墨子與孟子論「兼愛」

Mozi and Mengzi on ＂Inclusive care＂ (jian'ai)

劉妮(Ni Liu)

墨子 ； 孟子 ； 兼愛 ； Mozi ； Mengzi ； Inclusive care (jian'ai)

東吳哲學學報

39期（2019 / 02 / 01）

1 - 21

繁體中文

墨子提出仇恨、紛爭、戰爭最根本的原因在於人「自愛不相愛」。人因「自愛不相愛」，在遇到犧牲自己的生命還是他人的生命這樣的倫理困境中，人會毫不猶豫地犧牲他人的生命而保全自己。在墨子看來，人會這樣做的根本原因是，人只愛自己，不愛他人，包括自己的父母和家人。墨子將「仁愛」的本質理解為「愛己」，並非「用己」。「愛己」非「自愛」，「自愛」當轉化為「兼愛」，理由是天的意願。墨子與孟子對「兼愛」的不同理解奠基於各自對天之意願的認知與信念差異上：孟子相信天要人「親親」，墨子相信天要人相愛，即「愛人如己身」。

Mozi advocates that the fundamental reason for hatred, strife and war is that people only care about themselves instead of caring about others. Since people only care about themselves, when faced with a moral dilemma they will not hesitate to sacrifice the lives of others in order to preserve their own lives. In Mozi's view, the fundamental reason why people do so is that they only care about themselves and do not not care about others, including their own family. Mozi understands the essence of ＂benevolence＂ to be ＂caring about oneself＂ rather than ＂using oneself.＂ ＂Caring about oneself＂ is not identical with ＂self-love＂, and ＂self-love＂ should ideally be transformed into ＂inclusive care＂, which is in conformity with ＂Heaven's intention＂. Mozi's and Mengzi's different understandings of ＂inclusive care＂ are based on their divergent conceptions of ＂Heaven's intention＂: Mengzi believes that ＂Heaven＂ wants people to care about their parents; Mozi, however, believes that ＂Heaven＂ wants people to be as concerned for others' interests as for their own.

1. 白崢勇(2010)。《墨子》兼愛說評議─兼談朱熹之評論。國文學誌，1，191-233。
   連結：
2. （宋）朱熹(2010).四書章句集注.北京:中華書局.
3. Graham, A. C.(1989).Disputers of the Dao: Philosophical Arguments in Ancient China.Chicago:Open Court.
4. Lau, D. C. (Trans.)(2003).Mencius.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
5. Lau, D. C. (Trans.)(2010).The Analects.Hong Kong:The Chinese University Press.
6. Nivison, D. S.(1996).The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy.Chicago:Open Court.
7. Robins, D.(2012).Mohist Care.Philosophy East & West,62,60-91.
8. 王先謙(2012).莊子集解.北京:中華書局.
9. 孫以楷(2003)。朱熹論墨子之兼愛說。孔子研究，4，91-97。
10. 孫詒讓(2015).墨子閑話.北京:中華書局.
11. 郭琰,陳江進(2010)。自愛與兼愛─墨子倫理思想的內在困境與出路探析。道德與文明，2，66-70。
12. 楊伯峻(2007).孟子譯注.香港:中華書局.
13. 楊伯峻(2007).論語譯注.香港:中華書局.
14. 黎靖德（編）(1986).朱子語類.北京:中華書局.
15. 戴卡琳(2011)。《墨子．兼愛》上、中、下篇是關於兼愛嗎？─愛範圍的不斷擴大。職大學報，5，29-34。