知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之建構

The Establishment of the Cognitive-Affective-Volitional Integrated Model of Mathematical Learning Process for Junior High School Students

10.6251/BEP.20030519

藍雅慧(Ya-Hui Lan)；張景媛(Ching-Yuan Chang)

動機 ； 情感 ； 結構方程模式 ； 意志 ； 數學學習 ； affection ； mathematical learning ； motivation ； structural equation model (SEM) ； volition

教育心理學報

35卷3期（2004 / 03 / 01）

201 - 219

繁體中文

本研究採用結構方程模式中的模式産出取向建構知情意整合的國中生數學學習曆程模式簡稱（簡稱知情意模式）。研究者首先提出包含情感／動機、意志控制、學習策略、學習表現等四個潛在變項之知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程初始模式（簡稱初始模式），以國內國中二年級學生共447人為研究參與者，使用『數學學習情感／動機量表』、『數學學習意志控制量表』、『數學學習表現量表』等工具。蒐集得的資料先以PRELIS 2.50版統計套裝軟體進行多變項常態分配假設的考驗，再使用LISREL 8.50版統計套裝軟體，以一般加權最小平方法進行模式的參數估計。結果發現，初始模式無法合理地解釋國中生數學學習歷程，在統計上亦不合理，因此，本研究進一步進行模式的修改，並對修改後的模式進行參數估計。經評估的結果發現，修改後的知情意模式能有效地用來說明實徵資料。然而，此模式在産出的過程經過修改，未來應再以其他觀察資料進行該模式的檢驗，以探討其通則化的可能性。

The purpose of this research aims to construct the Cognitive-affective-volitional Integrated Model of Mathematical Learning Process for Junior High School Students (the Cognitive-affective-volitional Model, for short) by using structural equation model in the approach of model generating. In the first place, the researcher proposed the initial model, which included the latent variables of affection/motivation, volition control, learning strategies, and learning performance. The research was applied to 447 second-graders in junior high school for the researcher to collect empirical data. The researcher first tested the acquired data on the hypothesis of multivariate normality distribution with PRELIS 2.50, and then estimated the parameters of the model by means of generally weighted least-squares (WLS) with LISREL 8.50. The result showed that the initial model could not give a good account of the mathematical learning process for junior high school students, and the statistic results did not seem reasonable, either. Therefore, the researcher revised the model, and evaluated the parameters of the revised model. After revision, the evaluation results showed that the Cognitive-affective-volitional Model could effectively explain the data. Though the process of model generating has been revised, the model however, should be tested with other observation data in the future to see if the model could further be generalized.

1. 程炳林(2001)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報：教育類，46(1)，67-92。
   連結：
2. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
3. Brandt, R. S.(1987).Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas.North Central Regional Educational Laborary.
4. Corno, L.(1993).The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research.Educational Researcher,22(2),14-22.
5. Corno, L.(1986).The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning.Contemporary Educational Psychology,11,333-346.
6. Corno, L.,B. J. Zimmerman,D. H. Schunk (Eds.)(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice.New York:Springer-Verlag.
7. Corno, L.,Kanfer, R.,L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.)(1993).Review of research in education.Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association.
8. Garcia, T.,McCann, E. J.,Turner, J. E.,Roska, L.(1998).Modeling the mediating role of volition in the learning process.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23,392-418.
9. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
10. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1993).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
12. Kuhl, J.,B. A. Maher,W. B. Maher (Eds.)(1984).Progress in experimental personality research: Normal personality processes.New York:Academic Press.
13. Kuhl, J.,J. Beckmann (Eds.)(1985).Action control: From cognition to behavior.New York:Springer-Verlag.
14. Kuhl, J.,M. Boekaerts,P. R. Pintrich (Eds.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
15. Mayer, R. E.,G. H. Bower(Ed.)(1985).Learning in complex domains: A cognitive analysis of computer programming.The Psychology of Learning and Motivation,19,89-130.
16. Nelson-Le Gall, S.,Jones, E.(1990).Cognitive-motivational influences on the task-related help-seeking behavior of black children.Child Development,61(2),581-589.
17. Pintrich, P. R.,C. Ames,M. L. Maehr (Eds.)(1989).Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation-enhancing environments.Greenwich, CT:JAI.
18. Posamentier, A. S.,Stepelman, J.(1995).Teaching secondary school mathematics: Techniques and enrichment units.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill.
19. Schunk, D. H.(Eds.),B. J. Zimmerman(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice.New York:Springer-Verlag.
20. Skemp, R. R.(1989).Mathematics in the primary school.London:Routledge.
21. Snow, R. E.,Corno, L.,Jackson D. III.,D. C. Berliner,R. C. Calfee (Eds.)(1996).Handbook of educational psychology.New York:Macmillan.
22. Zimmerman, B. J.,D. H. Schunk (Eds.)(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement.New York:Springer-Verlag.
23. 林清山(1995)。多變項分析統計法。台北:東華。
24. 邱皓政(2001)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南。
25. 張春興(1994)。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華。
26. 張春興(1995)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華。
27. 張景媛(1994)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
28. 陳正昌、程炳林(2001)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用。台北:五南。
29. 曾憲政(1997)。課程改革－教育改革的軟體工程。教育天地，89，4-10。
30. 程炳林(1995)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
31. 鄭蕙如(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
32. 藍雅慧(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。

1. 劉玉玲,沈淑芬(2019)。國中生數學自我概念、數學學習策略與數學學業成就之模式建構。課程與教學，22(3)，187-214。