成敗情境對行動與狀態導向者負向情感、自我效能與工作記憶容量之影響

The Interaction Effects between Action Control Orientation and Success/Failure Conditions on Cognition, Motivation, and Emotion

10.6251/BEP.20090217

張憲卿(Hsien-Ching Chang)；程炳林(Biing-Lin Cherng)

行動導向 ； 自我效能 ； 負向情感 ； 情緒狀態導向 ； 認知狀態導向 ； action orientation ； cognitive state orientation ； emotional state orientation ； negative affective reaction ； self-efficacy

教育心理學報

41卷3期（2010 / 03 / 01）

605 - 633

繁體中文

行動控制理論將行動控制的人格分爲行動導向與狀態導向，其近十餘年的實徵研究發現，狀態導向者有許多不適應症狀。本研究將行動導向特質區分爲行動導向者、認知狀態導向者與情緒狀態導向者，並探究這三種行動控制導向與成敗情境對學習者負向情感、自我效能與工作記憶容量之交互作用。本研究採3（導向）×2（情境）×2（測量階段）受試者間受試者內混合實驗設計，藉由受試者隨堂測驗成績操弄成敗情境。受試者是修習教育學程的大學生113名。研究結果顯示：（一）面對失敗情境的情緒狀態導向組，其負向情感後測顯著地高於前測。（二）不論是行動導向者、認知狀態導向或情緒狀態導向者，面對失敗情境的受試，其自我效能的後測會顯著地低於前測。（三）三種導向的受試者，不論面對成功或失敗的情境，其工作記憶容量測驗的後測均高於前測。本研究根據研究結果進行討論並針對未來研究提出建議。

Kuhl's theory of action control, differentiates action orientation from state orientation, and recent empirical research show people who are state-oriented manifested maladaptive behaviors. In the current study, 113 college students were classified into three groups based on their action control dispositions: action orientation, cognitive state orientation, and emotional state orientation. The participants then were explored to either success or failure context to investigate the interaction effect between action control disposition and context. Negative affective reaction, self-efficacy and working memory capacity were measured prior to and after the exploration. A 3 (action control orientation)×2 (conditions)×2 (measurement occasion) mixed design was used. The following results were obtained: (a) in the failure condition, the emotional state-oriented scored higher in the posttest than in the pretest in negative affective reaction; (b) regardless of orientation, participants in the failure condition scored lower in the posttest than in the pretest in self-efficacy; and (c) regardless of orientation and condition, participants scored higher in the posttest than in the pretest in working memory capacity. Findings were discussed in terms of theoretical implications, practical applications, and future research.

1. 程炳林(2000)。國中生認知／意動成份與學習表現之相關研究。師大學報：教育類，45(1)，43-59。
   連結：
2. 程炳林(2000)。行動或狀態導向、目標層次、工作複雜度對國中生行動控制策略與工作表現之影響。教育心理學報，31(1)，67-92。
   連結：
3. 程炳林、林清山(2002)。學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中判角色。教育心理學報，34(1)，43-60。
   連結：
4. 程炳林、林清山(2000)。行動控制教學課程之教學效果研究。教育心理學報，31(1)，1-22。
   連結：
5. Ames, C.,Archer, J.(1988).Achievement goals in the classroom: Students's learning strategies and motivational processed.Journal of Educational Psychology,80,260-267.
6. Bandura, A.(1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist,37,122-147.
7. Berliner, D. C.(ed.),Calfee, R. C.(ed.)(1996).Handbook of Educational Psychology.New York:Macmillan.
8. Bouffard-Bouchard, T.(1990).Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task.Journal of Social Psychology,130,353-363.
9. Diener, C. I.,Dweck, C. S.(1978).Analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy and achievement cognitions following failure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36,451-462.
10. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(2002).Motivation, beliefs, values, and goals.Annual Review of Psychology,53,109-132.
11. Garcia, T.,McCann, E. J.,Turner, J. E.,Roska, L.(1998).Modeling the Mediating role of volition in the learning process.Contemporary Educational Psychology,23,392-418.
12. Greene, B. A.,Miller, R. A.(1996).Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,21,181-192.
13. Halische, F.(ed.),Kuhl, J.(ed.)(1987).Motivation, Intention, and Volition.NY:Springer-Verlag.
14. Higgins, E. F.(ed.),Sorrentino, R. M.(ed.)(1990).Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Vol. 2.NY:Guilford.
15. Kanfer, R.(ed.),Ackerman, P. L.(ed.),Cudeckl, R.(ed.)(1989).Abilities, motivation, and methodology: The minnesota symposium on Individual differences.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
16. Kuhl, J.(ed.),Atkinson, J. W.(ed.)(1989).Motivation, Thought, and Action.NY:Praeger.
17. Kuhl, J.(ed.),Beckmann, J.(ed.)(1985).Action Control: from Cognition to Behavior.NY:Springer-Verlag.
18. Kuhl, J.(ed.),Beckmann, J.(ed.)(1994).Volition and Personality.Seattle, WA:Hogrefe & Huber.
19. Kuhl, J.,Helle, P.(1986).Motivational and Volitional determinants of depression: The degenerated-intention hypothesis.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,95,247-251.
20. Kuhl, J.,Kazén, M.(1999).Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,128(3),382-399.
21. Kuhl, J.,Kazén, M.(1994).Self-discrimination and memory: State orientation and false self-ascription of assigned activities.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66(6),1130-1115.
22. Maher, B. H.(ed.)(1984).Progress in Experimental personality research.NY:Academic Press.
23. Menec, V. H.,Perry, R. P.,Struthers, C. W.(1995).The effect of adverse learning conditions on action-oriented state-oriented college students.Journal of Experimental Education,63(4),281.
24. Pajares, F.,Graham, L.(1999).Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students.Contemporary Educational Psychology,24,124-139.
25. Pintrich, P. R.(1989).The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom.Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Motivation Enhancing Environment,6,117-160.
26. Schunk, D. H.(1991).Self-efficacy and academic motivation.Educational Psychology,26(3&4),207-231.
27. Weinert, F. E.(ed.)(1987).Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
28. Wittrock, M.(ed.)(1986).Handbook of research on teaching.NY:Macmillan.
29. Zimmerman, B. J.(ed.),Schunk, D. H.(ed.)(1989).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice.NY:Springer.
30. 吳靜吉、程炳林(1993)。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學習成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報，66，13-39。
31. 周嘉娸(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
32. 林桑瑜(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所。
33. 林清山、程炳林(1996)。國中生自我調整學習因素與學習表現之關係暨自我調整的閱讀理解教學策略效果之研究。教育心理學報，28，15-58。
34. 張憲卿(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立成功大學教育研究所。
35. 陳麗芬(1995)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。
36. 程炳林(1999)。認知／意動成份二階驗證性因素分析模式之適配性研究。國教學報，11，385-410。
37. 程炳林、林清山(1999)。國中生學習行動控制模式之驗證及行動控制變項與學習適應之關係。教育心理學報，31(1)，1-35。
38. 程炳林、林清山(1998)。行動導向量表編製報告。中國測驗學會測驗年刊，45(1)，65-82。
39. 劉佩雲(1998)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所。

1. 黎育如(2022)。英語字母拼讀法融入學習策略對學習成效之影響－以國小五年級為例。中原大學教育研究所學位論文。2022。1-197。