注意力分配對圖像登錄之影響及其在教學上的應用方向

The Effect of Attention Allocation in the Encoding of Pictorial Stimuli and the Applications in Teaching

10.6251/BEP.20060707

汪曼穎(Man-Ying Wang)；王林宇(Lin-Yu Wang)

文字 ； 重複促發 ； 圖示 ； 圖形 ； 輔助圖形 ； adjunct pictures ； illustrations ； pictures ； repetition priming ； words

教育心理學報

38卷1期（2006 / 09 / 01）

67 - 83

繁體中文

本研究探討學習脈絡與圖像辨認的知覺處理需求如何影響學習時的注意力分配並進而影響記憶登錄，以及這些研究發現在教學上的應用方向。兩個實驗運用重複促發(repetition priming)典範來比較圖形－圖形(P-P)與文字－圖形(W-P)促發效果的相對大小。結果發現當圖形與文字在學習階段混合出現，或者圖形的辨認需要處理局部的知覺屬性時，注意力才會被導向至圖形的知覺層面並引發知覺登錄(encoding)；當圖形的辨認不需處理局部屬性且圖文形式沒有在受試者內產生對照時，沒有圖形知覺登錄的證據。這些發現顯示(1)即使是被一般人認為「簡單」而用作文字輔助的圖形，其記憶登錄卻不是單純的歷程(2)圖形登錄取決於學習脈絡與作業需求是否與如何影響注意力導向(3)以圖像為學習輔助媒介時，應重視教學活動的設計是否適切引導學生對於圖像的注意力分配，以及瞭解學習者是否擅於圖像的處理。

This study explores how study context and perceptual processing demands in picture recognition affect attention allocation and, in turn, memory encoding, as well as the applications of current findings in teaching. The repetition priming paradigm was adopted in two experiments. Relative magnitudes of picture-picture (P-P) and word-picture priming effects were compared. The results showed that when pictures and words were mixed in the study phase or when the recognition of the picture required processing of local perceptual features, attention was perceptually directed and resulted in perceptual encoding of the picture. If, however, the recognition of the picture did not require local processing and the surface format of pictures and words did not lead to contrast in subjects, no evidence of perceptual encoding for pictures was found. These findings suggest that: (1) memory encoding of pictures is not a simple process even though pictures are customarily regarded as an 'easy-to-learn' text adjunct; (2) pictorial encoding is determined by whether and how study context and processing demands affect the manner in which attention is allocated; (3) in devising a pictorial learning aid, learning activity should be so arranged that it properly directs students' attention allocation and the adeptness of the learner in pictorial processing should also be understood.

1. 周子敬(2006)。八大多元智慧問卷的信、效度分析。教育心理學報，37，215-229。
   連結：
2. Adler, C.(1993).Directed picture processing: The effects for learners on recall of related text.Dissertation Abstract International,54(3-A),863.
3. Benson, P. J.(1995).Problems in picturing text.Dissertation Abstract International,55(11-A),3357.
4. Bernard, R. M.(1990).Using extended captions to improve learning from instructional illustrations.British Journal of Education Technology,21,215-225.
5. Betrancourt, M.,Bisseret, A.(1998).Integrating textual and pictorial information via popup windows: An experimental study.Behavioral Information Technology,17,263-273.
6. Biederman, I.(1987).Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94,115-147.
7. Biederman, I,Cooper, E. E.(1991).Size invariance in visual object priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18,121-133.
8. Breitmeyer, B. G.,Ganz, L.(1976).Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.Psychological Review,83,1-36.
9. Brown, A. S.,Neblett, D. R.,Jones, T. C.,Mitchell, D. B.(1991).Transfer of processing in recognition priming: Some inappropriate finding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17,514-525.
10. Burgund, E. D.,Marsolek, C. J.(1997).Letter-case-specific priming in the right cerebral hemisphere with a form-specific perceptual identification task.Brain & Cognition,35,239-258.
11. Carney, R. N.,Levin, J. R.(2002).Pictorial illustrations still improve students` learning from text.Educational Psychology Review,14,5-25.
12. Carr, T. H.,McCauley, C.,Sperber, R. D.,Parmalee, C. M.(1982).Words, pictures and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification and the automaticity of information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8,757-777.
13. Damian, M. F.,Martin, R. C.(1998).Is visual lexical access based on phonological codes? Evidence from a picture-word interference task.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,5,91-96.
14. Durso, F. T.,Johnson, M. K.(1979).Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5,449-459.
15. Fang, Z.(1996).Illustrations, text, and the child reader. What are pictures in children`s storybooks for?.Reading Horizons,37,130-142.
16. Gardner, H.(1993).Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice.New York:Basic Books.
17. Gardner, H.(1999).Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century.New York:Basic Books.
18. Humphreys, G. W.,Evett, L. J.(1985).Are there independent lexical and non-lexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,8,689-740.
19. Iding, M. K.(1997).Can questions facilitate learning from illustrated science texts.Reading & Psychology,18,1-29.
20. Kinjo, H.,Snodgrass, J. K.(2000).Is there a picture superiority effect in perceptual implicit tasks.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,12,145-164.
21. Koran, M. L.,Koran, J. J.(1980).Interaction of learner characteristics with pictorial adjuncts in learning from science text.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,17,477-483.
22. Kosslyn, S. M.,Alpert, N. M.,Thompson, W. L.,Maljkovic, V.(1993).Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5,263-287.
23. Levie, W. H.,Lentz, R(1982).Effects of text illustrations: A review of research.Educational Communication & Technology Journal,30,195-232.
24. Levin, J. R.,Anglin, G. J.,Carney, R. N.,D. M. Willows,H. A. Houghton (Eds.)(1987).The psychology of illustration: I. Basic research.New York:Springer.
25. Levin, J. R.,F. J. Pirozzolo et M. C. Wittrock (Eds.)(1981).Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading.New York:Academic Press.
26. Levin, J.R.,Mayer, R.E.,B. K. Britton,A. Woodward,M. Brinkley (Eds.)(1993).Understanding illustrations in text.Learning from Textbooks,95-113.
27. Marsolek, C. J.(1999).Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition.Psychological Science,10,111-118.
28. Mayer, R. E.,Anderson, R. B.(1991).Animation need narration: An experimental test of a dual coding hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology,83,484-490.
29. Mayer, R. E.,Gallini, J. K.(1990).When is an illustration worth ten thousand words.Journal of Educational Psychology,82,715-726.
30. Mayer, R. E.,Moreno, R.(1998).A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory.Journal of Educational Psychology,90,312-320.
31. Mevarech, Z. R.,Kramarsky, B.(1997).From verbal descriptions to graphic representation: Stability and change in students` alternative conception.Educational Studies in Mathematics,32,229-263.
32. Morris, C.,Bransford, J. D.,Franks, J. J.(1977).Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16,519-533.
33. Moyer , J. C.,Sowder, L.,Threadgill-Sowder, J.,Moyer, M. B.(1984).Story problem formats: Drawn versus verbal versus telegraphic.Journal for Research in Mathematical Education,15,342-351.
34. Mulligan, N. W.,Brown, A. S.,L. Jiminez (Ed.)(2003).Attention, consciousness, and learning.Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
35. Nelson, D. L.,Reed, V. S.,McEvoy, C. L.(1977).Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3,485-497.
36. Nelson, D. L.,Reed, V. S.,Walling, J. R.(1976).Pictorial superiority effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2,523-528.
37. Ollerenshaw, A.,Aidman, E.,Kidd, G.(1997).Is an illustration always worth ten thousand words? Effects of prior knowledge, learning style, and multimedia illustrations on text comprehension.International Journal of Instructional Media,24,227-238.
38. Paivio, A.(1971).Imagery and verbal processes.New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
39. Paivio, A.,Csapo, K.(1973).Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding.Cognitive Psychology,5,176-206.
40. Park, S. M.,Gabrieli, D. E.(1995).Perceptual and nonperceptual components of implicit memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,21,1583-1594.
41. Peeck, J.(1993).Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text.Learning & Instruction,3,227-238.
42. Potter, M. C.,Faulconer, B.(1975).Time to understand pictures and words.Nature,253,437-438.
43. Reid, D. J.,Beveridge, M.(1986).Effects of text illustration on children`s learning of school science topic.British Journal of Educational Psychology,56,294-303.
44. Reinking, D. R.,Hayes, D. A.,McEneaney, J. E.(1988).Good and poor readers` use of explicitly cued graphic aids.Journal of Reading Behavior,20,229-243.
45. Riding, R. J.,Douglas, G.(1993).The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance.British Journal of Education Psychology,63,297-307.
46. Roediger, H. L. III(1990).Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45,1043-1056.
47. Shepard, R. N.(1967).Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6,156-163.
48. Snodgrass, G. J.,Vanderwart, M.(1980).A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,6,174-215.
49. Starreveld, P. A.,La Heij, W.(1996).Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,22,896-918.
50. Stewig, J. W.(1992).Reading pictures, reading text: Some similarities.New Advocate,5(1),11-22.
51. Szymanski, K. F.,Macleod, C. M.(1996).Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory.Consciousness & Cognition,5,165-175.
52. Toth, J. P.,E. Tulving,F. I. M. Craik (Eds.)(2000).The Oxford handbook of memory.New York:Oxford University Press.
53. Tversky, B.,Hemenway, K.(1984).Objects, parts, and categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113,169-193.
54. Weidenmann, B.,H. Mandl & Levin (Eds.)(1989).Knowledge acquisition from text and picture.Oxford, England:North-Holland.
55. Weldon, M. S.,Coyote, K. C.(1996).Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22,670-686.
56. Weldon, M. S.,Roediger, H. L.(1987).Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15,269-280.
57. Weldon, M.,Roediger, H. L.,Challis, B. H.(1989).The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,17,95-105.
58. 朱錦鳳(2003)。「問題解決創造力測驗」的發展及其相關研究。教育與心理研究，26，671-695。
59. 何縕琪、林清山(1994)。表徵策略教學對提升國小低解題正確率學生解題表現之之研究。教育心理學報，27，259-279。
60. 吳昭容(1990)。圖示對國小學童解數學應用題之影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究獨立研究。
61. 吳昭容(1993)。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告,未出版
62. 汪曼穎(1997)。常見物體之輪廓圖知覺及語意特性評估研究。中華心理學刊，39，157-172。
63. 汪曼穎、黃榮村(2002)。整體診斷性與複雜度對物體辨識之影響。中華心理學刊，44，189-210。
64. 林淑菁(2002)。國立台北師範學院特殊教育學系。
65. 徐文鈺(1992)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所。
66. 張春興(1995)。在應用科學基礎上建立教育心理學的獨立體系。教育心理學報，28，1-14。
67. 張景媛(1995)。國中生建構幾何概念之研究暨統整式合作學習的幾何策略效果之評估。教育心理學報，28，99-144。
68. 許良榮(1994)。圖形與科學課文學習關係的探討。教育研究資訊，4，121-131。
69. 楊淑芬(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所特殊教育教學碩士班。

1. 黃詩芸、崔夢萍(2016)。運用眼動追蹤技術於國小低成就學生數學文字題輔助線上測驗設計之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，115，13-35。
2. 劉嘉茹、黃台珠、林玉雯(2010)。探討圖形表徵與視知覺學習偏好對生物辨識學習之影響。科學教育學刊，18(6)，521-546。
3. 周珮儀(2015)。從認知心理學探究教科書插圖設計及其教學轉化。教科書研究，8(2)，139-174。
4. (2010)。圖像優於文字？N世代學生認知發展之探究。教育研究月刊，193，15-23。
5. (2014)。一位成長團隊教師的三位數加減簡報製作與教學之專業成長研究。教育學報，42(1)，77-100。