教師自我效能的概念與測量

Teacher Efficacy: Its Concept and Measurement

10.6251/BEP.20020619

孫志麟(Chih-Lin Sun)

自我效能 ； 教師自我效能 ； 教學自我效能量表 ； self efficacy ； teacher efficacy ； teaching efficacy scale

教育心理學報

34卷2期（2003 / 04 / 01）

139 - 156

繁體中文

教師自我效能與學生的學習成就、學校改進及教育革新息息相關。教育領域在這方面的研究，累積了許多豐碩的成果，但有關教師自我效能的概念與測量問題，卻一直存有爭議，以至影響研究品質及其應用價值。本研究以Bandura(1977)自無效能理論和Tschannen-Moran、Hoy與Hoy(1998)教師自我效能統整理論爲基礎，同時參酌相關的實徵研究，釐清教師自我效能的概念，並建構量表以評估教師的自我效能。研究對象取自於大臺北地區的415位國民小學教師，編製完成之〈教學自我效能量表〉，包含教學執行、班級管理、學習評量、親師溝通、教學革新和環境轉化等六個向度，共可解釋54.52%總變異量。在信度估計方面，六個分量表及總量表的Cronbachα係數介於.61~.84(N=415)之間。此外，相隔三週再測之穩定再測之穩定係數，落在.52~.78(N=120)範圍。顯示：教學自我效能量表具有內部一致性及穩定性，其信度大致符合要求。整體而言，研究結果支持教師自我效能爲一多向度的概念，這與先前將教師自我效能的結構區分爲個人教學自我效能及一般教學自我效能雙向度的研究並不相同。本研究所發展的測量工具，可以反映教師在教學領域細微層面的效能評估，這對教師自我效能的理論研究與實務應用均有其重要意涵。最後，本研究也針對教師自我效能的概念、測量、結構及應用等議題時進行討論。

Teacher efficacy) has been shown to be a powerful construct related to student achievement, school improvement, and education innovation The research of this construct has horn much fruit in the field of education And yet there remains a lack of clarity in the concept and structure of teacher efficacy Based on the self-efficacy theory de eloped h3 l3andura (1977) and the integrated model of teacher efficacy proposed by Tschannen-Moran. Hoy, & Hoy (1998) this study explored the concept and measurement of teacher efficacy. A sample of 415 pr1mar teachers in Taiwan as administered an efficacy questionnaire adapted from the Teaching Efficacy Scale (TES) Factor analysis revealed that teacher efficacy is multidimensional in nature, comprising six factors instructional efficacy classroom management efficacy, efficacy to assess learning progress, efficacy to communicate with parents. efficacy to enlist teaching reform, and efficacy) to change environment. The TES dc eloped in this study differs from measures of teacher efficacy found in previous research, this studs employed six dimensions of efficacy rather than separated subscales for personal teaching efficacy and general teaching efficacy These results supported that teacher efficacy is a multidimensional concept, thus has implications for both theory and practice. Finally, the issues in the concept, measurement, structure, and application of teacher efficacy are discussed.

1. Ashton, P.,Webb, R. B.(1986).Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement.Longman:
2. Bandura, A.(1992).Self-efficacy: Through control of action.
3. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York:W. H. Freeman and Company.
4. Bandura, A.(1986).Englewood Cliffs.
5. Bandura, A.(1977).Englewood Cliffs.
6. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37
7. Bandura, A.(1977).Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change.Psychological Review,84
8. Bandura, A.(1991).Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,50
9. Deemer, S. A.,Minke, K. M.(1999).An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale.Journal of Educational Research,90(1),3-10.
10. Fuller, B.,Wood, K.,Rapoport, T.,Dornbusch, S.(1982).The organizational context of individual efficacy.Review of Educational Research,52(1),7-30.
11. Fuller, J. A.,Warner, R. M.(2000).Family stressors as predictors of codependency.Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs,126(1)
12. Gibson, S.,Dembo, M. H.(1984).Teacher efficacy: A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,76(4),569-582.
13. Guskey, T. R.(1981).Measurement of the responsibility teacher for academic successes and failures in the classroom.Journal of Teacher Education,32(3),44-51.
14. Guskey, T. R.,Passaro, P. D.(1994).Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions.American Educational Research Journal,31,627-643.
15. Heppner, P. P.,Kirlinghan, D. Jr.,Wampold, B. E.(1999).Research design in counseling.
16. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V.,Bassler, O. C.,Brissie, J. S.(1987).Parent involvement: Contribution of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics.American Educational Research Journal,24,417-435.
17. Newmann, F. M.,Rutter, R. A.,Smith, M. S.(1989).Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations.Sociology of Education,62,221-238.
18. Rotter, J. B.(1966).Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs,80(1),1-28.
19. Soodak, L.,Podell, D.(1996).Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multifaceted construct..Teaching and Teacher Education,12(4),401-412.
20. Tschannen-Moran,M.,Hoy, A. W.,Hoy, W. K.(1998).Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure..Review of Educational Research,68(2),202-248.
21. Wheatley, K. F.(1998).Positive teacher efficacy as an obstacle to educational reform.Journal of Research and Development in Education,34(1),14-27.
22. Woolfolk, A. E.,Rosoff, B.,Hoy, W.(1990).Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students.Teaching and Teacher Education,6(2),137-148.
23. 王受榮(1992)。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
24. 王湘栗(1997)。國民小學教師關注與教師效能感之研究。台北市立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
25. 何郁玲(1999)。小學教師職業倦怠、教師效能感與生命意義感關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所。
26. 李慧碧(1997)。學校情境因素與教師效能感關係之研究─以國中教師為例。國立成功大學教育研究所。
27. 周新富(1991)。國小教師專業承諾、教師效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
28. 洪瑞峰(2000)。台北縣國小教師效能感與家長參與班級教育活動關係之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所。
29. 孫志麟(1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所。
30. 郭宜之(1997)。中等學校教育學程之課程與教學和職前教師教師效能關係之研究。淡江大學教育資料科學學系。
31. 郭明德(1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
32. 陳蘭馨(1998)。師人格特質、自我效能、學生行為信念與班級經營風格之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所。
33. 陳啓明(1999)。另類的教學評量--「卷宗評量」。教育實習輔導季刊，5(1)
34. 陳啓勳(1997)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
35. 章英華、傅仰止(2002)。台灣地區社會變遷基本調查計畫：第四期第二次調查計畫執行報告。
36. 馮莉雅(1997)。國中教師角色衝突、專業成長與其教師效能感關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
37. 廖吳勇(1998)。國民小學教師工作動機、參與決定與自我效能關係之研究。台北市立台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
38. 劉威德(1994)。國中教師教學成敗歸因、社會支持與教學自我效能相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所。
39. 顏銘志(1996)。國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. 王敏琦(WANG, Min-Chi);蕭佳純(HSIAO, Chia-Chun)(2024)。高級中等學校教師專業發展阻礙、自我效能對工作壓力之影響－以學校支持為調節效果。教育理論與實踐學刊。(49)。1-31。 
2. 許紫玲(2017)。桃園市國民小學教師專業學習社群與教師集體效能感關係之研究。清華大學教育與學習科技學系學位論文。2017。1-119。