CISC教學策略與國中生微粒概念學習成效之相關研究

Effect of the CISC Instructional Strategy on the Particle Concepts Learning Achievement of Junior High Students

10.6251/BEP.20070928

林小慧(Hsiao-Hui Lin)

具體影像空間教學策略 ； 迷思概念 ； 微粒概念 ； Concrete Image Spatial Concepts CISC instructional strategy ； misconception ； particle concepts

教育心理學報

39卷4期（2008 / 06 / 01）

533 - 554

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討具體影像空間教學策略(CISC)對國中生微粒概念學習成效的影響。參與研究對象爲台北縣85位八年級學生，經由分配成實驗組（CISC教學）及控制組（類比教學）。所有學生均接受「微粒概念理解測驗」的前測及後測，以檢驗CISC教學策略對國中生微粒概念學習成效的影響。研究結果以單因子共變數分析(ANCOVA)進行統計分析。本研究主要發現：1．實驗組受試學生其微粒概念之學習成效優於控制組。2．實驗組男女生其微粒概念之學習成效未達顯著差異。依據統計結果發現，CISC策略不僅能提升學習者心像操作能力，使二維與三維表徵產生互動，並能透過辨認轉換以洞悉複雜抽象之化學分子結構，減少學習者的認知負荷，且能降低抽象概念的複雜度，有助於學生建構正確心像，以利科學概念的理解。

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the Concrete Image Spatial Concepts (CISC) instructional strategy on the particle concepts learning achievement of junior high students. The sample consisted of 85 junior high, eighth-grade students in the Taipei area. The experimental group received a 3-week CISC treatment, whereas the control group received a 3-week non-CISC teaching. The Particle Concepts Comprehension Test was used in pre- and post-test. The results showed significant difference in particle concepts comprehension between the two groups, and the particle concepts learning achievement of experiment was better than the control group. However, no significant difference was found between male and female students in the experimental group. From the qualitative data collected from field observations, it was observed that CISC not only elevated the learners' operational abilities with mental images, but also catalyzed the interactions between 2D/3D representations. It appears that CISC strategy was effective in lowering students' cognitive load and the complexity of abstract concepts. CISC also demonstrated its effectiveness in elevating students' comprehension through ease in mental images construction.

1. 林小慧、熊召弟、林世華(2006)。具體影像空間教學策略與中學生空間能力之相關研究。教育心理學報，37(4)，393-409。
   連結：
2. 林財庫(2004)。中小學生物質微粒模式之迷思概念的診斷工具和分析方法。科學教育學刊，12(2)，183-218。
   連結：
3. 林財庫、林慧潔(2003)。高雄市國中小學生氣體迷思概念的認知類型、層次、頻率分佈及認知發展的分析研究。科學教育學刊，11(3)，297-330。
   連結：
4. 邱美虹、高淑芬(1999)。類比對應對學生建構“原子結構”心智表徵之影響。師大學報，44(1、2)，31-59。
   連結：
5. 許良榮、劉政華(2004)。中小學生之溶解概念的形成與發展。科學教育學刊，12(3)，265-287。
   連結：
6. Andersson, B.(1984).Chemical reaction.Sweden:EKNA, University of Gothenburg.
7. Bar, V.(1986).The Amos de Shalit Science Teaching Center.Israel:The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
8. Bar, V.,Gaglili, I.(1994).Stages of childrens` views about evaporation.International Journal of Science Education,16,157-174.
9. Bar, V.,Travis, A. S.(1991).Children`s views concerning phrases.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,29(4),363-382.
10. Barke, H. D.(1993).Chemical education and spatial ability.Journal of Chemical Education,70,968-971.
11. Barke, H. D.,Engida, T.(2001).Structural chemistry and spatial ability different cultures.Chemistry Education: Research and practice in Europe,2(3),227-239.
12. Benson, D. L.,Wittrock, M. C.,Baur, M. E.(1993).Students` preconceptions of the nature of gases.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,30(6),587-597.
13. Bodner, G. M.,Cutler, A. R.,Greenbowe, T. J.,Robinson, W. R.(1984).Multi-images or lap-dissolve slide techniques and visual images in the large lecture section.Journal of Chemical Education,61(5),447-449.
14. Boujacude, S. B.(1988).A study of conceptual change in junior high school science students during instruction about the concept of buring.
15. Boulter, C. J.,Buckley, B. C.,J. K. Gilbert,C. J. Boulter (Eds.)(2000).Developing models in science education.Holland:Kluwer Academic.
16. Carey, S.(1985).Conceptual change in childhood.Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
17. Chou, C.,Tsai, C.(2002).Developing web-based curricula: issues and challenges.Journal of curriculum studies,34(6),623-636.
18. Driver, R.,E. Guesne,Tiberghien (Eds.)(1985).A Children`s ideas in science.Philadelphia:Open University Press.
19. Driver, R.,Russell, J.(1982).An investigation in the idea of heat, temperature and change of state, of children between 8 and 14 years.Leeds:University of leeds.
20. Ebenezer, J. V.,Erickson, G. L.(1996).Chemistry students` concepts of solubility: A phenomenography.Science Education,80(2),181-201.
21. Gabel, D. L.,Sherwood, R. D.(1980).The effect of student manipulateion of molecular model on chemistry achievement according to piagetian level.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,17(1),75-81.
22. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.(2006).Multivariate data analysis.New York:Macmillan.
23. Happs, J.(1980).Learning in Science Project.Hamilton:Universidad de Waikato.
24. Holford, D. G.,Kempa, R. F.(1970).The effectiveness of stereoscopic viewing in the learning of spatial relationships in structural chemistry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,7(3),265-270.
25. Lin, H. S.,Cheng, H. J.,Lawrenz, F.(2000).The assessment of students and students’ understanding of gas laws.Journal of Chemical Education,77(2),235-238.
26. Meheut, M.,Saltiel, E.,Tiberghien(1985).Pupils` (11-12 year olds) conceptions of combustion.Europeanan of Journal Science Education,7(1),83-93.
27. Nicholson, J. R.,Seddon, G. M.,Worsnop, J. G.(1977).Teaching the understanding of pictorial spatial relationships to Nigerian secondary school students.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,8,401-414.
28. Nieswandt, M.(2001).Problems and possibilities for learning in an introductory chemistry course from a conceptual change perspective.Science Education,85(5),158-179.
29. Novick, S.,Nussbaum, J.(1978).Junior high school pupils` understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study.Science Education,62(3),73-281.
30. Novick, S.,Nussbaum, J.(1981).Pupils` understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A cross-age study.Science Education,65(2),187-196.
31. Osborne, R. J.,Cosgrove, M. M.(1983).Children`s conceptions of the changes of state water.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,20(9),825-838.
32. Rohr, M.,Reimann, P.,M. W. van Someren,P. Reimann,H. P. A. Boshuizen,T. de. Jong (Eds.)(1998).Advances in learning and instruction series learning with multiple representations.Oxford:Elsevier Science Ltd.
33. Ross, K. J.(1991).Burning: A constructive not a destructive process.School Science Review,72,39-50.
34. Rozzelle, A. A.,Rosenfeld, S. M.(1985).Stereoscopic projection in organic chemistry: Bridging the gap between two and three dimensions.Journal of Chemical Education,62(12),1084-1085.
35. Schollum, B.(1981).Learning in Science Project.Hamilton:Universidad de Waikato.
36. Schollum, B.(1982).Learning in Science Project.Hamilton:Universidad de Waikato.
37. Sedden, G. M.,Eniaiyeju, P. A.,Jusoh, I.(1984).The visualization of rotation in diagrams of three-dimensional structures.American Education Research Journal,21(1),25-38.
38. Seddon, G. M.,Moore, R. G.(1986).The structure of abilities in visualizing the rotation of three-dimensional structures presented as models and diagrams.British Journal of Educational Psychology,56,138-149.
39. Stavy, R.(1990).Children`s conception of change in the state of matter from liquid (or solid) to gas.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(3),247-266.
40. Stavy, R.(1988).Children`s conception of gas.International Journal of Science Education,10(5),553-560.
41. Talley, L. Y.(1973).The use of three-dimensional visualization as a moderator in the higher cognitive learning of concepts in college level chemistry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,10(3),263-269.
42. Zoller, U.(1990).Students` misunderstanding and misconception in college freshman chemistry (General and Organic).Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),1053-1065.
43. 史嘉章(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
44. 吳明隆(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務－問卷分析與應用統計。台北:知城數位科技。
45. 李秀芬(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學地球科學研究所。
46. 李明中(1993)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學物理研究所。
47. 李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北:心理。
48. 林小慧、熊召弟、國立政治大學主辦(2005)。協助國中生理解「物質的構造」教學研究：CISC策略。「學習與創新教育與創新－國際學術研討會」宣讀之論文，台北:
49. 林振霖(1992)。我國學生分子概念發展與診斷教學的研究：（一）我國學生分子概念的理解與解題之間的關係的研究。彰化師範大學學報，3，407-478。
50. 林振霖(1993)。我國學生分子概念發展與診斷教學的研究：（二）我國學生分子概念發展的研究。彰化師範大學學報，4，337-398。
51. 邱美虹(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
52. 邱美虹(2003)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
53. 邱美虹、傅化文(1993)。分子模型與立體化學的解題。科學教育月刊，1(2)，161-188。
54. 洪振方(1987)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所。
55. 許良榮、王瓏真(2003)。中小學生對物質「燃燒」的迷思概念之研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊，1-17。
56. 陳世雄(1991)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所。
57. 黃湘武、黃寶鈿(1985)。學生空氣概念、粒子性質及動力平衡。中華民國第一屆科學教育學術研討會論文彙編
58. 黃湘武、黃寶鈿(1985)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
59. 黃寶鈿(2002)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版
60. 黃寶鈿、陳世雄(1993)。從重量受恆推理能力探究學生對物質變化的錯誤概念。師大學報，38，175-201。
61. 詹耀宗、邱鴻麟(2004)。以多元觀點探討中學生氧化還原迷思概念。高雄師範大學學報，17，337-358。
62. 廖焜熙(1999)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所。
63. 廖焜熙、邱美虹(1996)。立體化學與空間能力。化學，54(2)，145-151。
64. 鄭志鵬(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所。
65. 謝志仁、郭重吉(1993)。國中學生化學變化相關概念另有架構之探究。科學教育月刊，4，25-51。
66. 蘇育任(2001)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,未出版

1. 蔡錕承、張欣怡(2011)。結合實物與虛擬實驗促進八年級學生「溫度與熱」知識整合、實驗能力與學習策略之研究。科學教育學刊，19(5)，435-459。
2. 洪文東(2011)。空間主題教學活動對幼兒空間概念學習與認知之影響。美和學報，30(1)，125-146。