兒童類比推理能力的學習潛能評估研究

A Study on the Learning Potential Assessment of Children's Analogy Reasoning Ability

10.6251/BEP.20010521

江淑卿(Shwu-Ching Jiang)

認知轉換階段 ； 認知功能 ； 學習潛能評估 ； 類比推理 ； Analogy Reasoning ； Cognitive Function ； Cognitive Transitional Stage ； Learning Potential Assessment

教育心理學報

33卷1期（2001 / 10 / 01）

47 - 64

繁體中文

本研究目的係探討認知轉換階段兒童在學习潛能評估中類比推理能力之改變歷程。以60位六歲和七歲兒童为研究對象，採三因子混合實驗設計，實驗組接受類比推理模組教學，控制組未接受教學，两組的前後測都實施「歸納推理能力測驗」的類比推理分測驗和臨床晤談，前後測之得分以三因子混合設計變異數分析驗證效果，並将晤談資料依解題類型分析，以探討認知功能的改變。此外，以實驗組六歲和七歲受試各一位为案例，透過原案分析，闡釋類比推理的轉變歷程。研究發现：1.學习潛能評估均能促進六歲和七歲兒童的類比推理能力。此外，學习潛能評估能改變兒童的解題類型，激發其認知功能，其中以七歲兒童的映射(mapping)能力進步甚多。2.在學习潛能評估的歷程中，两位案例漸能正確推論與映射，不受反證影響，且能説明原因，但六歲案例的認知功能較七歲案例不稳定，易受任務的型式和難度之影響，需較多的引導才能正確答題。

This study focuses on how Chinese graduate students'wives adapt to Americansociety and how they evaluate these experiences while their husbands are about to attainthe doctoral degree.The wives of five new Ph.Ds or candidates were interviewed.Theresults are presented in two parts.The first reveals general modes of adjustment.Thereare two diverse patterns of adjustment shown in the initial period.Afterward,all theinformants share the three later stages.The second part stresses the effects of specificfactors and life incidents on the adaptation process.Herein they experience somealienation and a great many other difficulties.Yet the endeavor pays off in the variousforms of improvement.When their husbands were about to obtain their degree,they alsoare aware of the need to have continuous growth.This study underlines the interactionbetween individual mental state and environment adaptation,notably the positive effect ofgoing back to school on the wives'sense of self-worth and the smoother functioning oftheir marriages.Attention is also paid to some of the negative effects of the dependentrole on the wife's career.The study also suggests the necessity of English classes andadaptation counseling for them.

1. Alexander, P. A.,Wilson, V. L.,White, C. S.,Fuqua, J. D.,Clark, G. D.,Wilson, A. F.,Kulikowich, J. M.(1989).Development of analogical reasoning in 4 and 5 year old children.Cognitive Development,4,65-88.
2. Allen, J. P.,Hauser, S. T.,Borman-Spurrell, E.(1996).Attachment theory as a framework for understanding outcomes of sever adolescent psychopathology: An eleven-year follow-up study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,64
3. Blagg, N.(1991).Can we teach intelligence? A comprehensive evaluation of Fereustein's Instrumental Enrichment Program.Hillsdal, NJ:Erlbaum.
4. Blagg, N.,Ballinger, M. P.,Gardner, R. J.(1990).The Somerset Thinking Skills Course: Understanding analogies.Oxford, England:Blackwell.
5. Blain, M. D.,Thompson, J. M.,Whiffen, V. E.(1993).Attachment and perceived social support in late adolescence: The interaction between working model of self and others.Journal of Adolescent Research,8
6. Case, R.(1986).Intellectual development: birth to adulthood.New York:Academic Press.
7. Cassidy, J.(1994).Rochester.
8. Chen, Z.,Daehler, M. W.(1989).Positive and negative transfer in analogical problem solving by 6-year-old children.Cognitive Development,4,327-344.
9. Deloache, J. S.,Miller, K. F.,Pierroutsakos, S. L.(1997).Handbook of Child Psychology.Wiley.
10. Ericsson, K. A.,Simon, H. A.(1993).Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data.Cambridge:The MIT Press.
11. Erikson, E.(1964).Insight and responsibility.
12. Feuerstein, R.(1980).Instrumental enrichment: an intervention program for cognitive modifiability.Baltimore:University Park Press.
13. Feuerstein, R.,Hoffman, M. B.,Jensen, M. R.,Rand, Y.(1985).Thinking and learning skills, volume 1.Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Feuerstein, R.,Rand, Y, Jensen, M. R.,Kaniel, S.,Tzuriel, D.(1987).In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential.
15. Feuerstein, R.,Rand, Y.,Jensen, M. R.,Kaniel, S.,Tzuriel, D.(1987).Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential.New York:Guilford Press.
16. Gentner, D.(1988).Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift.Child Development,59,47-59.
17. Gerber, M. M.,Semmel, D. S.,Semmel, M.(1994).Computer-based dynamic assessment of multidigit multiplication.Exceptional children,61(2)
18. Ginsburg, H. P.(1997).Entering the child's mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice.Cambridge University Press.
19. Glaser, R.,Pellegrino, J.(1982).How and how much can intelligence be increased.NJ:Ablex.
20. Goswami, U.(1992).Analogical reasoning in children.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Goswami, U.(1996).Advances in child development and behavior.New York:Academic Press.
22. Goswami, U.,Brown, A. L.(1989).Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations.Cognition,35,69-95.
23. Grudin, J.(1980).Processes in verbal analogy solution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,6,67-74.
24. Halford, G. S.(1992).Analogical reasoning and conceptual complexity in cognitive development.Human Development,35,193-218.
25. Lidz, C. S.,Thomas, C.(1987).Dynamic assessment: An Inter-actional approach to evaluating learning potential.New York:Guilford Press.
26. Mearig, J. S.(1987).Dynamic assessment: An Interactional approach to evaluating learning potential.New York:Guilford Press.
27. Moshman, D.(1997).Handbook of Child Psychology.Wiley.
28. Patton, M. Q.(1990).Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
29. Rattermann, M. J.,Gentner, D.(1998).More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy: Children's performance on a causal-mapping task.Cognitive Development,13,453-478.
30. Seokhoon, S.(1997).Using mediated learning experience children's thinking.
31. Sheard, C.,Readence, J. E.(1988).An investigation of the inference and mapping process of the componential theory of analogical reasoning.Journal of Educational Research,81(6),347-353.
32. Sigler, R. S.(1998).Children's thinking.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
33. Sophian, C.(1997).Beyond competence: The significance of performance for conceptual development.Cognitive Development,12,281-303.
34. Sternberg, R. J.(1986).Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills.San Diego:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
35. Sternberg, R. J.(1977).Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review,84(4),353-378.
36. Sternberg, R. J.,Gardner, M. K.(1983).Unities in inductive reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112,80-116.
37. Tzuriel, D.,Haywood, H. C.(1992).Interactive assessment.Springer-Verlag.
38. Tzuriel, D.,Klein, P.(1987).Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential.New York:Guilford Press.
39. Vosniadou, S.,Schommer, M.(1989).Explanatory analogies can help children acquire information from expository text.Journal of Education Psychology,80(4),524-536.
40. Vuchinich, S.,Emery, R. E.,Cassidy, J.(1988).Family members as third parties in dyadic family conflict:Strategies, alliances, and outcomes.Child Development,59
41. Vye, N. J.,Bums, M. S.,Delclos, V. R.,Bransford, J. D.(1985).John F.Kennedy Center for Research on Education and Human Development.
42. Vye, N. J.,ums, M. S.,Delclos, V, R.,Bransford, J. D.(1987).Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential.
43. 江淑卿 Jiang, Shwu-Ching(1998)。動態評量在促進類比推理能力的學習與遷移歷程之研究。國立屏東科技大學學報 Bulletin of National Pingtung University of Science and Technology，7(4)，327-334。
44. 羊憶蓉(1994)。載於台灣研究基金會(主編)，台灣的教育改革。
45. 國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系(1987)。修訂考夫曼兒童智力測驗。
46. 張麗芬 CHANG, LI-FENG(1993)。幼兒類比推理能力之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
47. 許天威 Sheu, Tian Way、蕭金土 Shaun, Jin-Too(1999)。綜合性非語文智力測驗。台北:心理。
48. 許文甄(2001)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
49. 郭生玉 Kuo, Sheng-Yu、范德鑫 Fan, Te-Hsin(1992)。國小資優生鑑定測驗研究報告。臺北:教育部訓練委員會。
50. 郭佳華(2001)。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。

1. 陳鳳如(2007)。國中學生寫作能力的學習潛能評估之分析研究。師大學報：教育類，52(2)，73-94。
2. 許家驊(2008)。不同策略教學及鷹架中介設計對個體數學文字題解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報，39(4)，513-532。
3. 黃麗分、黃永昌、洪瑞雲、吳庭瑜(2007)。類比與證僞思考技能之學習。教育心理學報，38(3)，271-290。
4. 蘇宜芬、陳茹玲(2005)。類比故事的表面特徵與結構特徵在不同年齡層對故事回想表現的影響。教育心理學報，37(2)，123-146。
5. 鄭雅丰(2019)。幼兒類比推理測驗編製與評量。幼兒教育年刊，30，1-23。