技術課程教師對大學生學習型態與職業刻板印象的影響：示範有利性的角色

The Influence of Teachers on College Students' Learning Styles and Occupational Stereotypes in Technical Courses: The Role of Modeling Priority

10.6251/BEP.20060804

楊昭景(Chao-Chin Yang)；邱文彬(Wen-Bin Chiou)

大學生 ； 示範有利性 ； 社會學習論 ； 學習型態 ； 職業刻板印象 ； college students ； modeling priority ； social learning theory ； learning styles ； vocational stereotypes

教育心理學報

38卷2期（2006 / 12 / 01）

131 - 150

繁體中文

本研究目的在於探討高等教育技術課程的合作教學中，技術教師與一般教師在社會學習之示範有利性的差異，以及大學生的職業刻板印象與學習型態是否會受到教師楷模的影響。計有174位大一新生參與此項縱貫性研究，研究結果指出，技術教師的示範有利性高於一般教師，意即在合作教學中技術教師較可能成為學生所認同的角色楷模。就學習型態而言，無論大學生認同的角色楷模為技術教師或一般教師，他們對經驗引導的學習型態偏好高於理論引導。交叉延右方格分析指出，大學生知覺技術教師的示範有利性愈高者，其後來的學習型態偏好愈傾向經驗引導型式，學習型態偏好愈傾向經驗引導型式者，其後來所知覺技術教師的示範有利性也愈高；一般教師的示範有利性與學生對理論引導型式的學習型態偏好具有相似的相互關聯性。角色楷模為技術教師的大學生，其職業刻板印象與技術教師較為一致；反之，角色楷模為一般教師的大學生，其職業刻板印象則與一般教師較為一致。教師示範有利性與學習型態、職業刻板印象的關係在一學期內相當穩定。本文最後討論研究發現，並提出結論與建議。

The article aimed to investigate the differences in modeling priority between technical teachers and lecturing teachers, and whether the role models affect college students' learning styles and vocational stereotypes in the collaborative teaching of technical courses. One hundred and seventy-four freshmen were recruited as participants in this longitudinal study. Results indicated that the modeling priority of technical teachers was higher than that of lecturing teachers, which means that technical teachers were more likely to be identified as role models by students in collaborative teaching. As to learning styles, the college students significantly preferred the experience-driven mode to the theory-driven mode regardless of whether their role models were technical or lecturing teachers. Cross-legged panel analysis showed that the students perceiving higher modeling priority of technical teachers subsequently exhibited greater preferences for the experience-driven mode. Meanwhile, the students who initially preferred the experience-driven mode also perceived higher modeling priority of technical teachers subsequently. Similar relationships were found between modeling priority of lecturing teachers and students' preferences for the theory-driven mode. For the students who identified technical teachers as role models, their vocational stereotypes were more consistent with technical teachers than with lecturing teachers. In contrast, for students who identified lecturing teachers as role models, their vocational stereotypes were more consistent with lecturing teachers than with vocational teachers. The relationships among teachers' modeling priority, learning styles, and vocational stereotypes were stable over a one-semester period. Research findings were discussed and conclusions and implications were proposed.

1. 吳坤璋、黃台珠、吳裕益(2005)。教育心理學報。
   連結：
2. 林文瑛(2004)。教育心理學報。
   連結：
3. 陳夏蓮、李薇莉(2000)。護理研究。
   連結：
4. Anastasi, A.,Urbina, S.(1996).New York,MacMillam.
5. Bacon, D. R.(2004).Journal of Education for Business.
6. Bandura, A.(1977).Englewood Cliffs, NJ,Prentice-Hall.
7. Bandurs, A.(1986).Englewond Cliffs, NJ,Prentice-Hall.
8. Campbell, D. T.,Fiske, D. W.(1959).Psychological Bulletin.
9. Carol, M.(1991).The Clearing House.
10. Cassidy, S.,Eschus, P.(2000).Educational Psychology.
11. Chsrkins, R. J.,O‵ Toole, D. M.,Wetzel, J. N.(1985).Journal of Economic Education.
12. Collinson, E.(2000).Contemporary Education.
13. Cook, T. D.,Campbell, D. T.(1979).Boaton,Houghton Mifflin.
14. Daymunt, T. N.,Andriaani, P. J.(1984).The Journal of Human Resources.
15. Dollar, D.(2001).Community College Review.
16. Felder, R. M.,Silverman, I. K.(1988).Engineering Education.
17. Fennema, E.,B. Fennema,G. C. Leder(1990).New York,Teacher College Press.
18. Flarrelson, G. L.,Leaver-Dunn, D.,Wright, K. B.(1998).Journal of Athletic Training.
19. Fox, H. W.,Renaa, S. R.(1977).Human Resource Management.
20. Franken, M. W.(1983).Psychology of Women Quarterly.
21. Guild, P. B.,Garger, S.(1985).Alexandria, VA,Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
22. Haar, J.,Hall, G.,Schoepp, P.,Smith, D. H.(2002).The clearing House.
23. Hair, J., F.,Anderson, R. F.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(2002).Upper Saddle River, NJ,Prentice-Hall.
24. Hayes, J.,Allinaon, C. W.(1996).British Journal of Management.
25. Hayes, J.,Allinaon, C. W.(1990).Psychological Reports.
26. Honey, P.,Mumford, A.(1992).Ludon, UK,Honey.
27. Honigafeld, A.,Schiering, M.(2004).Educational Psychology.
28. Jester, C.(2000)..
29. Keller, C.(2001).The Joumal of Social Psychology.
30. Kirrane, M.,Ryan, A.(2000).Management Research News.
31. Kolb, D. A.(1985).Boston,McBer.
32. Lipton, J. P.,O‵ Connor, M.(1991).The Journal of Psychology.
33. Lou, R.(2002).Journal of Education for Business.
34. Marcia, J. G.,Lawrimore, K. W.(1994).Atlantic Economic Journal.
35. Matthews, D. B.(1996).The Cleaning House.
36. Matthews, D. B.(1991).Research in Higher Education.
37. Miller, K. M.(1960).Journal of Applied Psychology.
38. Nelson, T. B.,Acker, M.,Mania, M.(1996).Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
39. Oswald, P. A.(2003).Perceptual and Motor Skills.
40. Reading-Brown, M. S.,Hayden, R. R.(1989).Psychological Reports.
41. Reid, G. M.(1995).Psychological Reporfs.
42. Sigelman, C. K.,Shaffer, D. R.(1995).Pacific Grove, CA,Brooks/Cole.
43. Snyder, R. F.(2000).The High School Journal.
44. Solomon, R. P.(1997).Canadian Journal of Education.
45. Stemberg, R. F.(2000).Orlando, FL,Harcourt.
46. Thompson, T. C.(1997).Business Communication Quarterly.
47. Whittington, M. S.,Connors, J.(2005).The Agricultural Education Magazine.
48. Yoder, J. D.,Schleicher, T. L.(1996).Sex Roles.
49. 王文科(1991)。學習心理學：學習理論導論。臺北:五南。
50. 吳天元(2001)。臺北，國立臺北科技大學主辦「技職教育新意涵國際教育學術研討會」宣讀之論文。
51. 洪久賢(2000)。生活應用科學期刊。
52. 紀憲燕(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺彎師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
53. 張春興(1994)。臺北，東華。
54. 郭順利(1998)。教育研究。
55. 彭台臨(2001)。臺北，國立臺北科技大學主辦「技職教育新意涵國際教育學術研討會」宣讀之論文。
56. 湯誌龍(2001)。臺北，國立臺北科技大學主辦「技職教育新意涵國際教育學術研討會」宣讀之論文。
57. 黃天中(1995)。生涯規劃概論：生涯與生活篇。臺北:桂冠。
58. 楊昭景(2000)。臺北，國立臺北科技大學主辦「海峽兩岸高等職業技職教育學術研討會」宣讀之論文。
59. 萬家春(1992)。般度拉約社會學習論。臺北:師大書苑。
60. 趙珠吟(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所碩士論文。
61. 鍾菁(1994)。國立臺北商專學報。
62. 羅瑞玉(2002)。觀光客倍增計畫，國家重要發展產業政策。

1. 陳貴凰、洪文發(2011)。不同世代台灣廚師職涯發展之研究。餐旅暨觀光，8(3)，167-189。
2. 林洹瑜,周玉真(2018)。大學生參加美容專業技能競賽的經驗學習分析。弘光學報，81，69-85。