题名

Results of Student Ratings: Does Faculty Attitude Matter?

并列篇名

“學生評鑑教師教學”之結果：教師態度有關嗎？

DOI

10.6251/BEP.20030425

作者

張德勝(Te-Sheng Chang)

关键词

學生評鑑教師教學 ； 大學教師評鑑 ； 態度 ； student ratings of instruction ； faculty evaluation ； attitude

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

35卷2期（2003 / 12 / 01）

页次

183 - 200

内容语文

英文
中文摘要

本研究主要的目的在探討教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度及其在評鑑得分之相關，並分析正面態度的教師與負面態度的教師，其評鑑結果的分數的差異情形。研究對象爲八十七學年第二學期度國立花蓮師範學院七十位教師。研究工具有兩種，第一種是教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度的調查問卷(the Attitude towards Student Ratings of Instruction Questionnaire, ASRI)，主要是了解教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」的看法；另一種工具是「國立花蓮師範學院教學意見反映調查表」(the Student Ratings of Instruction form, SRI)，主要是了解學生對教師教學的滿意度。這項工具共包含四個層面，分別是「準備與計畫」、「教材與內容」、「教法與技巧」、「作業與評鑑」。 研究結果顯示如下：(一)對「學生評鑑教師教學」持正面態度的教師，在「準備與計畫」、「教材與內容」、「評鑑與作業」與整體得分的評鑑分數顯著的高於對負面態度的教師；(二)同意將評鑑結果公佈在學校期刊的教師，在「教法與技巧」與整體性方面顯著高於不同意的教師；(三)教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」整體的同意度與其被學生評鑑結果之分數有顯著的相關。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the student ratings of faculty with positive attitude and negative attitude towards student ratings. The correlation between faculty attitude towards student ratings and their ratings scores was investigated. The sample consisted of 70 faculty members at National Hualien Teachers College in Taiwan, during the 1999 spring semester. Two instruments, the Attitude towards Student Ratings of Instruction Questionnaire (ASRI) and the Student Ratings of Instruction form (SRI), were administered. The ASRI was used to measure faculty attitude towards student ratings, The SRI was used measure students' perceptions of these teachers' appeal and their teaching effectiveness. Results indicate that (1) The overall-agreement group was rated statistically higher than was the overall-disagreement group on Preparation/Planning, Material/Content, Assignment/Examination, and the total rating scores; (2) Faculty members with positive attitude towards the publication of student ratings were rated higher than those with negative attitude regarding to Method/Skill, and the total rating scores; (3) The correlation between faculty attitude towards overall agreement on student ratings and their ratings scores was statistically significant.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Abbott, R. D.,Wulff, D. H.,Nyquist, J. D.,Ropp, V. A.,Hess, C. W.(1990).Satisfaction with processes of collecting student opinions about instruction: The student perspective.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,201-206.
  2. Armstrong, S.(1998).Are student ratings of instruction useful?.American Psychologist,53(11),1223-1224.
  3. Arreola, R. A.(1995).Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system.Bolton, MA:Anker Publishing Company, Inc.
  4. Avi-Itzahak, T.,Kremer, L.(1986).An investigation into the relationship between university faculty attitudes toward student rating and organizational and background factors.Educational Research Quarterly,10,31-38.
  5. Baxter, E. P.(1991).The TEVAL experience 1983-1988: The impact of a student evaluation of teaching scheme on university teachers.Studies in Higher Education,16,151-178.
  6. Benson, D. E.,Lewis, J. M.(1994).Students` evaluation of teaching and accountability: Implications from the Boyer and ASA reports.Teaching Sociology,22(2),195-199.
  7. Brandenburg, D. C.,Slinde, J. A.,Batista, E. E.(1977).Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations.Research in Higher Education,7,67-78.
  8. Bridgeman, W. J.(1986).Student evaluation viewed as a group process factor.Journal of Psychology,120,183-190.
  9. Calderon, T. G.,Gabbin, A. L.,Green, B. P.(1995).Promoting and evaluating effective teaching: The report of the American Accounting Association teaching and curriculum section`s committee on promoting and evaluating effective teaching.Sarasota, FL:American Accounting Association.
  10. Centra, J. A.(1981).Determining faculty effectiveness.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  11. Centra, J. A.(1993).Reflective faculty evaluation.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  12. Centra, J. A.,Gaubatz, N. B.(2000).Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching?.Journal of Higher Education,70(1),17-33.
  13. Chang, T.(2000).Student ratings: What are teachers college students telling us about them?.Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA.:
  14. Chang, T.(2002).Teachers college faculty attitudes toward student ratings: The comparison between required policy and optional policy.Journal of Ping-Dung Teachers College,16,205-230.
  15. Cohen, P. A.(1981).Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies.Review of Educational Research,51,281-309.
  16. d`Apollonia, S.,Abrami, P. C.(1997).Navigating student ratings of instruction.American Psychologist,52(11),1198-1208.
  17. Feldman, K. A.(1992).College students` views of male and female college teachers: Part Ⅰ-Evidence from the social laboratory and experiments.Research in Higher Education,33,317-375.
  18. Feldman, K. A.(1993).College students` views of male and female college teachers: Part Ⅱ-Evldence from students` evaluations of their classroom teachers.Research in Higher Education,34,151-211.
  19. Feldman, K. A.(1977).Consistency and variability among college students in their ratings among courses: A review and analysis.Research in Higher Education,6,223-274.
  20. Feldman, K. A.(1983).Seniority and experience of college teachers as related to evaluations they receive from students.Research in Higher Education,18,3-124.
  21. Franklin, J.,Theall, M.(1989).Who reads ratings: Knowledge, attitude and practice of users of student ratings of instruction.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco:
  22. Greenwald, A. G.,Gillmore, G. M.(1998).How useful are student ratings? Research to comments on the current issues section.American Psychologist,53(11),1228-1229.
  23. Jacobs, L. C.(1987).University faculty and students` opinions of student ratings.Bloomington, IN:Bureau of Evaluative Studies and Testing.
  24. Marsh, H. W.(1984).Students` evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility.Journal of Educational Psychology,76,707-754.
  25. Marsh, H. W.(1987).Students` evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research.International Journal of Educational Research,11,253-388.
  26. Marsh, H. W.,Dunkin, M. J.,J. C. Smart (Ed.)(1992).Higher education: Handbook of theory and research.New York:Agathon Press.
  27. Marsh, H. W.,Roche, L.(1993).The use of students` evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness.American Educational Research Journal,30,217-251.
  28. O, T. Y.(1996).University of Kansas.
  29. Owie, I.(1985).Incongruence between expected and obtained grades and students` ratings of the instructor.Journal of Instructional Psychology,12,196-397.
  30. Peterson, K. D.(1995).Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press, Inc.
  31. Rich, H. E.(1976).Attitude of college and university faculty towards the use of student evaluations.Educational Research Quarterly,1,17-27.
  32. Roche, L. A.,Marsh, H. W.(1998).Workload, grades, and students` evaluations of teaching: Clear understanding sometimes requires more patient explanations.American Psychologist,53(11),1230-1231.
  33. Seldin, P.(1993).The use and abuse of student ratings of professors.The Chronicle of Higher Education,46,40.
  34. Spencer, K. J.(1994).Hempstead, NY.,Hofstra University.
  35. Spencer, P. A.,Flyr, M. L.(1992).The formal evaluation as an impetus to classroom change: Myth or reality? (Research/Technical Report).Riverside, CA:Riverside Community College.
  36. Tatro, C. N.(1995).Gender effects on student evaluations of faculty.Journal of Research and Development in Education,28,169-173.
  37. Van Patten, J.(1994).The politics of assessment of the professoriate.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Philosophy of Education Society,Atlanta:
  38. Wachtel, H. K.(1998).Student evaluation of college effectiveness: a brief review.Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education,23(2),191-211.
  39. Wagenaar, T. C.(1995).Student evaluation of teaching: Some cautions and suggestions.Teaching and Sociology,64,64-68.
  40. Wilson, R.(1998).New research casts doubt of student evaluation of professors.The Chronicle of Higher Education,44(19),12-14.
被引用次数
  1. 林劭仁(2012)。大學通識教學評鑑的後設評鑑研究。課程與教學，15(3)，53-74。
  2. 羅寶鳳、曾明基、張德勝、邱于真(2011)。學生認知歷程對學生評鑑教師教學的影響：階層線性模式分析。課程與教學，14(3)，157-180。
  3. 蕭芳華、董娟娟、葉連祺、楊世英、陳仁海(2005)。大學學生評鑑教師教學量表之編製。測驗學刊，52(1)，59-81。
  4. (2009)。影響學生填答教學意見調查問卷的因素及其實施建議。教育研究與發展期刊，5(4)，245-267。
print cancel