行動或狀態導向、目標層次、工作複雜度對國中生行動控制策略與工作表現之影響

The Effects of Action vs. State Orientation,Goal Level, and Task Complexity on Junior High School Students' Action Control Strategies and Task Performance

10.6251/BEP.20000104

程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

行動導向 ； 狀態導向 ； 目標層次 ； 工作複雜度 ； 行動控制策略 ； 工作表現 ； action vs. state orientation ； goal level ； task complexity ； action control strategies ； tasks performance

教育心理學報

31卷2期（2000 / 02 / 01）

85 - 104

繁體中文

本研究的目的在考驗行動或狀態導向、目標層次、工作複雜度對國中生行動控制策略和工作表現之交互影響。研究採2（行動導向、狀態導向）×2（高難度目標、模糊目標）×2（簡單工作、複雜工作）受試者間實驗設計。受試者篩選自四所國中共320人（行動導向者與狀態導向者各160人），依變項是行動控制策略與工作表現（含完成題數與寫作品質）。研究結果顯示行動或狀態導向×目標層次×工作複雜度在行動控制策略與完成題數上有顯著的三因子交互作用，但是在寫作品質上只有目標層次×工作複雜度的二因子交互作用。

The purposes of this study was to test the interaction effects among action vs. state orientation, goal level, and task complexity on junior high school students' action control strategies and task performance (including writing quantify and quality). For this purpose, a2×2×2(action vs. state orientation×goal level×task complexity) experimental design was adopted. 320 Subjects (action orientation 160, state orientation 160) were selected from 4 junior high schools and randomly assigned to one of the eight experimental conditions. Three-way ANOVA was employed to analyze the data. The results showed that There were significant three-way interaction effects among action vs. state orientation, goal level, and task complexity on subjects' action control strategies and writing quantify and two-way significant interaction effects between goal level and task complexity on subjects' writing quality.

1. Boekaerts, M.(1994).Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation.Seattle:Hogrefe & Huber.
2. Boekaerts, M.(1995).Handbook of personality and intelligence.New York:Plenum.
3. Boekaerts, M.(1997).Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students.Learning and Instruction,7(2),161-186.
4. Butler, D. L.(1994).From learning strategies to strategic learning: Promoting self-regulated learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities.Canadian Journal of Special Education,9,69-101.
5. Carroll, J.,Christenson, C.(1995).Teaching and learning about student goal setting in a fifth-grade classroom.Language Arts,72(1),42-49.
6. Carson, A. T.,Baker, R. C.(1993).Psychological correlates of codependency in women.The International Journal of the Addictions,29(4)
7. Cervone, D.,Jiwani, N.,Wood, R.(1991).Goal setting and differential influence of self-regulatory processes on complex decision-making performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),257-266.
8. Corno, L.(1994).Self-regulation of learning and performance.Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Corno, L.(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice.NY:Springer-Verlag.
10. Corno, L.(1993).The best-laid plans: modern conceptions of volition and educational research.Educational Researcher,22(2),14-22.
11. Corno, L.,Kanfer, R.(1993).The role of volition in learning and performance.Review of Research in Education,19,301-341.
12. Earley, P. C.,Connolly, T.,Ekegren, G.(1989).Goal, Strategy Development and Task Performance: Some Limits on the Efficacy of Goal Setting.Journal of Applied Psychology,74(1),24-33.
13. Earley, P. C.,Lee, C.,Hanson, L. A.(1990).Joint moderating effects of job experience and task component complexity relations among goal setting, task strategies, and performance.Journal of Organizational Behavior,11(1),3-15.
14. Earley, P. C.,Perry, B. C.(1987).Work plan availability and performance: An assessment of task strategy priming on subsequent task completion.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,39,279-302.
15. Eccles, J.(1983).Achievement and achievement motives.
16. Gagne, E. D.(1985).The cognitive psychology of school learning.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
17. Garcia, T.,McCann, E. J.,Turner, J. E.,Roska, L.(1998).Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23(4),392-418.
18. Hayes, J. R.,Flower, L. S.(1980).Cognitive processes in writing.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Haywood, H. C.,Brown, A. L.,Wingenfeld, S.(1990).Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment.School Psychology Review,19(4)
20. Johnson, L.(1997).Teffect of goal setting and self-instruction on learning a reading comprehension: A study of students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities,30(1),80-91.
21. Knudson, R. E.(1992).Effects of task complexity on narrative writing.Journal of Research and Development in Education,26(1),7-14.
22. Kobak, R. R.,Cole, H. E.,Ferenz, G. R. Fleming, W. S.,Gamble, W.(1993).Attachment and emotion regulation during mother-teen problem solving: A control theory analysis.Child Development,64
23. Kobak, R. R.,Sceery, A.(1988).Attachment in late adolescence: Working Model, affect regulation, and representations of self and others.Child Development,59
24. Kobak, R. R.,Sudler, N.,Gamble, W.(1991).Attachment and depressive symptoms during adolescence: A developmental pathways analysis.Development and Psychopathology,3
25. Kuhl, J.(1987).Motivation, intention, and volition.NY:Springer-Verlag.
26. Kuhl, J.(1992).A theory of self-regulation: Action versus state orientation, self-discrimination, and some applications.Applied Psychology: An International Review,41(2),97-129.
27. Kuhl, J.(1994).Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation.Seattle, WA:Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
28. Kuhl, J.(1984).Progress in Experimental Personality research, Vol. 13.New York:Academic Press.
29. Kuhl, J.(1996).Who control whom when 'I control myself'?.Psychological Inquiry,7(1),61-68.
30. Kuhl, J.(1985).Action control: From cognition to behavior.New York:Springer-Verlag.
31. Kuhl, J.,Kraska, K.(1989).Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Individual Differences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Latham, G. P.,Locke, E. A.(1991).Self-Regulation through Goal Setting.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,50,212-247.
33. Locke, E. A.,Latham, G. P.(1990).A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
34. Locke, E. A.,Latham, G. P.(1990).Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel.American psychological Society,I(4)
35. Lodico, C. A.(1998).An investigation of the efficacy of a stress-management intervention that utilizes humor as a central aspect of the program.Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences and Engineering,54(8-B)
36. Martens, B. K.,Hiralall, A. S.,Bradley, T. A.(1997).A note to teacker: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback.School Psychology Quarterly,12(1),33-41.
37. Mayer, R. E.(1985).The Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
38. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach.Boston:Little, Brown and Company.
39. Mayer, R. E.(1987).Educational Psychology: A cognitive approach.
40. Mayer, R. E.(1992).Thinking, problem solving, cognition.
41. Phillips, L.,Steinkamp, M.(1995).Improving academic motivation.
42. Snow, R. E.(1989).Abilities, Motivation, and Methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Individual Differences.Hillsdale:Erlbaum.
43. Snow, R. E.(1989).Toward assessment of cognitive and conative structures in learning.Educational Researcher,18(9),8-15.
44. Snow, R. E.,Corno, L.,Jackson III, D.(1996).Handbook of Educational Psychology.New York:Macmillan.
45. Snow, R. E.,Swanson, J.(1992).Instructional psychology: Aptitude, adaptation, and assessment.Annual Review of Psychology,43,583-626.
46. Trawick, L.,Corno, L.(1995).Expanding the volitional resources of urban community college students.New Direction for Teaching and Learning,63,57-70.
47. Volet, S. E.(1997).Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals.Learning and Instruction,7(3)
48. Wood, R. E.(1986).Task Complexity: Definition of the Construct.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,37,60-82.
49. Wood, R. E.,Locke, E. A.(1987).The relation of self-efficacy and grade goals to academic performance.Educational and Psychological Measurement,47(4),1013-1024.
50. Wood, R. E.,Mento, A. J.,Locke, E. A.(1987).Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology,72(3),416-425.
51. Wood, W.,Rhodes, N.,Whelan, M.(1989).Sex differences in positive well-being: A consideration of emotional style and marital status.Psychological Bulletin,106(2)
52. 林清山 Lin, Chen-Shan、程炳林 Cherng, Biing-Lin(1997)。青少年心理發展與適應之整合性研究:國中生學習行動控制模式的建構與驗證暨教學輔導策略實驗方案效果之研究( I )。行政院國家科學委員會。
53. 陳英豪、吳裕益 Wu, Yuh-Yih、王萬清 Wang, Wan-Ching(1989)。兒童寫作能力測驗編製報告。教育學誌，1-48。
54. 陳鳳如 Chen, Feng-Ru(1993)。活動式寫作教學法對國小兒童寫作表現與寫作歷程之實驗效果研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學研究所。
55. 陳麗芬(1995)。行動控制觀點的自我調節學習及其相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
56. 程炳林 Cherng, Biing-Lin、林清山 Lin, Chen-Shan(1999)。國中生學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應之關係。教育心理學報 Bulletin of Educational Psychology，31(1)，1-35。
57. 程炳林 Cherng, Biing-Lin、林清山 Lin, Chen-Shan(1998)。行動導向量表編製報告。測驗學刊 Psychological Testing，65-82。
58. 劉佩雲 Liu, Pay-Yun(1998)。兒童自我調整學習之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
59. 劉念肯(1993)。情緒不良適應與情緒障礙。諮商與輔導，95
60. 簡楚瑛 Chien, Chu-Ying、王萬清 Wang, Wan-Ching(1988)。同儕互動對國小學生寫作能力之影響。初等教育學報(臺南師院)，143-167。

1. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46(1)，67-92。
2. 程炳林、張憲卿(2010)。成敗情境對行動與狀態導向者負向情感、自我效能與工作記憶容量之影響。教育心理學報，41(3)，605-634。
3. 蘇嘉鈴、程炳林(2005)。國中生行動導向、目標導向與動機調整策略之關係。教育心理學報，36(4)，395-415。
4. 謝辰昕、劉俊億、周璻薇、吳淑禎(2010)。餐飲外場從業人員的社會支持、情緒勞務與工作表現之研究。人類發展與家庭學報，12，1-30。
5. 鍾燕宜、陳景元(2007)。銷售行動控制量表的發展與評量。中山管理評論，15(1)，197-223。
6. (2002)。成就目標、行動控制取向與數學能力知覺的中介效果對國中生數學學習行為組型之關係研究。教育與心理研究，25(3)，629-656。