.)(1989).The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society.Cambridge Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
13. Heidegger, M.(2004).Wegmarken.Frankfurt a. M.:Klostermann.
14. Heidegger, M.(1981).Über den Humanismus.Frankfurt a. M.:Klostermann.
15. Heidegger, M.(1966).Einführung in die Metaphysik.Tübingen:Niemeyer.
16. Heidegger, M.(1989).Beiträge zur Philosophie (vom Ereignis).Frankfurt a. M.:Klostermann.
17. Heidegger, M.(1979).Sein und Zeit.Tübingen:Max Niemeyer.
18. Heidegger, M.,Eman, P.(Trans.),Maly, K.(Trans.)(1999).Contributions to Philosophy (from Enowning).Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
19. Heidegger, M.,Manheim, R.(Trans.)(1959).An Introduction to Metaphysics.New Haven:Yale University Press.
20. Hyland, D. A.(Ed.)Manoussakis, J. P.(Ed.)(2006).Heidegger and the Greek.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
21. Jamme, C.(Hrsg.),Harris, K.(Hrsg.)(1992).Martin Heidegger. Kunst-Politik-Technik.München:Wilhelm Fink.
22. Kisiel, T.(1995).The Genesis of Heidegger's Being and Time.Berkeley:University of California Press.
23. Krell, D. F.(Ed.)(1996).Basic Writings.London:Routledge.
24. Nussbaum, M.(2001).The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
25. Schmidt, D. J.(2001).On Germans & Other Greeks. Tragedy and Ethical Life.Bloomington:Indiana University Press.
26. Tabachnick, D. E.(2004).Techne, Technology and Tragedy. From Virginia Tech.Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology,7(3)
27. Villa, D. R.(1996).Arendt and Heidegger: The Fate of the Political.New Jersey:Princeton University Press.

1. 劉鐔靖(2019)。以氣思維勾勒政治期待─當代莊學視域〈人間世〉詮釋。東華漢學，29，49-80。