题名

影響農牧戶所得之決定因素與政府補貼之政策效果

并列篇名

Evaluating Government Subsidies on Farm Incomes in Taiwan

DOI

10.6181/AGEC.201906_(62).0002

作者

王玉安(Yu-Ann Wang)；林心榆(Hsin-Yu Lin)；張嘉玲(Chia-Lin Chang)

关键词

家庭收支 ； 政府補貼 ； 所得不均 ； Gini係數 ； 農牧戶 ； 分量迴歸 ； Family income ； Government subsidies ； Income inequality ； Gini coefficient ； Farmers and herdsmen ； Quantile regression

期刊名称

農業與經濟

卷期/出版年月

62期（2019 / 06 / 01）

页次

27 - 66

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本文探討政府補貼是否有效改善農牧戶所得，並比較補貼前後所得Gini係數的變化。為降低所得極端行為被低估之偏誤，利用利用行政院主計處家庭收支調查報告及Koenker & Bassett分量迴歸模分析影響農牧戶所得的決定因素。實證結果顯示，政府保險類補貼與非保險類補貼對提高所得的影響效果正負相反，負向的非保險類補貼抵銷部分保險類補貼的正效果。保險類補貼對所得中下之農牧戶有幫助，但非保險補貼無助於提高所得。果農所得水準最低，但與其他作物所得差距不多，顯示補貼已發揮效果，但政府應重新調整非保險類補貼政策，參考本文實證結果，改善目前缺失。
英文摘要

The purpose of the paper is to explore whether government subsidies can effectively improve the incomes of farmers and herders in Taiwan. The cross-section data are taken from the Report on the Survey of Family Income & Expenditure, published by Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. In order to reduce the underestimation of the behaviour of the highest and lowest income households, the paper uses the Koenker and Bassett quantile regression model to explore the determinants of the incomes of farmers and herders, and to analyze the effects of the government subsidy policy, which can be divided into insurance subsidies and non-insurance subsidies. The empirical results show that, the effects of insurance and non-insurance subsidies have contrasting effects on incomes, with the negative effects of non-insurance subsidies partly offsetting the positive effects of government insurance subsidies. The quantile regression results show that regardless of the income levels of households, non-insurance subsidies cannot effectively improve the incomes of farmers and herders. Although the average incomes of fruit farmers are the lowest, the differences in incomes of the other cultivated crops are very small. Overall, the government subsidy policy has had discernible and measurable impacts, with the incomes of farmers of different cultivated crops seemingly approaching a common level.
主题分类 生物農學 > 農業
生物農學 > 森林
生物農學 > 畜牧
生物農學 > 漁業
社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 林健次(2009)。芬蘭經濟的特質。臺灣國際研究季刊，5(4)，25-48。
    連結：
  2. 唐正道,徐士勛,李紹瑋(2013)。從家戶特性變化看中國沿海及內陸城市的所得分配與不均度。中國大陸研究，56(2)，45-78。
    連結：
  3. Alhamzawi, R.(2016).Bayesian Model Selection in Ordinal Quantile Regression.Computational Statistics & Data Analysis,103,68-78.
  4. Becker, T.,Weispfenning, V.(1993).Gröbner Bases: A Computational Approach to Commutative Algebra.New York:Springer-Verlag Press.
  5. Causa, O., A. de Serres, and N. Ruiz (2014), “Growth and Inequality: A Close Relationship?” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/economy/growth-and-inequality-close-relationship.htm
  6. Darkwah, K. A.,Nortey, E. N.,Lotsi, A.(2016).Estimation of the Gini Coefficient for the Lognormal Distribution of Income Using the Lorenz Curve.Springer Plus,5(1)
  7. De Beer, J.,Oguamanam, C.,Schonwetter, T.(2014).Innovation, Intellectual Property and Development Narratives in Africa.The Collaborative Dynamics of Innovation and Intellectual Property in Africa,Cape Town:
  8. Ghosh, P. K.,Lee, J. Y.(2016).Decomposition of Changes in Korean Wage Inequality, 1998-2007.Journal of Labor Research,37(1),1-28.
  9. Grotti, R.,Scherer, S.(2016).Does Gender Equality Increase Economic Inequality? Evidence From Five Countries.Research in Social Stratification and Mobility,45,13-26.
  10. Kimhi, A.(2007).The Hebrew University, Discussion PaperThe Hebrew University, Discussion Paper,未出版
  11. Kimhi, A.,Arayama, Y.,Kim, J. M.,Jerusalem, R.(2014).Identifying Determinants of Income Inequality in the Presence of Multiple Income Sources: The Case of Korean Farm Households.EAAE 2014 Congress Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies,Slovenia: Ljubljana:
  12. Koenker, R.(2005).Quantile Regression.Cambridge, New York:Cambridge University Press.
  13. Koenker, R.,Bassett, G., Jr.(1978).Regression Quantiles.Econometrica,46(1),33-50.
  14. Koenker, R.,Hallock, K.(2001).Quantile Regression an Introduction.Journal of Economic Perspectives,15,43-56.
  15. Kuznets, S.(1955).Economic Growth and Income Inequality.The American Economic Review,45(1),1-28.
  16. Lee, H. Y.,Kim, J.,Cin, B. C.(2013).Empirical Analysis on the Determinants of income inequality in Korea.International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology,53,95-110.
  17. Lorenz, M. O. (1905), “Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth,”Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209-219.
  18. Manna, R.,Regoli, A.(2012).Regression-Based Approaches For the Decomposition of Income Inequality in Italy, 1998-2008.Rivista di Statistica Ufficiale,14(1),5-18.
  19. Nakhaei Rad, N.,Mohtashami Borzadaran, G. R.,Yari, G. H.(2016).Maximum Entropy Estimation of Income Share Function from Generalized Gini Index.Journal of Applied Statistics,43(16),2910-2921.
  20. OECD (2018), “Income Inequality (Indicator),” OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm
  21. Severini, S.,Tantari, A.(2015).The Distributional Impact of Agricultural Policy Tools on Italian Farm Household Incomes.Journal of policy Modeling,37(1),124-135.
  22. WID (2016), “The World Wealth and Income Database,” World Inequality Database. http://www.wid.world
  23. Wu, H.,Ding, S.,Wan, G.(2015).Income Inequality and Rural Poverty in China: Focusing on the Role of Government Transfer Payments.China Agricultural Economic Review,7(1),65-85.
  24. 石曜合(2010)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。
  25. 行政院主計總處（2012），「101 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=197
  26. 行政院主計總處（2007），「96 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=192
  27. 行政院主計總處（2002），「91 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=187
  28. 行政院主計總處（2003），「92 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=188
  29. 行政院主計總處（2006），「95 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=191
  30. 行政院主計總處（2004），「93 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=189
  31. 行政院主計總處（2014），「103 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=199
  32. 行政院主計總處（2001），「90 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=186
  33. 行政院主計總處（2010），「99 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=195
  34. 行政院主計總處（2011），「100 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=196
  35. 行政院主計總處（2013），「102 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=198
  36. 行政院主計總處（2008），「97 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=193
  37. 行政院主計總處（2017），「106 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=2850
  38. 行政院主計總處（2005），「94 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=190
  39. 行政院主計總處（2009），「98 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=194
  40. 行政院主計總處（2015），「104 年家庭收支調查」。https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/datasearch_detail.php?id=200
  41. 林國慶,許聖章,施瑩艷(2007)。,臺北:行政院農業委員會。
  42. 劉宇晴(2006)。國立政治大學財政研究所。
  43. 魏敏芳(2015)。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所。
print cancel