题名

以試題反應理論分析CES-D量表不同調查方式的差異效果

并列篇名

Survey Mode Effect Analyzed by Item Response Theory on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale

作者

李仁豪(Ren-Hau Li)；謝進昌(Jin-Chang Hsieh)；余民寧(Min-Ning Yu)

关键词

多向度潛在回歸 ； 流行病學研究中心憂鬱量表 ； 評定量尺模式 ； 試題反應理論 ； Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale ； item response theory ； multidimensional latent regression ； rating scale model

期刊名称

教育心理學報

卷期/出版年月

39卷測驗與評量專刊（2008 / 02 / 01）

页次

21 - 42

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究主要是探討網路問卷與紙本問卷這兩種調查方式是否有所差異，問卷內容是採用國際間廣泛使用的CES-D憂鬱量表。2400位樣本分層隨機取自台灣中小學教師，其中共有1141位教師在20題CES-D量表上作答，包括535位網路組及606位紙本組教師。本研究藉由單參數試題反應理論軟體ConQuest開發的多向度潛在回歸模組來比較網路問卷組與紙本問卷組在問卷內容上的差異情形。研究結果顯示，儘管網路問卷回收率稍低於紙本問卷，但並未導致兩組受試者在背景變項上有所差異。在問卷內容的比較上，雖然網路問卷組在問卷內容的潛在平均數顯著地低於紙本問卷組，但是並無實質上的重要差異，亦即問卷組別變項對CES-D量表各因素的解釋力趨近於0。本研究認為仍有必要持續進行調查方式的比較研究，以確認網路問卷是否可取代紙本問卷，以減少研究及社會成本。
英文摘要

This study investigated whether differences exist between Internet and paper questionnaires in survey mode, where the internationally- and widely-used ”Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression” (CES-D) scale was adopted as content of the questionnaire. Of 2400 primary and secondary school teachers stratified and sampled randomly from Taiwan, 1141 teachers responded to the 20_item CES-D Scale, including 535 teachers in the Internet group, and 606 teachers in the paper group. This research used multidimensional latent regression module developed by ConQuest software. Using one-parameter item response theory, we compared the differences between the Internet and paper questionnaire groups. The results of this study showed no significant difference between the two groups in background variables; nonetheless, response rate in the Internet group was lower than that in the paper group. As for comparisons between content of questionnaires, although the latent means of the Internet group were significantly lower than those of the paper group, these differences had no substantial meanings. The group variable of survey mode explained close to zero variance in factors of the CES-D Scale. To examine whether Internet questionnaire survey can be used to substitute for paper survey in order to reduce research and administration cost, we encourage more comparisons between the two survey modes.
主题分类 社會科學 > 心理學
社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 余民寧、李仁豪(2008)。調查方式與議題熟悉度對問卷回收率與內容的影響。教育學刊，30，101-140。
    連結：
  2. 游森期、余民寧(2006)。網路問卷與傳統問卷之比較：多樣本均等性方法學之應用。測驗學刊，53(1)，105-130。
    連結：
  3. Linacre, J. M. (2006). A user's guide to FACETS. Retrieved August, 15, 2006 from http://www.winsteps.com
  4. Aquilino, W. S.(1994).Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment.Public Opinion Quarterly,58,210-240.
  5. Bandilla, W.,Bosnjak, M.,Altdorfer, P.(2003).A comparison of web-based and traditional written selfadministered surveys using the ISSP environment module.Social Science Computer Review,21,235-243.
  6. Boisvert, J. A.,McCreary, D. R.,Wright, K. D.,Asmundson, G. J. G.(2003).Factorial validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale in military peacekeepers.Depression and Anxiety,17(1),19-25.
  7. Bond, T. G.,Fox, C. M.(2001).Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  8. Brouwers, A.,Tomic, W.(2000).A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management.Teaching & Teacher Education,16(2),239-253.
  9. Bullough, R. V., Jr.(2005).Teacher vulnerability and teachability: A case study of a mentor and two interns.Teacher Education Quarterly,32(2),23-39.
  10. Carini, R. M.,Hayek, J. H.,Kuh, G. D.,Kennedy, J. M.,Ouimet, J. A.(2003).College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter?.Research in Higher Education,44,1-19.
  11. Chan, K. S.,Orlando, M.,Ghosh-Dastidar, B.,Duan, N.,Sherbourne, C. D.(2004).The interview mode effect on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale: An item response theory analysis.Medical Care,42(3),281-289.
  12. Cheung, C-K.,Bagley, C.(1998).Validating an American scale in Hong Kong: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).The Journal of Psychology,132(2),169-186.
  13. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Cohen, J.(1992).Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer.Psychological Bulletin,112(1),155-159.
  15. Couper, M. P.,Rowe, B.(1996).Evaluation of a computer-assisted self-interview component in a computer-assisted personal interview survey.Public Opinion Quarterly,60,89-105.
  16. Czaja, R.(1987).Asking sensitive behavioral questions in telephone interviews.International Quarterly of Community Health Education,8(1),23-32.
  17. Denscombe, M.(2006).Web-based questionnaires and the mode effect: An evaluation based on completion rates and data contents of near-identical questionnaires delivered in different modes.Social Science Computer Review,24(2),246-254.
  18. Edman, J. L.,Danko, G. P.,Andrade, N.,McArdle, J. J.,Foster, J.,Glipa, J.(1999).Factor structure of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) among Filipino-American adolescents.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology,34(4),211-215.
  19. Embretson, S. E.,Reise, S. P.(2000).Item response theory for psychologists.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. Goho, J.(2002).Mixed mode effects in a community college graduate survey.the 42nd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research,Toronto, Canada:
  21. Greenfield, T. K.,Midanik, L. T.,Rogers, J. D.(2000).Effects of telephone versus face-to-face interview modes on reports of alcohol consumption.Addiction,95(2),277-284.
  22. Hayslett, M. M.,Wildemuth, B. M.(2004).Pixels or pencils? The relative effectiveness of Web-based versus paper surveys.Library & Information Science Research,26,73-93.
  23. Henson, R.,Cannell, C. F.,Roth, A.(1978).Effect of interview mode on reporting of moods, symptoms, and need for social approval.Journal of Social Psychology,105,123-129.
  24. Holbrook, A. L.,Green, M. C.,Krosnick, J. A.(2003).Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: Comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias.Public Opinion Quarterly,67,79-125.
  25. Huang, H-M.(2006).Do print and Web surveys provide the same results?.Computers in Human Behavior,22,334-350.
  26. Jurado, D.,Gurpegui, M.,Moreno, O.,Fernandez, M. C.,Luna, J. D.,Galvez, R.(2005).Association of personality and work conditions with depressive symptoms.European Psychiatry,20,213-222.
  27. Kwak, N.,Radler, B.(2002).A comparison between mail and web surveys: Response pattern, respondent profile, and data quality.Journal of Official Statistics,18(2),257-273.
  28. Lautenschlager, G. J.,Flaherty, V. L.(1990).Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability?.Journal of Applied Psychology,75(3),310-314.
  29. Layne, B. H.,DeCristoforo, J. R.,McGinty, D.(1999).Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction.Research in Higher Education,40,221-232.
  30. McCabe, S. E.(2004).Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment.Journal of Drug Education,34(1),61-72.
  31. McCabe, S. E.,Boyd, C. J.,Couper, M. P.,Crawford, S.,D''Arcy, H.(2002).Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and U.S. mail.Journal of Studies on Alcohol,63,755-761.
  32. McCabe, S. E.,Boyd, C. J.,Young, A.,Crawford, S.,Pope, D.(2005).Mode effects for collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: A randomized pilot study of web-form versus paper-form surveys.Addictive Behaviors,30,663-671.
  33. McCabe, S. E.,Couper, M. P.,Cranford, J. A.,Boyd, C. J.(2006).Comparison of web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: Evidence for minimal mode effects.Addictive Behaviors,31,162-168.
  34. Miller, T. Q.,Markides, K. S.,Black, S. A.(1997).The factor structure of the CES-D in two surveys of elderly Mexican Americans.The Journals of Gerontology,52B(5),S259-S269.
  35. Motl, R. W.,Dishman, R. K.,Birnbaum, A. S.,Lytle, L. A.(2005).Longitudinal invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale among girls and boys in middle school.Educational and Psychological Measurement,65(1),90-108.
  36. Newman, J. C.,Des Jarlais, D. C.,Turner, C. F.,Gribble, J.,Cooley, P.,Paone, D.(2002).The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes.American Journal of Public Health,92,294-297.
  37. O''Rourke, N.(2005).Factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among older men and women who provide care to persons with dementia.International Journal of Testing,5(3),265-277.
  38. Pealer, L.,Weiler, R. M.,Pigg, R. M.,Miller, D.,Dorman, S. M.(2001).The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students.Health Education Behavior,28,547-559.
  39. Pridemore, W. A.,Damphousse, K. R.,Moore, R. K.(2005).Obtaining sensitive information from a wary population: A comparison of telephone and face-to-face surveys of welfare recipients in the United States.Social Science & Medicine,61,976-984.
  40. Radloff, L. S.(1977).The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population.Applied Psychological Measurement,1,385-401.
  41. Richman, W. L.,Kiesler, S.,Weisband, S.,Drasgow, F.(1999).A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews.Journal of Applied Psychology,84,754-775.
  42. Schonfeld, I. S.(1990).Psychological distress in a sample of teachers.The Journal of Psychology,124(3),321-338.
  43. Schonfeld, I. S.(2000).An updated look at depressive symptoms and job satisfaction in first-year women teachers.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,73(3),363-372.
  44. Schwarz, N.,Strack, F.,Hippler, H. J.,Bishop, G.(1991).The impact of administration mode on response effects in survey measurement.Applied Cognitive Psychology,5(3),193-212.
  45. Shaw, D.,Davis, C. H.(1996).The Modern Language Association: Electronic and paper surveys of computer-based tool use.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,47,932-940.
  46. Spijker, J.,van der Wurff, F. B.,Poort, E. C.,Smits, C. H. M.,Verhoeff, A. P.,Beekman, A. T. F.(2004).Depression in first generation labour migrants in Western Europe: The utility of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D).International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,19,538-544.
  47. Tomsic, M. L.,Hendel, D. D.,Matross, R. P.(2000).A World Wide Web response to student satisfaction surveys: Comparisons using paper and Internet formats.the Annual Meeting of the Association for Instructional Research,Cincinnati, OH:
  48. Tourangeau, R.(2004).Survey research and societal change.Annual Review of Psychology,55(1),755-801.
  49. Wright, D. L.,Aquilino, W. S.,Supple, A. J.(1998).A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-andpencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use.Public Opinion Quarterly,62,331-353.
  50. Wu, M. L.,Adams, R. J.,Wilson, M. R.(1998).ACER ConQuest: Generalised item response modeling software manual.Camberwell, Melbourne:The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd..
  51. 余民寧、李仁豪(2006)。調查方式與問卷長短對回收率與調查內容影響之研究。當代教育研究，14(3)，127-168。
  52. 彭駕騂(2001)。從教師憂鬱症談心理適應。台灣教育，608，26-31。
被引用次数
  1. 陳密桃、李新民(2009)。寬恕的測量及其與焦慮的潛在關聯。教育心理學報，41(1)，1-27。
  2. 郭緒東、汪在莒(2010)。大學新生自覺憂鬱程度、運動認知預期與健康生活品質之結構模式驗證。逢甲人文社會學報，21，93-116。
  3. 林聖岳,李成雲,李玉嬋,吳佳容(2021)。台灣民眾之心理健康素養與心理健康狀態測量工具。諮商與輔導，430，37-40+12。
  4. 湯雅芬,陳柏霖,余民寧(2012)。大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，8(4)，19-52。
  5. 鐘珮純、趙珮晴、陳柏霖、許嘉家、余民寧(2012)。自覺健康狀態、健康責任、情緒幸福感及憂鬱關係之調查。屏東教育大學學報，38(教育)，199-226。
  6. (2010)。網路與紙本調查方式、網路問卷長短、網路問卷議題熟悉度高低的DIF分析及潛在平均數差異。教育與心理研究，33(2)，111-139。
  7. (2023)。國中綜合活動領域教師學科教學知識量表編製暨效度分析。教育心理學報，55(2)，401-424。
print cancel