Crafting the Self through Losing the Self: Exploring Xunzi's Ideal Self and the Role of Others

道德轉化中的自我與他人：初探《荀子》中的自我打造與自我喪失

王華(Ellie Hua Wang)

Xunzi ； rituals ； moral transformation ； autonomy ； self ； 荀子 ； 禮 ； 化性 ； 自主 ； 自我

東吳哲學學報

36期（2017 / 08 / 01）

59 - 101

英文

This paper explores Xunzi's account of the ideal self and self-transformation, as well as the roles the self and others play in this account. I first introduce two aspects of the Confucian self, the social aspect and what I call the ＂reflective agent＂ aspect, and an apparent tension between them. I then examine Tang (2012)'s account of the roles rituals and community play in self-transformation, and explore the possible tension between these two aspects of the self in this account by addressing the issue of autonomy. I argue that Xunzian autonomy should be understood as a kind of ＂substantive self-correction＂, which is different from ＂autonomy as the modern ideal＂ and from the form Tang developed (I call it ＂substantive self-control＂). Moreover, I argue that the characteristics often emphasized in the idea of autonomy such as independence and self-control are not ultimate goals of the Xunzian self-transformation. Indeed, as we will see, even though Xunzi emphasizes the reflective capacity of the heartmind, his concern is not so much with the complete control of the self or one's life; rather, it is to craft the self into a beautiful and substantially (instead of merely normatively) other-related existence. I argue that, in this self-crafting process one unavoidably loses oneself in various senses. We can say that Xunzi's self-transformation is through self-loss and the connectedness to others. The tension between the self and others, between the two aspects of the self, is positive and necessary for self-transformation and the ideal self.

本文探究荀子對理想自我和自我轉化的看法，以及自我與他人在這個看法中扮演的角色。筆者指出儒家自我「社會面向」與「反思行動者面向」兩者之間存在的緊張關係，並檢視鄧小虎 (2012) 對禮與社群在自我轉化中角色的論述，藉對其所牽涉到「自主」問題的探討，進一步發展筆者對《荀子》中理想自我與自我轉化的詮釋，以及自我兩個面向間的關係。《荀子》中理想自我涉及的自主並不在強調「獨立」與「自我控制」，而在於對自我加工，創造出一個美好的、與他人緊密相連的自我。筆者指出：自我轉化是透過個人在三個意義下失去自我而與他人連結而達成。

1. (1994).Human Rights and the World's Religions, Boston University Studies in Philosophy and Religion.Notre Dame, Ind.:Notre Dame University Press.
2. Christman, J. (2015). Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. From: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/
3. (1991).Rules, Rituals and Responsibilities.La Salle, IL:Open Court.
4. Ames, R. T.(2010).Achieving Personal Identity in Confucian Role Ethics: Tang Junyi on Human Nature as Conduct.Oriens Extremus,49,143-166.
5. Chan, J.(2002).Moral Autonomy, Civil Liberties, and Confucianism.Philosophy East and West,52(3),281-310.
6. Chong, K.-C.(Ed.),Tan, S.-H.(Ed.),Ten, C. L.(Ed.)(2003).The Moral Circle and the Self: Chinese and Western Approaches.Chicago:Open Court.
7. Chong、 K.-C.(2007).Early Confucian Ethics: Concepts and Arguments.Peru, IL:Open Court.
8. Cua, A. S.(1979).Dimensions of Li (Propriety): Reflections on an Aspect of Hsün Tzu's Ethics.Philosophy East and West,29(4),373-394.
9. de Greck, M.,Shi, Zhenhao,Wang, Gang,Zuo, Xiangyu,Yang, Xuedong,Wang, Xiaoying,Northoff, Georg,Han, Shihui(2012).Culture Modulates Brain Activity during Empathy with Anger.Neuroimage,59(3),2871-2882.
10. Des Pres, T.(1976).The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps.New York:Oxford University Press.
11. Fingarette, H.(1979).The Problem of the Self in the Analects.Philosophy East and West,29,129-140.
12. Han, S.,Northoff, G.(2009).Understanding the Self: A Cultural Neuroscience Approach.Progress in Brain Research,178(C),203-212.
13. Herr, R. S.(2003).Is Confucianism Compatible with Care Ethics? A Critique.Philosophy East and West,53(4),471-489.
14. Hutton, E. L.(2014).Xunzi: The Complete Text by Xunzi.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
15. Hutton, E. L.(Ed.)(2016).Dao Companion to the Philosophy of Xunzi.Dordrecht:Springer.
16. Ivanhoe, P. J.(Ed.)(1996).Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics.Chicago:Open Court.
17. Kline, T. C., III(Ed.),Ivanhoe, P. J.(Ed.)(2000).Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the "Xunzi".Indianapolis, IN:Hackett.
18. Knoblock, J.、Zhang, J.(2003)。大中華文庫漢字對照─荀子。湖南:湖南人民出版社。
19. Lau, D. C.(Trans.)(1992).The Analects.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
20. Liu, J.-L.(2006).An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: from Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism.Oxford:Blackwell Publisher.
21. Railton, P.(1984).Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Philosophy and Public Affairs,13(2),134-171.
22. Shafer-Landau, R.(Ed.)(2006).Oxford Studies in Metaethics.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
23. Shun, K.-L.(Ed.),Wong, D. B.(Ed.)(2004).Confucian Ethics, A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy and Community.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
24. Tang、 S.-F.(2012).Self and Community in the Xunzi.Frontiers of Philosophy in China,7(3),455-470.
25. Tu、 W.-M.(1985).Confucian Thought: Selfhood as Creative Transformation.New York:SUNY Press.
26. Wiesel, E.(1969).Night.New York:Avon Books.
27. Williams, B.(1981).Moral Luck.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
28. 馮耀明(2005)。荀子人性論新詮：附〈榮辱〉篇23字衍之糾謬。國立政治大學哲學學報，14，169-230。
29. 楊儒賓(2016)。恍惚的倫理儒家觀想功夫論之源。中國文化，1，3-22。
30. 鄧小虎(2015)。荀子的為己之學：從性惡到養心以誠。北京:北京大學出版社。