諮商督導歷程中人際行為與受督導者知覺之分析研究

A Study of Interpersonal Behaviors and the Supervisee's Perceptions in Counseling Supervision Process

10.6251/BEP.20051018

翁令珍(Ling-Chen Weng)；廖鳳池(Feng-Tsu Liao)

人際行為 ； 社會行為結構分析 ； 受督導者知覺 ； 重要事件 ； 諮商督導歷程 ； counseling supervision process ； interpersonal behaviors ； significant events ； supervisee's perceptions ； Structural Analysis of Social Behavior

教育心理學報

37卷2期（2005 / 12 / 01）

99 - 122

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究諮商督導歷程中的人際行為與受督導者知覺，採重要事件之研究取向，以社會行為結構分析(SASB)為架構之「人際行為分類系統」為工具，分析督導雙方之人際行為互動歷程，並在每次督導後訪談受督導者的知覺。研究對象為正修習督導實習及諮商實習課程的一對督導者與受督導者，一學期的督導過程加以錄音，受督導者並於每次督導後填寫「督導重要事件表格」與接受人際歷程回憶訪談。結果發現在十九個重要事件當中：(1)督導者最常表現之人際行為類別為「肯定了解」或「保護引導」，而受督導者最常表現「表達揭露」或「信任依賴」，且雙方互動組型皆以「互補」為主。(2)歸納受督導者所知覺之有意義因素、以及事件之立即影響，分別得到七類。(3)隨著督導進展，事件主題與人際行為及受督導者知覺呈現不同特徵，且受督導者對於督導者具控制意味或敵對立場的行為以及「表達揭露」，較有知覺，並主要受「保護引導」影響。最後根據研究結果，提出對於督導實務與未來研究之建議。

The purposes of the study was mainly to investigate the supervisee's perceptions in counseling supervision process and his or her interpersonal behaviors that shown during counseling, also to find out the relationship between interpersonal behaviors and the supervisee's perceptions. Sessions of a volunteer supervision dyad were recorded, and material of the supervisee's perceptions was collected by using Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR). In total of 19 events were taking into account and analyzed. The interpersonal process of all events were intensively analyzed with the cluster version of Structural Analysis of Social Behaviors(SASB). This study findings showed: Firstly, it was often to see that the supervisor displayed ”affirming” or ”protecting” behaviors while the supervisee exhibited ”disclosing” or ”trusting” behaviors, which ”complementary” seem to be appropriate to illustrated the form of interactions. Secondly, there were seven different categories of supervisee-perceived significant factors as well as seven different categories of immediate impacts were gained from the study. Lastly, the characters of event themes, interpersonal behaviors and the supervisee's perceptions changed with supervision stages, it also found that the supervisee could clearly perceive the supervisor's controlling, hostile, and disclosure behaviors. In addition, suggestion for practice and implication for future research were discussed and provided based in the study findings.

1. 翁令珍、廖鳳池(2002)。諮商初期諮商師與當事人之互動組型與當事人晤談感受之分析研究。中華輔導學報，12，33-72。
   連結：
2. 鄭如安、廖鳳池(2005)。督導歷程中重要事件之分析研究。諮商輔導學報-高師大輔導與諮商研究所所刊，12，35-70。
   連結：
3. Alien, G. J.,Szollos, S. J.,Williams, B. E.(1986).Doctoral students' comparative evaluations of best and worst psychotherapy supervision.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,17,91-99.
4. Alpher, V. S.(1991).Interdependence and parallel processes: A case study of Structural Analysis of Social Behavior in supervision and short-term dynamic psychotherapy.Psychotherapy,28,218-231.
5. Benard, J. M.,Goodyear, R. K.(2004).Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.).Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
6. Benjamin, L. S.(1974).Benjamin, L. S..Psychological Review,81(5),392-425.
7. Benjamin, L. S.(1996).Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality Disorders (2nd ed.).New York:Guiford Press.
8. Benjamin, L. S.,Cushing, G.(2000).Reference manual for coding social interactions in terms of structural analysis of social behavior.Salt Lake City:University of Utah.
9. Chen, E. C.,Bernstein, B. L.(2000).Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cases.Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(4),485-497.
10. Chung, Y. B.,Baskin, M. L.,Case, A. B.(1998).Positive and negative supervisory experiences reported by counseling trainees.Psychological Reports,86(762)
11. Elliott, R.(1984).Patterns of change.New York:The Guilford Press.
12. Elliott, R.,James, E.,Reimschuessel, C.,Cislo, D.,Sack, N.(1985).Significant events and the therapeutic impacts.Psychotherapy,22(3),620-630.
13. Fiedler, P.(1994).Therapeutic and everyday discourse as behavior change.New Jersey:Ablex.
14. Gray, L. A.,Ladany, N.,Walker, J. A.,Ancies, J. R.(2001).Psychotherapy trainees' experience of counterproductive events in supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology,48(4),371-383.
15. Greenberg, L. S.,Pinsof, W. M.(1986).The psychotherapeutic process: A research book.New York:Guiford Press.
16. Harrist, R. S.,Quintana, S. M.,Strupp, H. H.,Henry, W. P.(1994).Intemalization of interpersonal process in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy.Psychotherapy,31(1),49-57.
17. Henry, W. P.(1997).Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation.New York:Guiford Press.
18. Henry, W. P.,Schacht, T. E.,Strupp, H. H.(1986).Structural analysis of social behavior: Application to a study of interpersonal process in differential psychotherapeutic outcome.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,54(1),27-31.
19. Henry, W. P.,Schacht, T. E.,Strupp, H. H.(1990).Patient and therapist introject, interpersonal process, and differential psychotherapy outcome.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,58(6),768-774.
20. Henry, W. P.,Strupp. H. H.,Butler, S. R.,Schacht, T. E.,Binder, J. L.(1993).Effects of training in time-limited dynamic psychotherapy: Changes in therapist behavior.Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology,61,434-440.
21. Humeidan, M. A.(2002).Thesis(Ph. D.) of Ball State University.
22. Kennard, B. D.,Stewart, S. M.,Gluck, M. R.(1987).The supervision relationship: Variables contributing to positive versus negative experiences.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,18,172-175.
23. Kiesler, D. J(1996).Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy.New York:Wiley.
24. Kiesler, D. J.,Watkins, L. M.(1989).Interpersonal complementarity and the therapeutic alliance: A study of relationship in psychotherapy.Psychotherapy,26(2),183-194.
25. Ladany, N.,Hill, C. E.,Corbett, M. M.,Nutt, E. A.(1996).Nature, Extent, and Importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors.Journal of Counseling Psychology,43(1),10-24.
26. Leppard, W. J.(1998).Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 59(6-A), 1922.
27. Logonbill, C.,Hardy, E.,Delworth, U.(1982).Supervision: A conceptual model.Counseling Psychologist,10,3-42.
28. Lorr, M.,Strack, S.(1999).A study of Benjamin's eight-facet Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB).Journal of Clinical Psychology,55(2),207-215.
29. MacKenzie, K. R.(1983).Advances in group psychotherapy.American Group Psychotherapy Association.
30. Patton, M. J.,Kivlighan, D. M.(1997).Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and treatment adherence in counselor training.Journal of Counseling Psychology,44(1),108-115.
31. Pincus, A. L.,News, S. L.,Dickinson, K. A.,Ruiz, M. A.(1998).A comparison of three indexes to assess the dimensions of Structural Analysis of Social Behavior.Journal of Personality Assessment,70(1),145-170.
32. Romans, J. S. C.(1996).Gender differences in counselor/therapist trainees.Clinical Supervisor,14(1),77-85.
33. Stoltenberg, C. D.,McNeill, B. W.,Delworth, U.(1998).IDM: An integrated developmental model for supervising counselor and therapists.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
34. Strack, S.(1996).Introduction to the special series-interpersonal theory and the interpersonal circumplex: Timothy Leary's Legacy.Journal of Personality Assessment,66(2),213-216.
35. Svartberg, M.,Stiles, T.C.(1992).Predicting patient change from therapist competence and patient-therapist complementarity in short-term anxiety-provoking psychotherapy: A pilot study.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,60(2),304-307.
36. Tracey, T. J. G.,Sherry, P.,Albright, J. M.(1999).The interpersonal process of cognitive-behavioral therapy: An examination of complementarity over the course of treatment.Journal of Counseling Psychology,46(1),80-91.
37. Wester, S. R.,Vogel, D. L.,Archer, J. Jr.(2004).Male restricted emotionality and counseling supervision.Journal of Counseling and development,82,91-98.
38. Wonhen, V.,McNeill, B. W.(1996).A phenomenological investigation of "good" supervision events.Journal of Counseling Psychology,43(1),25-34.
39. 李錦虹(1997)。國立台灣大學心理學研究博士論文。
40. 翁令珍(2001)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
41. 翁令珍(2002)。個別諮商歷程中的人際互補行為。輔導季刊，38(1)，1-9。
42. 陳春曲(2005)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
43. 廖宏啟(1999)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。

1. 賴姳臻,陳秀蓉(2023)。新手諮商督導者的督導意圖與行動之探究。教育心理學報，54(4)，835-862。
2. 連廷嘉(2008)。諮商督導工作同盟關係與受督導者滿意度之相關研究。新竹教育大學學報，25(2)，33-63。
3. 廖鳳池、方韻珠(2009)。以社會行為結構分析法探討青少年與其母親親子互動之分析研究。諮商輔導學報：高師輔導所刊，21，123-164。
4. 廖鳳池、翁令珍(2007)。督導介入對受督導者之衝擊—以區辨模式爲架構之歷程分析。教育心理學報，39(2)，241-261。
5. 廖鳳池、張淑芬(2011)。督導雙方對諮商督導關係知覺之配對研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，30，79-102。
6. (2015)。建立愛情關係中伴侶間人際行為測量工具之研究。教育與心理研究，38(1)，93-124。