在溝通脈絡下的結構取向教學對國中生英語學習表現影響之研究

A Study of the Effects of Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Contexts of English Performance for Junior High School Students

10.6251/BEP.20030801

吳青蓉(Ching-Jung Wu)

英語學習表現 ； 結構取向教學 ； 學習策略 ； 錯誤分析 ； 後 設認知 ； English learning performance ； error analysis ； form-focus intstruction ； learning strategies

教育心理學報

35卷3期（2004 / 03 / 01）

269 - 294

繁體中文

本研究主要目的有二：一是探討學生英語學習時會産生的錯誤類型，並設計在溝通脈絡下的結構取向英語教學課程。二是探討在溝通脈絡下的結構取向教學對國中生英語學習表現之影響。依據研究目的，本研究者先以英語高、中、低能力各五位學生採質性研究法來瞭解其英語學習的錯誤類型。結果發現：這些學生在英語學習時會有跨語言和語言內部兩類錯誤類型産生並據此來設計實驗教學課程。在實驗教學方面以70名英語低成就學生爲對象，藉由英語後設認知策略量表與英語成就測驗（前、後測）等工具的實施，以二因子混合設計變異數分析的方法進行統計處理，並採質性方法來深入瞭解實驗組學生的英語學習變化情形。結果發現：本研究的實驗教學課程有助於維持實驗組學生在後設認知與英語學習成就上的表現，反觀控制組學生在這些方面則從初期到後期呈逐步下滑的趨勢。再者，實驗組學生會善用策略來對自己常犯的英語錯誤進行監控、評鑑與修正，所以他們對英語學習更有信心也更願意去學習。

The purposes of this study are: (1) to investigate students' errors in learning English with the use of qualitative analyses and further to design a form-focused instruction program in communicative contexts; (2) to examine the effects of such program developed by the researcher. In order to accomplish these purposes, the researcher needs first to investigate students' errors in learning English with the use of qualitative analysis involving thinking-aloud and thinking-by-questioning methods. Participants are 15 eighth-grade students divided into three groups of high, middle, and low levels in English. Based on the errors made by the students, the results can be classified into two patterns: interlingual and intralingual. According to the results of error analyses, the researcher has therefore designed a form-focused instruction program in communicative contexts and examined the effects of the program. There are totally 70 eight-grade students with low English performance in two groups, experimental group and control group. By utilizing Metacognition Strategies Inventory and English Achievement Tests (pre-test and after-test) as primary instruments, the data acquired are then statistically studied by two-way mixed-design ANOVA, with a deeper focus on the English learning process in the experimental group by using a qualitative analysis. The results indicates that the form-focused instruction program in communicative contexts could help the students in the experimental group maintain their performances in metacognition strategies and English learning achievements (reading, writing, and speaking). However, the performances of the control group in these inventories and tests tend to decline. What is more, after class, the students in experimental group are able to apply the strategies to retain their learning interests and to actively monitor, evaluate, and modify their English learning habits. In short, from the analyses of students' English learning process, students in the experimental group become more confident and willing to learn English after the form-focused instruction program.

1. Alderson, J. C.(2000).Assessing reading.
2. Anderson, J.(1993).Rules of mind. Hillsdale.
3. Anderson, J.(1995).Learning and memory: An integrated approach.
4. Anderson, J. R.(1982).Acquisition of cognitive skill.Psychological Review,89(4)
5. Anderson, J.,Fincham, J.(1994).Acquisition of procedural skills from examples.Journal of Experimental Psychology,20
6. Bachman, L. F.,Palmer, A. S.(1996).Language testing in Practice.
7. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of marketing science,16
8. Baker, L.,Brown, A. L.(1984).Handbook of reading research.
9. Brown, A. L.(1987).In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe(Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding.
10. Brown, A. L.(1989).A practical guide to language learning.
11. Brown, H. D.(1994).Principles of language learning and teaching.
12. Cameron, C. A.,Lee, K.(1999).Emergent use of English grammatical morphemes by Chinese-speaking children.International Review of Applied Linguistics,36
13. Celce-Murcia, M.(1993).State of the Art TESOL Essays.
14. Centra, J. A.(1993).Reflective faculty evaluation.
15. Centra, J. A.(1981).Determining faculty effectiveness.
16. Centra, J. A.,Gaubatz, N. B.(2000).Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching.Journal of Higher Education,70(1)
17. Chamot, A. U.,Barnhardt, S.,El-Dinary, P. B.,Robbins, J.(1999).The learning strategies handbook.
18. Chamot, Anna Uhl.,Kupper, L.(1989).Learning Strategies in Foreign Language Instruction.Foreign Languages Annuals,22
19. Chang, T.(2002).Teachers college faculty attitudes toward student ratings: The comparison between required policy and optional policy.Journal of Ping-Dung Teachers College,16
20. Chang, T.(2000).Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
21. Corder, S. P.(1973).Harmondsworth.
22. Corder, S. P.(1967).The Significance of Learner's Errors.International Review of Applied Linguistics,5(4)
23. DeKeyser, R.(1998).Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.
24. DeKeyser, R.(1995).Learning L2 grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,17
25. Doughty, C.(1991).Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from and empirical study of SL relativisation.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,13
26. Doughty, C.,Williams, J.(1998).Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.
27. Eccles, J.,Wigfield, A.,Schiefele, U.(1998).Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development.
28. Ellis, N.(1996).Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,18
29. Ellis, N.(1993).Rules and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,5
30. Ellis, R.(2001).Introduction: Investigating Form-Focused Instruction.Language Learning,51
31. Flavell, J. H.(1971).First discussant's comments: What is memory development of.Human Development,14
32. Flavell, J. H.(1987).Metacongnition, motiuation and understanding.
33. Fleming, J.(1953).The role of supervision in psychiatric training.Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic,17
34. Gass, S.(1988).Integrating research area: A framework for second language studies.Applied Linguistics,9
35. Gottfried, A.E.,Fleming, J.S.,Gottfried, A. W.(2001).Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study.Journal of educational Psychology,93(1)
36. Hacker, D. J.(1998).Metacognition in educational theory and practice.
37. Hackett, G.(1995).Self-efficacy in adaptation of youth to changing societies.
38. Hackett, G.(1985).The role of mathematics self-efficacy in choice of math-related majors of college men and women: A path analysis.Journal of Counseling Psychology,32
39. Hackett, G.,Betz, N. E.(1981).A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women.Journal of Vocational Behavior,18
40. Hackett, G.,Lent, R. W.(1992).Handbook of Counseling Psychology.
41. Hair, J. F. Jr.,Anderson, R.E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Englewood Cliffs.
42. Harley, B.(1998).Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.
43. Harley, B.,Swain, M.(1984).Interlanguage.
44. Healtoa, J. B.(1990).Writing English Language Tests.
45. Heaton, J. B.(1990).Classroom Testing.
46. Johnson, K.(1996).Language teaching and skill learning.
47. Lightbown, P. M.(1998).Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.
48. Lightbown, P. M.(1991).Foreign second language pedagogy: A commemorative volume for Claus Faerch.
49. Lightbown, P.,pada, N.(1990).Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,12
50. Long, M. H.(1991).Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective.
51. Loschky, l.,Bley-Vroman, R.(1993).Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating theory and practice.
52. McLaughlin, B.(1990).Reconstructuring.Applied Linguistics,11
53. McLaughlin, B.(1987).Theories of second language learning.
54. Retrieved from ESL Reform Resources in ESL Cybersite
55. Merrill, F. E.(1969).Society and culture: An introduction to sociology.
56. Oxford, R. L.(1990).Language Learning Strategies : What Every Teacher Should Know.
57. Oxford, R.,Shearin, J.(1994).The Modern Language Journal, vol. 78, Iss. 1.
58. Pajares, F.,Graham, L.(1999).Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,24
59. Pica, T.,Kanagy, R.,Falodun, J.(1993).Tasks and language learning : Integrating theory and practice.
60. Pieree, L. V.,O’Malley, J. M.(1992).NCBE Program Information Guide Series.
61. Pierson, H. D.,Fu, G. S.,Lee, S.(1980).An analysis of the relationship between language attitudes and English attainment of secondary students in Hong Kong.Language Learning,30
62. Robinson, P.(1996).Learning simple and complex language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,18
63. Scheider, W.,Shiffrin, R.(1977).Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search and attention.Psychological Review,84
64. Schmidt, R.(1990).The role of consciousness in second language learning.Applied Linguistics,11
65. Selinker, L.(1972).Interlanguage.International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching,10(3)
66. Skehan, P.(1996).A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction.Applied Linguistics,17
67. Skemp, R. R.(1989).Mathematics in the primary school.
68. Spada, N.(1997).Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research.Language Teaching,29
69. Spada, N.,Lightbown, P. M.(1993).Instruction and the development of questions in the L2 classroom.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,14
70. Swain, M .(1985).Input in second learning acquisition.
71. Swanson, J. L.(1997).Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
72. Swanson, J. L.,Tokar, D. M.(1991).Development and initial validation of the career barrier inventory.Journal of Vocational Behavior,39
73. Swanson, J. L.,Tokar, D. M.(1991).College students’ perceptions of barriers to career development.Journal of Vocational Behavior,38
74. VanPatten, B.(1990).Attending to content and form in the input: An experiment in consciousness.Studies in Second Language Acquisition,12
75. VanPatten, B.(1994).Consciousness in second language learning.
76. VanPatten, B.(1996).Norwood.
77. Verma, M. K.(1981).Humor differences among creative and non-creative high school students from various academic streams.India Psychological Review,20(2)
78. Vermunt, J. D.(1987).Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research.
79. 吳青蓉(1996)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
80. 吳麗林(2001)。英語學習辭彙記憶差異探究。英語教學，25(4)
81. 吳麗娟(1997)。「共依附」的特質與治療。測驗與輔導，145
82. 吳麗娟(1997)。「個體化」、「自我分化」的另一端-談「共依附」的意義與內涵。諮商與輔導，144
83. 吳麗娟(1998)。「共依附」父母的特質與其對孩子的影響。諮商與輔導，154
84. 吳麗娟(1998)。唯有放下他人，才能釋放自己-談「共依附」治療模式。諮商與輔導，145
85. 吳麗娟(1985)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
86. 吳麗娟(1999)。「共依附」父母的親職教育:放下孩子,釋放自己。諮商與輔導，157
87. 周中天(2003)。英語成績兩極化的省思。國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會通訊，19
88. 胡永崇(1995)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文。
89. 黃素月(1999)。教師用錄音帶及紙筆書寫方式給予學生英文作文回饋的教學法的個案研究。東海學報，40(1)