潛意識思考及意識思考對困難問題決策之影響

The Role of Unconscious and Conscious Thought in Decision Making of Difficult Problems

10.6251/BEP.20081229

楊牧貞(Mu-Jang Yang)；陳沐新(Mu-Hsin Chen)；許得億(Ter-Yi Hsu)；胡逸璽(Yi-Hsi Hu)

決策 ； 意識思考 ； 潛意識思考 ； conscious thought ； decision making ； unconscious thought

教育心理學報

41卷2期（2009 / 12 / 01）

427 - 440

繁體中文

潛意識思考理論主張，在複雜且困難的作業情境下，潛意識思考所做的決策會優於意識思考所做的決策。本研究以兩個有關手機喜好度評估之實驗驗證上述假設，實驗上的情境較簡單，實驗二則爲較複雜的情境，結果發現無論實驗一或實驗二之結果均顯示，意識思考組與潛意識思考組對手機優勢性所做之決策並無不同。然而依區辨手機之難易度將實驗參與者分爲兩組後則發現，對於易區辨理想手機與不理想手機之參與者而言，其決策之效果並不因思考方式的不同而有所差異，但是對於不易區辨理想手機與不理想手機之參與者而言，則呈現潛意識思考優於意識思考之決策的結果。綜合本研究之結果可知，不同的思考方式對於不同難度的作業具有不同的效果，在複雜且困難的作業情境下，潛意識思考的決策表現優於意識思考之決策表現，但是作業難易度的界定應以參與者之能力爲考量之依據。此外，本研究結果在教育方面之應用，於文中亦有所討論。

The role of unconscious and conscious thought in making cell phone preference decisions was investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were presented with a simple decision problem related to cell phone preferences. In Experiment 2, a more complex problem related to cell phone preferences was presented to the participants. Results from these two experiments showed that unconscious thinkers made no better decisions than conscious thinkers did. The participants were then divided into two groups according to the difficulty in making cell phone preference decisions. It was found that, for the group of participants who made cell phone preference decisions without much difficulty, unconscious thinkers made no better decisions than conscious thinkers did. However, unconscious thinkers were found to make better decisions than conscious thinkers did for the group of participants who made the decisions with relatively much difficulty. Results of this study suggested that decisions about the issues which seemed to be complex from the viewpoint of the participants could be better approached by unconscious thought. Possible applications for the results to education were also discussed.

1. 吳宜貞(2004)。重複閱讀及文章難度對五年級學生閱讀能力影響之探討。教育心理學報，35(4)，319-336。
   連結：
2. 吳宜貞、戴麗觀(2007)。重複聆聽、故事難度和識字能力對聽力理解的影響。教育心理學報，38(3)，251-270。
   連結：
3. 林正昌、林清山、金樹人(2004)。決策過程中決策策略的權變運用：電腦模擬。教育心理學報，36(2)，127-144。
   連結：
4. 張景媛、呂玉琴、何縕琪、吳青蓉、林奕宏(2002)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報，33(2)，1-22。
   連結：
5. 陳湘淳、李玉琇(2005)。記憶策略訓練對工作記憶容量的影響。教育心理學報，37(1)，41-59。
   連結：
6. 程炳林、林清山(2002)。學習歷程前決策與與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報，34(1)，43-60。
   連結：
7. Acker, F.(2008).New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis.Judgment and Decision Making,3,292-303.
8. Dijksterhuis, A.(2004).Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87,586-598.
9. Dijksterhuis, A.,Bos, M. W.,Nordgren, L. F.,van Baaren, R. B.(2006).On making the right choice: The deliberation-without attention effect.Science,311,1005-1007.
10. Dijksterhuis, A.,Merus T.(2006).Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought.Consciousness and Cognition,15,133-146.
11. Dijksterhuis, A.,Nordgren L. F.(2006).A theory of unconscious thought.Perspectives on Psychological Science,1,95-109.
12. Dijksterhuis, A.,Smith, P. K.,van Baaren, R. B.,Wigboldus, D. H. J.(2005).The unconscious consumer: Effects of environment on consumer behavior.Journal of Consumer Psychology,15,193-202.
13. Dijksterhuis, A.,van Olden, Z.(2006).On the benefits of thinking unconsciously : Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42,627-631.
14. Edwards, W.(1961).Behavioral decision theory.Annual Review of Psychology,12,473-498.
15. 科景網站
16. Gigerenzer, G.,Todd, P. M.(1999).Simple heuristics that make us smart.NY:Oxfard University Press.
17. Hasher, L.,Zack, R. T.(1984).Automatic processing of fundamental information.American Psychologist,39,1372-1388.
18. Hasher, L.,Zack, R. T.(1979).Automatic and effertful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology : General,108,356-388.
19. Lee, M. D.,Cummins, T. D. R.(2004).Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the "take the best" and the "rational" model.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,11,343-352.
20. Lewicki , P.(1986).Nonconscious Social Information Processing.NY:Academic Process.
21. Nissen, M. J.,Bullerner, P.(1987).Attentional requirements of learning : Evidence from performance measure.Cognitive Psychology,19,1-32.
22. Reber, A. S.(1967).Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,6,855-863.
23. Reber, A. S.(1969).Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81,115-119.
24. Rey, A.,Goldstein, R. M.,Perruchet, P.(2009).Does unconscious thought improve complex decision making?.Psychological Research,73,372-379.
25. Schacter , D. L.(1987).Implicit memory : History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning , Memory and Cognition,13,501-518.
26. Shiffrin, R. M.,Schneider , W. F.(1977).Controlled and automatic human information processing : II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84,127-190.
27. Shiffrin, R. M.,Schneider, W. F.(1977).Controlled and automatic human information processing : I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84,1-66.
28. Simonson, I.(2005).In defense of consciousness: The role of conscious and unconscious inputs in consumer choice.Journal of Consumer Psychology,15,211-217.
29. Wilson, T. D.,Lisle, D. J.,Schooler, J. W.,Hodges, S. D.,Klaaren, K. J.,LaFleur, S. J.(1993).Introspecting about reasons can reduce post-choice satisfaction.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,19,331-339.
30. Wilson, T. D.,Schooler, J. W.(1991).Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,60,181-192.
31. 何子樂(2003)。想像比知識重要：科教見思。台北:群學。
32. 馬志欽(1996)。談科學創意思考訓練。科學月刊，27，884-885。
33. TAIWAN 數位台灣計畫網站