多重夫妻支持性團體模式效果之初探－以高風險家庭為例

The Effects of Multiple Couples Group Therapy: Application to the High-Risk Families

10.6251/BEP.20081022

伍育英(Yu-Yin Wu)；鄭玉英(Maria Cheng)；杜長齡(Chang-Ling Tu)

多重夫妻支持性團體 ； 高風險家庭 ； 團體療效因子 ； group therapeutic factor ； high-risk family ； multiple couples group therapy

教育心理學報

41卷S期（2009 / 10 / 01）

185 - 203

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討多重夫妻支持性團體模式運用在高風險家庭之效果。研究採解釋型混合研究法。第一階段爲量化研究，以沈瓊桃編製的「多面向婚姻滿意量表」與自編之「攜手向愛走整體回饋表」爲研究工具，研究參與者爲13對高風險夫妻與1位太太。第二階段的質性研究，則以內容分析法作爲資料分析的架構，分析8對高風險夫妻的深度訪談內容。綜合2階段研究，結果發現(1)高風險夫妻在「彈性程度」、「價值觀」、「親友關係」、「反應心向」與「單面向婚姻滿意」5個向度上，在團體結束時的滿意度，顯著地高於參加團體前的滿意度；(2)「價值觀」、「反應心向」與「子女教養」這3個向度，於團體結束時的滿意度亦顯著地高於團體結束1個月後的滿意度：(3)「單面向婚姻滿意」這個向度，於團體結束時以及團體結束1個月後，其滿意度皆高於參加團體前的滿意度；(4)團體結束1個月後，男性的「親密程度」滿意度顯著的高於女性；(5)團體的療效因子，包括情緒、互動與認知三大因素，其中又以認知因素最被高風險夫妻看重。本研究最後根據研究結果加以討論，並針對實務工作及未來研究提出建議。

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of multiple couples group therapy applied to the high-risk families. The explanatory mixed method design was used to divide the study into two phases. In Phase 1, quantitative data were collected from 13 couples and 1 wife who completed the ”Multi-dimensional Marital Satisfaction Inventory” and the ”Together to Love Inventory”. In Phase 2, qualitative data were collected from 8 couples' in-depth interviews and analyzed by the method of content analysis. Results indicated that the satisfaction of before-group, after-group and one-month-after group are significantly different for several sub-scales. And the emotional, interactive and conceptive factors composed the group therapeutic factors. Implications for counseling practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.

1. Berg, B. L.(2007).Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.Boston:Pearson.
2. Berger, R.(1999).Preventive therapy in couples therapy.Philadelphia:Brunner/Mazel.
3. Berger, R.(1999).Preventive approaches in couples therapy.NC:Brunner/Mazel.
4. Calvo, G.(1988).Face to face: Becoming a happier married couple.Minneapolis, MN:International Marriage Encounter.
5. Chaim, G.,Armstrong, S.,Shenfeld, J.,Kelly, C.,Li, S.(2003).Brief couples therapy: Group and individual couple treatment for addition and related mental health concerns.Canada:Center for Addition and Mental Health.
6. Cline, V. B.(1987).How to make a good marriage great.New York:Walker and Company.
7. Coché, J.,N. S. Jacobson(Eds.),A. S. Gurman(Eds.)(1995).Clinical handbook of couple therapy.New York:The Guilford Press.
8. Creswell, J. W.(2008).Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
9. Fals-Stewart, W.(2007).Group-based couple therapy for drug abuse.New York:National Institute on Drug Abuse.
10. Feld, B.(1998).Initiating a couples group.Group,22(4),245-259.
11. Feld, B.(2003).Phases of couples group therapy: A consideration of therapeutic action.Group,27(1),5-19.
12. Greene, J. C.,Caracelli, V. J.,Graham, W. F.(1989).Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,11,255-274.
13. Li, S.,Armstrong, S.,Chaim, G.,Kelly, C.,Shenfeld, J.(2007).Group and individual couple treatment for substance abuse clients: A pilot study.American Journal of Family Therapy,35(3),221-233.
14. McManus, M. J.(1993).Marriage savers.Grand Rapids, MI:Zondervan.
15. National Marriage Encounter(1981).Guide for teams.Orlando, FL:National Marriage Encounter.
16. Rouke, L.,Anderson, T.,Garrison, D. R.,Archer, W.(2002).Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcript.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education,12,8-22.
17. Stedman, J. M.(1982).Marriage encounter: An insider's consideration of recent critiques.Family Relations,31,123-129.
18. Yalom, I. D.(1995).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy.New York:Basic Books.
19. 內政部兒童局(2008)。推動高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計畫。台北:內政部兒童局。
20. 內政部兒童局(2006)。「高風險家庭關懷輔導處遇實施計畫」評估期末報告。
21. 沈瓊桃(2002)。多面向婚姻滿意量表之編製。中華心理衛生學刊，15(3)，67-100。

1. 劉婷、孫頌賢(2015)。深情相擁： 情緒取向未婚伴侶心理教育團體。教育實踐與研究，28(2)，213-242。