黑格爾論思辯與概念

Hegel on Speculation and Concept

史偉民(Wei-Min Shi)

黑格爾 ； 思辯 ； 判斷 ； 概念 ； Hegel ； speculation ； judgment ； concept

東吳哲學學報

36期（2017 / 08 / 01）

1 - 34

繁體中文

本文將首先檢視幾種對於黑格爾的判斷觀念的解釋，指出在對「判斷中的繫詞意指同一性」之命題的解釋中，學者們或者認為黑格爾使用「同一性」一詞的方式不合常規，或者認為他使用「判斷中的繫詞意指同一性」此一命題的方式不合常規。相對於此，本文主張黑格爾以不合常規的方式使用「判斷」一詞，而用之意指面對對象，企圖發現其實在定義的思維；相反地，思辯命題則表達人類思維對實在的範疇架構。一系列的思辯命題，因之呈現了對象本身的發展，也就是此一對象之概念的發展──此即黑格爾所主張的「概念之運動」，此一觀念預設了一種非形式邏輯概念。

This paper begins with examining some interpretations of Hegel's doctrine of judgment. It will be demonstrated that, while interpreting Hegel's claim that the copula in the judgment means identity, scholars either think that Hegel uses the term ＂identity＂ unconventionally or that he uses the proposition ＂the copula in the judgment means identity＂ in a unconventional way. It is maintained in this paper that Hegel uses the term ＂judgment＂ unconventionally to mean the thinking that attempts to achieve the real definition of the object. In contrast, the speculative proposition expresses human thinking's categorial structuring of reality. The series of speculative propositions, therefore, presents the development of the object as well as the development the concept of the object. This is what Hegel names as the movement of concept, which presupposes a kind of non-formal-logical concept.

1. Fichte, J. G. (1845). Johann Gottlieb Fichte's sämmtliche Werke. Zur theoretischen Philosophie. 1, Band 1 (J. H. Fichte, Ed.). Berlin: Verlag von Veit und Comp.
2. Russell, B. (1914). Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
3. Erdmann, B. (1907). Logik. Bd. 1. Logische Elementarlehre. Halle: Verlag von Max Niemeyer.
4. Ameriks, K.(1990).Kant, Fichte, and Short Arguments to Idealism.Archiv für die Geschichte der Philosophie,72(1),63-85.
5. Arndt, A.(Ed.),Iber, Ch.(Ed.),Kruck, G.(Ed.)(2006).Hegels Lehre vom Begriff, Urteil und Schluss.Berlin:Akademie Verlag.
6. Carlson, D. G.(Ed.)(2005).Hegel's Theory of the Subject.Hampshire:Palgrave MacMillan.
7. Collingwood, R. G.(1994).The Idea of History.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Collingwood, R. G.,Connelly, J.(Ed.),D'Oro, G.(Ed.)(2005).An Essay on Philosophical Method.Oxford:Clarendon Press.
9. Davidson, D.(1974).On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association,47,5-20.
10. Deligiorgi, K.(Ed.)(2006).Hegel: New Directions.Montreal:McGinn-Queen's University Press.
11. Desmond, W.(Ed.)(1989).Hegel and His Critics.Albany, New York:State University of New York Press.
12. Dworkin, R.(1986).Law's Empire.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
13. Dworkin, R.(1972).The Jurisprudence of Richard Nixon.The New York Review of Books,18(8),27-35.
14. Gallie, W. B.(1964).Philosophy and the Historical Understanding.London:Chatto & Windus.
15. Gallie, W. B.(1956).Essentially Contested Concepts.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,56,167-198.
16. Graeser, A.(1990).Hegel über die Rede vom Absoluten. Teil I: Urteil, Satz und spekulativer Gehalt.Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung,44,175-193.
17. Hegel, G. W. F.(1986).Werke in zwanzig Bänden.Frankfurt a. M.:Suhrkamp.
18. Horstmann, R.-P.(1991).Die Grenzen der Vernunft.Frankfurt a. M.:Verlag Anton Hain.
19. Horstmann, R.-P.(1984).Ontologie und Relationen. Hegel, Bradley, Russell und die Kontroverse über interne und externe Beziehungen.Königstein i. Ts.:Athenaum.
20. Houlgate, S.(2004).Hegel, Nietzsche and the Criticism of Metaphysics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
21. Kruck, G.,Schick, F.(1996).Identität im prädikativen Urteil? Überlegungen zu einem alten Streit am Fall des positiven Urteils in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik.Jahrbuch für Philosophie des Forschungsinstituts Hannover,7,176-196.
22. Lenders, W.(1971).Die analytische Begriffs- und Urteilstheorie von G. W. Leibniz und Chr. Wolff.Hildesheim:Georg Olms Verlag.
23. Martin, C.(2016).Hegel on Judgements and Posits.Hegel Bulletin,37(1),53-80.
24. Pinkard, T.(1988).Hegel's Dialectic. The Explanation of Possibility.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
25. Pippin, R.(1989).Hegel's Idealism: The Satisfaction of Self-Consciousness.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
26. Pippin, R.(1993).Hegel's Original Insight.International Philosophical Quarterly,33(3),285-295.
27. Quine, W. V. O.(1960).Word and Object.Cambridge, Mass.:The MIT Press.
28. Rosen, S.(2014).The Idea of Hegel's Science of Logic.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
29. Rosenkranz, K.(1977).Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegels Leben.Darmstadt:Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
30. Surber, J. O'Neill(Ed.)(2006).Hegel and Language.New York:State University of New York Press.
31. Weitz, M.(1956).The Role of Theory in Aesthetics.The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism,15(1),27-35.
32. Weitz, M.(1977).The Opening Mind.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
33. 劉創馥(2014)。黑格爾新釋。臺北:臺大出版中心。