臺灣外岸磯釣遊憩效益之評估

Evaluating the Recreation Benefits of Rock Fishing in Taiwan

10.6181/agec.2007.39.02

詹滿色(Man-Ser Jan)；林妍伶(Yan-Ling Lin)；莊慶達(Ching-Ta Chuang)

外岸磯釣 ； 條件評估法 ； 遊憩效益 ； Rock fishing ； Contingent valuation method ； Evaluation benefit

農業與經濟

39期（2007 / 12 / 01）

45 - 72

繁體中文

本文利用民國95年9月至96年3月間對台灣外岸磯釣客之問卷調查資料，應用條件評估法(contingent valuation method, CVM)衡量磯釣客對於外岸磯釣購買釣魚證的意願及願付價格，並找出影響磯釣客購買釣魚證的顯著因子，藉以得知磯釣釣客之行爲特性、需求及外岸磯釣的遊憩效益。 問卷的結果顯示：台灣從事外岸磯釣以男性爲主，平均36歲，以高中和大學（專）爲主，平均個人月所得爲3-5萬元，外岸磯釣的經驗平均爲6-12年。釣客磯釣的目的主要爲釣魚樂趣，半數以上的磯釣客未加入相關釣魚環保團體。在旅遊成本部分，在釣場的停留時間平均爲8小時以上，平均全年釣魚次數爲47次，外岸磯釣的次數爲20次。平均一次外岸磯釣花費爲3,776元，包括磯釣補充釣具及釣餌、冰塊、食物、飲料支出、住宿費、搭船費、交通費等支出。八成八以上的釣客願意購買釣魚證，且約8成的釣客不會因此而減少外岸磯釣的次數。若釣魚證分爲單次和無限次∕年兩種，則願意購買無限次/年的釣客佔6成6。雙界二分選擇模型(double boundeddichotomous choice model)的估計結果顯示，區域變數、磯釣次數、教育程度、經驗、磯釣支出、停留時間、對環境滿意程度皆爲影響支付意願的顯著因子。平均而言，外岸磯釣釣魚證願付價格爲每次每人311.19元。

This study applied the contingent valuation method (CVM) to estimate the leisure benefit of rock fishing in Taiwan. A double-bounded dichotomous choice model was used to estimate the response functions. The empirical result shows that most respondents are male, 36 years old on average, at high school or university education level, their monthly income is about $30,000-$50,000, and with 6-12 years experience of rock fishing. Most respondents go rock fishing just for pleasure, and more than 50% of respondents have not join fishing group. The average catch bag of rock fishing is about 16.9 catty. The on time of rock fishing is more than 8 hours. Respondents also show that they go rock fishing 20 times per year on average. Average travel cost of respondents is $3,776. Among 340 respondents, 88% of them are willing to pay if the price of the fishing permit is reasonable. If the fishing license is further categorized into one trip and unlimited, more than 66% of the subjects would buy unlimited license, in addition, the reasonable price for the fishing license is at $1,244 per year. The results of CVM shows that rock fishing has a one trip recreational use value of $311.19 and significant variables are area, frequency of rock fishing, education, experience, travel cost variable.

1. 孫金華、江福松、施淵源、劉振鄉(2003)。臺灣東北角磯釣釣者願付價值之分析。農業經濟半年刊，11，63-88。
   連結：
2. 台灣釣權會
3. Alberini, A.(1995).Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,29,169-180.
4. Alberini, A.(1995).Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,29,169-180.
5. Bateman, I.,I. Langford,A. Jones,G. Kerr(2001).Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.Resource and Energy Economics,23,191-213.
6. Bishop, R.,T. Heberlein(1979).Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,61,926-930.
7. Cameron, T. A.(1992).Combining Contingent Valuation and Travel Cost Data for the Valuation of Nonmarket Goods.Land Economics,16(5),302-317.
8. Cantrell, R. N.,G. Marissa,P. S. Leung,D. Ziemann(2004).Recreational Anglers` Willingness to Pay for Increased Catch Rates of Pacific Threadfin (Polydactylus Sexfilis) in Hawaii.Fisheries Research,68,149-158.
9. Fisher, A. C.,W. M. Hanemann,A. G. Keeler(1990).Integrating Fishery and Water Resource Management: A Biological Model of a California Salmon Fishery.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,20(3),234-261.
10. Hanemann, M.,J. Loomis,B. Kanninen(1991).Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,73,1255-1263.
11. Hanemann, W. M.(1984).Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.American Journal of Agricultural Economics,66(3),332-341.
12. Laitila, T.,A. Paulrud(2006).A Multi-Attribute Extension of Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation for Valuation of Angling Site Characteristics.Journal of Leisure Research,38,133-142.
13. Layman, R. C.,J. R. Boyce,K. R. Criddle(1996).Economic Valuation of the Chinook Salmon Sport Fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under Current and Alternate Management Plans.Land Economics,72,113-128.
14. 吳珮瑛、蘇明達(2001)。墾丁國家公園資源經濟效益評估－兼論資源保育之哲學觀與資源價值之內涵。國家公園學報，11(1)，1-29。
15. 莊慶達、詹滿色、林妍伶(2007)。台灣外岸磯釣現況與國內外相關管理之探討。台灣水產，2(9)，28-37。
16. 鄭蕙燕、林政德(1998)。條件評估法之嵌入效果：台灣野生動物保護區之驗證。農業經濟半年刊，64，125-149。

1. 楊倩姿、高文揚、白如玲(2017)。責任vs.價格─對休閒海釣專業者扮演何種角色？。運動休閒餐旅研究，12(1)，30-54。