埤圳濕地生態系統服務對房價的影響及環境損害評估－GIS基礎下的空間特徵價格法

Effect of Wetlands on Residential Property Values and Evaluation of Environmental Damage with Development of Wetlands: GIS-based of Spatial Hedonic Price Method

10.6181/agec.2015.55.02

吳珮瑛(Pei-Ing Wu)；陳懿(Yi Chen)；邱可甄(Ke-Zhen Qiu)

空間特徵價格函數 ； 地理資訊系統 ； 生態系統服務補償 ； 邊際隱含價格 ； 環境損害 ； 實價登錄資料 ； Spatial hedonic price function ； Geographic information system ； Payment for ecosystem services ； Marginal implicit price ； Environmental damage

農業與經濟

55期（2015 / 12 / 01）

37 - 82

繁體中文

本文以空間落遲模型估計涵蓋地理資訊系統生成的房屋周邊公共設施，房屋至八德埤塘自然生態公園距離及房屋周邊環繞之埤塘及埤圳濕地面積等空間變數，選取桃園市八德區、離八德埤塘自然生態公園3公里範圍內，在2012年8月至2014年9月，完成交易的3,924筆家用、住商及國民住宅房價資料，探討房價及位處離八德埤塘自然生態公園不同距離，且周邊環繞不同埤塘或埤圳濕地面積的關係。依此，評估開發現有埤塘或埤圳濕地所造成的環境損害金額，此一金額也是開發者使用埤塘及埤圳濕地資源須支付的生態影響費。結果顯示，以距離八德埤塘生態自然公園的遠近而言，離此越遠房價越低，然此一現象至距離八德埤塘自然生態公園約1.3里處則呈現相反的趨勢。而房屋周邊500公尺所環繞的埤塘及濕地面積之大小與房價間並無固定趨勢，其中高房價區位之一是落在八德市相對熱鬧的區域，這些房屋周邊已無可開發的埤塘或埤圳濕地；另一則是房屋周邊有2,000-10,000平方公尺的埤塘及濕地面積，這些房屋周邊的埤塘即是八德埤塘自然生態公園。依此評估未來開發不論包括或不包括經整治且具典範的八德埤塘生態自然公園，造成的環境總損害為2012年8月至2014年9月，在八德區完成交易的3,924棟總房價的16.26%－17.76%，金額約為44億5千萬至48億6千萬之間。整體結果顯示，未來潛在開發者擬開發埤塘及埤圳濕地為建地時，估算支付開發環境總損害的大小，除了須納入開發所處的位置外，尚須考慮每平方公尺及整體開發面積對環境造成的損害。

The purpose of this study is to evaluate environmental damage as a payment for utilizing wetland ecosystem services for construction sites. Since the spatial differentiation of residential property values varies along the distance and acreage of wetlands around the houses a spatial lag hedonic price model is employed. A set of data with 3,924 actual price registrations of residential property transactions in March of 2011 to September of 2014 collected by Department of Interior of Taiwan is conducted for analyses. The study area covers all transacted properties within 3 kilometers radius of Taoyuan Bade Eco-Pond Park. This Park is located in a county which has the most ponds in Taiwan and is part of Taoyuan Reservoir and Canal Wetlands which are classified as national level wetland. The results show that values of residential properties are lower as they are farther away from the reference site of Taoyuan Bade Eco-Pond Park. The highest residential properties values located in the areas which are either without reservoirs and wetlands for further development or are next to Taoyuan Bade Eco-Pond Park and this Park is the only space for development around this area. The value of total environmental damage is about 4.45 billion NT dollars with further development of all other wetlands around the residential properties. If further development includes Taoyuan Bade Eco-Pond Park the value of total environmental damage increases to 4.86 billion NT dollars. These results indicate that the evaluation of payment and amount for the loss of ecosystem services of wetlands development not only has to account for the locations of the wetland sites but also has to account for environmental damage of per square meter and total acreage of development.

1. 逢甲大學地理資訊系統研究中心（ 1995a ），《GEODISCOVERY 》。http://museum02.digitalarchives.tw/teldap/2008/GeoDiscovery/5-2-1.html。
2. 行政院內政部（2014），《不動產交易實價查詢服務網》。http://plvr.land.moi.gov.tw/DownloadOpenData。
3. United Nations Environment Programme, International Union for Conservation of Nature, and Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2013),International Payments for Ecosystem Services (IPES).http://www.unep.ch/etb/events/IPES%20Side%20Event%20Bonn/IPES%20SUM%20FINAL.pdf.
4. 國家發展委員會（2012），《NGIS 國土資訊網》。http://ngis.nat.gov.tw/3_3_2.aspx。
5. 桃園市政府（2015），《桃園市的埤塘》。http://www.tycg.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=64&parentpath=0,6,58
6. 桃園縣政府教育局（2014），《桃園縣政府教育局中等教育科桃園縣103 學年度總量管制國民中學一覽表（統計至103.5.23）》http://www.tyc.edu.tw/sac/news_view.php?id=1399429955
7. 逢甲大學地理資訊系統研究中心（ 1995b ），《GEODISCOVERY 》。http://museum02.digitalarchives.tw/teldap/2008/GeoDiscovery/5-1-1.html。
8. Aiama, D.,Edwards, S.,Bos, G.,Ekstrom, J.,Krueger, L.,Quétier, F.,Savy, C.,Semroc, B.,Sneary, M.,Bennun, L.(2015).No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact Approaches for Biodiversity: Exploring the Potential Application of These Approaches in the Commercial Agriculture and Forestry.Gland, Switzerland:International Union for Conservation of Nature.
9. Ao, C. L.,Chen, J. T.,Jiao, Y.,Wang, J.(2013).The Effect of Distance of the Ecological Conservation Value: A Case Study of Sanjiang Plain Wetland.Acta Ecologica Sinica,33(16),5100-5117.
10. Baltagi, B. H.(ed.)(2001).A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics.Oxford:Blackwell Press.
11. Basu, A.,Thibodeau, T. G.(1998).Analysis of Spatial Autocorrelation in House Prices.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,17(1),61-85.
12. Bourassa, S. C.,Cantoni, E.,Hoesli, M.(2007).Spatial Dependence,Housing Submarkets, and House Price Prediction.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,35(2),143-160.
13. Box, G. E. P.,Cox, D. R.(1964).An Analysis of Transformation.Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B,26(2),211-243.
14. Brown, T. C.,Bergstrom, J. C.,Loomis, J. B.(2007).Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services.Natural Resources Journal,47(2),329-376.
15. Can, A.,Megbolugbe, I.(1997).Spatial Dependence and House Price Index Construction.Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,14(1),203-222.
16. Cho, S. H.,Lambert, D. M.,Kim, S. G.,Roberts, R. K.,Park, W. M.(2011).Relationship between Value of Open Space and Distance from Housing Locations within a Community.Journal of Geographical Systems,13(4),393-414.
17. Doss, C. R.,Taff, S. J.(1996).The Influence of Wetland Type and Wetland Proximity on Residential Property Values.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,21(1),120-129.
18. Dumenu, W. K.(2013).What Are We Missing? Economic Value of an Urban Forest in Ghana.Ecosystem Services,5,137-142.
19. Dunse, N.,Jones, C.(2005).Rental Depreciation, Obsolescence and Location: The Case of Industrial Properties.Journal of Property Research,22(2-3),205-223.
20. Engel, S.,Pagiola, S.,Wunder, S.(2008).Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues.Ecological Economics,65(4),663-674.
21. Garrod, G.,Willis, K.(1992).The Amenity Value of Woodland in Great Britain: A Comparison of Economic Estimates.Environmental and Resource Economics,2(4),415-434.
22. Ghosh, P. K.,Mondal, M. S.(2013).Economic Valuation of the Non-Use Attributes of a South-Western Coastal Wetland in Bangladesh.Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,56(9),1403-1418.
23. Greiber, T.(ed.)(2009).Payments for Ecosystem Services: Legal and Institutional Frameworks.Gland, Switzerland:International Union for Conservation of Nature Press.
24. Gürlük, S.,Atanur, G.,Turan, Ö.(2012).Economics of Limiting Congesting in Urban Forest Recreation Areas.Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,27(5),449-459.
25. Halvorsen, R.,Pollakowski, H. D.(1981).Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations.Journal of Urban Economics,10(1),37-49.
26. Hornsten, L.,Fredma, P.(2000).On the Distance to Recreational Forests in Sweden.Landscape and Urban Planning,51(1),1-10.
27. Jack, B. K.,Leimona, B.,Ferraro, P. J.(2008).A Revealed Preference Approach to Estimating Supply Curves for Ecosystem Services: Use of Auctions to Set Payments for Soil Erosion Control in Indonesia.Conservation Biology,23(2),359-367.
28. Jiaoa, L.,Liua, Y.(2010).Geographic Field Model Based Hedonic Valuation of Urban Open Spaces in Wuhan, China.Landscape and Urban Planning,98(1),47-55.
29. Kakuru, W.,Turyahabwe, N.,Mugisha, J.(2013).Total Economic Value of Wetland Products and Services in Uganda.The Scientific World Journal,2013,1-13.
30. Kim, C. W.,Phipps, T. T.,Anselin, L.(2003).Measuring the Benefits of Air Quality Improvement: A Spatial Hedonic Approach.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,45(1),24-39.
31. Kryvobokov, M.(2013).Hedonic Price Model: Defining Neighbourhoods with Thiessen Polygons.International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis,6(1),79-97.
32. Kumar, P.(ed.)(2010).The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations.London:Earthscan Press.
33. Kumar, P.(ed.),Thiaw, I.(ed.)(2009).Values, Payments and Institutions for Ecosystem Management: A Developing Country Perspective.UK:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited Press.
34. Kumar, P.,Kumar, M.,Garrett, L.(2014).Behavioural Foundation of Response Policies for Ecosystem Management: What Can We Learn from Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES).Ecosystem Services,10,128-136.
35. Kuminoff, N. V.,Parmeter, C. F.,Pope, J. C.(2010).Which Hedonic Models Can We Trust to Recover the Marginal Willingness to Pay for Environmental Amenities?.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,60(3),145-160.
36. Lancaster, K.(1966).A New Approach to Consumer Theory.Journal of Political Economy,74,132-157.
37. Lantz, V.,Boxall, P. C.,Kennedy, M.,Wilson, J.(2013).The Valuation of Wetland Conservation in an Urban/ Peri Urban Watershed.Regional Environmental Change,13(5),939-953.
38. Ma, S.,Swinton, S. M.(2011).Valuation of Ecosystem Services from Rural Landscapes Using Agricultural Land Prices.Ecological Economics,70(9),1649-1659.
39. Mahan, B. L.,Polasky, S.,Adams, R. M.(2000).Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Approach.Land Economics,76(1),100-113.
40. Malpezzi, S.,Ozanne, L.,Thibodeau, T. G.(1987).Microeconomic Estimates of Housing Depreciation.Land Economics,63(4),372-385.
41. Mansfield, C.,Pattanayak, S. K.,McDow, W.,McDonald, R.,Halpin, P.(2005).Shades of Green: Measuring the Value of Urban Forests in the Housing Market.Journal of Forest Economics,11(1),177-199.
42. McPherson, E. G.(1992).Accounting for Benefits and Costs of Urban Greenspace.Landscape and Urban Planning,22(1),41-51.
43. Muradian, R.,Corbera, E.,Pascual, U.,Kosoy, N.,May, P. H.(2010).Reconciling Theory and Practice: An Alternative Concept Framework for Understanding Payments for Environment Services.Ecological Economics,69(6),1202-1208.
44. Ojea, E.,Martin-Ortega, J.,Chiabai, A.(2012).Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Economic Valuation: The Case of Forest Water Services.Environmental Science & Policy,19-20,1-15.
45. Pace, R. K.,Barry, R.,Clapp, J. M.,Rodriguez, M.(1998).SpatiotemporalAutoregressive Models of Neighborbood Effects.Journal of Real EstateFinance and Economics,17(1),15-33.
46. Poudyala, N. C.,Hodgesa, D. G.,Merrettb, C. D.(2009).A Hedonic Analysis of the Demand for and Benefits of Urban Recreation Parks.Land Use Policy,26,975-983.
47. Rosen, S.(1974).Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.Journal of Political Economy,82(1),34-55.
48. Saphoresa, J. D.,Lic, W.(2012).Estimating the Value of Urban Green Areas: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis of the Single Family Housing Market in Los Angeles, CA.Landscape and Urban Planning,104(3-4),373-387.
49. Schläpfer, F.,Waltert, F.,Segura, L.,Kienast, F.(2015).Valuation of Landscape Amenities: A Hedonic Pricing Analysis of Housing Rents in Urban, Suburban and Periurban Switzerland.Landscape and Urban Planning,141,24-40.
50. Smith, S.,Rowcroft, P.,Everard, M.,Couldrick, L.,Reed, M.,Rogers, H.,Quick, T.,Eves, C.,White, C.(2013).Payments for Ecosystem Services: A Best Practice Guide.London:Defra Press.
51. Stevenson, S.(2004).New Empirical Evidence on Heteroscedasticity in Hedonic Housing Models.Journal of Housing Economics,13(2),136-153.
52. Tapsuwan, S.,Ingram, G.,Burton, M.,Brennan, D.(2009).Capitalized Amenity Value of Urban Wetlands: A Hedonic Property Price Approach to Urban Wetlands in Perth, Western Australia.The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,53(4),527-545.
53. United States Environmental Protection Agency(2014).Mitigation Banking Factsheet Compensating for Impacts to Wetlands and Streams, What Is a Mitigation Bank?.Washington, DC:United States Environmental Protection Agency Press.
54. Ward, M. D.,Gleditsch, K. S.(2008).Spatial Regression Models.Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications Press.
55. Wattage, P.,Mardle, S.(2008).Total Economic Value of Wetland Conservation in Sri Lanka Identifying Use and Non-Use Values.Wetlands Ecology and Management,16(5),359-369.
56. Whittle, P.(1954).On Stationary Processes in the Plane.Biometrika,41(3),434-449.
57. Zoppi, C.,Argiolas, M.,Lai, S.(2015).Factors Influencing the Value of Houses: Estimates for the City of Cagliari, Italy.Land Use Policy,42,367-380.
58. 錢玉蘭(2014)。行政院內政部營建署城鄉發展分署委託研究計畫行政院內政部營建署城鄉發展分署委託研究計畫,台北:國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所。

1. 蔡孟珂,劉哲良,吳珮瑛(2019)。空間特徵分量Durbin模型之建構－桃園市都市計劃區多元開放空間組合價值之檢視。都市與計劃，46(4)，297-341。
2. 蔡孟珂,劉哲良,吳珮瑛(2020)。多元開放空間破碎或分散對住民效益之評估：臺中市都市計畫區的探索。地理學報，95，1-36。