利用VIKOR方法解決企業資源規劃系統評選問題

Utilizing VIKOR to Make ERP System Supplier Selection Decision

10.6181/AGEC.200506_(34).0003

林俊宏(Jiun-Hung Lin)；曾國雄(Gwo-Hsiung Tzeng)；任維廉(William Jen)

多準則決策方法 ； 多準則妥協解排序法 ； 物流服務提供者 ； 企業資源規劃系統 ； MCDM ； VIKOR ； LSP ； ERP system

農業與經濟

34期（2005 / 06 / 01）

69 - 91

繁體中文

超市與量販店一直是農產品與農產加工品供應鏈中的重要通路，近年來，提供此通路物流服務的物流公司更進一步扮演著調節零售需求和產地供給的角色，因而成為此供應鏈中日趨重要的通路。這些物流服務提供者的日常作業十分複雜，因此需要企業資源規劃系統（ERP）協助整合所有作業和品項的各項資訊。如何評選出適合的ERP系統提供業者成為物流服務提供者的重要課題。本研究依據多準則決策法的概念建立評選模式。首先以ERP業者和企業之間共同合作和雙贏的概念為基礎，並依據經濟學的觀點，由供給、需求、監督之三個層面建立評選架構。其次採用可處理評估準則之間相互衝突並產生最佳妥協解的VIKOR法進行排序。

Both supermarkets and hypermarkets are key channels in the supply chain of fresh and processed agricultural products. More recently, logistics service providers (LSP) of these two channels play the role of modulating both wholesale demand and supply of place of origin, and consequently become a key channel in this supply chain. The daily operations of LSP are very complicated; therefore, Enterprise Resources Planning System (ERP) can be adopted to integrate and coordinate all information on all operations and items. Hence, how to select a suitable ERP provider becomes an important issue for LSP. This study constructs a selection decision model via Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method (MCDM). First, based on the concept of cooperation and win-win between LSP and ERP providers through the viewpoint of economic, a selection framework is constructed using three aspects, supply, demand and supervision. Next, VIKOR, which can treat the conflict between criteria and generate an optima comprise solution is adopted to rank ERP providers.

1. Chiou, H.K. , Tzeng, G.H.(2002).Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach To Analysis and Evaluation of Green Engineering for Industry.Environmental Management,30(6),816-830.
2. Chiu, Y.C. , Shyu, J.Z. , Tzeng, G.H.,.Fuzzy MCDM for Evaluating the Ecommerce Strategy.International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology (Forthcoming)
3. Davenport, T. H.(2000).Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems.Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
4. Davenport, T. H.(1998).Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.Harvard Business Review,July/August,55-65.
5. Hsu, Y.G.,Tzeng, G.H.,Shyu, J.Z.(2003).Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Selection of Government-Sponsored Frontier Technology R&D Projects.R &D Management,33(5),539-551.
6. Hwang, C.L.,Lin, M.J.(1987).Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria: Springer- Verlag.New York:
7. Hwang, C.L.,Lin, M.J.(1981).Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Springer-Verlag.New York:
8. Kang, T.H.,Tzeng, G.H.,Yuan, Benjamin,Lee, H.Y.(2003).Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Global Information Technology Management World Conference.
9. Kumary, V., Maheshwariy, B.,Kumary, U.(2002).Enterprise resource planning systems adoption process: a survey of Canadian organizations.International Journal of Production Research,40(3),509-523.
10. Markus, M. L. , Tanis, C.(2000).The enterprise system experience: from adoption to success.Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past,251-276.
11. Opricovic, S.(1998).Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems
12. Opricovic, S. , Tzeng, G.H.(2003).Defuzzification for a Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Model.International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems,11(5),635-652.
13. Saaty, T.L.(1980).The Analytic Hierarchy Process
14. Shee , D.Y. , Tzeng, G.H.(2002).The Key Dimensions of Criteria For the Evaluation of ISPs: An Exploratory Study.The Journal of Computer Information System,42(2),112-121.
15. Sugiyama K. , Tagawa S. , Toda M.(1981).IEEE Transation on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.
16. Tzeng, G.H.(2003).Multi-Objective Programming and Goal-Programming: Theory and Applications.Springer:Tanino, T. .
17. Tzeng, G.H. , Teng, M.H. , Chen, J.J. , Opricovic S.(2002).Multicriteria Selection for a Restaurant Location in Taipei.International Journal of Hospitality Management,21(2),171-187.
18. Tzeng, G.H. , Tsaur, S.H. , Laiw, Y.D. , Opricovic, S.(2002).Multicriteria analysis of environmental policy in Taipei: public preferences and improvement strategies.Journal of environmental Management,64(1),1-12.
19. Wei, Chun-Chin , Wang, Mao-Jiun J.(2004).A comprehensive framework for selecting an ERP system.International Journal of Project Management,22(2),161-169.
20. Yoon, K.P. , Hwang, C.L.(1995).Multiple Attribute Decision Making.Saga Publications.
21. Yu, P.L.(1973).Management Science.
22. Zeleny, M.(1982).Multiple Criteria Decision Making.New York:McGraw-Hill.
23. 李宗儒(1999)。花卉批發市場拍賣人員遴選因素之探討及其績效評比之研究。農業經濟半年刊，66，109-128。
24. 鄧振源 、 曾國雄(1989)。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（下）。中國統計學報，27，1-20。

1. Wu, Sou-Shan,Lin, Feng-Yi,Chang, Chih-Yang(2009).A STUDY ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS AND MONTHLY SALES IN TAIWAN'S PUBLICLY ISSUED COMPANIES.工業工程學刊,26(5),337-343.
2. 傅雲瑄、胡天鐘(2012)。以新混合式多評準決策模式建構改善網路銀行績效之策略。運籌與管理學刊，11(1)，35-49。
3. 管孟忠、陳之寧、林君孺(2012)。應用複合多評準決策建立創新行銷專案績效評價體系。資訊與管理科學，5(2)，1-16。
4. 管孟忠、許建華、紀念呈、林心雅(2010)。運用決策實驗室法探討3C零售業提升服務品質專案之關鍵成功因素。運籌與管理學刊，9(1)，67-81。
5. 簡瑞瑩、黃士滔(2008)。結合品質機能展開與可拓優度評價法以提升綠色螺絲供應商之經營績效。品質學報，15(3)，167-191。
6. 江支璋(2010)。結合AHP與VIKORRUG模式評選線上拍賣網站。明新學報，36(2)，107-122。
7. 賴志松、胡天鐘(2013)。利用VIKOR法來探討六堆客家文化園區發展績效之研究。多國籍企業管理評論，7(2)，95-110。
8. 呂適仲、吳聲佑、吳桂陽(2019)。應用多準則決策分析法於苗栗縣文化景觀資源評估之研究。建築學報，108(S建築)，59-82。
9. 潘玲玲,劉若緹,畢威寧(2018)。VIKOR結合AHP運用於標竿學習－以閱讀書寫教學為例。聯大學報，15(1)，1-18。
10. 鄭永安、楊啟良、許悅玲(2018)。我國國籍航空公司疲勞管理之研究：從理論到實務。航空安全及管理季刊，5(4)，331-351。
11. 鄭珍如、朱炫璉(2007)。某政府機關績效管理制度之實證評估—平衡計分卡及層級分析法之利用。管理學報，24(6)，689-705。