電子化學習歷程檔案實施之態度研究

A Study of Students' Attitude Toward the Electronic Portfolio Practice

10.6251/BEP.19991231

岳修平(Hsiu-Ping Yueh)；王郁青(Yu-Ching Wang)

電腦與網路科技 ； 電子化學習歷程檔案實施 ； 學習歷程檔案評量 ； computer and network technology ； electronic portfolio practice ； portfolio assessment

教育心理學報

31卷2期（2000 / 02 / 01）

65 - 83

繁體中文

教育隨著時代的變遷不斷的進行革新，傳統以教師為中心的教學方式已演變成以學生為中心，另類評量法亦隨之應運而生，其中學習歷程檔案乃是最具代表性的一種。而電腦多媒體及網路技術的蓬勃發展，遂使學習歷程檔案走向電子化。本研究以台灣大學87學年度所開設的「網際網路教學與訓練」課程進行電子化學習歷程檔案之實證研究，目的即是要探討電子化學習歷程檔案之實施對於促進教學與學習的成果，以及瞭解學生對於此實施方式之態度與看法。本研究運用訪談、觀察與問卷調查的方式來進行資料蒐集，並運用統計套裝軟體進行資料分析，研究結果顯示學生製作電子化學習歷程檔案的成果與個人具備之電腦相關技術及網路使用經驗有關，另外學生對於應用電子化學習歷程檔案輔助學習與評量的評價都非常高。不過，依據本研究之結果學生反應態度與成績方面卻無顯著相關。

While the pendulum swings in the field of measurement in education, alternative assessment tool such as portfolio assessment has been the focus of many educators. As a useful tool to assess students' learning in more authentic ways, portfolio assessment is also considered as a learning and instructional tool.Electronicportfolios can be more powerful tools than traditional portfolios with multimedia technology supports. This study implements an electronic portfolio practice in avideo-conferencing distance learning course with one local classroom at National Taiwan University and two classes at other universities. The purposes of this empirical study were to assess the effectiveness of the electronic portfolio practice on facilitating teaching and learning, as well as to understand students' attitude toward this practice. Results of this study have shown that the quality of students' electronic portfolio products has high correlation with their personal computer abilities and network experiences. Besides, all students show high attitude toward the application of electronic portfolio practice on facilitating their learning and classroom evaluation. However, there is no significant correlation between students' attitude scores and their grades in this study.

1. Feature article - Learning & leading with technology
2. Electronic Portfolio Planning Issues
3. Barrett, H. C.(1996).Student portfolios: A collection of articles.Palatine, IL:IRI/ Skylight Training and Publishing.
4. Barrett, M.,Trevitt, J.(1991).Attachment behaviour and the schoolchild.
5. Bushweller, K.(1995).The high-tech portfolio.The Executive Educator.
6. Carpenter, C. D.,Ray, M. S.,Bloom, L. A.(1995).Portfolio assessment: Opportunities and challenges.Intervention in School and Clinic,3(1),34-41.
7. Cushman, K.(1994).Technology in the essential school: Making change in the information age.Horace.
8. Fasick, E.,McLaren, C.(1995).The electronic student portfolio.The Kamehameha Journal of Education,Summer
9. Graves, D. H.,Sunstein, B. S.(1992).Portfolio portraits.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
10. Lambdin, D. V.,Walker, V. L.(1994).Planning for classroom: Portfolio assessment.Arithmetic Teacher,41(6),318-324.
11. Mills, E.,Reisetter, M.(1995).Portfolio assessment in graduate education classes.The Professional Educator,17(2),15-24.
12. Milone, M. N.(1995).Electronic portfolios: Who's doing them and how?.Technology and Learning,October
13. Moersch, C.,Fisher III, L. M.(1996).Student portfolios: A collection of articles.Palatine, IL:IRI/ Skylight Training and Publishing.
14. Montague, M.,Applegate, B.(1993).Middle school students' mathematical problem sovling: An analysis of think-aloud protocols.Journal Disability Quarterly,76(1)
15. Montague, M.,Warger, C.,Morgan, T.H.(2000).Solve It! Strategy Instruction to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,75(2)
16. Moss, P. A.(1992).Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment.Review of Educational Research,62(3),229-258.
17. Nolet, V.(1992).Classroom-based measurement and portfolio assessment.Diagnostique,18(1),5-10.
18. Paulson, F. L.,Paulson, P. R.,Meyer, C. A.(1991).What makes a portfolio a portfolio?.Educational Leadership,48(5),60-63.
19. Proderick, P.(1997).Electronic portfolio assessment: How do we get there?.
20. Pryor, D.B.,Tollerud, T.R.(1999).Applications of adlerian principles in school settings.Professional School Counseling,2(4)
21. Stiggins, R. J.(1994).Student-centered classroom assessment.New York:Merrill.
22. Tierney, R. J.,Carter, M. A.,Desai, L. E.(1991).Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom.Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon.
23. Yueh, H.(1997).The relationship between the quality of portfolios and students' use of self-regulated learning strategies.University Park:Pennsylvania State University.
24. Yueh, H.(1996).Portfolio Assessment: Theory, Practice, and Implication.University Park:Pennsylvania State University.
25. 岳修平 Yueh, Hsiu-Ping(1999)。網路教學於學校教育之應用。課程與教學 Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly，2(4)，61-76。
26. 岳修平 Yueh, Hsiu-Ping(1999)。台灣北區遠距教學實施評估。教學科技與媒體 Instructional Technology & Media，43，11-20。
27. 林子雯(2000)。成人學生角色扮演、社會支持與幸福感之相關研究。正修學報，13

1. 柯皓仁、林孟毅(2015)。電子化歷程檔案應用於專業發展之系統建置：以中華民國圖書館學會為例。圖資與檔案學刊，87，54-76。
2. 陸維元(2012)。完形理論應用於大學攝影教學之學習成效評估。藝術教育研究，24，73-109。
3. 于第(2014)。職場導向之學生e-portfolio的內容與特性。技術與職業教育學報，5(2)，1-27。
4. 張基成、吳炳宏(2011)。網路化學習歷程檔案學習者自評之信效度。科學教育學刊，19(2)，169-184。
5. 張基成、吳炳宏(2012)。網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評量之信度與效度。科學教育學刊，20(5)，393-412。
6. 張琬翔、尹玫君(2013)。從學習觀點探討教育網站評鑑之內涵。教育學誌，29，71-104。
7. 鄭雯,郭玲玲(2023)。高中育才與大學選才：以核心素養作為連結。通識教育學刊，31，11-33。
8. 朱碧靜(2009)。學習歷程檔案在圖書資訊利用教育之應用：通識課程之實作與省思。圖書與資訊學刊，68，66-79。
9. (2002)。高等教育課程改革與教學科技運用。視聽教育雙月刊，43(2)，2-8。
10. (2004)。創新教學評量設計：國中英語歷程檔案的應用與挑戰。教育研究資訊，12(5)，109-140。
11. (2006)。以Blog作為互動式學習歷程檔案平台之應用。視聽教育雙月刊，47(4)，26-40。
12. (2010)。數位化學習歷程檔案採用之類型、目錄與架構之考量。教學科技與媒體，92，31-50。
13. (2012)。通識英語課程設計：寫作探索。正修通識教育學報，9，45-62。
14. (2013)。大學生電子學習歷程檔案使用行為及其相關因素之研究：以某大學為例。教育研究月刊，234，58-72。
15. (2014)。服務學習的「教」與「學」。朝陽學報，19，17-30。
16. (2021)。高中學習歷程檔案評析。教育研究月刊，329，35-50。